A combination of gemcitabine and 5-fluorouracil in advanced pancreatic cancer, a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

In a randomized clinical trial, gemcitabine (GEM) was more effective than 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) in advanced pancreatic cancer patients. GEM and 5-FU have different mechanisms of action and their combination, from a theoretical point of view, could result in a higher activity. To test activity and feasibility of such a combination, a multi-institutional phase II study was initiated in November 1996 by the Italian Group for the study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD). Primary objectives of this study were to determine the activity in terms of response rate and clinical benefit, while the secondary objective was toxicity. According to the optimal two-stage phase II design, 54 patients were enrolled. Schedule was: GEM 1000 mg m(-2) intravenous (i.v.), and 5-FU 600 mg m(-2) bolus i.v. weekly for 3 weeks out of every 4. All the 54 patients were symptomatic (pain, weight loss, dyspepsia). A clinical benefit was obtained in 28 patients (51%) (95% confidence interval (CI) 38-64%). Two patients achieved a partial response and 34 a stable disease. Median survival for all the patients was 7 months. Side-effects were mild: no gastrointestinal or haematological grade 3-4 toxicity (WHO) were recorded. We observed only six episodes of grade 2 (WHO) leukopenia and seven episodes of thrombocytopenia. Although the non-randomized design of this study suggests caution in the interpretation of these data, in consideration of the low incidence of toxicity and the favourable results obtained in terms of clinical benefit, it may be worthwhile to test more active schedules of 5-FU (continuous infusion) in combination with gemcitabine.

A new palliative prognostic score: a first step for the staging of terminally ill cancer patients. Italian Multicenter and Study Group on Palliative Care.

In recent years, extensive research has been performed to identify prognostic factors that predict survival in terminally ill cancer patients. This study describes the construction of a simple prognostic score based on factors identified in a prospective multicenter study of 519 patients with a median survival of 32 days. An exponential multiple regression model was adopted to evaluate the joint effect of some clinico-biological variables on survival. From an initial model containing 36 variables, a final parsimonious model was obtained by means of a backward selection procedure. The Palliative Prognostic Score (PaP Score) is based on the final model and includes the following variables: Clinical Prediction of Survival (CPS), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), anorexia, dyspnea, total white blood count (WBC) and lymphocyte percentage. A numerical score was given to each variable, based on the relative weight of the independent prognostic significance shown by each single category in the multivariate analysis. The sum of the single scores gives the overall PaP Score for each patient and was used to subdivide the study population into three groups, each with a different probability of survival at 30 days: (1) group A: probability of survival at 30 days > 70%, with patient score < or = 5.5; (2) group B: probability of survival at 30 days 30-70%, with patient score 5.6-11.0; and (3) group C: probability of survival at 30 days < 30%, with patient score > 11.0. Using this method, 178/519 (34.3%) patients were classified in risk group A, 205 (39.5%) patients were in risk group B, and 136 (26.2%) patients were in risk group C. The patients classified in the three risk groups had a very different survival experience (logrank = 294.8, P < 0.001), with a median survival of 64 days for group A, 32 days for group B, and 11 days for group C. The PaP Score based on simple clinical and biohumoral variables proved to be statistically significant in a multivariate analysis. The score is valid in this population (training set). An independent validation on another patient series (testing set) is required and is the object of a companion paper.

Subcutaneous administration of interleukin-2 and interferon-alpha 2b in advanced renal cell carcinoma: long-term results.

Clinical data have supported the combination of subcutaneous r-interleukin-2 (rIL-2) and r-interferon-alpha (rIFN-alpha) as a promising combination for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC), with a reduced toxicity. We evaluated the activity and safety of this outpatient immunotherapy and report on the clinical results and the long-term survival analysis. Objective responses was observed in 9 of 50 (18%) patients, 6 of whom (12%) achieved a complete response. Overall median survival is 12 months, six patients were surviving at a median follow-up of 24 months, and three (6%) are still progression-free.

