Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Kidney J ; 15(6): 1152-1159, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35664271

RESUMO

Background: Cancer risk is increased by 2- to 4-fold in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) compared with the general population. Little attention, however, has been given to KTRs with ultra long-term survival >20 years. Methods: We studied 293 of 1241 KTRs (23.6%), transplanted between 1981 and 1999, who showed kidney allograft survival >20 years. These long-term survivors were analysed for cancer development, cancer type, cancer-associated risk factors and patient and allograft outcomes. Results: By 10, 20 and 30 years post-transplantation, these long-term KTRs showed a cancer rate of 4.4%, 14.6% and 33.2%, and a non-melanoma skin cancer (NMSC) rate of 10.3%, 33.5% and 76.8%, respectively. By recipients' ages of 40, 60 and 80 years, KTRs showed a cancer rate of 3.4%, 14.5% 55.2%, and a NMSC rate of 1.7%, 31.6% and 85.2%, respectively. By 30 years post-transplantation, post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD) showed the highest incidence of 8.5%, followed by renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with 5.1%. Risk factors associated with the development of cancer were only recipient age (P = 0.016). Smoking history was associated with the risk of lung cancer (P = 0.018). Risk factors related to the development of NMSC included recipient age (P = 0.001) and thiazide diuretics (P = 0.001). Cancer increased the risk of death by 2.4-fold (P = 0.002), and PTLD increased the risk of kidney allograft loss by 6.5-fold (P = 0.001). No differences were observed concerning the development of donor-specific antibodies (P > 0.05). Conclusions: In long-term KTRs, cancer is a leading cause of death. PTLD remains the most common cancer type followed by RCC. These results emphasize the need for focused long-term cancer surveillance protocols.

2.
Clin Infect Dis ; 75(1): e585-e593, 2022 08 24.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35234868

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: BNT162b2 by Pfizer-BioNTech and mRNA-1273 by Moderna are the most commonly used vaccines to prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infections. Head-to-head comparison of the efficacy of these vaccines in immunocompromised patients is lacking. METHODS: Parallel, 2-arm (allocation 1:1), open-label, noninferiority randomized clinical trial nested into the Swiss HIV Cohort Study and the Swiss Transplant Cohort Study. People living with human immunodeficiency virus (PLWH) or solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR; ie, lung and kidney) from these cohorts were randomized to mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2. The primary endpoint was antibody response to SARS-CoV-2 spike (S1) protein receptor binding domain (Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay, Roche; cutoff ≥0.8 units/mL) 12 weeks after first vaccination (ie, 8 weeks after second vaccination). In addition, antibody response was measured with the Antibody Coronavirus Assay 2 (ABCORA 2). RESULTS: A total of 430 patients were randomized and 412 were included in the intention-to-treat analysis (341 PLWH and 71 SOTR). The percentage of patients showing an immune response was 92.1% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 88.4-95.8; 186/202) for mRNA-1273 and 94.3% (95% CI: 91.2-97.4; 198/210) for BNT162b2 (difference: -2.2%; 95% CI: -7.1 to 2.7), fulfilling noninferiority of mRNA-1273. With the ABCORA 2 test, 89.1% had an immune response to mRNA-1273 (95% CI: 84.8-93.4; 180/202) and 89.5% to BNT162b2 (95% CI: 85.4-93.7; 188/210). Based on the Elecsys test, all PLWH had an antibody response (100.0%; 341/341), whereas for SOTR, only 60.6% (95% CI: 49.2-71.9; 43/71) had titers above the cutoff level. CONCLUSIONS: In immunocompromised patients, the antibody response of mRNA-1273 was noninferior to BNT162b2. PLWH had in general an antibody response, whereas a high proportion of SOTR had no antibody response.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Vacinas Virais , Vacina de mRNA-1273 contra 2019-nCoV , Anticorpos Antivirais , Vacina BNT162 , COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido , SARS-CoV-2 , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/genética , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/metabolismo
3.
Clin Transplant ; 35(11): e14401, 2021 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34181768

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Letermovir (LTV) might be an alternative treatment to nephrotoxic foscarnet (FOS) in Ganciclovir (GCV) resistant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection. However, its efficacy in controlling active CMV viremia is unclear, as it is only approved for CMV prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation. METHODS: This case series describes 14 kidney transplant recipients (KTR) with moderate-level GCV resistant CMV infection, treated by different step-down strategies after initial FOS therapy: (1) Observation without antiviral follow-up or switch to valganciclovir (VGCV) (pre-LTV era), and (2) Switch to LTV±VGCV (LTV era). RESULTS: One patient died under FOS. Thirteen patients were followed under step-down regimens. All but two patients had ongoing CMV viremia when stopping FOS. In pre-LTV era, 5/9 (56%) experienced a CMV breakthrough > 10 000 IU/ml calling for another course of FOS, as compared to 1/4 (25%) in the LTV era. Addition of VGCV to LTV at low-level viral breakthrough, addressing a possible developing resistance against LTV, prevented viral surge in two patients. In the pre-LTV era, CMV-related death or graft loss occurred in three of nine (33%), compared to no death or graft loss in the LTV era. CONCLUSION: A step-down strategy combining LTV+VGCV, might allow to safely stop FOS at ongoing low-level viremia.


Assuntos
Infecções por Citomegalovirus , Transplante de Rim , Acetatos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Citomegalovirus , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/etiologia , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/prevenção & controle , Foscarnet/uso terapêutico , Ganciclovir/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Transplante de Rim/efeitos adversos , Quinazolinas , Transplantados , Valganciclovir/uso terapêutico
4.
J Clin Virol ; 24(1-2): 45-56, 2002 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11744428

RESUMO

The humoral immune response against human cytomegalovirus (HCMV) was evaluated in immunocompromised patients by Western blotting (WB) based on recombinant viral envelope (gB and gH) and tegument (pp150 and pp65) proteins. Three groups of patients were investigated: (a) 74 renal transplant recipients; (b) 24 hemodialysis patients, both groups without clinical evidence of viral infections; and (c) 19 renal transplant patients with manifest HCMV infections. The results obtained suggest that (i) the WB is considerably more sensitive, recognizing the HCMV-specific IgM response rather than the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays. An IgM response was detected in one-third of all clinically asymptomatic renal patients. (ii) The virus-specific IgM response is primarily directed against the pp150 epitope. (iii) In patients with clinically manifest HCMV disease, additional IgM reactivities are most frequently directed against the glycoprotein B epitope. (iv) The severity of HCMV infections correlates with the extent of the IgM antibody response, i.e. with the number of specific epitopes involved. (v) After transplantation, IgM reactivity and its epitope-specific pattern persist for years.


Assuntos
Anticorpos Antivirais/sangue , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/imunologia , Citomegalovirus/imunologia , Hospedeiro Imunocomprometido/imunologia , Imunoglobulina M/sangue , Transplante de Rim , Western Blotting , Infecções por Citomegalovirus/sangue , Epitopos/imunologia , Humanos , Fosfoproteínas/imunologia , Proteínas Recombinantes/imunologia , Diálise Renal , Proteínas do Envelope Viral/imunologia , Proteínas da Matriz Viral/imunologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA