Pulmonary vein isolation durability and lesion regression in patients with recurrent arrhythmia after pulsed-field ablation.

BACKGROUND: A novel multipolar pulsed-field ablation (PFA) catheter has recently been introduced for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Pre-market data showed high rates for PVI-durability during mandatory remapping studies. OBJECTIVE: To present post-market data in patients with recurrent arrhythmias. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing a redo procedure after an index PFA PVI using a bipolar-biphasic PFA system were included. 3-D electro-anatomical maps (3D-EAM) on redo procedure were compared to the 3D-EAM acquired after ablation during the index procedure. PVI durability was assessed on a per-vein and per-patient level and the sites of reconnections were identified. Furthermore, lesion extent around veins with durable isolation was compared to study lesion regression. RESULTS: Of 341 patients treated with a PFA PVI, 29 (8.5%) underwent a left atrial redo ablation due to arrhythmia recurrence. At the end of the index procedure, 110/112 veins (98%, four common ostia) were isolated. On redo procedures performed a median of 6 months after the first ablation, 3D-EAM identified 69/110 (63%) PVs with durable isolation. In 6 (21%) patients, all PVs were durably isolated. Reconnections were more often found on the right-sided veins and on the anterior aspects of the upper veins. Only minor lesion regression was observed between the index and redo procedure (a median of 3 mm (0 - 9.5) on the posterior wall). CONCLUSION: In patients with arrhythmia recurrence after PFA PVI using a first-generation PFA device, durable isolation was observed in 63% of the veins and 21% of the patients showed durable isolation of all previously isolated veins.

Pulsed-field vs. cryoballoon vs. radiofrequency ablation: a propensity score matched comparison of one-year outcomes after pulmonary vein isolation in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

BACKGROUND: Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has shown favourable data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We sought to compare procedural and 1-year follow-up data of patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI using PFA, cryoballoon ablation (CBA) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA). METHODS: Consecutive patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing a first PVI with PFA at our institution were included. For comparison, patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing a first PVI with CBA and RFA were selected using a 1:2:2 propensity score matching. The PFA group followed the standard 32-applications lesion-set protocol, the CBA group a time-to-effect plus 2-min strategy, and the RFA group the CLOSE protocol. Patients were followed with 7d-Holter ECGs 3, 6, and 12 months after ablation. The primary endpoint was recurrence of atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) following a blanking period of 3 months. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients were included (PFA n = 40; CBA n = 80; RFA n = 80). Median procedure times were shortest with CBA (75 min) followed by PFA (94 min) and RFA (182 min; p < 0.001). Fluoroscopy dose was lowest with RFA (1.6Gycm2) followed by PFA (5.0Gycm2) and CBA (5.7Gycm2; p < 0.001). After a 1-year follow-up, freedom from ATa recurrence was 85.0% with PFA, 66.2% with CBA and 73.8% with RFA (p = 0.12 PFA vs. CBA; p = 0.27 PFA vs. RFA). CONCLUSION: In a propensity score matched analysis of patients with paroxysmal AF, freedom from any ATa 1 year after PVI using PFA was favourable and at least as good as for PVI with CBA or RFA.