A phase II study of gemcitabine in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract previously treated with platinum. Italian Co-operative Group on Bladder Cancer.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine, a pyrimidine antimetabolite, in the treatment of advanced transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract. 35 patients with unresectable or metastatic transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary tract previously treated with a platinum-based regimen were studied. Gemcitabine was administered at a dosage of 1200 mg/m2 as a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1, 8 and 15, repeated every 28 days. 31 patients were evaluable for efficacy. 4 patients achieved a complete response (12.9%), 3 a partial response (9.6%) and 13 (42%) were stable for at least 4 weeks (overall response 22.5%; 95% confidence interval 8-37%). The median response duration was 11.8 months (range 3.6-17.7 + months) and median survival for all patients entered was 5 months (range 2-21 + months). 2 patients with complete response are still alive with no evidence of disease after 14 and 21 months. Gemcitabine also provided subjective symptomatic relief from pain, cystitis, dysuria, haematuria and peripheral oedema. Patients experienced little WHO grade 3-4 toxicity, with anaemia in 8 patients (23%), thrombocytopenia in 5 (14.2%), leucopenia in 4 (11.4%) and neutropenia in 7 (20%). WHO grade 3-4 hepatic toxicity occurred in 4 patients (11.4%) and transient elevations of transaminase was noted in 3 (8.6%). No patient had WHO grade 3-4 elevation of serum creatinine level. There was no WHO grade 4 symptomatic toxicity and no alopecia was noted. Transient influenza symptoms with gemcitabine occurred in 18 patients (51.4%) with 13 patients (37.1%) experiencing fever (2.9% WHO grade 3). In conclusion, gemcitabine is an new active agent for the treatment of transitional cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder with a mild toxicity profile; it warrants further investigation in combination with cisplatin in chemotherapy naive patients.

Efficacy and safety of levodropropizine and dihydrocodeine on nonproductive cough in primary and metastatic lung cancer.

Nonproductive cough is a frequent and distressing symptom in patients with lung cancer, and it is not even relieved by palliative chemotherapy. A double-blind, randomized clinical trial regarding the treatment of nonproductive cough was performed in 140 adults with primary lung cancer or metastatic cancer of the lungs. The therapeutic efficacy and the tolerability of a 7-day treatment with levodropropizine drops (75 mg t.i.d.) were evaluated in comparison with dihydrocodeine drops (10 mg t.i.d.; 7 days). Efficacy was assessed on the basis of cough severity scores, number of night awakenings due to cough, and overall estimate of antitussive efficacy. Tolerability was evaluated by laboratory results, vital signs and any adverse event occurring during the clinical trial, including presence or absence of somnolence. Subjective cough severity was significantly reduced during treatment with either levodropropizine and dihydrocodeine, the antitussive effect and its time-profile being similar for both drugs. Also, according to the investigator's evaluation, both levodropropizine and dihydrocodeine produced a significant decrease in cough severity. Concurrently with the relief of cough, the number of night awakenings was decreased significantly by both drugs, with no difference between the two treatments. No change in laboratory test values was considered clinically relevant, and vital signs were not clinically affected. The number of patients reporting adverse events was similar in the levodropropizine (n=6) and dihydrocodeine (n=4) group. However, the percentage of patients experiencing somnolence in the group receiving levodropropizine (8%) was significantly lower as compared with that of the dihydrocodeine group (22%). These results confirm the antitussive effectiveness of levodropropizine and suggest a more favourable benefit/risk profile when compared to dihydrocodeine.

Intensive weekly chemotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer using 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, epidoxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione and filgrastim: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD).

