Remdesivir for 5 or 10 Days in Patients with Severe Covid-19.

BACKGROUND: Remdesivir is an RNA polymerase inhibitor with potent antiviral activity in vitro and efficacy in animal models of coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19). METHODS: We conducted a randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial involving hospitalized patients with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, oxygen saturation of 94% or less while they were breathing ambient air, and radiologic evidence of pneumonia. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive intravenous remdesivir for either 5 days or 10 days. All patients received 200 mg of remdesivir on day 1 and 100 mg once daily on subsequent days. The primary end point was clinical status on day 14, assessed on a 7-point ordinal scale. RESULTS: In total, 397 patients underwent randomization and began treatment (200 patients for 5 days and 197 for 10 days). The median duration of treatment was 5 days (interquartile range, 5 to 5) in the 5-day group and 9 days (interquartile range, 5 to 10) in the 10-day group. At baseline, patients randomly assigned to the 10-day group had significantly worse clinical status than those assigned to the 5-day group (P = 0.02). By day 14, a clinical improvement of 2 points or more on the ordinal scale occurred in 64% of patients in the 5-day group and in 54% in the 10-day group. After adjustment for baseline clinical status, patients in the 10-day group had a distribution in clinical status at day 14 that was similar to that among patients in the 5-day group (P = 0.14). The most common adverse events were nausea (9% of patients), worsening respiratory failure (8%), elevated alanine aminotransferase level (7%), and constipation (7%). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with severe Covid-19 not requiring mechanical ventilation, our trial did not show a significant difference between a 5-day course and a 10-day course of remdesivir. With no placebo control, however, the magnitude of benefit cannot be determined. (Funded by Gilead Sciences; GS-US-540-5773 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04292899.).

Antibiotic therapy and clinical outcomes of Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bacteraemia.

INTRODUCTION: Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) bacteraemia is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We assessed clinical outcomes in patients with PA bacteraemia treated with piperacillin-tazobactam (TZP) versus other antibiotics, and monotherapy versus combination, all with proven activity by disc testing without minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients with PA bacteraemia in 2007 to 2008 were reviewed for demographic, comorbidity, clinical, laboratory, treatment and outcome data. Primary outcome was 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included microbiological clearance, clinical response and length of stay (LOS). RESULTS: Median age for 91 patients was 65 years. Median Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS) II score was 30. Monotherapy was used in 77 cases: 42 on ceftazidime, 17 on TZP, 10 on carbapenems, and 8 on other antipseudomonal antibiotics. The 30-day mortality was 20.9%, and similar between ceftazidime and TZP versus other antibiotics respectively. More patients in combination versus monotherapy group had cardiovascular diseases, diabetes mellitus and vascular access as source of bacteraemia. Patients on monotherapy had higher 30-day mortality (24.7% vs 0%, P = 0.037). Multivariate analysis identified SAPS II score (OR = 1.097, 95% CI, 1.032 to 1.166, P = 0.003) and cancer (OR = 4.873, 95% CI, 1.235 to 19.223, P = 0.024) as independent predictors of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSION: TZP appeared to be an effective culture-guided antibiotic for PA bacteraemia. High 30-day mortality in monotherapy might be confounded by comorbidity, illness severity and sample size. Cancer patients and a high SAPS II score were independent predictors of 30-day mortality.