Comparison of the PolarX and the Arctic Front cryoballoon for pulmonary vein isolation in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (COMPARE CRYO) - Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Single-shot devices are increasingly used for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in atrial fibrillation (AF). The Arctic Front cryoballoon (Medtronic) is the most frequently used single-shot technology. A recently developed novel cryoballoon has been introduced (PolarX, Boston Scientific) with the aim to address limitations of the Arctic Front system. METHODS: COMPARE CRYO is a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial with blinded endpoint adjudication by an independent clinical events committee. A total of 200 patients with paroxysmal AF undergoing their first PVI are randomized 1:1 between PolarX cryoballoon ablation and Arctic Front cryoballoon ablation. Continuous monitoring during follow-up is performed using an implantable cardiac monitor (ICM) in all patients. The primary endpoint is time to first recurrence of any atrial tachyarrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, and/or atrial tachycardia) ≥ 120 s between days 91 and 365 post ablation as detected on the (ICM). Procedural safety is assessed by a composite of cardiac tamponade, persistent phrenic nerve palsy >24 h, vascular complications requiring intervention, stroke/transient ischemic attack, atrioesophageal fistula or death occurring during or up to 30 days after the procedure. Key secondary endpoints include (1) procedure and fluoroscopy times, (2) AF burden, (3) proportion of patients with recurrence in the blanking period, (4) proportion of patients undergoing repeat ablation, and (5) quality of life changes at 12 months compared to baseline. CONCLUSION: COMPARE CRYO will compare the efficacy and safety of the novel PolarX cryoballoon and the standard-of-practice Arctic Front cryoballoon for first PVI performed in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal AF. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT04704986).

Efficacy and safety of a novel cryoballoon ablation system: multicentre comparison of 1-year outcome.

AIMS: The aim of the study was to compare the 1-year efficacy and safety of a novel cryoballoon (NCB) ablation system (POLARx; Boston Scientific) for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared with the standard cryoballoon (SCB) system (Arctic Front, Medtronic). METHODS AND RESULTS: Consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI using the NCB and the SCB at two centres were included. We report 1-year efficacy after 12 months, short-term safety and hospitalizations within the blanking period, and predictors for AF recurrence. In case of repeat procedures, pulmonary vein (PV) reconnection patterns were characterized. Eighty patients (age 66 ± 10 years, ejection fraction 57 ± 10%, left atrial volume index 39 ± 13 mL/m2, paroxysmal AF in 64%) were studied. After a single procedure and a follow-up of 12 months, 68% in the NCB group and 70% in the SCB group showed no recurrence of AF/atrial tachycardias (P = 0.422). One patient in the NCB group suffered a periprocedural stroke with full recovery. There were no differences regarding hospitalizations during follow-up between the groups. PV reconnection observed during 12 repeat procedures (4 NCB, 8 SCB) pattern was comparable between the groups with more reconnections in the right-sided compared with the left-sided PVs. CONCLUSION: In this multicentre study comparing two currently available cryoballoon ablation systems for PVI, no differences were observed in the efficacy and safety during a follow-up of 12 months.

Technical and procedural comparison of two different cryoballoon ablation systems in patients with atrial fibrillation.

PURPOSE: The aim was to report procedural and technical differences of a novel cryoballoon (NCB) ablation catheter for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) compared to the standard cryoballoon (SCB) catheter. METHODS: Consecutive patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) undergoing PVI using the NCB and the SCB were included. Procedural parameters, technical differences, acute efficacy, and safety are reported. RESULTS: Eighty patients (age 66 ± 10 years, ejection fraction 57 ± 10%, left atrial volume index 40 ± 6 ml/m2) were studied. With the NCB, 156 of 158 PVs (99%) were isolated compared to isolation of 159 of 159 PVs (100%) with the SCB. The median number of freezes in the NCB and the SCB group was 6 (IQR 5-8) and 5 (IQR 4-7), respectively (p = 0.051), with 73% and 71% of the PVs isolated with a single freeze, respectively. Nadir temperature and temperature at isolation were - 59 ± 6 °C and - 45 ± 17 °C in the NCB group and - 46 ± 7 °C and - 32 ± 23 °C in the SCB group, respectively (both p < 0.001) with no difference in time to isolation (TTI). Procedural differences were observed for the total procedure time (84 ± 29 min in the NCB group and 65 ± 17 min in the SCB group, p = 0.003). There was a peri-procedural stroke in one patient in the NCB group. Differences in catheter design were observed that may account for the differences in temperature recordings and ice cap formation. CONCLUSIONS: Acute efficacy and TTI were similar with the NCB compared to the SCB. Measured temperatures were lower with the NCB, most likely due to differences in catheter design.

Left atrial appendage electrical isolation for persistent atrial fibrillation.

Left atrial appendage (LAA) may be the source for initiation and maintenance of atrial fibrillation (AF). This report shows restoration of sinus rhythm in the atria during radiofrequency wide-area LAA electrical isolation, whereas AF persists in the LAA.

Takotsubo syndrome and estrogen receptor genes: partners in crime?

AIMS: We aimed to analyze genetic polymorphism of estrogen receptor (ESR) 1 and ESR2 in a series of postmenopausal women with Takotsubo syndrome (TS). METHODS: In total, 81 consecutive white women were prospectively enrolled: 22 with TS (TS group; mean age 71.2 ±â€Š9.8 years), 22 with acute myocardial infarction (MI group; mean age 73.2 ±â€Š8 years), and 37 asymptomatic healthy controls (CTRL group; mean age 69 ±â€Š4.2 years). Genotyping of ESR1 -397C>T (rs2234693) and -351A>G (rs9340799) and ESR2 -1839G>T (rs 1271572) and 1082G>A (rs1256049) genetic variants was performed. We estimated the odds ratio (OR) between the genotype of each examined locus with the occurrence of TS or MI. RESULTS: The risk of experiencing TS was higher for those study participants carrying the T allele at the rs2234693 locus of the ESR1 gene [OR: 2.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.973-4.11, P = 0.04, TS vs. MI + CTRL; OR: 2.79, 95% CI: 1.17-6.64, P = 0.016, TS vs. MI alone]. Women carrying a T allele at the rs1271572 locus of the ESR2 gene demonstrated an even higher risk (OR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.55-6.73, P = 0.0019, TS vs. MI + CTRL; OR: 9.13, 95% CI: 2.78-29.9, P = 0.0001, TS vs. MI alone). CONCLUSION: The study reports preliminary findings suggesting a possible link between ESR polymorphisms and the occurrence of TS. Larger studies are needed to confirm our results.

Left atrial function in cardiac amyloidosis.

AIMS: Left atrium can be involved by amyloid deposition in familial amyloid polyneuropathy (FAP). The aim of our study is to assess left atrium function in atrial amyloidosis. METHODS: Twenty-eight FAP patients (53 ±â€Š12 years) and a control group of 22 asymptomatic individuals (49 ±â€Š11 years) underwent strain echocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR). CMR by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) was used to assess the left atrium amyloid deposition, whereas strain echocardiography was used to quantify the left atrium deformation. The following atrial longitudinal strain (ALS) parameters were assessed: peak at the end of ventricular systole (peak-ALS), peak at early diastole (early-ALS), negative peak in late diastole, precontraction (prec)-ALS (difference between peak-ALS and early-ALS), and late ALS (sum of negative peak and prec-ALS). RESULTS: CMR showed atrial LGE in 14 FAP patients (LGE-atrial group), whereas 14 FAP patients showed no LGE (no-LGE-atrial group). Peak-ALS was significantly lower in the LGE-atrial group (22.8 ±â€Š13%) compared with the no-LGE-atrial group (59.6 ±â€Š33.1%; P = 0.001) and controls (47.4 ±â€Š16.4%; P = 0.001). Early-ALS was lower in the LGE-atrial group (10.2 ±â€Š6.2%) compared with the controls (26.3 ±â€Š11.9%; P = 0.02) and the no-LGE-atrial group (30.2 ±â€Š22.4%; P = 0.01). Prec-ALS was lower (P = 0.001) in the LGE-atrial group (12.6 ±â€Š7.8%) compared with the no-LGE-atrial group (26.2 ±â€Š15%). Conversely, late-ALS was higher (P = 0.04) in the no-LGE-atrial group (22.8 ±â€Š12.3%) compared with the controls (13.9 ±â€Š9%); no significant differences were found in the negative peak among groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with atrial amyloidosis have an adverse left atrium remodeling associated with left atrium dysfunction. Left atrium assessment may provide useful information in the clinical and prognostic stratification of amyloidotic patients.