RESUMO
Progression of myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) to accelerated or blast-phase is associated with poor survival outcomes. Since 2017 there have been several therapies approved for use in acute myeloid leukemia (AML); these therapies have been incorporated into the management of accelerated/blast-phase MPNs (MPN-AP/BP). We performed a multi-center analysis to investigate outcomes of patients diagnosed with MPN-AP/BP in 2017 or later. Two-hundred two patients were identified; median overall survival (OS) was 0.86 years. We also analyzed patients based on first-line treatment; the three most common approaches were intensive chemotherapy (IC) (n=65), DNA methyltransferase inhibitor (DNMTi)-based regimens (n=65), and DNMTi + venetoclax (VEN)-based regimens (n=54). Median OS was not significantly different by treatment type. In addition, we evaluated response by 2017 European LeukemiaNet (ELN) AML criteria and 2012 MPN-BP criteria in an effort to understand the association of response with survival outcomes. We also analyzed outcomes in 65 patients that received allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (allo-HCT); median OS was 2.30 years from time of allo-HCT. Our study demonstrates that survival amongst patients with MPN-AP/BP is limited in the absence of allo-HCT even in the current era of therapeutics and underscores the urgent need for new agents and approaches.
RESUMO
Jehovah's Witnesses cannot accept blood products based upon religious beliefs, and when they present with acute leukemia, the ideal treatment strategy can be controversial. We present six cases of Jehovah's Witnesses with acute lymphoblastic leukemia and show that complete remission can be achieved without using anthracycline in 83% (5/6) of patients. We also report, for the first time in this population, that the use of agents with novel mechanisms of action, such as blinatumomab and nelarabine, is associated with minimal myelosuppression and can produce durable responses, with 2 of 6 patients still alive in CR3 at 4.9 and 6.6 years.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The optimal approach to combine gemtuzumab-ozogamicin (GO) with various chemotherapy backbones and other newer agents safely remains to be determined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of the safety and outcomes of adult patients with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) treated with GO with intensified versus standard anthracycline doses (daunorubicin dose 90 mg/m2 vs 60 mg/m2) ± FLT3 inhibitors. The χ2 test and Mann-Whitney U test were used to compare categorical and continuous data. Survival estimates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and survival comparisons made using log-rank test. RESULTS: We report a 97% overall response rate in 34 patients with newly diagnosed AML with a median age of 54 years (19-75 years) treated with GO and standard induction. The 11 patients (100%) receiving GO plus daunorubicin dose 90 mg/m2 as part of 7 + 3 induction achieved complete response versus 91% (20/22) complete response in the standard daunorubicin dose group (P = NS). No increased toxicity was noted with the higher daunorubicin dose or when GO and 7 + 3 were combined with FLT3 inhibitors in 3 younger patients (<60 years). Two older patients treated with GO+7 + 3 and FLT3i experienced grade 3 or higher cardiotoxicity. We observed a longer estimated event-free survival for patients with newly diagnosed AML in our cohort (median, 24 months; 95% confidence interval, 17.2 to not reached) compared with historical data. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate that anthracycline dose intensification with GO may offer higher response rates without increased toxicity in younger patients presenting with de novo AML across European Leukemia Net risk categories.