Functional alignment in total knee arthroplasty best achieves balanced gaps and minimal bone resections: an analysis comparing mechanical, kinematic and functional alignment strategies.

PURPOSE: Key concepts in total knee arthroplasty include restoration of limb alignment and soft-tissue balance. Although differences in balance have been reported amongst mechanical alignment (MA), kinematic alignment (KA) and functional alignment (FA) techniques, it remains unclear whether there are differences in gap imbalance or resection thicknesses when comparing different constitutional alignment subgroups. METHODS: MA (measured resection technique), KA (matched resections technique) and FA (technique based on the restricted KA boundaries) were compared in 116 consecutive patients undergoing 137 robotic-assisted cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasties. The primary outcome was the proportion of balanced gaps (differential laxities ≤ 2 mm) for extension, flexion, medial and lateral gap measurements. Manual pre-resection laxity measurements were obtained for MA and KA and manual post-resection measurements were obtained for FA in 10° and in 90° of knee flexion. Secondary outcomes were resection depths and implant alignment. All outcomes were analysed per constitutional coronal alignment and joint line obliquity subgroups. RESULTS: The proportions of balance in all four gap measurements were 54.7%, 66.4% and 96.5%, with MA, KA and FA, respectively. Across all constitutional alignment types, FA achieved the highest proportion of balance. MA resected the least amount of bone from the medial tibial plateau. KA had femoral components in most valgus and most internally rotated, tibial components in most varus and was the most bone-preserving for the posteromedial femoral condyle. FA had the most externally rotated femoral components and was most bone-preserving for the distal femoral resections. CONCLUSION: The study shows that implant alignment to the mechanical axis or joint line anatomy (equal resections) alone does not guarantee a balanced total knee arthroplasty. FA resulted in the highest proportion of balanced knees across all analysed subgroups. Future research will consider whether one alignment philosophy leads to superior outcomes for different constitutional alignment subgroups. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Long leg radiographs underestimate the degree of constitutional varus limb alignment and joint line obliquity in comparison with computed tomography: a radiographic study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to understand if differences exist between computed tomography (CT) and long leg radiographs (LLR) when defining coronal plane alignment of the lower limb in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It aimed to identify any such differences between the two imaging modalities by quantifying constitutional limb alignment (arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA), joint line obliquity (JLO) and Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) type within the same population. METHODS: A retrospective radiographic study compared pre-operative LLR and CT measurements in patients undergoing robotic-assisted TKA. The aHKA, JLO and CPAK types were calculated after measuring the medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) and lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA). The primary outcomes were the mean differences in aHKA (MPTA-LDFA), JLO (MPTA + LDFA) and proportions of CPAK types between LLR and CT groups. The secondary outcomes were the differences in CT-derived MPTA values based on four different tibial sagittal landmarks. RESULTS: After exclusions, 465 imaging sets were analysed in 394 patients. There was a statistically significant mean difference between LLR and CT, respectively, for both MPTA (87.5° vs. 86.2°; p < 0.01) and LDFA (88.7° vs. 87.3°; p < 0.01). There were also statistically significant differences for aHKA (- 0.2° vs. - 1.1°) and JLO (175.1° vs. 173.4°) for LLR and CT, respectively (both p < 0.01). CT increased the proportion of patients with CPAK Type I (constitutional varus aHKA, apex distal JLO) and CPAK Type II (neutral aHKA, apex distal JLO), and decreased numbers of CPAK Types III-VI. There were significant mean differences in the MPTA using varying sagittal landmarks. CONCLUSION: Alignment determined by LLRs underestimates the magnitude of both constitutional varus alignment and joint line obliquity compared to CT, differences that notably increase the proportions of patients included in CPAK Types I and II. These distinctions are primarily due to underestimation of proximal tibial varus when measured on LLRs compared to CT, which more specifically defines articular weight-bearing points. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Effect of Aspirin vs Enoxaparin on 90-Day Mortality in Patients Undergoing Hip or Knee Arthroplasty: A Secondary Analysis of the CRISTAL Cluster Randomized Trial.

