Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Semin Ophthalmol ; 39(5): 340-352, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38303587

RESUMO

Viral keratitis is a significant cause of ocular morbidity and visual impairment worldwide. In recent years, there has been a growing understanding of the pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, and diagnostic modalities for viral keratitis. The most common viral pathogens associated with this condition are adenovirus, herpes simplex (HSV), and varicella-zoster virus (VZV). However, emerging viruses such as cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), and Vaccinia virus can also cause keratitis. Non-surgical interventions are the mainstay of treatment for viral keratitis. Antiviral agents such as Acyclovir, Ganciclovir, and trifluridine have effectively reduced viral replication and improved clinical outcomes. Additionally, adjunctive measures such as lubrication, corticosteroids, and immunomodulatory agents have alleviated symptoms by reducing inflammation and facilitating tissue repair. Despite these conservative approaches, some cases of viral keratitis may progress to severe forms, leading to corneal scarring, thinning, or perforation. In such instances, surgical intervention becomes necessary to restore corneal integrity and visual function. This review article aims to provide an overview of the current perspectives and surgical interventions in managing viral keratitis. The choice of surgical technique depends on the extent and severity of corneal involvement. As highlighted in this article, on-going research and advancements in surgical interventions hold promise for further improving outcomes in patients with viral keratitis.


Assuntos
Antivirais , Infecções Oculares Virais , Ceratite Herpética , Humanos , Infecções Oculares Virais/diagnóstico , Infecções Oculares Virais/virologia , Infecções Oculares Virais/tratamento farmacológico , Infecções Oculares Virais/cirurgia , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Ceratite Herpética/diagnóstico , Ceratite Herpética/tratamento farmacológico , Ceratite Herpética/cirurgia , Ceratite Herpética/virologia , Herpes Zoster Oftálmico/diagnóstico , Herpes Zoster Oftálmico/tratamento farmacológico , Herpes Zoster Oftálmico/virologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos
2.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 71(9): 3270, 2023 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37602629

RESUMO

Background: LASIK for refractive error correction has become a universal surgery. Despite its popularity, the estimated prevalence of traumatic flap dislocations in post-LASIK patients is 3.9%, and it is sometimes associated with epithelial ingrowth. The prognosis in such cases depends on the rapid surgical revision of the flap with the removal of the EI and perioperative steps to prevent Epithelial ingrowth (EI) recurrence in the future. Purpose: The video aims to display the steps involved in revising the flap, removing EI, and tips to prevent its recurrence. Synopsis: A 33-year-old post-LASIK patient presented with decreased vision, photophobia, and glare during the COVID pandemic in the right eye for 2 months. The best-corrected visual acuity was reduced to 6/60. The anterior segment revealed traumatic flap dislocation along with macro fold temporally and epithelial ingrowth. She underwent a successful flap revision surgery with no recurrence of epithelial ingrowth postoperatively. Highlights: A successful revision of a 2-month-old traumatic folded flap was performed along with the complete removal of EI. It explains the step-by-step approach to avoid the recurrence of EI in each step of the surgical revision of the flap. The video is self-explanatory and guides novice surgeons too. Video link: https://youtu.be/JuOSjhrfw0g.


Assuntos
COVID-19 , Ceratomileuse Assistida por Excimer Laser In Situ , Erros de Refração , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Adulto , Ceratomileuse Assistida por Excimer Laser In Situ/efeitos adversos , Olho , Fotofobia
3.
Indian J Ophthalmol ; 70(11): 3893-3897, 2022 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36308122

RESUMO

Purpose: To determine the most preferred method of operating brown cataracts among ophthalmologists in India. Methods: A cross-sectional, questionnaire-based study was conducted among ophthalmologists all over India through electronic and social media from May 1 to June 15, 2022. All single, voluntary entries within the stipulated time period were accepted for analysis. Results: A total of 230 ophthalmologists participated in the study among which 198 (86%) preferred Manual small-incision cataract surgery (mSICS) as the first option. This was preferred due to the high risk of complications associated (40, 33.6%) as well as endothelial damage due to increased Phaco power (53, 47.9%). The majority of the surgeons (162, 70.4%) preferred a superior tunnel for SICS, and 51.7% (119) performed continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis in 100% of their cases. The most common complication encountered was posterior capsular rupture (PCR) (66%), followed by zonular dialysis (ZD) (18.7%), whole bag removal (8.3%), and Descemet's membrane detachment (7%). Conclusion: Despite diverse recent new modalities of Femto Laser assisted cataract surgery (FLACS). Phakonit, and Smart Intraocular Lens (IOLs), the majority of ophthalmologists still find the manual small-incision cataract surgery (mSICS) procedure a safe surgery for mature brown cataracts.


Assuntos
Extração de Catarata , Catarata , Oftalmologistas , Cirurgiões , Humanos , Estudos Transversais , Extração de Catarata/métodos , Catarata/complicações , Catarata/epidemiologia , Inquéritos e Questionários
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA