Results of a randomized, prospective clinical trial evaluating metronomic chemotherapy in nonmetastatic patients with high-grade, operable osteosarcomas of the extremities: A report from the Latin American Group of Osteosarcoma Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Metronomic chemotherapy (MC) consists of the administration of a low dose of chemotherapy on a daily or weekly basis without a long break to achieve an antitumoral effect through an antiangiogenic effect or stimulation of the immune system. The potential effect of MC with continuous oral cyclophosphamide and methotrexate in patients with high-grade operable osteosarcomas (OSTs) of the extremities was investigated. METHODS: Patients with high-grade OSTs who were 30 years old or younger were eligible for registration at diagnosis. Eligibility for randomization included 1) nonmetastatic disease and 2) complete resection of the primary tumor. The study design included a backbone of 10 weeks of preoperative therapy with methotrexate, adriamycin, and platinum (MAP). After surgery, patients were randomized between 2 arms to complete 31 weeks of MAP or receive 73 weeks of MC after MAP. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS) from randomization. RESULTS: There were 422 nonmetastatic patients registered (May 2006 to July 2013) from 27 sites in 3 countries (Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay), and 296 were randomized to MAP plus MC (n = 139) or MAP alone (n = 157). At 5 years, the EFS cumulative proportions surviving in the MAP-MC group and the MAP-alone group were 61% (standard error [SE], 0.5%) and 64% (SE, 0.5%), respectively, and they were not statistically different (Wilcoxon [Gehan] statistic = 0.724; P =.395). The multivariate analysis showed that necrosis grades 1 and 2, tumor size, and amputation were associated with shorter EFS. CONCLUSIONS: According to the current follow-up, EFS with MAP plus MC is not statistically superior to EFS with MAP alone in patients with high-grade, resectable OSTs of the extremities. Cancer 2017;123:1003-10. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Osteosarcoma in patients younger than 12 years old without metastases have similar prognosis as adolescent and young adults.

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer is relatively rare and tends to present specific age distribution, as a prognostic factor for some of these diseases. Information on how young age affects prognosis, response to chemotherapy, and local control options in children versus AYA with osteosarcoma (OST) is minimal. METHODS: In order to identify the main differences in clinical pathologic features, surgical approaches and survival rates of primary high grade OST of the extremity between children (n = 156; <12 years old) and AYA (n = 397; 12-30 years old), the institutional database with 553 patients treated by BOTG studies over 15 years were reviewed. RESULTS: There were no differences in metastases at diagnosis, tumor size, and grade of necrosis between the two age groups. The rate of amputation was 30% higher in the children group (P = 0.018). The rate of limb salvage surgery using reconstruction with allograft or autograft was 70% higher in the children group (P = 0.018) while endoprosthesis rate was 40% higher in the AYA group (P = 0.018). The log rank test revealed that survival is similar between the two age groups for non-metastatic patients (P = 0.424 for OS and P = 0.393 for EFS). Metastatic patients of both ages group had higher risk of dying compared to non-metastatic (HR 3.283 95% CI 2.581-4.177; P < 0.001). Children with metastases at diagnosis had less OS time (P = 0.049) and EFS time (P = 0.032) than adolescents. CONCLUSION: Non-metastatic OST in preadolescent patients does not appear to be significantly different from those seen in AYA patients, but has local control challenges. Children presenting with metastases should be considered an ultra-high-risk group.

Fifteen Years' Experience of the Brazilian Osteosarcoma Treatment Group (BOTG): A Contribution from an Emerging Country.

PURPOSE: Little information is available regarding the tumor features, prognostic factors, and treatment results in children and adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with osteosarcoma diagnosed in developing countries. We reviewed the results of three observational cohorts of osteosarcoma patients treated in an emerging country. METHODS: A total of 604 patients below the age of 30 years with high-grade osteosarcoma were prospectively enrolled in the Brazilian Osteosarcoma Treatment Group (BOTG) studies III, IV, and V. Gender, age, time from onset of symptoms to diagnosis, primary tumor site, presence or absence of metastases at diagnosis, tumor size, type of surgery (limb-sparing or amputation), treatment protocol, and histological response were correlated with survival. RESULTS: The estimated 5-year overall survival and event-free survival (EFS) rates for the 553 eligible patients were 49% and 39% respectively; of the 390 non-metastatic patients included in the total, overall- and event-free survival were 59% and 48% respectively. Metastases at diagnosis, primary tumor site, type of surgery, and histological response were significant predictors of overall survival and EFS in univariate and multivariate analysis, whereas tumor size and treatment protocol lost prognostic significance in multivariate analysis. CONCLUSION: We report on the outcome of three consecutive studies for the treatment of osteosarcoma carried out in Brazil over 15 years. Although the survival rates presented are below those reported in current literature, it represents the result of a favorable experience gathered from the national collaborative work.