Importance: Ischemic heart disease remains the leading cause of mortality following hip and knee arthroplasty. Due to its antiplatelet and cardioprotective properties, aspirin has been proposed as an agent that could reduce mortality when used as venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis following these procedures. Objective: To compare aspirin with enoxaparin in reducing 90-day mortality for patients undergoing hip or knee arthroplasty procedures. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a planned secondary analysis of the CRISTAL cluster randomized, crossover, registry-nested trial performed across 31 participating hospitals in Australia between April 20, 2019, and December 18, 2020. The aim of the CRISTAL trial was to determine whether aspirin was noninferior to enoxaparin in preventing symptomatic VTE following hip or knee arthroplasty. The primary study restricted the analysis to patients undergoing total hip or knee arthroplasty for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis only. This study includes all adult patients (aged ≥18 years) undergoing any hip or knee arthroplasty procedure at participating sites during the course of the trial. Data were analyzed from June 1 to September 6, 2021. Interventions: Hospitals were randomized to administer all patients oral aspirin (100 mg daily) or subcutaneous enoxaparin (40 mg daily) for 35 days after hip arthroplasty and 14 days after knee arthroplasty procedures. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was mortality within 90 days. The between-group difference in mortality was estimated using cluster summary methods. Results: A total of 23 458 patients from 31 hospitals were included, with 14 156 patients allocated to aspirin (median [IQR] age, 69 [62-77] years; 7984 [56.4%] female) and 9302 patients allocated to enoxaparin (median [IQR] age, 70 [62-77] years; 5277 [56.7%] female). The mortality rate within 90 days of surgery was 1.67% in the aspirin group and 1.53% in the enoxaparin group (estimated difference, 0.04%; 95% CI, -0.05%-0.42%). For the subgroup of 21 148 patients with a nonfracture diagnosis, the mortality rate was 0.49% in the aspirin group and 0.41% in the enoxaparin group (estimated difference, 0.05%; 95% CI, -0.67% to 0.76%). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of a cluster randomized trial comparing aspirin with enoxaparin following hip or knee arthroplasty, there was no significant between-group difference in mortality within 90 days when either drug was used for VTE prophylaxis. Trial Registration: http://anzctr.org.au Identifier: ACTRN12618001879257.

Does Choice of Patellar Implant in Total Knee Arthroplasty Matter?: A Randomized Comparative Trial of 3 Commonly Used Designs.

BACKGROUND: There is currently a lack of evidence to identify the optimal patellar implant design in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The aim of this study was to assess clinical, intraoperative, radiographic, and scintigraphic differences between inlay (IN), onlay round (OR), and onlay oval (OO) patellar implants. METHODS: A parallel-group, double-blinded, randomized trial compared IN, OR, and OO patellar implants using the same posterior-stabilized TKA prosthesis for each. Patient outcomes were prospectively followed for a minimum of 2 years, with survivorship outcomes followed for a mean of 5 years. The primary outcome was the between-group differences in the mean Kujala score change from preoperatively to 2 years postoperatively. The secondary outcomes included differences in other knee-specific and general health outcomes, intraoperative characteristics, radiographic parameters, patellar vascularity, and implant survivorship. RESULTS: A total of 121 participants (40 in the IN group, 41 in OR group, 40 in the OO group) were allocated to 1 of 3 implant designs. At 2 years postoperatively, there were no significant differences in Kujala score changes between groups (p = 0.7; Kruskal-Wallis test). Compared with the IN group, the OR group showed greater improvements in Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) Activities of Daily Living and in KOOS Quality of Life compared with the OO group. However, the OO design exhibited better bone coverage and lower lateral facetectomy rates compared with the IN and OR designs. The IN group had more lateral contact compared with the OO group (p = 0.02; Fisher exact test), but the overall value for lateral contact was not significant (p = 0.09; chi-square test). There were no differences in postoperative scintigraphic vascularity (p = 0.8; chi-square test). There was 1 revision for infection at 3 years postoperatively in the OO group, and no revision in the other groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patellar design did not influence patellofemoral outcomes or survivorship. However, OR implants showed improvements in some secondary patient-reported outcome measures, and OO implants exhibited superior bone coverage and improvements in several intraoperative, radiographic, and scintigraphic outcomes. These findings, combined with superior long-term implant survivorship from previous studies, add support for the use of onlay designs in TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle and stressed hip-knee-ankle angle: equivalent methods for estimating constitutional lower limb alignment in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty (KA TKA) relies on precise determination of constitutional alignment to set resection targets. The arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) is a radiographic method to estimate constitutional alignment following onset of arthritis. Intraoperatively, constitutional alignment may also be approximated using navigation-based angular measurements of deformity correction, termed the stressed HKA (sHKA). This study aimed to investigate the relationship between these methods of estimating constitutional alignment to better understand their utility in KA TKA. METHODS: A radiological and intraoperative computer-assisted navigation study was undertaken comparing measurements of the aHKA using radiographs and computed tomography (CT-aHKA) to the sHKA in 88 TKAs meeting the inclusion criteria. The primary outcome was the difference in the paired means between the three methods to determine constitutional alignment (aHKA, CT-aHKA, sHKA). Secondary outcomes included testing agreement across measurements using Bland-Altman plots and analysis of subgroup differences based on different patterns of compartmental arthritis. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between any paired comparison or across groups (aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.1°, p = 0.817; aHKA vs. CT-aHKA: 0.3°, p = 0.643; CT-aHKA vs. sHKA: 0.2°, p = 0.722; ANOVA, p = 0.845). Bland-Altman plots were consistent with good agreement for all comparisons, with approximately 95% of values within limits of agreement. There was no difference in the three paired comparisons (aHKA, CT-aHKA, and sHKA) for knees with medial compartment arthritis. However, these findings were not replicated in knees with lateral compartment arthritis. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference between the arithmetic HKA (whether obtained using CT or radiographs) and the stressed HKA in this analysis. These findings further validate the preoperative arithmetic method and support use of the intraoperative stressed HKA as techniques to restore constitutional lower limb alignment in KA TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Robotic-assisted surgery and kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty (RASKAL study): a protocol of a national registry-nested, multicentre, 2×2 factorial randomised trial assessing clinical, intraoperative, functional, radiographic and survivorship outcomes.

INTRODUCTION: Robot-assisted surgery (RAS) and kinematic alignment (KA) are being increasingly adopted to improve patient outcomes in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is uncertainty around the individual or combined effect of these concepts compared with computer-assisted surgery (CAS) and mechanical alignment (MA), respectively. This study aims to assess the effectiveness of RAS, KA or both to improve clinical outcomes, functional measures, radiographic precision and prosthetic survivorship when compared with current gold standards of surgical care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A national registry-nested, multicentre, double-blinded, 2×2 factorial, randomised trial will be undertaken with 300 patients undergoing primary unilateral TKA performed by 15 surgeons. The primary outcome will be the between-group differences in postoperative change over 2 years in the mean Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12), comparing first, RAS to CAS as its control, and second, KA to MA as its control. Secondary outcomes will include other knee-specific and general health patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), intraoperative pressure loads as a measure of soft tissue balance, 6-month postoperative functional outcomes, radiological precision using CT imaging, complications and long-term prosthetic survivorship. The contribution of each patient's unique coronal plane alignment of the knee phenotype to primary and secondary PROMs will be investigated. OMERACT-OARSI criteria and Patient Acceptable Symptom State outcome score thresholds for the KOOS-12 and Oxford Knee Score will be used in secondary analyses. Primary intention-to-treat and secondary per-protocol analyses will be performed. Statistical analysis will include a generalised linear mixed model for repeated measures for continuous KOOS-12 scores. Kaplan-Meier estimates with adjusted HRs of implant survivorship will be calculated. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained from Sydney Local Health District-Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (Approval X20-0494 and 2020/ETH02896 10.24/DEC20). Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented in national, state and international meetings. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12621000205831.

The Addition of Suture Tape to the Hamstring Graft Construct Does Not Reduce Instrumented Knee Laxity Following ACL Reconstruction.

Purpose: To establish the effect of the addition of suture tape to the hamstring graft construct through measurement of instrumented sagittal plane knee laxity at 6 months after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: A retrospective analysis was undertaken of a consecutive series of primary ACLR performed between May 2017 and June 2019. Patients with concomitant or historic contralateral knee injury were excluded. Suture tape was included in the graft construct from the midpoint of the study period (May 2018). Sagittal plane knee laxity was quantified using the KT2000 arthrometer at 6 postoperative months. Mean side-to-side differences in sagittal plane laxity between the operated and contralateral, uninjured knees were compared for grafts with and without suture tape. Additional outcomes included comparison between suture tape application techniques (graft reinforcement versus augmentation), comparison between suture tape with and without iliotibial band (ITB) tenodesis and documentation of complications necessitating further surgery. Results: A total of 169 patients were eligible for inclusion. Seventy-two grafts included suture tape and 84 patients underwent concomitant ITB tenodesis. There was no significant difference in mean laxity between grafts containing suture tape (mean difference: 1.2 mm, SD: 2.6 mm) and those without (mean difference: 1.3 mm, SD: 2.1 mm), P = .83 (CI -.92 to 1.13). Neither were there significant differences in laxity when using suture tape with concomitant ITB tenodesis (mean difference: 1.1 mm, SD: 2.1 mm), P = .75 (CI -.79 to 1.09), or when comparing techniques: graft reinforcement (mean difference .9 mm, SD 2.6 mm); graft augmentation (mean difference: 1.5 mm, SD: 2.5 mm) P = .52 (CI -2.29 to 1.16). There were no complications associated with suture tape. Conclusions: The addition of suture tape to an autologous hamstring graft construct did not reduce instrumented sagittal knee laxity in the first 6 months after ACL reconstruction. As such, the clinical relevance of its use remains unknown. Level of Evidence: Level III, retrospective cohort study.

The importance of joint line obliquity: a radiological analysis of restricted boundaries in normal knee phenotypes to inform surgical decision making in kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Restricted kinematic alignment (rKA) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore native soft tissue laxities while limiting alignment extremes that risk prosthetic failure. However, there is no consensus where restricted boundaries (RB) should be set. This study aims to determine the proportion of limbs in which constitutional alignment and joint line obliquity (JLO) would be restored with various RB scenarios, to inform decision making in rKA TKA. METHODS: The mechanical hip-knee-ankle (mHKA) angle, arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) were measured on radiographs of 500 normal knees. Incrementally wider RBs were then applied. The proportion of limbs within each increment was determined when RBs were applied only to HKA, or to HKA, LDFA and MPTA together. In addition, the proportion of limbs within published adjusted mechanical alignment (aMA) and rKA protocols were determined, as well as those within one, two and three standard deviations of the means for HKA, LDFA and MPTA. RESULTS: When restrictions to mHKA alone were applied, 74.0% and 97.8% of knees were captured with boundaries of ± 3° and ± 6° respectively. However, when the same boundaries to HKA were also applied to MPTA and LDFA, 36.2% and 91.0% of knees were captured respectively, highlighting the limiting effect that JLO has on restoration of normal knee phenotypes. When comparing previously published boundaries, aMA of 0° ± 3° captured 36.2%; rKA of 0° ± 3 for HKA and 85° to 95° for LDFA/MPTA captured 67.8%; rKA of - 5° to 4° HKA and 86°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 63%; and rKA of - 6° to + 3° for HKA and 84°-93° for LDFA/MPTA captured 85.4%. CONCLUSION: The greatest proportions of normal knee phenotypes were captured with boundaries that were centred around population means for HKA and JLO. Further, these findings demonstrate that restricting the JLO has a significant limiting influence on restoration of normal knee phenotypes beyond that of restricting HKA alone. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Mechanical alignment for primary TKA may change both knee phenotype and joint line obliquity without influencing clinical outcomes: a study comparing restored and unrestored joint line obliquity.

