Factors associated with failed 'test of cure' in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme: A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine predictive factors associated with failed 'test of cure' (TOC) in the NHS Cervical Screening Programme (NHSCSP). METHODS: Retrospective cohort study of all patients treated by large loop excision of transformation zone (LLETZ) between 1st April 2014 and 1st April 2019. Those with no documented HPV genotype on referral, no TOC outcome, those having a hysterectomy, chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy were excluded from final analysis. RESULTS: Patients referred with a singular HPV genotype of HPV 16, HPV 18, or HPV Other types (HPV O) were significantly more likely to pass TOC than those referred with multiple HPV genotypes (p < 0.0001). Those with HPV genotypes including HPV O were significantly more likely to fail TOC as compared to those with genotypes of solely HPV 16 and/or 18 (p < 0.0001). Patients aged ≥51 years were significantly more likely to fail TOC when compared to all other age groups (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Age >51 yrs. and infection with multiple hr-HPV types were predictors of post treatment hr-HPV persistence. Knowledge of HPV genotype both at referral, and following treatment, could allow a more individualised, and patient-centred, approach to both the management and follow up of CIN. HPV genotype should be reported as standard on all cervical screening sample results. The term HPV O should not be utilised and instead actual HPV genotype should be reported. This would enable us to optimise not only future research but would also allow future monitoring of the efficacy of vaccination programmes.

Clinical indications referrals - what is the risk of premalignant and malignant female genital tract disease in women referred to a dedicated nurse-led colposcopy service? A retrospective cohort study.

Post-coital bleeding (PCB) is a poor predictive factor for cancer and should not be managed as urgent referral. Urgent referral to colposcopy is justified however, in the presence of a visible suspicion of cervical cancer. This retrospective cohort study of women attending a clinical indications referral service aims to identify the risk of pre-malignant and malignant disease in women with clinical indication referrals to colposcopy. Thirty-seven of 3521 women (1%) were diagnosed with pre-malignant cervical or endometrial disease; 14 women (0.4%) were diagnosed with cancer (11 cervix, three endometrial). To detect one cancer in women referred with an abnormal cervix, one would need to see 70 women; to detect one cancer in women referred with PCB one would need to see 790 women. Improved education in primary care and obstetrics and gynaecology training is key to improving clinical indications referral services, which is otherwise an effective and efficient service.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Post-coital bleeding is a poor predictive factor for cancer and should not be considered an urgent referral.What do the results of this study add? The presence of a visible suspicion of cervical cancer however does warrant urgent referral as approximately one in 70 women will have a malignancy detected.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Improved education in primary care and obstetrics and gynaecology training is the key to improving clinical indications referral services.

Are we managing our patients correctly following treatment for cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia? A review of practice at the Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit.

OBJECTIVE: Women diagnosed with cervical glandular intraepithelial neoplasia (CGIN) remain at risk of further pre-malignant and malignant disease and require rigorous post-treatment follow-up. We assess the effectiveness and safety of community cervical sampling follow-up in women treated for CGIN. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted of women diagnosed with CGIN between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2019, at Jessop Wing Colposcopy Unit, Sheffield, UK. RESULTS: Of 140 women diagnosed with CGIN, 76 had co-existing cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN). Cytologists were significantly more likely to report glandular neoplasia in the absence of co-existing CIN, and high-grade dyskaryosis in its presence (Ps < 0.0001). Co-existing CIN was significantly more likely to be present with high or low-grade compared to normal colposcopy findings (P < 0.0001). The 6-month test of cure (TOC) was attended by 67% of women (84% within 12 months), and the 18-month post-treatment sampling by 52.5% of women (70% within 24 months). Colposcopy recalled 96% of women correctly for the 18-month sampling, but 20% of women undertaking primary care samples were incorrectly recalled at 3 years instead. CONCLUSIONS: When CGIN is diagnosed, two dates for recall should be provided at 6 and 18 months post-treatment to the Cervical Screening Administration Service and the centralised screening laboratory ensuring the 18-month post-treatment sample is correctly appointed, preventing women with HPV-negative TOC samples being returned to 3-year recall. Follow-up of CGIN should be closely audited by the centralised laboratories ensuring women with CGIN are not put at additional risk.

Influence of high risk HPV genotype on colposcopic performance: A large prospective study demonstrates improved detection of disease with ZedScan I, particularly in non-HPV 16 patients.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of high-risk Human Papilloma Virus (hrHPV) genotyping on the detection of high-grade disease (CIN2+) using colposcopic impression both with and without electrical impedance spectroscopy (ZedScan I) as an adjunct. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort of women with a known hrHPV genotype referred to a single colposcopy service. RESULTS: 839 women underwent colposcopy and ZedScan I examination. 613 women were referred with abnormal cytology; 411 (67%) with low-grade dyskaryosis (67%) and 202 (33%) with high-grade dyskaryosis. 187 were referred with persistent hrHPV but negative cytology. 35 were attended for follow up and 4 for a clinical indication. 159 (19%) women were positive for HPV16 only; 54 (6%) with HPV18 only, 443 (53%) women were positive for hrHPV other types (HPV O). 183 (22%) were positive for multiple hrHPV genotypes. CIN2+ was present in 170 (84.2%) of high-grade and 69 (16.7%) of low-grade cytology referrals. Colposcopy was better at detecting HPV16 associated CIN2+ than that associated with HPV18 or HPV O (86.9% vs 79.7%, p=0.0191). ZedScan I increased the detection of CIN2+ from 85.6% to 96% irrespective of hrHPV genotype status (p<0.0001). CONCLUSION: The use of an electrical impedance spectroscopic device (ZedScan I) increases detection of CIN2+ irrespective of hrHPV genotype.