Relationship Between Measures of Adiposity, Arterial Inflammation, and Subsequent Cardiovascular Events.

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to evaluate how different measures of adiposity are related to both arterial inflammation and the risk of subsequent cardiovascular events. METHODS AND RESULTS: We included individuals who underwent (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging for oncological evaluation. Subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) volume, visceral adipose tissue (VAT) volume, and VAT/SAT ratio were determined. Additionally, body mass index, metabolic syndrome, and aortic (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose uptake (a measure of arterial inflammation) were determined. Subsequent development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) events was adjudicated. The analysis included 415 patients with a median age of 55 (P25-P75: 45-65) and a median body mass index of 26.4 (P25-P75: 23.4-30.9) kg/m(2). VAT and SAT volume were significantly higher in obese individuals. VAT volume (r=0.290; P<0.001) and VAT/SAT ratio (r=0.208; P<0.001) were positively correlated with arterial inflammation. Thirty-two subjects experienced a CVD event during a median follow-up of 4 years. Cox proportional hazard models showed that VAT volume and VAT/SAT ratio were associated with CVD events (hazard ratio [95% confidence interval]: 1.15 [1.06-1.25]; P<0.001; 3.60 [1.88-6.92]; P<0.001, respectively). Body mass index, metabolic syndrome, and SAT were not predictive of CVD events. CONCLUSIONS: Measures of visceral fat are positively related to arterial inflammation and are independent predictors of subsequent CVD events. Individuals with higher measures of visceral fat as well as elevated arterial inflammation are at highest risk for subsequent CVD events. The findings suggest that arterial inflammation may explain some of the CVD risk associated with adiposity.

Increased arterial inflammation in individuals with stage 3 chronic kidney disease.

PURPOSE: While it is well known that patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk for the development and progression of atherosclerosis, it is not known whether arterial inflammation is increased in mild CKD. The aim of this study was to compare arterial inflammation using 18F-FDG PET/CT in patients with CKD and in matched controls. METHODS: This restrospective study included 128 patients undergoing FDG PET/CT imaging for clinical indications, comprising 64 patients with stage 3 CKD and 64 control patients matched by age, gender, and cancer history. CKD was defined according to guidelines using a calculated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). Arterial inflammation was measured in the ascending aorta as FDG uptake on PET. Background FDG uptake (venous, subcutaneous fat and muscle) were recorded. Coronary artery calcification (CAC) was assessed using the CT images. The impact of CKD on arterial inflammation and CAC was then assessed. RESULTS: Arterial inflammation was higher in patients with CKD than in matched controls (standardized uptake value, SUV: 2.41 ± 0.49 vs. 2.16 ± 0.43; p = 0.002). Arterial SUV correlated inversely with eGFR (r = -0.299, p = 0.001). Venous SUV was also significantly elevated in patients with CKD, while subcutaneous fat and muscle tissue SUVs did not differ between groups. Moreover, arterial SUV remained significantly elevated in patients with CKD compared to controls after correcting for muscle and fat background, and also remained significant after adjusting for clinical risk factors. Further, CKD was associated with arterial inflammation (SUV) independent of the presence of subclinical atherosclerosis (CAC). CONCLUSION: Moderate CKD is associated with increased arterial inflammation beyond that of controls. Further, the increased arterial inflammation is independent of presence of subclinical atherosclerosis. Current risk stratification tools may underestimate the presence of atherosclerosis in patients with CKD and thereby the risk of cardiovascular events.

Nonpharmacological lipoprotein apheresis reduces arterial inflammation in familial hypercholesterolemia.

BACKGROUND: Patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) are characterized by elevated atherogenic lipoprotein particles, predominantly low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), which is associated with accelerated atherogenesis and increased cardiovascular risk. OBJECTIVES: This study used (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)FDG-PET) to investigate whether arterial inflammation is higher in patients with FH and, moreover, whether lipoprotein apheresis attenuates arterial wall inflammation in FH patients. METHODS: In total, 38 subjects were recruited: 24 FH patients and 14 normolipidemic controls. All subjects underwent FDG-PET imaging at baseline. Twelve FH patients who met the criteria for lipoprotein apheresis underwent apheresis procedures followed by a second FDG-PET imaging 3 days (range 1 to 4 days) after apheresis. Subsequently, the target-to-background ratio (TBR) of FDG uptake within the arterial wall was assessed. RESULTS: In FH patients, the mean arterial TBR was higher compared with healthy controls (2.12 ± 0.27 vs. 1.92 ± 0.19; p = 0.03). A significant correlation was observed between baseline arterial TBR and LDL-C (R = 0.37; p = 0.03) that remained significant after adjusting for statin use (ß = 0.001; p = 0.02) and atherosclerosis risk factors (ß = 0.001; p = 0.03). LDL-C levels were significantly reduced after lipoprotein apheresis (284 ± 118 mg/dl vs. 127 ± 50 mg/dl; p < 0.001). There was a significant reduction of arterial inflammation after lipoprotein apheresis (TBR: 2.05 ± 0.31 vs. 1.91 ± 0.33; p < 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The arterial wall of FH patients is characterized by increased inflammation, which is markedly reduced after lipoprotein apheresis. This lends support to a causal role of apoprotein B-containing lipoproteins in arterial wall inflammation and supports the concept that lipoprotein-lowering therapies may impart anti-inflammatory effects by reducing atherogenic lipoproteins.

Measurement of arterial activity on routine FDG PET/CT images improves prediction of risk of future CV events.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether arterial inflammation measured by (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ((18)F-FDG-PET) improves prediction of cardiovascular disease (CVD) beyond traditional risk factors. BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether arterial (18)F-FDG uptake measured with routine PET imaging provides incremental value for predicting CVD events beyond Framingham risk score (FRS). METHODS: We consecutively identified 513 individuals from 6,088 patients who underwent (18)F-FDG-PET and computed tomography (CT) imaging at Massachusetts General Hospital between 2005 and 2008 and who met additional inclusion criteria: ≥30 years of age, no prior CVD, and free of cancer. CVD events were independently adjudicated, while blinded to clinical data, using medical records to determine incident stroke, transient ischemic attack, acute coronary syndrome, revascularization, new-onset angina, peripheral arterial disease, heart failure, or CVD death. FDG uptake was measured in the ascending aorta (as target-to-background-ratio [TBR]), while blinded to clinical data. RESULTS: During follow-up (median 4.2 years), 44 participants developed CVD (2 per 100 person-years at risk). TBR strongly predicted subsequent CVD independent of traditional risk factors (hazard ratio: 4.71; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.98 to 11.2; p < 0.001) and (hazard ratio: 4.13; 95% CI: 1.59 to 10.76; p = 0.004) after further adjustment for coronary calcium score. Addition of arterial PET measurement to FRS scores improved the C-statistic (mean ± standard error 0.62 ± 0.03 vs. 0.66 ± 0.03). Further, incorporation of TBR into a model with FRS variables resulted in an integrated discrimination of 5% (95% CI: 0.36 to 9.87). Net reclassification improvements were 27.48% (95% CI: 16.27 to 39.92) and 22.3% (95% CI: 11.54 to 35.42) for the 10% and 6% intermediate-risk cut points, respectively. Moreover, TBR was inversely associated with the timing of CVD (beta -0.096; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Arterial FDG uptake, measured from routinely obtained PET/CT images, substantially improved incident CVD prediction beyond FRS among individuals undergoing cancer surveillance and provided information on the potential timing of such events.