PURPOSE: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), knee phenotypes including joint line obliquity are of interest regarding surgical realignment strategies. The hypothesis of this study is that better clinical results, including decreased postoperative knee pain, will be observed for patients with a restored knee phenotype. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on prospective data, including 1078 primary osteoarthritic knees in 936 patients. The male:female ratio was 780:298, mean age at surgery was 71.3 years ± 8.0. International Knee Society Scores and standardized long-leg radiographs (LLR) were collected preoperatively and at 2 years follow-up after TKA. Patients were categorized using the Coronal Plane Alignment of the Knee (CPAK) classification including the lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA) and medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA) measured on LLR by a single observer, allowing knee phenotypes to be categorized considering the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle (aHKA) angle (MPTA-LDFA) as measure of constitutional alignment, and joint line obliquity (JLO) (MPTA + LDFA). Clinical results were compared between patients with surgically restored preoperative constitutional knee phenotype to patients without restored constitutional knee phenotypes. Descriptive data analysis such as means, standard deviations and ranges were performed. T tests for independent samples were performed to compare group differences. Comparisons of categorical data were performed using the χ2 test. Significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: A third of patients (33.4%) had constitutional knee varus with apex distal JLO. 63.5% of patients had preoperative apex distal JLO. Postoperatively, 57.8% of patients had a neutral HKA (- 2° to 2°) and a neutral JLO (- 3° and 3°), with only 18% of patients with restored constitutional knee phenotype. Of these patients, statistically less postoperative pain was observed in patients where apex distal JLO was restored compared to non-restored apex distal JLO (pain score 46.7 vs. 44.6; p = 0.02) without clinical relevance. Other categories of restored JLO or arithmetic HKA angle were not associated with improved outcomes. CONCLUSION: This study showed that performing mechanical alignment for primary TKA resulted in most cases in a change of the preoperative knee phenotype. These results emphasize the relevance of considering joint line obliquity to better understand preoperative knee deformity and better restore knee phenotypes with a more personalized realignment strategy to potentially improve TKA postoperative results. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

No difference in clinical outcomes between portable navigation and conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: A randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Portable accelerometer-based navigation devices (PAD) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have been proposed to combine the alignment precision of computer navigation with the efficiency of conventional instrumentation (CON). The aim of this study was to determine if PAD was more effective than CON in TKA in improving clinical outcomes at medium term follow-up. METHODS: Participants undergoing primary TKA were randomly assigned to either PAD or CON. The primary outcome was the mean between-group difference in the four subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (∆KOOS4 ) between preoperative status and latest follow-up. Secondary outcomes included analysis of between-group differences in all KOOS subscales, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (∆WOMAC) scores, complications and reoperation rates. RESULTS: Of the 178 participants allocated to a treatment arm, 159 (89.3%) completed follow-up at a mean of 4.3 years (range 3.2-5.8 years). There was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful difference in ∆KOOS4 between preoperative status and latest follow-up (PAD = 41, CON = 43; p = 0.5). There was no difference in mean ∆WOMAC scores (PAD = 39, CON = 41; p = 0.9) or ∆KOOS subscales between groups. In addition, there were no differences in complications or reoperations between groups. CONCLUSIONS: PAD was not superior to CON in improving patient-reported outcomes or reducing complications and reoperation rates at medium term follow-up. The use of PAD in TKA to improve clinical outcomes alone cannot be justified based on the results of this study.

Surgeon-defined assessment is a poor predictor of knee balance in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective, multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The accuracy of surgeon-defined assessment (SDA) of soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is poorly understood despite balance being considered a significant determinant of surgical success. The study's hypothesis was that intra-operative SDA is a poor predictor of coronal balance in TKA. METHODS: A prospective, multicenter study assessing accuracy of SDA of balance was conducted in 250 patients (285 TKAs). Eight surgeons and thirteen trainees participated, and all were blinded to sensor measurements. The primary outcome was test accuracy of SDA measured at 10°, 45° and 90° compared to sensor measures as the gold standard test. Cohen's kappa coefficient was calculated to determine chance-corrected agreement. Secondary outcomes include the relationship of SDA to level of surgical experience, analysis of between-surgeon differences, and the influence of patient and operative factors on SDA accuracy. RESULTS: Average accuracy of SDA was 58.3%, 61.2% and 66.5% at 10°, 45° and 90° respectively. Cohen's kappa coefficient was 0.18 at all angles and rated as "slight agreement". SDA sensitivities to correctly identify a balanced knee (76.2% at 10°; 82.6% at 45°; 83.2% at 90°) were approximately twice specificities to correctly identify an unbalanced knee (42.6% at 10°; 34.1% at 45°; 41.4% at 90°). Surgical experience (surgeon versus trainee) had no effect on capacity to determine balance. Considerable between-surgeon variability was found (33-65% at 10°, 41-73% at 45°, 55-89% at 90°). CONCLUSION: SDA was a poor predictor of balance, particularly when assessing the unbalanced TKA. Surgeon experience had no effect on test accuracy and considerable between-surgeon variability was recorded. These findings question the accuracy of SDA in TKA. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN# 12618000817246.

Does the Use of Intraoperative Pressure Sensors for Knee Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty Improve Clinical Outcomes? A Comparative Study With a Minimum Two-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND: It is undetermined whether using sensors for knee balancing in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) improves patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes of sensor balance (SB) with manual balance (MB) TKA with a minimum two-year follow-up. METHODS: A consecutive series of 207 MB TKAs was compared with 222 SB TKAs between April 2014 and April 2017. A single surgeon performed all surgeries, using the same prosthesis. The primary end point was the aggregated mean change in four subscales of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS4) between preoperative and two-year time points. Secondary outcomes included mean differences between groups in all five KOOS subscales, proportions of knee balancing procedures, and rates of reoperations including revisions and manipulations for stiffness. RESULTS: The mean changes in the KOOS4 aggregated means for MB TKA (42.4; standard deviation, 29.1) and SB TKA (41.5; standard deviation, 25.0) were not significantly different (mean difference, 0.9; 95% confidence interval: -2.6 to 4.4, P = .62). There were significantly more balancing procedures in the SB group (55.9% versus 16.9%; P < .01). There were no significant differences in the number of reoperations (1.4% SB versus 1.4% MB; P = .71) or manipulations for stiffness (3.7% SB versus 4.4% MB; P = .69). CONCLUSION: The use of sensors in TKA to achieve knee balance did not result in improved clinical outcomes, despite significantly increasing the number of surgical interventions required to achieve a balanced knee. Sensors did not alter the rates of revision surgery or requirements for manipulation. It remains to be determined whether precise soft-tissue balancing improves prosthetic survivorship and joint biomechanics.

Interobserver agreement of sensor-derived compartmental pressure measurements in computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Sensor-guided compartmental pressure measurements are becoming increasingly utilized in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to objectively confirm intraoperative knee balance. We aimed to determine agreement of pressure measurements between two observers when performing sensor-guided TKA with the use of computer-assisted surgery (CAS). METHODS: One-hundred and eighteen consecutive patients undergoing 130 TKAs were analysed. Femoral and tibial trial implants were inserted prior to performing knee balancing. We compared the reliability of sensor pressure compartmental measurements between two observers at 10, 45 and 90° of flexion using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) estimates and the 95% limits of agreement (Bland-Altman plots). RESULTS: The interobserver agreement between sensor pressure measurements was excellent at 10° of knee flexion, with ICCs of 0.93 and 0.91 in the medial and lateral compartments, respectively (P < 0.001). At 45°, medial and lateral compartment ICCs were 0.91 and 0.76, respectively (P < 0.001). At 90°, the ICC was 0.88 medially and 0.76 laterally (P < 0.001). Although the agreement decreased at higher knee flexion, it remained good to excellent. The 95% limits of agreement at each angle were all within 20 psi and 11 psi for the medial and lateral compartments, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: There was excellent interobserver agreement of sensor pressure measurements at 10° of knee flexion with computer-assisted TKA. Interobserver agreement decreased slightly as knee flexion angles increased, particularly in the lateral compartment. It is likely that interobserver agreement and hence reliability of sensor pressure measurements in TKA has some dependence on accurate angular positioning of the knee.

