Image-based assessment of aortoiliac aneurysm anatomical characteristics in patients from the global iliac branch study.

OBJECTIVE: Endovascular repair is the preferred treatment for aortoiliac aneurysm, with preservation of at least one internal iliac artery recommended. This study aimed to assess pre-endovascular repair anatomical characteristics of aortoiliac aneurysm in patients from the Global Iliac Branch Study (GIBS, NCT05607277) to enhance selection criteria for iliac branch devices (IBD) and improve long-term outcomes. METHODS: Pre-treatment CT scans of 297 GIBS patients undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair were analyzed. Measurements included total iliac artery length, common iliac artery length, tortuosity index, common iliac artery splay angle, internal iliac artery stenosis, calcification score, and diameters in the device's landing zone. Statistical tests assessed differences in anatomical measurements and IBD-mediated internal iliac artery preservation. RESULTS: Left total iliac artery length was shorter than right (6.7 mm, P = .0019); right common iliac artery less tortuous (P = .0145). Males exhibited greater tortuosity in the left total iliac artery (P = .0475) and larger diameter in left internal iliac artery's landing zone (P = .0453). Preservation was more common on right (158 unilateral, 34 bilateral) than left (105 unilateral, 34 bilateral). There were 192 right-sided and 139 left-sided IBDs, with 318 IBDs in males and 13 in females. CONCLUSION: This study provides comprehensive pre-treatment iliac anatomy analysis in patients undergoing endovascular repair with IBDs, highlighting differences between sides and sexes. These findings could refine patient selection for IBD placement, potentially enhancing outcomes in aortoiliac aneurysm treatment. However, the limited number of females in the study underscores the need for further research to generalize findings across genders.

DETOUR2 trial outcomes demonstrate clinical utility of percutaneous transmural bypass for the treatment of long segment, complex femoropopliteal disease.

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous transmural arterial bypass (PTAB) using the DETOUR system aims to create a percutaneous, endovascular femoropopliteal bypass for the treatment of long segment, complex superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery disease. The goal of the DETOUR2 study is to investigate the safety and effectiveness of the therapy in comparison with pre-established performance goals. METHODS: The DETOUR2 investigational device exemption study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter, international trial of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease patients (Rutherford classes 3-5) undergoing the DETOUR procedure for long segment (>20 cm) superficial femoral artery disease. Prespecified end points included primary safety (composite of major adverse events) at 30 days, and effectiveness (primary patency defined as freedom from restenosis or clinically driven target lesion revascularization) at 1 year. RESULTS: We enrolled 202 patients at 32 sites with 200 treated with the DETOUR system. The mean lesion length was 32.7 cm, of which 96% were chronic total occlusions (CTO) and 70% were severely calcified. Technical success was achieved in 100% of treated patients. The primary safety end point was met with a 30-day freedom from major adverse event rate of 93.0%. The 1-year primary effectiveness end point was met with 72.1% primary patency at 12 months. Primary-assisted and secondary patency were 77.7% and 89.0%, respectively, at 12 months. The 12 month deep venous thrombosis incidence was 4.1% with no pulmonary emboli reported. Venous quality-of-life scores showed no significant changes from baseline. There was a Rutherford improvement of at least one class through 12 months in 97.2% of patients. The mean ankle-brachial index also improved from 0.61 to 0.95 during this period. There were marked improvements in quality-of-life and functional status measures. CONCLUSIONS: The DETOUR2 study met both the primary safety and effectiveness end points, demonstrating clinical usefulness of this novel therapeutic strategy in long femoropopliteal lesions.

Recent advances and controversial issues in the optimal management of asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: The optimal management of patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis (AsxCS) is enduringly controversial. We updated our 2021 Expert Review and Position Statement, focusing on recent advances in the diagnosis and management of patients with AsxCS. METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed up to August 1, 2023, using PubMed/PubMed Central, EMBASE and Scopus. The following keywords were used in various combinations: "asymptomatic carotid stenosis," "carotid endarterectomy" (CEA), "carotid artery stenting" (CAS), and "transcarotid artery revascularization" (TCAR). Areas covered included (i) improvements in best medical treatment (BMT) for patients with AsxCS and declining stroke risk, (ii) technological advances in surgical/endovascular skills/techniques and outcomes, (iii) risk factors, clinical/imaging characteristics and risk prediction models for the identification of high-risk AsxCS patient subgroups, and (iv) the association between cognitive dysfunction and AsxCS. RESULTS: BMT is essential for all patients with AsxCS, regardless of whether they will eventually be offered CEA, CAS, or TCAR. Specific patient subgroups at high risk for stroke despite BMT should be considered for a carotid revascularization procedure. These patients include those with severe (≥80%) AsxCS, transcranial Doppler-detected microemboli, plaque echolucency on Duplex ultrasound examination, silent infarcts on brain computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography scans, decreased cerebrovascular reserve, increased size of juxtaluminal hypoechoic area, AsxCS progression, carotid plaque ulceration, and intraplaque hemorrhage. Treatment of patients with AsxCS should be individualized, taking into consideration individual patient preferences and needs, clinical and imaging characteristics, and cultural, ethnic, and social factors. Solid evidence supporting or refuting an association between AsxCS and cognitive dysfunction is lacking. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal management of patients with AsxCS should include BMT for all individuals and a prophylactic carotid revascularization procedure (CEA, CAS, or TCAR) for some asymptomatic patient subgroups, additionally taking into consideration individual patient needs and preference, clinical and imaging characteristics, social and cultural factors, and the available stroke risk prediction models. Future studies should investigate the association between AsxCS with cognitive function and the role of carotid revascularization procedures in the progression or reversal of cognitive dysfunction.

