Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Transplant Cell Ther ; 30(7): 663-680, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38642840

RESUMO

Data on recent bone marrow harvest (BMH) collections from the NMDP has shown that bone marrow (BM) quality has decreased based on total nucleated cell count in the product. To ensure that quality BM products are available to all recipients, the NMDP Marrow Alliance was formed in April 2021 to increase the capability of BM collection centers to safely deliver high-quality products consistently and to identify and disseminate guidelines for performing BMH. This white paper describes the best practices for BMH as defined by the NMDP Marrow Alliance.


Assuntos
Medula Óssea , Humanos , Transplante de Medula Óssea/normas , Transplante de Medula Óssea/métodos , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Células da Medula Óssea , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/normas
2.
Neurology ; 92(9): e973-e987, 2019 02 26.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30674587

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To determine the association of a neurologist visit with health care use and cost outcomes for patients with incident epilepsy. METHODS: Using health care claims data for individuals insured by United Healthcare from 2001 to 2016, we identified patients with incident epilepsy. The population was defined by an epilepsy/convulsion diagnosis code (ICD codes 345.xx/780.3x, G40.xx/R56.xx), an antiepileptic prescription filled within the succeeding 2 years, and neither criterion met in the 2 preceding years. Cases were defined as patients who had a neurologist encounter for epilepsy within 1 year after an incident diagnosis; a control cohort was constructed with propensity score matching. Primary outcomes were emergency room (ER) visits and hospitalizations for epilepsy. Secondary outcomes included measures of cost (epilepsy related, not epilepsy related, and antiepileptic drugs) and care escalation (including EEG evaluation and epilepsy surgery). RESULTS: After participant identification and propensity score matching, there were 3,400 cases and 3,400 controls. Epilepsy-related ER visits were more likely for cases than controls (year 1: 5.9% vs 2.3%, p < 0.001), as were hospitalizations (year 1: 2.1% vs 0.7%, p < 0.001). Total medical costs for epilepsy care, nonepilepsy care, and antiepileptic drugs were greater for cases (p ≤ 0.001). EEG evaluation and epilepsy surgery occurred more commonly for cases (p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with epilepsy who visited a neurologist had greater subsequent health care use, medical costs, and care escalation than controls. This comparison using administrative claims is plausibly confounded by case disease severity, as suggested by higher nonepilepsy care costs. Linking patient-centered outcomes to claims data may provide the clinical resolution to assess care value within a heterogeneous population.


Assuntos
Assistência Ambulatorial , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Epilepsia/terapia , Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Neurologia , Demandas Administrativas em Assistência à Saúde , Adulto , Idoso , Anticonvulsivantes/economia , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapêutico , Gerenciamento Clínico , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/economia , Epilepsia/economia , Feminino , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Serviços de Saúde/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neurologistas , Procedimentos Neurocirúrgicos , Pontuação de Propensão , Quinazolinas , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA