Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Radiographics ; 31(1): 135-60, 2011.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21257939

RESUMO

Regional lymph node involvement in urogenital malignancies (category N in the TNM classification system) is a significant radiologic finding, with important implications for treatment and prognosis. Male urogenital pelvic cancers commonly spread to iliopelvic or retroperitoneal lymph nodes by following pathways of normal lymphatic drainage from the pelvic organs. The most likely pathway of nodal spread (superficial inguinal, pelvic, or paraaortic) depends on the tumor location in the prostate, penis, testis, or bladder and whether surgery or other therapy has disrupted normal lymphatic drainage from the tumor site; knowledge of both factors is needed for accurate disease staging. At present, lymph node status is most often assessed with standard anatomic imaging techniques such as multidetector computed tomography or magnetic resonance (MR) imaging. However, the detection of nodal disease with these techniques is reliant on lymph node size and morphologic characteristics, criteria that provide limited diagnostic specificity. Functional imaging techniques, such as diffusion-weighted MR imaging performed with or without a lymphotropic contrast agent and positron emission tomography, may allow a more accurate nodal assessment based on molecular or physiologic activity.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Urogenitais/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Urogenitais/patologia , Virilha , Humanos , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Linfonodos/patologia , Metástase Linfática , Imageamento por Ressonância Magnética , Masculino , Pelve , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA