Improved blood pressure control with nifedipine GITS/valsartan combination versus high-dose valsartan monotherapy in mild-to-moderate hypertensive patients from Asia: results from the ADVISE study, a randomized trial.

AIMS: ADVISE was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, prospective, open-label, parallel-group study comparing combination therapy of nifedipine GITS 30 mg plus valsartan 80 mg (N + V) with high-dose valsartan (160 mg) monotherapy (V160) in Asian patients with hypertension. METHODS: Patients with hypertension inadequately controlled with valsartan 80 mg for at least 4 weeks were randomized. The coprimary endpoints were the mean changes in clinic systolic and diastolic blood pressures (SBP and DBP, respectively) at Week 12. Other endpoints included blood pressure (BP) control rate, response rate, and adverse events. RESULTS: The full analysis set (FAS) comprised 359 patients. Least squares (LS) mean changes in SBP were -18.3 mmHg (N + V; n = 177) and -16.5 mmHg (V160; n = 182) (difference: -1.9 mmHg; P = 0.0998). DBP LS mean changes were -9.8 mmHg (N + V) and -7.4 mmHg (V160) (difference: -2.4 mmHg; P = 0.0011). BP control rates were significantly higher in the N + V group (Week 4: 51.2% vs. 38.4%, P = 0.0138; Week 8: 68.3% vs. 50.3%, P = 0.0004; and Week 12: 71.2% vs. 55.5%, P = 0.0024). Similar findings were observed when patients were stratified according to smoking status, SBP baseline quartiles, and ESC/ESH guideline-defined added-risk category. The BP response rate was also higher in the N + V group compared with the V160 group. Rates of adverse drug reactions (all mild-to-moderate) were similar: 4.5% (N + V) and 4.4% (V160). CONCLUSIONS: Although one of the coprimary endpoints did not reach statistical significance, combination treatment with N + V provided a greater early and more consistent BP-lowering effect than monotherapy with V160, including superior reduction in DBP and BP control rates.

The catecholamine-beta-adrenoreceptor-cAMP system and prediction of cardiovascular events in hypertension.

Although the importance of elevated circulating plasma catecholamines on cardiac structural and functional remodelling of hypertension is well documented, it is unclear whether the catecholamine-beta-adrenoreceptor (beta AR)-cAMP system can predict different cardiovascular events. 2. A total of 601 identified hypertensive patients with baseline and follow-up plasma levels of noradrenaline (NA) and adrenaline (Adr), lymphocyte beta AR density (B(max)) and intra-lymphocyte cAMP levels in peripheral blood (last examination 60+/-26 months apart) were followed up for an additional 24+/-12 months. 3. After the last follow up, a composite end-point of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke occurred in 139 patients (23.1%). In Cox analyses, adjusting for other standard factors as well as treatment effect, NA (hazard ratio 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.17-1.28; P=0.0008), Adr (hazard ratio 1.53; 95% CI 1.18-2.00; P=0.002), beta AR (hazard ratio 1.12; 95% CI 1.06-1.17; P=0.007) and cAMP (hazard ratio 1.15; 95% CI 1.09-1.21; P=0.005) separately predicted cardiovascular mortality. Noradrenaline, Adr, beta AR and intra-lymphocyte cAMP separately predicted fatal/non-fatal MI; NA and Adr predicted fatal/non-fatal stroke, whereas B(max) and intra-lymphocyte cAMP levels were not a significant predictor of fatal/non-fatal stroke. When stratifying the study population by NA or Adr (median 4 nmol/L), B(max) (median 600 fmol/10(7) cells) and cAMP (median 5.0 pmol/mg protein) above and below the median values in both parameters categories, patients above the median had composite cardiovascular end-point (all P<0.001) and high cardiovascular death (all P<0.01, log-rank test). 4. These results suggest that plasma NA and Adr are significant predictors of cardiovascular mortality, MI and stroke. The B(max) and intra-lymphocyte cAMP levels are significant predictors of cardiovascular mortality and MI, but not stroke.