Comparison of binocular visual quality in six treatment protocols for bilateral cataract surgery with presbyopia correction: a prospective two-center single-blinded cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the postoperative binocular visual quality in six treatment protocols for bilateral age-related cataract surgery with presbyopia correction for clinical decisions. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this prospective two-center single-blinded cohort study, participants from North or South China who underwent bilateral phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation were divided into six protocols: monovision, diffractive bifocal, mixed, refractive bifocal, trifocal, and micro-monovision extended range of vision (EROV). Binocular visual quality was evaluated at 3 months postoperatively, including binocular uncorrected full-range visual acuity, binocular defocus curves (depth of focus [DoF] and area under the curve [AUC]), binocular visual function (fusion function and stereopsis), binocular subjective spectacle independence rates, visual analog scale (VAS) of overall satisfaction, 25-item visual function questionnaire (VFQ-25), and binocular dysphotopsia symptoms. RESULTS: Of the 300 enrolled patients, 272 (90.7%; 544 eyes) were analyzed. The trifocal protocol showed excellent binocular full-range visual acuity and the best performance for most DoFs and AUCs. The monovision protocol presented the worst binocular visual quality in most perspectives, especially in convergence, distance, and near stereopsis (p < 0.001). The full-range subjective spectacle independence rates were sorted from highest to lowest as follows: trifocal (84.8%), refractive bifocal (80.9%), EROV (80.0%), mixed (73.3%), diffractive bifocal (65.2%), and monovision (32.6%) protocols, with no statistically significant differences between the former five protocols (p > 0.05). The EROV protocol achieved the highest VAS and VFQ-25 scores. The incidence of postoperative binocular dysphotopsia symptoms was comparable in all protocols. CONCLUSIONS: The trifocal protocol showed the best performance, and the monovision protocol presented the worst performance in most perspectives of binocular visual quality for presbyopia correction. The refractive bifocal, mixed, or EROV protocols can provide an approximate performance as a trifocal protocol. Ophthalmologists can customize therapies using different protocols.

Tear Inflammatory Cytokines Analysis and Clinical Correlations in Diabetes and Nondiabetes With Dry Eye.

PURPOSE: To enhance the understanding of dry eye (DE) in diabetes by evaluating the ocular surface characteristics and the levels of tear inflammatory cytokines. DESIGN: Cross-sectional study. METHODS: Subjects were divided into 4 groups: 32 patients in the diabetes with DE group; 24 patients in the diabetes without DE group; 28 patients in the nondiabetes with DE group; and 29 volunteers in the normal group. Ocular surface disease index (OSDI) was self-answered and ocular surface characteristics including tear film break-up time (BUT), Schirmer I test, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and corneal sensitivity were evaluated. Concentrations of epidermal growth factor (EGF), IL-17A, IL-1ß, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) were measured by mutiplex bead analysis. Spearman correlations between cytokines and ocular surface parameters were calculated. RESULTS: The level of EGF in tears significantly increased in the diabetes with DE group and positively correlated with the CFS and negatively correlated with the Schirmer I test in this group (P < .05). No differences were found in the levels of IL-17A, IL-1ß, and TNF-α in the diabetes with DE and diabetes without DE groups compared to the normal group (P > .05). The nondiabetes with DE group showed increased levels of IL-17A, IL-1ß, and TNF-α in tears compared to the normal group and the levels of IL-1ß and TNF-α in tears positively correlated with CFS (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that levels of EGF in tears have potential to be the diagnostic biomarker of DE in diabetes. No differences of IL-17A, IL-1ß, and TNF-α in tears were found between the diabetes with DE and normal group, suggesting different pathogenesis of diabetes DE vs nondiabetes DE.

Keratometric measurements and IOL calculations in pseudophakic post-DSAEK patients.

BACKGROUND: To compare different K readings in pseudophakic patients post-Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and evaluate corresponding prediction errors in intraocular lens (IOL) power calculations. METHODS: Subjects that underwent cataract surgery and DSAEK surgery at least 3 and 6 months prior, respectively, and IOL implantation in the capsular bag were included in this study. Manifest refraction and IOL information were recorded. A Scheimpflug keratometer (Pentacam) was used for corneal measurements, including the mean anterior and posterior radii of curvature, simulated keratometer (SimK), true net power (TNP), and equivalent K reading (EKR) at the 4.0-mm zone. Conventional keratometry was acquired using the IOLMaster (KMaster). The four K measurements were evaluated for calculating the predicted refraction. RESULTS: The study included 20 eyes from 19 subjects. The ratio of the posterior to the anterior corneal radius was 74.1 ± 3.24%. Comparison of the four keratometric methods (KMaster, SimK, EKR, and TNP) revealed statistically significant differences among all the methods besides KMaster and SimK. Of the four IOL calculation methods(KMaster, SimK, EKR and TNP method),the arithmetic prediction error of the KMaster, SimK, and EKR methods featured nonsignificant differences from zero(p = 0.07, 0.19 and 0.84 respectively); the EKR method calculated the highest percentage of eyes with IOLs within the prediction error. CONCLUSIONS: IOL calculations in post-DSAEK eyes using KMaster, SimK, and EKR can yield small refractive errors after surgery. The EKR (4.0-mm diameter) method was found to be the most accurate.