An international, multispecialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document on controversial issues in the management of patients with asymptomatic and symptomatic carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the publication of various national/international guidelines, several questions concerning the management of patients with asymptomatic (AsxCS) and symptomatic (SxCS) carotid stenosis remain unanswered. The aim of this international, multi-specialty, expert-based Delphi Consensus document was to address these issues to help clinicians make decisions when guidelines are unclear. METHODS: Fourteen controversial topics were identified. A three-round Delphi Consensus process was performed including 61 experts. The aim of Round 1 was to investigate the differing views and opinions regarding these unresolved topics. In Round 2, clarifications were asked from each participant. In Round 3, the questionnaire was resent to all participants for their final vote. Consensus was reached when ≥75% of experts agreed on a specific response. RESULTS: Most experts agreed that: (1) the current periprocedural/in-hospital stroke/death thresholds for performing a carotid intervention should be lowered from 6% to 4% in patients with SxCS and from 3% to 2% in patients with AsxCS; (2) the time threshold for a patient being considered "recently symptomatic" should be reduced from the current definition of "6 months" to 3 months or less; (3) 80% to 99% AsxCS carries a higher risk of stroke compared with 60% to 79% AsxCS; (4) factors beyond the grade of stenosis and symptoms should be added to the indications for revascularization in AsxCS patients (eg, plaque features of vulnerability and silent infarctions on brain computed tomography scans); and (5) shunting should be used selectively, rather than always or never. Consensus could not be reached on the remaining topics due to conflicting, inadequate, or controversial evidence. CONCLUSIONS: The present international, multi-specialty expert-based Delphi Consensus document attempted to provide responses to several unanswered/unresolved issues. However, consensus could not be achieved on some topics, highlighting areas requiring future research.

One-Year Results of a Low-Profile Endograft in Acute, Complicated Type B Aortic Dissection.

BACKGROUND: The safety and effectiveness of the RelayPro endograft (Terumo Aortic) was assessed for the treatment of acute, complicated type B aortic dissection (TBAD). METHODS: A prospective pivotal trial analyzed a primary end point of all-cause mortality at 30 days. Secondary end points included technical success, major adverse events (disabling stroke, renal failure, and paraplegia/paralysis), endoleaks, patency, rupture, device integrity, false lumen perfusion, reinterventions, aortic expansion, and migration evaluated to 5 years. RESULTS: The study involved 22 United States centers and enrolled 56 patients (mean age, 59.5 ± 11.4 years) from 2017 to 2021; of whom, 73.2% were men and 53.6% were African American. TBAD was complicated by malperfusion of the kidneys (51.8%), lower extremities (35.7%), and viscera (33.9%), and rupture (10.7%). Dissection extended proximally to zones 1/2 (14.3%) and zone 3 (78.6%) and distally to the iliac arteries (67.3%). Most procedures were percutaneous (85.5%). Technical success was 100%. Median hospitalization was 7 days (interquartile range, 5-12 days). All-cause mortality at 30 days was 1.8% (1 of 56; upper 95% CI, 8.2%; P < .0001). Seven major adverse events occurred in 6 patients (10.7%), consisting of paraplegia (n = 3), paraparesis (n = 2), disabling stroke (n = 1), and renal failure (n = 1). All paraplegia/paraparesis resolved with lumbar drainage. Kaplan-Meier analysis estimated a freedom from major adverse events of 89.1% at each interval from 30 days to 3 years. There was 1 endoleak (Type Ia), 2 retrograde dissections, and aortic diameter growth occurred in 2. There has been no rupture, fistula, component separation, patency loss, stenosis, kinking, twisting, bird beak, loss of device integrity, or fracture. CONCLUSIONS: RelayPro is safe and effective in acute, complicated TBAD. Follow-up is ongoing to evaluate longer-term outcomes and durability.

Association between socioeconomic deprivation and presentation with a ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm.

OBJECTIVE: Given the ongoing nature of research in the social determinants space and urges to improve United States Preventive Services Task Force screening efforts for abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), this project aims to characterize the association between the level of socioeconomic deprivation, rurality, and ruptured AAA (rAAA) presentation across the United States. METHODS: We queried the Vascular Quality Initiative registry (2010-2019) for patients with AAAs. The area deprivation index (ADI) is an index from 1 to 100 used to capture socioeconomic status. ADI was grouped into quintiles, with the most deprived regions being quintile 5 and having the highest ADI index. Multivariable logistic regression assessed the association between ADI, rurality, and rAAA presentation overall and before age 65. RESULTS: Of the 82,909 patients included, 11,458 patients (14%) resided in the most socioeconomically deprived regions, and 18,083 patients (22%) lived in rural regions. Overall, 6831 patients (8.2%) experienced an rAAA, with 4696 patients (69%) residing in the three most deprived quintiles. Most patients underwent endovascular repair (n = 67,933; 82%), followed by open repair (n = 14,976; 18%). On multivariable analysis, residence in the most socioeconomically deprived region was associated with a near 1.5-fold increased odds of presenting with an rAAA compared with a residence in the least deprived regions (odds ratio [OR], 1.46; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.31-1.63; P < .001), whereas urban residence was associated with a decreased odds to present with an rAAA compared with rural residence (OR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.79-0.89; P < .001). When stratifying the study population by the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommended age for AAA screening (65 years old), 14,147 patients (17%) were under 65. Of those under 65, 1381 patients (9.8%) experienced a rAAA, and 9955 patients (71%) resided in the three most deprived quintiles. Residence in the most socioeconomically deprived region was associated with an increased odds of presenting with an rAAA compared with residence in the least deprived region (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.01-1.69; P = .042). However, there were no significant associations between rural residence and increased rAAA presentation among individuals under 65 (OR, 1.07; 95% CI, 0.93-1.23; P = .36). CONCLUSIONS: Among all patients in this study, patients residing in highly socioeconomically deprived or rural regions were more likely to present with an rAAA, but among those under 65, only residence in a socioeconomically deprived area was associated with increased odds of rAAA presentation. Understanding the effects of socioeconomic deprivation on rAAA presentation can identify at-risk populations for early AAA screening before rupture.

Natural history of superior mesenteric artery in-stent restenosis.

OBJECTIVE: Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) stenting is the preferred approach for patients with symptomatic SMA-associated chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). The durability of this modality is impacted by in-stent restenosis (ISR). Duplex ultrasound (DUS) and computed tomographic angiography (CTA)-measured ISR may be weakly correlated and not uniformly associated with recurrence of presenting symptoms. This study aims to analyze the association between the degree of ISR for patients with CMI and to develop a predictive model for symptom recurrence. METHODS: Single center, retrospective study included all patients with CMI with SMA stents from the period of 2003 to 2020. Follow-up period analysis included patients' symptoms recurrence, DUS, CTA, and angiography. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate whether peak systolic velocity (PSV) was predictive of symptom recurrence. A subgroup analysis of patients (asymptomatic and symptomatic) with SMA ISR was identified; restenosis defined by DUS with peak systolic velocity (PSV) ≥350. RESULTS: The study included 186 patients with the ROC analysis obtained from 503 postoperative visits. PSV was not a predictor of symptoms return with area under the curve (AUC) = 0.49 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.40-0.57). Agreement analysis between imaging modalities showed higher agreement between CTA and angiogram (AUC, 0.769; 95% CI, 0.688-0.849) vs CTA and DUS (AUC, 0.650; 95% CI, 0.589-0.711). The subgroup analysis of patients with ISR included 99 patients (asymptomatic n = 67; symptomatic n = 32). There was no statistical difference between median time (months) to ISR between both groups: 4.5 (asymptomatic group) and 7.6 (symptomatic group). The use of preoperative antiplatelet (86% vs 65%; P = .015) and P2Y12 receptor blockers (36% vs 13%; P = .016) was more prevalent in the asymptomatic group. There was no difference between the type or number of stents placed, stent diameter, or concomitant celiac artery intervention between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The natural history of SMA and multimodality defined ISR in CMI has not previously been described. Elevated PSV was a poor predictor of symptoms recurrence. Both asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with ISR did not differ in type of stent placed, time to ISR, or involvement of celiac artery. Antiplatelet use pre- and postoperatively appears protective against symptoms recurrence. Our findings underscore the need for long-term surveillance integrating clinical evaluation and multimodality imaging when indicated.

Late Referral and Patient Transfer is Associated with Worse Outcomes for Patients Presenting with Initially Uncomplicated Type B Aortic Dissections.

BACKGROUND: Acute type B aortic dissections (TBADs) can become complicated at any time point, necessitating surgical repair. We sought to investigate the effect of interhospital transfer on the development of delayed complications in acute type B aortic dissection (dcTBAD). METHODS: All patients who presented with acute TBAD to a tertiary aortic center from 2015 to 2019 were analyzed. Patients were divided into initially complicated type B aortic dissection (icTBAD) (0-24 hours from symptom onset), dcTBAD (25 hours to 14 days), and uncomplicated type B aortic dissection (ucTBAD) groups. Criteria for complicated dissection were aortic rupture, malperfusion, or rapid aortic growth. Demographics, patient history, the timing of presentation, imaging findings, and clinical outcomes were compared between groups. RESULTS: Of 120 acute TBADs included, 27 (22%) were initially complicated (aortic rupture, n = 9; malperfusion, n = 18). Twenty-one (18%) developed delayed complications (aortic rupture, n = 3; malperfusion, n = 14; rapid growth, n = 4) at a median of 7.0 [4.0, 9.0] days from symptom onset. Seventy-two (60%) remained uncomplicated. Overall, 111 (93%) presented as transfers from outside hospitals (icTBAD, n = 25; dcTBAD, n = 21; ucTBAD, n = 65). Of those, dcTBADs were more likely to have a prolonged delay between presentation to the outside hospital and referral to the tertiary center compared to ucTBADs (median = 1.00 [0.0, 5.0] days delayed vs. 0.00 [0.0, 0.0] days delayed; P < 0.001). Initially uncomplicated patients referred for transfer ≥24 hours from presentation went on to develop dcTBAD more often than those transferred in <24 hours (73% vs 13%; P < 0.001). Of dcTBADs, 38% had no high-risk features on initial imaging. Patients with dcTBAD had significantly longer length of stay (median = 12 vs 7 days; P = 0.006). In-hospital mortality was significantly higher in dcTBADs than ucTBADs (9.5% vs 0%; P = 0.047). In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between dcTBADs and icTBADs (9.5% vs. 11%; P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence and consequence of dcTBADsare not insignificant. Late referral and transfer to a tertiary aortic center (≥24 hours from initial presentation) was associated with dcTBADsrequiring surgical intervention. The development of dcTBADwas associated with increased length of stay and increased in-hospital mortality.

Renal Artery Reimplantation Versus Bypass in Elective Open Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Complex open abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair often necessitates revascularization of renal arteries by either renal artery reimplantation or bypass. This study aims to evaluate the perioperative and short term outcomes between these 2 strategies of renal artery revascularization. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent open AAA repair from 2004 to 2020 at our own institution. Patients who underwent elective suprarenal, juxtarenal, or type 4 thoracoabdominal aneurysm repair were identified using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes and a retrospectively maintained database of AAA patients. Patients who had symptomatic aneurysm or significant renal artery stenosis before AAA repair were excluded. Patient demographics, intraoperative conditions, renal function, bypass patency, and perioperative and postoperative outcomes at 30 days and 1 year were compared. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-three patients underwent either renal artery reimplantation (n = 86) or bypass (n = 57) during this time period. The mean age was 69.7 years and 76.2% of the patients were male. Median preoperative creatinine was 1.2 mg/dL for the renal bypass group versus 1.06 mg/dL for reimplantation (P = 0.088). Both groups had similar median preoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) of >60 mL/min (P = 0.13). Bypass and reimplantation groups had similar perioperative complications including acute kidney injury (51.8% vs. 49.4% P = 0.78), inpatient dialysis (3.6% vs. 1.2% P = 0.56), myocardial infarction (1.8% vs. 2.4% P = 0.99), and death (3.5% vs. 4.7% P = 0.99), respectively. During the 30-day follow-up period, renal artery stenosis was identified in 9.8% of bypasses and 6.7% of reimplantations (P = 0.71). Six point one percent of patients in the bypass group had renal failure requiring dialysis (both acute and permanent) compared to 1.3% in reimplantation group (P = 0.3). For those who had 1-year follow-up, the reimplantation group had higher new incidence of renal artery stenosis compared to bypass group (6 vs. 0 P = 0.16). CONCLUSIONS: Given that there is no significant difference in outcomes between renal artery reimplantation and bypass within 30 days or at 1-year follow-up, both bypass and reimplantation are acceptable means for renal artery revascularization during elective AAA repair.

Management of patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia across three consecutive eras.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular intervention (EI) is the most commonly used modality for chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). Since the inception of this technique, numerous publications have reported the associated clinical outcomes. However, no publication has reported the comparative outcomes over a period of time in which both the stent platform and adjunctive medical therapy have evolved. This study aims to assess the impact of the concomitant evolution of both the endovascular approach and optimal guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) on CMI outcomes over three consecutive time eras. METHODS: A retrospective review at a quaternary center from January 2003 to August 2020 was performed to identify patients who underwent EIs for CMI. The patients were divided into three groups based on the date of intervention: early (2003-2009), mid (2010-2014), and late (2015-2020). At least one angioplasty/stent was performed for the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) and/or celiac artery. The patients' short- and mid-term outcomes were compared between the groups. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazard models were also conducted to evaluate the clinical predictors for primary patency loss in SMA only subgroup. RESULTS: A total of 278 patients were included (early, 74; mid, 95; late, 109). The overall mean age was 71 years, and 70% were females. High technical success (early, 98.6%; mid, 100%; late, 100%; P = .27) and immediate resolution of symptoms (early, 86.3%; mid, 93.7%; late, 90.8%; P = .27) were noted over the three eras. In both the celiac artery and SMA cohorts, the use of bare metal stents (BMS) declined over time (early, 99.0%; mid, 90.3%; late, 65.5%; P < .001) with a proportionate increase in covered stents (CS) (early, 0.99%; mid, 9.7%; late, 28.9%; P < .001). The use of postoperative antiplatelet and statins has increased over time (early, 89.2%; mid, 97.9%; late, 99.1%; P = .003) and (early, 47%; mid, 68%; late, 81%; P = .001), respectively. In the SMA stent-only cohort, no significant differences were noted in primary patency rates between BMS and CS (hazard ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-2.87; P = .94). High-intensity preoperative statins were associated with fewer primary patency loss events compared to none/low- or moderate-intensity statins (hazard ratio, 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.72; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent outcomes were observed for CMI EIs across three consecutive eras. In the SMA stent-only cohort, no statistically significant difference in early primary patency was noted for CS and BMS, making the use of CS at additional cost controversial and possibly not cost effective. Notably, the preoperative high-intensity statins were associated with improved SMA primary patency. These findings demonstrate the importance of guideline-directed medical therapy as an essential adjunct to EI in the treatment of CMI.

Value of Routine Troponin Measurement in Open Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Repair.

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in the postoperative period after major vascular surgery. Depending on the study population, up to 25% of patients have troponin elevation after noncardiac surgery, yet many do not meet the diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI). Although outcomes of routine troponin elevation in patients undergoing mixed major vascular surgery have been evaluated, this has not been studied exclusively in elective, open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (oAAA), especially regarding perioperative and overall mortality. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, retrospective review of routine troponin surveillance for consecutive, oAAA from 2014 to 2019. A total of 319 patients were identified and analyzed for management patterns and interventions. The cohort was stratified into groups for comparison based on those in whom troponin was routinely checked (RC) as part of a care strategy during the study period, not routinely checked (NRC), elevated troponin (ET) >0.001 ng/mL, and not elevated. The median follow-up was 21.5 ± 23.8 months. Groups were compared on demographic data, cardiac comorbidities, 30-day and 3-year outcomes for MI and death using two-sample t-tests, Wilcoxon rank sum tests, Pearson chi-square tests, and Fisher exact tests when appropriate. RESULTS: Troponin was measured in 83.7% (267/319) of patients who underwent elective oAAA repair. Routine troponin checks were obtained in 79.9% (255/319) of patients. ET was identified in 16.5% of those with RC (42/255) and 4.7% of those with NRC (3/64). Of patients with ET, 37.8% (17/45) had a cardiology consultation, 4.4% (2/45) had a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 4.4% (2/45) had another cardiac intervention. All 4 patients undergoing PCI or other cardiac intervention had received routine troponin checks. Patients with ET were older (71.2 vs. 68.6; P = 0.04), more likely to receive intraoperative blood products (P = 0.003), had longer operative times (P = 0.011), higher length of stay (9 vs. 7 days; P < 0.01), and higher 30-day MI rate (3 vs. 0; P = 0.04). They had neither longer aortic clamp times nor worse preoperative cardiac function, and the proximal clamp position during oAAA repair did not impact troponin detection. Additionally, 3-year overall mortality was increased in patients who had ET but there was not a significant difference in 3-year mortality between groups receiving routine troponin checks versus not. CONCLUSIONS: ET, identified after elective oAAA repair, was associated with a higher risk of 30-day MI and lower overall survival. However, it was not demonstrated that routine assessment of troponin levels postoperatively leads to decreased 3-year mortality in this setting.

Prevalence of intracranial aneurysms in Marfan syndrome.

OBJECTIVE: Aneurysmal pathology of the aorta is well-defined in the Marfan syndrome (MFS) population. Owing in part to the rarity of pathologies, the prevalence of intracranial aneurysms (IA) in MFS is poorly defined. There is debate as to whether or not there is an association between the two. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of IA in a population of patients with MFS who underwent intracranial imaging. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective review of patients with MFS. Between 1995 and 2021, 983 patients were reviewed. We identified 198 patients with MFS who had intracranial imaging. Imaging consisted of CTA and/or MRA, and was read by an attending radiologist. Details of the aneurysm, patient demographics, and aortic characteristics were collected. RESULTS: The prevalence of IA was 7.1% (14/198). Age of patients with IA (55.0 ± 15.1 years) was not significantly different than those without IA (52.6 ± 16.0 years) (P = .58). The most common location of IA was the internal carotid artery. The mean diameter of the IA was 7 ± 5.8 mm. No ruptures of the internal carotid artery were identified. One patient (0.5%) underwent intervention for the IA. There were no significant differences found in aortic characteristic including dimensions, history of dissection, or aneurysm. CONCLUSIONS: In a large, single-center experience over 20 years, we identified patients with confirmed MFS who underwent intracranial imaging. The prevalence of IA in our experience was 7.1%. There were no patient or aortic characteristics found to be significantly associated with IA; however, this finding may be due to the small number of aneurysms. Although this number is higher than the historically reported prevalence in the general population, a collection of experiences from multiple institutions will likely be required to truly define the risk of IA in MFS and to determine whether screening is warranted.

Effects of abdominal aortic aneurysm appropriateness dashboard on clinical practice.

OBJECTIVE: The Society for Vascular Surgery published abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) practice guidelines in 2003, 2009, and 2018 to improve the management and treatment of AAAs. In 2014, our vascular surgery department implemented a quarterly AAA dashboard (AAAdb) to record the perioperative outcomes and guideline compliance with a focus on intervention appropriateness and procedural follow-up, which supplemented our Vascular Quality Initiative data. From the available reported evidence and expert consensus opinions, nine additional criteria for the appropriate treatment of AAAs <5 cm in women and <5.5 cm in men were noted, when applicable. The purpose of our study was to assess the effects of AAAdb implementation on adherence to society and institutional guidelines, documentation of treatment rationale, and the quality of follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of elective open and endovascular AAA repair at a single institution from 2010 to 2018. The AAAdb was implemented in the middle of this period in 2014. The patient demographics, aortic size, repair indication, repair type, 30-day mortality, and postoperative and 1-year follow-up imaging findings were analyzed. The primary outcome was adherence to intervention appropriateness and the follow-up guidelines. The categorical factors were summarized using frequencies and percentages and compared using the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher exact test. Continuous measures were summarized using the mean ± standard deviation and compared between study periods using two-sample t tests. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2018, 1549 patients had undergone elective AAA repair: 657 before and 892 after AAAdb implementation. No differences were found in AAA size after AAAdb (5.6 ± 1.2 cm vs 5.6 ± 1.1 cm; P = .88). However, the proportion of size-appropriate repairs increased (64.1% vs 71.3%; P = .003). The proportion of small AAA repairs with a documented rationale had increased (64.4% vs 80.5%; P < .001), with rapid disease progression cited most often. No difference was found in 30-day mortality (1.2% vs 1.5%; P = .69). Follow-up imaging after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair increased at <60 days postoperatively (76% vs 84%; P = .004) and at 1 year of follow-up (78% vs 86%; P = .0005). The proportion of patients with endoleak at <60 days postoperatively had increased in the post-AAAdb cohort (21% vs 29%; P = .012). CONCLUSIONS: The AAAdb served as a centerpiece for improving the appropriateness of care and compliance with national and institutional guidelines, including treatment of small AAAs in special circumstances. Its implementation was associated with higher quality follow-up and surveillance in a high-volume, regional aortic center. Consideration should be given to adding additional criteria to the Society for Vascular Surgery guidelines and Vascular Quality Initiative reporting.

The USMLE® STEP 1 Pass or Fail Era of the Vascular Surgery Residency Application Process: Implications for Structural Bias and Recommendations.

United States Medical Licensing Examination® (USMLE®) STEP 1 score reporting has been changed to a binary pass/fail format since January 26, 2022. The motives behind this change were (1) the questionable validity of using USMLE STEP 1 as a screening tool during the candidate selection process and (2) the negative impact of using standardized examination scores as an initial gatekeeping threshold for the underrepresented in medicine (URiM) candidates applying to graduate medical education programs, given their generally lower mean standardized exams scores compared to non-URiM students. The USMLE administrators justified this change as a tactic to enhance the overall educational experience for all students and to increase the representation of URiM groups. Moreover, they advised the program directors (PDs) to give more attention to other important qualities and components such as the applicant's personality traits, leadership roles and other extracurricular accomplishments, as part of a holistic evaluation strategy. At this early stage, it is unclear how this change will impact Vascular Surgery Integrated residency (VSIR) programs. Several questions are outstanding, most importantly, how VSIR PDs will evaluate applicants absent the variable which heretofore was the primary screening tool. Our previously published survey showed that VSIR PDs will move their attention to other measures such as USMLE STEP 2 Clinical Knowledge (CK) and letters of recommendation during the VSIR selection process. Furthermore, more emphasis on subjective measures such as the applicant's medical school rank and extracurricular student activities is expected. Given the expected higher weight of USMLE STEP 2CK in the selection process than ever, many anticipate that medical students will dedicate more of their limited time to its preparation at the expense of both clinical and nonclinical activities. Potentially leaving less time to explore specialty pathways and to determine whether Vascular Surgeons  is the appropriate career for them. The critical juncture in the VSIR candidate evaluation paradigm presents an opportunity to thoughtfully transform the process via current (Standardized Letter of Recommendation, USMLE STEP 2CK, and clinical research) and future (Emotional Intelligence, Structure Interview and Personality Assessment) measures which constitute a framework to follow in the USMLE STEP 1 pass/fail era.

A Novel Technique and Outcomes for Transcaval Endoleak Embolization.

BACKGROUND: Strategies for embolization of type 2 endoleaks include translumbar, transgraft, transarterial, and transcaval approaches. The transcaval approach is limited by an inconsistent ability to access the aortic sac and the risk of puncturing and damaging the endograft or adjacent structures. We describe a novel technique for caval to aortic aneurysm sac access and report early outcomes. METHODS: A retrospective review of all patients who underwent transcaval embolization (TCE) at a tertiary referral center. From March 2019 to June 2021, 12 patients were identified to have undergone a novel approach to transcaval aortic sac access using a 0.014″ heavy weight tip wire guide and continuous current electrocautery to create the connection between the inferior vena cava and aortic aneurysm sac. The endoleak outflow vessel is then selectively embolized with coils or liquid embolic agents. When selective embolization was not possible, the aneurysm sac was instilled with liquid embolic agents to induce thrombosis. RESULTS: Twelve patients underwent transcaval embolization using this method over the 3-year period. The average patient age was 79.2 ± 6.2 years and 10/12 (83.3%) were male. A high rate of comorbidities was noted in the cohort. Transcaval access into the aortic sac was achieved in all patients, while selective cannulation of outflow vessels was accomplished in 2/12 (16%) target vessels. Of these, both cases had vessels embolized using detachable coils and liquid embolic agents. Nonselective embolization was performed using liquid embolic and thrombotic agents in the other 10/12 cases. There was one perioperative complication of minor bleeding (1/12, 8.3%). Two patients were observed in intensive care unit for back pain. A persistent endoleak was identified on postoperative imaging performed at 30 days in 4/12 (33.3%) patients. Sac enlargement > 5 mm following TCE was observed in 3/12 (25%) patients. Three patients underwent open conversion with endovascular aneurysm repair explant. One patient was explanted at 1 month after failure to embolize the endoleak flow channel using TCE. A second was explanted for persistent endoleak found to be a Type IIIb with aortic diameter growth > 5 mm at 15-month follow-up. The third explant was performed for aortic sac infection at 4 months postprocedure without endoleak. CONCLUSIONS: TCE is an adjunctive technique to treat endoleaks in patients who have either failed transarterial or translumbar access. An electrified 0.014″ chronic total occlusion wire technique for transcaval access to the aortic sac for endoleak embolization can be successful in all cases without significant acute morbidity or mortality. The transcaval approach is still limited by ability to steer catheters and microcatheters into the outflow vessels with a resultant persistent endoleak and eventual need for explant.

Vascular surgery integrated resident selection criteria in the pass or fail era.