Local extension prevents curative resection in more than two-thirds of gastric cancer patients. Unfortunately, resectability is one of the main prognostic factors in these patients, and survival is longer when tumours are completely removed. Preoperative chemotherapy is an attractive concept for obtaining curative resection. Thirty-two locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer patients were enrolled in five Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD) centres. For 16 patients, surgical unresectability was based on computerized tomography scan evaluation of tumour size (four patients) and invasion of adjacent structures (12 patients), whereas in another 16 patients locally advanced disease was confirmed by laparotomy. They received weekly administration of cisplatin 40 mg m(-2), 5-fluorouracil 500 mg m(-2), epidoxorubicin 35 mg m(-2), 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg m(-2) and glutathione 1.5 g m(-2). From the day after to the day before each chemotherapy administration, filgrastim was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 microg kg(-1). One cycle of therapy consisted of eight weekly treatments. Fifteen of 32 patients (47%) responded to chemotherapy, whereas 13 (41 %) had stable disease and four (12%) progressed on therapy. Of the 15 responding patients, 13 were completely resected after chemotherapy and two of them had a complete pathological response. Two clinically responding patients were found unresectable at operation because of peritoneal seeding. At a median follow-up from the start of treatment of 24 months (range 11-39 months), 10 of 13 resected patients are alive and eight are relapse free. Three patients died after 11, 12, and 14 months respectively. Toxicity was acceptable: side-effects consisted mainly of grade II National Cancer Institute common toxicity criteria (NCICTC) leucopenia and thrombocytopenia in ten patients. Neither treatment-related death nor surgical complications in patients undergoing surgery were observed. This weekly intensive regimen enabled resection in half of previously inoperable tumours with a moderate toxicity. It can be offered to patients with locally advanced unresectable gastric cancer to obtain curative resection.

Phase II study of the activity and tolerability of a combined regimen of high-dose epirubicin and cisplatin in stage IIIb and IV non-small cell lung cancer.

AIM: To explore the feasibility and activity of a combined regimen of high-dose epirubicin and cisplatin as an alternative to current treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). METHOD: Forty-four patients with stage IIIb or IV NSCLC, median Karnofsky index 90, were enrolled. Epirubicin (60 mg/m2) was administered on days 1 and 2 and cisplatin (100 mg/m2) on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 21 days for a maximum of six cycles. A hematopoietic growth factor (G-CSF) was used only for patients reaching codified nadir count values. RESULTS: A total of 130 cycles were administered with a mean of 2.9 cycles per patient. Of 41 assessable patients one showed a complete response and 15 had partial responses (overall response rate, 39%). Grade 3 or 4 leukopenia and grade 3 hemoglobin toxicity were seen in 40% and 14%, respectively, of the administered cycles. The most common nonhematologic toxic events were nausea and vomiting, mucositis, anorexia, and asthenia. CONCLUSIONS: This epirubicin-cisplatin regimen seemed effective and was generally well tolerated, and therefore suitable for use in an outpatient setting.

Intensive weekly chemotherapy for advanced gastric cancer using fluorouracil, cisplatin, epi-doxorubicin, 6S-leucovorin, glutathione, and filgrastim: a report from the Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer.

PURPOSE: A multiinstitutional trial was performed to confirm the clinical activity, in terms of response rate and toxicity (primary objectives) and duration of responses and survival (secondary objectives), of an intensive weekly regimen in advanced gastric cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with measurable unresectable and/or metastatic gastric carcinoma received 1-day per week administration of cisplatin (CDDP) 40 mg/m2, fluorouracil (5FU) 500 mg/m2, epi-doxorubicin (epi-ADR) 35 mg/m2, 6S-stereoisomer of leucovorin 250 mg/m2, and glutathione 1.5 g/m2. On the other days, filgrastim was administered by subcutaneous injection at a dose of 5 mg/kg. One cycle of therapy consisted of eight 1-week treatments. Patients who showed a response or stable disease received a further 6 weeks of therapy. RESULTS: Of 105 enrolled patients, 11 had locally advanced unresectable disease only; 33 had primary nonresected and metastatic disease; 48 had metastatic disease and primary tumor resected; 10 had locoregional recurrence and metastatic disease; and three had locoregional recurrence only. After one cycle, 18 complete responses (CRs) and 47 partial responses (PRs) were achieved, for an overall response rate of 62% (95% confidence interval [CI], 53% to 71%). Twenty patients had stable disease and 20 progressed on therapy. The median survival duration of all 105 patients was 11 months, with 1- and 2-year survival rates of 42% and 5%, respectively. World Health Organization (WHO) grade III to IV toxicity, in terms of anemia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, and mucositis, was experienced by 40 patients (38%). There were no treatment-related deaths. CONCLUSION: These data support the results of the pilot study and confirmed the high activity of the regimen, with acceptable toxicity. This schedule deserves evaluation in the adjuvant setting.

Evaluation of factors influencing 5-fluorouracil-induced diarrhea in colorectal cancer patients. An Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD) study.

Diarrhea is one of the dose-limiting toxicities for administration of fluorouracil (5FU) in patients with colorectal cancer and can result in severe morbidity and mortality. No well-defined prognostic factors influencing 5FU-associated diarrhea have been identified, which means its occurrence is unforeseeable. The aim of this study was to check whether any characteristics related to patients or chemotherapy could allow the identification of subsets of patients at higher risk of developing diarrhea while receiving a regimen containing 5FU. A logistic regression analysis was performed with age, sex, site of primary tumor, presence of primary tumor, presence of colostomy, time since surgery, number of courses of chemotherapy, diarrhea in previous courses, season of treatment, and chemotherapeutic regimens used as model parameters to predict occurrence of diarrhea in 258 colorectal cancer patients receiving a 5FU-containing regimen. Presence of primary tumor (P = 0.004), previous episodes of chemotherapy-related diarrhea (P = 0.00005) and summer season (P = 0.014) were found to be significant risk factors for developing diarrhea. The other variables examined, such as age, sex, chemotherapeutic regimen, site of primary tumor, presence of colostomy, and time since surgery, were not significantly correlated to diarrhea. Chemotherapeutic regimen was the only parameter that allowed prediction of the severity of diarrhea: 5FU/6S-leucovorin/interferon caused more severe diarrhea, followed by 5FU/leucovorin weekly. Although the analysis of these clinical features does not seem to allow the definition of a well-defined subset of colorectal cancer patients at higher risk of 5FU-induced diarrhea, it can be recommended that patients with primary tumor, or who have experienced diarrhea in earlier courses of chemotherapy or are receiving treatment in summer should be carefully monitored, especially in the first cycles.

High-versus low-dose levo-leucovorin as a modulator of 5-fluorouracil in advanced colorectal cancer: a 'GISCAD' phase III study. Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although leucovorin (LV) + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is considered the treatment of choice for advanced colorectal cancer in most countries, the optimal schedule of this combination has not yet been established. Low-dose LV appears to be as active as high-dose LV in the daily-times-five regimen, but no randomized study of the levorotatory stereoisomer (6S-LV) given at two different dose levels has been published. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between November 1991 and June 1994, 422 patients (all with measurable disease previously untreated with chemotherapy) were randomized to 6S-LV (100 mg/sqm/i.v.) + 5-FU (370 mg sqm/15 min i.v. infusion), both administered for 5 days every 28 days (arm A), or to 6S-LV (10 mg/sqm/i.v./5-FU (doses as above), also given for 5 days every 28 days (arm B). The primary endpoint of the study was the comparison of response rates (WHO criteria): the secondary endpoint was the assessment of survival and tolerability. No evaluation of the quality of life or the symptomatic effect of treatment was planned. RESULTS: The response rate was 9.3% in arm A (95% CI: 5.4-13.1), with 2 CR and 18 PR, and 10.7% in arm B (95% CI: 6.5-14.9), with 3 CR + 19 PR, without any significant difference (P = 0.78). The median time to progression was eight months in both groups and overall survival was 11 months, with no difference between treatments. Toxicity mainly consisted of gastrointestinal side effects (mucositis and diarrhoea), which were rarely severe (grade 3-4: 5%-10% of patients) and similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this large-scale multicentre trial, the low and high doses of 6S-LV appeared to be equivalent in terms of the biochemical modulation of 5-FU in advanced colorectal cancer although, for several reasons (including the timing and the strict criteria of response evaluation, the high number of patients with unfavourable prognostic factors, the multi-institutional nature of the study, the dose and modality of 5-FU administration), the response rate was lower than that reported in some of the other published studies. Given the considerable difference in economic cost between the two dosages, the use of high-dose 6S-LV in the daily-times-five regimen is not recommended in clinical practice.

[Locoregional chemotherapy of liver metastasis from colorectal carcinoma]. / Chemioterapia locoregionale delle metastasi epatiche da carcinoma del colon-retto.