Characteristics of three different patellar implant designs in total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Despite debate over the role of patellar resurfacing in total knee arthroplasty, many surgeons feel it decreases re-operation rates and anterior pain, and an increasing number are adopting resurfacing. This study compares intra-operative characteristics of different patellar implants to assist surgeons in gaining better understanding of these implants. METHODS: The three most commonly used patellar implants (inset, onlay round and onlay oval) were allocated randomly to 120 patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty. We compared the groups in terms of implant size, bone coverage, lateral underhang (uncovered lateral facet) and need for partial lateral facetectomy. We also compared the patient-reported outcome measures between the groups at 6 months post-operatively. RESULTS: The inset, onlay round and onlay oval designs had bone coverage of 48.5%, 65.9% and 85.9%, respectively (P < 0.01). Similarly, the onlay-oval implant was found to have the smallest lateral underhang of all three designs (inset 11.6 mm; onlay round 6.9 mm, onlay oval 1.6 mm, P < 0.01). The onlay-oval design was the largest implant with a median size of 35 mm, compared to 23 mm for the inset and 32 mm for the onlay round (P < 0.01). In addition, patellae using onlay-oval implants required significantly fewer lateral facetectomies due to improved bone coverage (inset 95%; onlay round 87%; onlay oval 3%; P < 0.01). Finally, comparison of patient-reported outcome measures between the groups showed no difference at an early assessment of 6 months. CONCLUSION: Onlay-oval design allows for the use of a larger implant, improving bone coverage and reducing the need for partial lateral facetectomy; however, early assessment of outcomes shows no difference between the three designs.

Modern total knee arthroplasty designs do not reliably replicate anterior femoral morphology.

PURPOSE: Biomechanical studies suggest that PF tracking is not reliably restored to physiological values in TKA despite surgical technique optimization. A clinical observation is that current TKA designs may not replicate anterior femoral offset. The aim was to examine the intraoperative resection thicknesses of the anterior femoral condyles during TKA and correlate these findings relative to modern prostheses. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of 199 patients who underwent 233 TKAs using a single implant design with measured anterior femoral condylar resection thicknesses. The aim was to restore posterior condylar offset whilst minimizing overstuffing of the anterior compartment of the knee by choosing the smallest prosthesis to allow for the maximal anterior resection as close to the cortex without inducing notching. Prosthetic measurements from 7 commonly used TKAs were collected by analysis of 3D models of median sized explants. RESULTS: An average of 7.9 mm (SD 2.5 mm, range 2-16.5 mm) and 11.5 mm (SD 2.5 mm, range 2-21 mm) was resected from the medial and lateral aspects of the anterior femur, respectively. The average anterior flange thickness for the prosthesis data set was 6.6 mm (SD 0.6 mm, range 6.1-7.9 mm) medially and 7.6 mm (SD 0.7 mm, range 6.8-9.0 mm) laterally. Comparison across patients who received the median prosthesis size of 5 (SD 1.3, range 2-8) was inadequately restored by 1.4 mm (p < 0.00001) medially and 3.4 mm (p < 0.00001) laterally. CONCLUSION: Host anatomy is not routinely restored during TKA. The surgical teaching to aim for an anterior femoral osteotomy close to the anterior cortex will result in understuffing of the PFJ and based on current prosthesis designs, the risk of overstuffing is not as significant as once believed. Future prostheses and surgical techniques should aim to restore not only posterior femoral but also anterior femoral offset. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, Case series.

