RESUMO
Magnetic resonance cholangiography (MRC) is an established diagnostic tool for noninvasive assessment of the biliary tract in humans. It has also been found to be feasible in companion animals, but no published studies have compared MRC sequences in veterinary medicine. The present study is part of a prospective, observational, analytical investigation on MR cholangiopancreatography performed on the donated bodies of 12 cats and eight dogs. The main aim of this study was to compare the images of 2D-SSh-TSE-MRC and 3D-TSE-MRC sequences for visualization and image quality of the feline and canine biliary tract. Both sequences are T2-weighted and noncontrast. Three independent readers scored the visibility of four segments of the biliary tract, namely the gallbladder (GB), cystic duct, common bile duct (CBD), and extrahepatic ducts, and the image quality of the two MRC sequences using five-point Likert scales. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to compare the scores between the MRC sequences separately for cats and dogs. Inter- and intraobserver agreements were measured using Gwet's AC2 with linear weighting. The 3D-TSE-MRC images were scored significantly higher than the 2D-SSh-TSE-MRC for both visibility and image quality (P < .001-.016 for cats, P = .008-.031 for dogs); the only exception was GB in dogs. In both cats and dogs, interobserver agreement for segment visibility and image quality ranged from slight to substantial in 2D-SSh-TSE-MRC and from poor to almost perfect in 3D-TSE-MRC. Most of the assessments (73% for segment visibility and 66% for image quality) had substantial to almost perfect intraobserver agreement. Findings from the current study support the use of 3D-TSE-MRC over 2D-SSh-TSE-MRC for evaluation of the feline and canine biliary tract, but further studies on live animals are warranted.
RESUMO
PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab when added to radiochemotherapy for unresectable esophageal cancer. METHODS: This randomized phase 2 trial (clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01787006) compared radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab (arm A) to radiochemotherapy (arm B) for unresectable esophageal cancer. Primary objective was 2year overall survival (OS). Arm A was considered insufficiently active if 2year OS was ≤40% (null hypothesisâ¯= H0), and promising if the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval was >45%. If that lower limit was >40%, H0 was rejected. Secondary objectives included progression-free survival (PFS), locoregional control (LC), metastases-free survival (MFS), response, and toxicity. The study was terminated early after 74 patients; 68 patients were evaluable. RESULTS: Two-year OS was 71% in arm A (95% CI: 55-87%) vs. 53% in arm B (95% CI: 36-71%); H0 was rejected. Median OS was 49.1 vs. 24.1 months (pâ¯= 0.147). Hazard ratio (HR) for death was 0.60 (95% CI: 0.30-1.21). At 2 years, PFS was 56% vs. 44%, LC 84% vs. 72%, and MFS 74% vs. 54%. HRs were 0.51 (0.25-1.04) for progression, 0.43 (0.13-1.40) for locoregional failure, and 0.43 (0.17-1.05) for distant metastasis. Overall response was 81% vs. 69% (pâ¯= 0.262). Twenty-six and 27 patients, respectively, experienced at least one toxicity grade ≥3 (pâ¯= 0.573). A significant difference was found for grade ≥3 allergic reactions (12.5% vs. 0%, pâ¯= 0.044). CONCLUSION: Given the limitations of this trial, radiochemotherapy plus cetuximab was feasible. There was a trend towards improved PFS and MFS. Larger studies are required to better define the role of cetuximab for unresectable esophageal cancer.