Hepatic metastases are a major cause of death in patients with colorectal carcinoma. Traditional intravenous chemotherapy produces responses in 10% to 30% of patients and surgical resection is feasible in approximately 20% of patients. Infusion of cytotoxic agents into the hepatic artery is the most promising form of therapy for unresectable hepatic metastases. The recent development of a totally implantable pump has allowed prolonged infusion of chemotherapeutic agents with a good compliance and quality of life of the patients. The rationale for hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) present an anatomical and pharmacological basis with the use of agents with high hepatic extraction resulting in minimal systemic toxicity. The results of eight randomized trial assessing the value of HAI Floxuridine shows that such regional chemotherapy increases the likelihood of hepatic response compared with systemic treatment (52% vs 15%). Survival information is difficult to evaluate because some of the studies are small, some had a crossover design and some others had bias factors. Extrahepatic disease develops in 40-70% of patients undergoing HAI; the use of systemic therapy plus HAI may produce a decrease in extrahepatic disease. Further studies of combined systemic/arterial regiment are necessary.

Factors influencing response rates for advanced colorectal cancer chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: The activity of various chemotherapy regimens used in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer is assessed by different groups of investigators and in various trials by what appear to be common criteria. However, there may be substantial inter-trial variation in the interpretation and application of these criteria which contributes to differences in response rates reported for the same regimen. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This paper reviews the most prominent studies in this field and examines the factors which may influence the assessment of activity in clinical trials such as patient selection, the definition and application of response criteria, the methods of assessment of time to progression and duration of response, factors related to the therapeutic regimen and statistical methods. Each factor is critically discussed. RESULTS: The analysis confirms that there is a large variability among the different studies and that an inter-trial comparison is often impossible, with subsequent difficulties for clinicians in determining the true impact of therapies. DISCUSSION: After briefly commenting on the various issues, this review makes recommendations about how to achieve consistency among trials, for instance by using standard criteria, by extending the use of randomization even in phase II trials and by evaluating high quality, well conducted clinical trials in a meta-analysis, thereby making possible comparison across trials. The conclusions, although specific to colorectal cancer, are also applicable to other advanced malignancies.

Salvage chemotherapy with paclitaxel in platinum-resistant advanced ovarian cancer patients.

Encouraging results with Paclitaxel are reported in ovarian cancer patients relapsing and progressing after platinum-based chemotherapy; however, the two populations have different probabilities of a response to a second-line treatment. Here we report the results achieved in 39 patients with platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, treated with Paclitaxel 175 mg/qm2 (or 135 mg/m2 if heavily pretreated) using 3-hour intravenous infusion every 3 weeks, in an attempt to verify the activity of this drug in platinum-resistant patients. The toxicity was mild to moderate and primarily hematologic and neurologic. The objective response rate is 12.8% with no complete responses. The response duration was brief and the median survival 6 (range 1-17) months. An accurate cost-benefit balance is necessary before routinely use of Paclitaxel in platinum-refractory patients. Further research is needed to determine the optimal role of Paclitaxel in the whole therapeutic strategy for ovarian cancer.

Cisplatin-associated anaemia in patients with solid tumours. A retrospective evaluation and considerations relative to erythropoietin administration.

We have reviewed the incidence of cisplatin-induced anaemia in patients affected with solid tumours treated with at least three courses of first-line cisplatin-containing regimens. In our experience, a low percentage (5%) of patients required transfusions of red blood cells. We think it is of the utmost importance to adopt uniform criteria in monitoring and treatment of patients at risk of developing cisplatin anaemia and to identify subsets of patients to eventually treat with erythropoietin.

Sequential methotrexate and 5-fluorouracil as second-line chemotherapy for advanced colorectal cancer patients pretreated with 5-fluorouracil and leucovorin: a GISCAD study.