Soft tissue balancing in total knee arthroplasty using sensor-guided assessment: is there a learning curve?

BACKGROUND: Sensor-guided assessment for soft tissue balance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been reported to improve patient satisfaction and self-reported outcome scores. As more surgeons adopt this technology in TKA, we performed this study to identify if there is a learning curve with its use. METHODS: Analysis of a total of 90 consecutive cases was performed in this study. Initial and final intercompartmental pressure differences were recorded before and after knee ligament balancing. The first 45 patients (group 1) were compared to the last 45 patients (group 2) in terms of operative time and the final state of knee balance. A balanced knee was defined as pressure difference between medial and lateral compartments of ≤15 pounds. RESULTS: Group 1 had 10 unbalanced knees in the final pressure difference assessment, while all cases in group 2 were balanced (P < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in mean operative time between the two groups. A scatter plot of intercompartmental pressure difference identified that after 30 cases, the capacity to achieve knee ligament balance improved. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that there is a learning curve with the use of sensor-guided assessment in TKA in achieving knee balance; however, the differences noted between initial and final groups were small and may not be of clinical significance.

A Retrospective Study Assessing Safety and Efficacy of Bipolar Radiofrequency Ablation for Knee Chondral Lesions.

OBJECTIVE: Bipolar radiofrequency (bRF) ablation is gaining popularity as a treatment modality for unstable knee chondral lesions of the knee. Limited reports of osteonecrosis and chondrolysis have been published; however, there is little data examining the safety of this treatment in larger series. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of bRF in the treatment of chondral lesions encountered during knee arthroscopy. DESIGN: A retrospective evaluation of adverse outcomes in patients that underwent treatment of chondral lesions using bRF was undertaken. Secondary outcome measures included change in patient reported outcome scores and its correlation to patient demographics and quality of chondral and meniscal lesions using Chondropenia Severity Score. RESULTS: Only 2.2% and 2.7% of the patients had a postoperative complication or required a reoperation, respectively. None of the complications were directly related to the use of bRF. A statistically significant difference was observed when comparing pre- and postoperative scores in all normalized categories ( P < 0.0001). No statistically significant correlation was found between change in self-reported scores and Chondropenia Severity Score. CONCLUSION: Bipolar radiofrequency ablation is a safe modality in treatment of chondral lesions.

The diameter of single bundle, hamstring autograft does not significantly influence revision rate or clinical outcomes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) graft failure is a complication of ACL reconstruction (ALCR). Smaller autograft diameter may be a contributing factor. Our aim was to determine if hamstring autograft diameter influences graft rupture and patient-reported outcome scores. METHODS: This study included 786 consecutive patients undergoing primary, single bundle, autograft hamstring ACLR. The primary outcome was revision ACLR surgery. Secondary outcomes were patient reported International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Knee Injury & Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Tegner Activity score. Multiple logistic regression and Fischer Exact tests were employed for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Increasing autograft diameter did not lead to a reduction in revision ACLR surgery (odds ratio [OR], 1.093; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.612 to 1.954; P=0.76). Revision ACLR positively correlated with male gender (OR, 3.971; 95% CI 1.109 to 14.214; P=0.03) and negatively correlated with increasing age (OR, 0.919; 95% CI 0.882-0.958, P<0.0001). There was no association between graft rupture rate and dichotomized graft size. At latest follow-up, there was no correlation between graft diameter and IKDC (Pearson's adjusted R2=0.058; P=0.75), Tegner Activity score (Pearson's adjusted R2=0.244; P=0.53), or any component of the KOOS (Pearson's adjusted R2 range: 0.008 to 0.141; P-value range: 0.21 to 0.76). CONCLUSION: Increased hamstring autograft diameter did not significantly reduce revision ACLR surgery or improve clinical outcomes. Other factors such as gender and age do influence the rate of revision ACL surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Level IV, retrospective case series.