OBJECTIVES: Vascular surgery integrated residency (VSIR) programs are highly competitive; however, criteria for resident selection remain opaque and non-standardized. The already unclear selection criteria will be further impacted by the impending transition of the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE) Step 1 from numeric scores to a binary pass/fail outcome. The purpose of this study was to investigate the historical and anticipated selection criteria of VSIR applicants. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional, nationwide, 59-item survey that was sent to all VSIR program directors (PDs). Data was analyzed using the Fisher exact test if categorical and the Mann-Whitney U test and the Kruskal-Wallis test if ordinal. RESULTS: Forty of 69 PDs (58%) responded to the survey. University-based programs constituted 85% of responders. Most VSIR PDs (65%) reported reviewing between 101 to 150 applications for 1 to 2 positions annually. Forty-two percent of the responding PDs reported sole responsibility for inviting applicants to interview, whereas 50% had a team of faculty responsible for reviewing applications. On a five-point Likert scale, letters of recommendation (LOR) from vascular surgeons or colleagues (a person the PD knows) were the most important objective criteria. Work within a team structure was rated highest among subjective criteria. The majority of respondents (72%) currently use the Step 1 score as a primary method to screen applicants. Regional differences in use of Step 1 score as a primary screening method were: Midwest (100%), Northeast (76%), South (43%), and West (40%) (P = .01). PDs responded that that they will use USMLE Step 2 score (42%) and LOR (10%) to replace USMLE Step 1 score. The current top ranked selection criteria are letters from a vascular surgeon, USMLE Step 1 score and overall LOR. The proposed top ranked selection criteria after transition of USMLE Step 1 to pass/fail include LOR overall followed by Step 2 score. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to evaluate the selection criteria used by PDs for VSIR. The landscape of VSIR selection criteria is shifting and increasing transparency is essential to applicants' understanding of the selection process. The transition of USMLE Step 1 to a pass/fail report will shift the attention to Step 2 scores and elevate the importance of other relatively more subjective criteria. Defining VSIR program selection criteria is an important first step toward establishing holistic review processes that are transparent and equitable.

One-year safety and effectiveness of the Alto abdominal stent graft in the ELEVATE IDE trial.

OBJECTIVE: This study reports the results of a prospective, multicenter trial designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the polymer based Endologix Alto Stent Graft System in treating abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), with sealing 7 mm below the top of the fabric in aortic neck diameters from 16 to 30 mm. METHODS: Seventy-five patients were treated with Alto devices between March 2017 and February 2018 in 16 centers in the United States for infrarenal AAAs (max diameter ≥5.0 cm in diameter or size increase by 0.5 cm in 6 months or diameter ≥1.5 times the adjacent normal aorta). Patients were followed for 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year by clinical evaluation and computed tomography and abdominal x-ray imaging. Treatment success was defined as technical success and freedom from AAA enlargement, migration, type I or III endoleak, AAA rupture or surgical conversion, stent graft stenosis, occlusion, kink, thromboembolic events, and stent fracture attributable to the device requiring secondary intervention through 12 months. Preoperative characteristics, perioperative variables, follow-up clinical evaluations, and radiographic examination results through the first 1 year were analyzed. RESULTS: The mean patient age was 73 years, with 93% of patients being male. The 30-day major adverse event rate was 5.3%. At 1 year, the primary endpoint was met with a treatment success rate of 96.7%. Through 1-year post-treatment, all-cause mortality was 4.0%. No AAA-related mortality occurred. AAA enlargement was 1.6%, type I endoleak rate was 1.4%, with 100% freedom from type III endoleaks, device migration, device fracture, stent occlusion, or AAA rupture. The device-related secondary intervention rate was 2.7%. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective study demonstrates the Endologix Alto is safe and effective in treating AAAs with appropriate anatomy at 1 year. The safety endpoint is met by a 5.3% 30-day major adverse event rate, whereas the effectiveness endpoint is met by a treatment success rate of 96%.

Results of the North American Complex Abdominal Aortic Debranching (NACAAD) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid debranching repair of pararenal and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms was initially designed as a better alternative to standard open repair, addressing the limitations of endovascular repair involving the visceral aorta. We reviewed the collective outcomes of hybrid debranching repairs using extra-anatomic, open surgical debranching of the renal-mesenteric arteries, followed by endovascular aortic stenting. METHODS: Data from patients who underwent hybrid repair in 14 North American institutions during 10 years were retrospectively reviewed. Society of Vascular Surgery scores were used to assess comorbidity risk. Early and late outcomes, including mortality, morbidity, reintervention, and patency were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 208 patients (118 male; mean age, 71±8 years old) were treated by hybrid repair with extraanatomic reconstruction of 657 renal and mesenteric arteries (mean 3.2 vessels/patient). Mean aneurysm diameter was 6.6±1.3 cm. Thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms were identified in 163 (78%) patients and pararenal aneurysms in 45 (22%). A single-stage repair was performed in 92 (44%) patients. The iliac arteries were the most common source of inflow (n=132; 63%), and most (n=150; 72%) had 3 or more bypasses. There were 30 (14%) early deaths, ranging widely across sites (0%-21%). A Society of Vascular Surgery comorbidity score >15 was the primary predictor of early mortality (P<0.01), whereas mortality was 3% in a score ≤9. Early complications occurred in 140 (73%) patients and included respiratory complications in 45 patients (22%) and spinal cord ischemia in 22 (11%), of whom 10 (45%) fully recovered. At 5 years, survival was 61±5%, primary graft patency was 90±2%, and secondary patency was 93±2%. The most significant predictor of late mortality was renal insufficiency (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality after hybrid repair and visceral debranching is highly variable by center, but strongly affected by preoperative comorbidities and the centers' experience with the technique. With excellent graft patency at 5 years, the outcomes of hybrid repair done at centers of excellence and in carefully selected patients may be comparable (or better) than traditional open or even totally endovascular approaches. However, in patients already considered as high-risk for surgery, it may not offer better outcomes.

Outcomes of Gore iliac branch endoprosthesis with internal iliac component versus Gore Viabahn VBX.

OBJECTIVE: The Gore Excluder iliac branch endoprosthesis (IBE; W.L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, AZ) is the only iliac branch device approved in the United States to preserve blood flow to the external and internal iliac arteries (IIAs). Some surgeons have used the Gore Viabahn VBX balloon expandable endoprosthesis (VBX; W.L. Gore & Associates) in the IIA rather than the self-expanding endograft designed for the IBE, the internal iliac component (IIC). The objective of the present study was to examine the outcomes for patients treated for aortoiliac artery aneurysms using the IBE with either the IIC or VBX stent. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, single-center review of patients treated for aortoiliac artery aneurysms using the Gore IBE device, with either the IIC or VBX stent into the IIA, from February 2016 to March 2021. The patient demographics, procedure details, 30-day morbidity and mortality, and 6-month and 1-year outcomes and mortality were analyzed. The categorical factors are summarized using frequencies and proportions. Continuous measures are summarized as the mean ± standard deviation. A significance level of P = .05 was assumed for all test results. The analyses were performed using SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC). RESULTS: A total of 62 patients (64 arteries) had undergone elective aortoiliac artery aneurysm repair with the IBE. The IIC was used exclusively in 35 cases (55%) and the VBX in 29 (45%). The patients who had received the VBX had had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (P = .006). Upper extremity access was used for VBX delivery in 24.1% of the procedures. No return to the operating room was required in either group. No differences were found in technical success (IIC, 97.1%; VBX, 93.1%; P = .59), the presence of endoleak on completion (20.0% vs 6.9%; P = .17), readmission (97.1% vs 93.1%; P = .59), or mortality (1.6% vs 0%; P = .45) at 30 days. No differences were found in the requirement for any IBE reintervention after 30 days. No type Ia, Ib, or III endoleaks had occurred in either group at any follow-up point. No significant difference was found in internal iliac limb primary patency (IIC, 100%; VBX, 96.3%) between groups. A nonstatistically significant trend was found toward fewer trunk-ipsilateral leg type II endoleaks in the VBX group during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that the VBX is a reasonable substitute for the IIC, with a comparable safety and efficacy profile. Given its inherent conformability, greater range of diameters, and longer working length, the VBX stent offers expanded IIA branch options with the IBE.

Natural history and growth rates of isolated common iliac artery aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: The natural history of isolated common iliac artery aneurysms (CIAAs) has not been well-studied. The optimal size threshold for elective repair of isolated CIAAs is also not well-defined. We sought to determine the natural history and growth rates of isolated CIAAs to justify a surveillance protocol and size for elective repair. METHODS: Isolated CIAAs (>2 cm) identified from January 1, 2008, through February 29, 2020, at a single center were reviewed. Patient demographics, comorbidities, and details of CIAA operative repairs were retrospectively collected. All available duplex ultrasound and computed tomography scans were reviewed from time of CIAA identification through June 2020. RESULTS: There were 244 isolated CIAAs found in 167 patients. The cohort was 94% male with an average age of 68.1 ± 8.8 years at the time of CIAA detection. CIAAs were identified with ultrasound examination 69% of the time with a mean CIAA diameter of 2.3 cm. Operative repair of a CIAA was performed in 11.4% of the cohort at an average diameter of 3.30 ± 1.02 cm. The majority of these repairs were performed via an endovascular approach (73.7%; n = 14). There were no symptomatic or ruptured isolated CIAAs. Concurrent aortic growth that led to an abdominal aortic aneurysm with diameter of at least 3 cm occurred in 10.6% (n = 26) of isolated CIAAs. The average length of time from CIAA diagnosis to repair was 65.7 ± 47.1 months. The overall CIAA growth rate was 0.4 mm/y. A subgroup analysis based on CIAA size demonstrated a growth rate of 0.2 mm/y fore CIAAs 2.00 to 2.49 cm, 0.3 mm/y for CIAAs 2.50 to 2.99cm, and 1.3 mm/y for CIAAs 3.0 cm or larger. There were two CIAAs greater than 3.0 cm with extreme growth, which significantly impacted the CIAA growth rate on sensitivity analysis. After excluding those two CIAAs from the model, the overall CIAA growth rate was 0.3 mm/y. The subgroup analysis then demonstrated a growth rate of 0.2 mm/y for CIAAs 2.00 to 2.49cm, 0.3 mm/y for CIAAs 2.50 to 2.99cm, and 0.5 mm/y for CIAAs 3 cm or larger. CONCLUSIONS: Isolated CIAAs are typically slow growing aneurysms that expectedly grow faster as they enlarge. Given the rare occurrence of rapid isolated CIAA growth, we recommend surveillance at 3 years for 2.00 to 2.49 cm isolated CIAAs, 2 years for 2.50 to 2.99 cm isolated CIAAs, and yearly for isolated CIAAs greater than 3.0 cm. The lack of symptomatic or ruptured isolated CIAAs in this study supports delaying elective repair until an isolated CIAA diameter reaches at least 3.5 cm. These recommendations should be considered for isolated CIAA practice guidelines.