The biochemical modulation of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) by means of methotrexate (MTX) and 6-S leucovorin (LV) seems mainly directed at two different intracellular targets, supporting the hypothesis of possible non-cross resistance between these two methods of 5-FU potentiation. Thirty-one patients, all previously treated with 5-FU and LV for advanced colorectal cancer (ACC), were treated with MTX = 200 mg/m2 iv day 1 and 5-FU 600 mg/m2 day 2 with 6-S LV 10 mg/m2 po q 6 h X 6 starting 24 h after MTX, repeated every 2 weeks. Of 30 evaluable patients, 2 Partial Remissions (PR) were achieved (Response Rate = 6.6%; 95% Confidence Interval 0%-14%). Eight patients had disease stabilization (SD). The overall median survival was 5 months (range 1-11). No WHO grade III-IV toxicities were reported. Despite the good tolerability, this combination of MTX, 5-FU and LV rescue has minimal activity in ACC after the failure of 5FU+LV-based chemotherapy.

Modulated 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) regimens in advanced colorectal cancer: a critical review of comparative studies.

Several modifications to the administration schedule of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) alone or in combination with other agents have been investigated in advanced colorectal cancer. Biochemical modulation of 5-FU with leucovorin (LV) increases response rate compared with 5-FU alone, but without improvement of overall survival. The best treatment schedule and optimal dose of LV remain unclear, although low doses seem equally as effective as high doses, with the advantage of reduced cost. Methotrexate can increase the activity of 5-FU to a similar degree as LV and a recent meta-analysis showed a slight improvement in survival. The combination of 5-FU + interferon has been disappointing, with phase III trials showing similar activity to 5-FU + LV, but with high toxicity. Other modulators (e.g. hydroxyurea, N-phosphonacetyl-L-aspartate, dipyridamole) show promising but sometimes conflicting results. Standardisation of assessment criteria should be considered when comparing these data to the activity of new drugs such as 'Tomudex' (raltitrexed, previously known as ZD1694), CPT-11 and oxaliplatin.

Epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil is an active and safe regimen for patients with advanced gastric cancer. An Italian Group for the Study of Digestive Tract Cancer (GISCAD) report.

BACKGROUND: A Phase II confirmatory multicenter trial was performed to evaluate a combination of epirubicin, cisplatin, and continuous infusion 5-fluorouracil (ECF) in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer. METHODS: Fifty-three patients with locally advanced (n = 7) or metastatic (n = 46) gastric cancer received a dose of epirubicin (50 mg/m2) and cisplatin (60 mg/m2) intravenously every 21 days for eight cycles with 5-fluorouracil (200 mg/m2/day) by intravenous continuous infusion for 21 consecutive weeks, administered through a central line using an external pump. RESULTS: Eight complete responses and 22 partial responses (response rate = 56%, 95% confidence interval +/- 13) were achieved. Twelve patients had stable disease. The median duration of response was 10 months (range, 3-21 months), and the median survival for all the patients was 9+ months (range, 2-28 months). Overall toxicity, which was primarily hematologic, was mild with only three patients requiring hospitalization for neutropenic fever. No death due to toxicity occurred. CONCLUSIONS: This study found that the ECF regimen is substantially active in treating patients with advanced gastric cancer and has a favorable pattern of toxicity. This schedule clearly deserves randomized comparative trials for palliation of metastatic disease and for adjuvant purposes.

Oral etoposide as second-line chemotherapy for colorectal cancer: a GISCAD study. Gruppo Italiano Studio Carcinomi Apparato Digerente.

Twenty-one patients with advanced colorectal cancer, all previously pretreated with a fluoropyrimidine-based regimen, received oral etoposide: 100 mg/die for 21 consecutive days, every three weeks. No objective response was achieved; 6 pts had a short-lasting stabilization of their disease. Toxicity was substantial and mainly represented by myelosuppression and alopecia. Protracted administration of etoposide is inactive as second-line treatment of colorectal cancer.

Non small cell lung cancer treatment with vinorelbine monochemotherapy: a phase II study.

Non small cell lung cancer is one of the leading causes of death in the industrial countries and some 70% of patients have non surgically eradicable disease. Platinum based combined regimens can achieve 35-40% objective responses, but advanced age, low performance status and concurrent diseases can exclude up to 60% of patients from an adequate poliychemotherapy treatment.