Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Cancer Lett ; 585: 216640, 2024 Mar 31.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38290659

RESUMO

Gemcitabine, a pivotal chemotherapeutic agent for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), frequently encounters drug resistance, posing a significant clinical challenge with implications for PDAC patient prognosis. In this study, employing an integrated approach involving bioinformatic analyses from multiple databases, we unveil CSNK2A1 as a key regulatory factor. The patient-derived xenograft (PDX) model further substantiates the critical role of CSNK2A1 in gemcitabine resistance within the context of PDAC. Additionally, targeted silencing of CSNK2A1 expression significantly enhances sensitivity of PDAC cells to gemcitabine treatment. Mechanistically, CSNK2A1's transcriptional regulation is mediated by H3K27 acetylation in PDAC. Moreover, we identify CSNK2A1 as a pivotal activator of autophagy, and enhanced autophagy drives gemcitabine resistance. Silmitasertib, an established CSNK2A1 inhibitor, can effectively inhibit autophagy. Notably, the combinatorial treatment of Silmitasertib with gemcitabine demonstrates remarkable efficacy in treating PDAC. In summary, our study reveals CSNK2A1 as a potent predictive factor for gemcitabine resistance in PDAC. Moreover, targeted CSNK2A1 inhibition by Silmitasertib represents a promising therapeutic strategy to restore gemcitabine sensitivity in PDAC, offering hope for improved clinical outcomes.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Gencitabina , Desoxicitidina/farmacologia , Desoxicitidina/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/tratamento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/genética , Carcinoma Ductal Pancreático/metabolismo , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/genética , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/metabolismo , Autofagia , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Resistencia a Medicamentos Antineoplásicos/genética
2.
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int ; 22(2): 147-153, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36690522

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Open pancreaticoduodenectomy (OPD) with portal or superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction has been applied in pancreatic cancer patients with tumor infiltration or adherence. However, it is controversial whether laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy (LPD) with major vascular resection and reconstruction is feasible. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LPD with major vascular resection compared with OPD with major vascular resection. METHODS: We reviewed data for all pancreatic cancer patients undergoing LPD or OPD with vascular resection at Department of Pancreatic Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, between February 2018 and May 2022. We compared the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative clinicopathological data of the two groups to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of LPD with major vascular resection. RESULTS: A total of 63 patients underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) with portal or superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction, including 25 LPDs and 38 OPDs. The LPD group had less intraoperative blood loss (200 vs. 400 mL, P < 0.001), lower proportion of intraoperative blood transfusion (16.0% vs. 39.5%, P = 0.047), longer operation time (390 vs. 334 min, P = 0.004) and shorter postoperative hospital stay (11 vs. 14 days, P = 0.005). There was no perioperative death in all patients. There was no significant difference in the incidence of total postoperative complications, grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula, delayed gastric emptying and abdominal infection between the two groups. No postpancreatectomy hemorrhage nor bile leakage occurred during perioperative period. There was no significant difference in R0 resection rate and number of lymph nodes harvested between the two groups. Patency of reconstructed vessels in the two groups were 96.0% and 92.1%, respectively (P = 0.927). CONCLUSIONS: LPD with portal or superior mesenteric vein resection and reconstruction was safe, feasible and oncologically acceptable for selected patients with pancreatic cancer, and it can achieve similar or even better perioperative results compared to open approach.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia , Neoplasias Pancreáticas , Humanos , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/efeitos adversos , Pancreaticoduodenectomia/métodos , Veias Mesentéricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Veias Mesentéricas/cirurgia , Veias Mesentéricas/patologia , China , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/patologia , Veia Porta/cirurgia , Veia Porta/patologia , Laparoscopia/efeitos adversos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas
3.
World J Gastrointest Surg ; 14(5): 482-493, 2022 May 27.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35734624

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The life-threatening complications following pancreatoduodenectomy (PD), intra-abdominal hemorrhage, and postoperative infection, are associated with leaks from the anastomosis of pancreaticoduodenectomy. Although several methods have attempted to reduce the postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) rate after PD, few have been considered effective. The safety and short-term clinical benefits of omental interposition remain controversial. AIM: To investigate the safety and feasibility of omental interposition to reduce the POPF rate and related complications in pancreaticoduodenectomy. METHODS: In total, 196 consecutive patients underwent PD performed by the same surgical team. The patients were divided into two groups: An omental interposition group (127, 64.8%) and a non-omental interposition group (69, 35.2%). Propensity score-matched (PSM) analyses were performed to compare the severe complication rates and mortality between the two groups. RESULTS: Following PSM, the clinically relevant POPF (CR-POPF, 10.1% vs 24.6%; P = 0.025) and delayed postpancreatectomy hemorrhage (1.4% vs 11.6%; P = 0.016) rates were significantly lower in the omental interposition group. The omental interposition technique was associated with a shorter time to resume food intake (7 d vs 8 d; P = 0.048) and shorter hospitalization period (16 d vs 21 d; P = 0.031). Multivariate analyses showed that a high body mass index, nonapplication of omental interposition, and a main pancreatic duct diameter < 3 mm were independent risk factors for CR-POPF. CONCLUSION: The application of omental interposition is an effective and safe approach to reduce the CR-POPF rate and related complications after PD.

4.
Org Lett ; 24(1): 240-244, 2022 01 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34958223

RESUMO

Unnatural α-amino acids are important synthetic targets in the field of peptide science. Herein we report an efficient, versatile, and straightforward strategy for the synthesis of homophenylalanine derivatives via the nickel-catalyzed Csp3-Csp3 cross-coupling of (fluoro)benzyl bromides/chlorides with natural α-amino-acid-derived alkylzinc reagents. The current protocol features the advantages of a low-cost nickel catalyst system, synthetic convenience, and the tolerance of rich functionality and stereochemistry.


Assuntos
Níquel
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA