[Translation into French and republication of: "Central venous catheter associated upper extremity deep vein thrombosis in cancer patients: Diagnosis and therapeutic management"]. / Traduction et republication de : « Thrombose veineuse profonde du membre supérieur associée à un cathéter veineux central chez les patients cancéreux : diagnostic et prise en charge thérapeutique ¼.

Catheter-related thrombosis (CRT) is a relatively frequent and potentially fatal complication arising in patients with cancer who require a central catheter placement for intravenous treatment. In everyday practice, CRT remains a challenge for management; despite its frequency and its negative clinical impact, few data are available concerning diagnosis and treatment of CRT. In particular, no diagnostic studies or clinical trials have been published that included exclusively patients with cancer and a central venous catheter (CVC). For this reason, many questions regarding optimal management of CRT remain unanswered. Due to the paucity of high-grade evidence regarding CRT in cancer patients, guidelines are derived from upper extremity DVT studies for diagnosis, and from those for lower limb DVT for treatment. This article addresses the issues of diagnosis and management of CRT through a review of the available literature and makes a number of proposals based on the available evidence. In symptomatic patients, venous ultrasound is the most appropriate choice for first-line diagnostic imaging of CRT because it is noninvasive, and its diagnostic performance is high (which is not the case in asymptomatic patients). In the absence of direct comparative clinical trials, we suggest treating patients with CRT with a therapeutic dose of either a LMWH or a direct oral factor Xa inhibitor, with or without a loading dose. These anticoagulants should be given for a total of at least 3 months, including at least 1 month after catheter removal following initiation of therapy.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Treatment of cancer-associated venous thromboembolism in patients under palliative care"]. / Traduction et republication de : « Traitement de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse associée au cancer chez les patients en soins palliatifs ¼.

Many patients with cancer require palliative care at some stage and the vast majority of people followed in palliative care are cancer patients. Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), and this is particularly true during the advanced palliative phase when mobility is limited or absent. Patients with cancer in palliative care are at higher bleeding risk compared to non-cancer patients. Decisions to treat VTE or withhold anticoagulation for these patients have proven to be difficult and depend largely on an individual clinician's judgment. For this reason, we have developed a consensus proposal for appropriate management of cancer-associated thromboembolism (CAT) in patients in palliative care, which is presented in this article. The proposal was informed by the recent scientific literature retrieved through a systematic literature review. In cancer patients in advanced palliative care, the benefit/risk ratio of anticoagulation seems unfavourable with a higher haemorrhagic risk than the benefit associated with prevention of CAT recurrence and, above all, in the absence of any benefit on quality of life. For this reason, we recommend that patients should be prescribed anticoagulants on a case-by-case basis. The choice of whether to treat, and with which type of treatment, should take into account anticipated life expectancy and patient preferences, as well as clinical factors such as the estimated bleeding risk, the type of VTE experienced and the time since the VTE event.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Management of venous thromboembolic disease in patients with malignant brain tumours"]. / Traduction et republication de : « Prise en charge de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse chez les patients atteints de tumeurs cérébrales malignes ¼.

This article addresses the management of venous thromboembolism in patients with malignant brain tumours, including both primary and secondary (metastatic) tumours. The available data on patients on venous thromboembolism recurrence and bleeding risks in patients with brain tumours is limited, since these patients have been excluded from most randomised, interventional, head-to-head, clinical trials comparing low molecular weight heparins to vitamin K antagonists or to direct oral factor Xa inhibitors. More information is available from retrospective observational studies, which however were generally small, and carried a high risk of confounding. Their findings suggest that direct factor Xa inhibitor use is associated with lower rates of intracranial haemorrhage compared with low molecular weight heparins. Overall, the safety profile of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors when used to prevent venous thromboembolism recurrence in patients with either primary or secondary brain tumours appears to be favourable. The available data are in favour of using an anticoagulant at a full therapeutic dose in patients with primary and secondary brain tumours experiencing a venous thromboembolism, although they are not yet sufficiently robust to permit recommending a direct factor Xa inhibitor over low-molecular weight heparin.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Management of cancer-associated thromboembolism in vulnerable population"]. / Traduction et republication de : « Prise en charge de la maladie thromboembolique veineuse associée au cancer chez les populations vulnérables ¼.

Although all patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) have a high morbidity and mortality risk, certain groups of patients are particularly vulnerable. This may expose the patient to an increased risk of thrombotic recurrence or bleeding (or both), as the benefit-risk ratio of anticoagulant treatment may be modified. Treatment thus needs to be chosen with care. Such vulnerable groups include older patients, patients with renal impairment or thrombocytopenia, and underweight and obese patients. However, these patient groups are poorly represented in clinical trials, limiting the available data on which treatment decisions can be based. Meta-analysis of data from randomised clinical trials suggests that the relative treatment effect of direct oral factor Xa inhibitors (DXIs) and low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) with respect to major bleeding could be affected by advanced age. No evidence was obtained for a change in the relative risk-benefit profile of DXIs compared to LMWH in patients with renal impairment or of low body weight. The available, albeit limited, data do not support restricting the use of DXIs in patients with TAC on the basis of renal impairment or low body weight. In older patients, age is not itself a critical factor for choice of treatment, but frailty is such a factor. Patients over 70 years of age with CAT should undergo a systematic frailty evaluation before choosing treatment and modifiable bleeding risk factors should be addressed. In patients with renal impairment, creatine clearance should be assessed and monitored regularly thereafter. In patients with an eGFR less than 30mL/min/1.72m2, the anticoagulant treatment may need to be adapted. Similarly, platelet count should be assessed prior to treatment and monitored regularly. In patients with grade 3-4, thrombocytopenia (less than 50,000platelets/µL) treatment with a LMWH at a reduced dose should be considered. For patients with CAT and low body weight, standard anticoagulant treatment recommendations are appropriate, whereas in obese patients, apixaban may be preferred.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Recurrent venous thromboembolism in anticoagulated cancer patients: diagnosis and treatment"]. / Traduction et republication de : « Maladie thromboembolique veineuse récidivante chez les patients cancéreux anticoagulés : diagnostic et traitement ¼.

Patients with cancer are at significantly increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE), due both to the impact of malignant disease itself and to the impact of certain anticancer drugs on haemostasis. This is true both for first episode venous thromboembolism and recurrence. The diagnosis and management of VTE recurrence in patients with cancer poses particular challenges, and these are reviewed in the present article, based on a systematic review of the relevant scientific literature published over the last decade. Furthermore, it is uncertain whether diagnostic algorithms for venous thromboembolism, validated principally in untreated non-cancer patients, are also valid in anticoagulated cancer patients: the available data suggests that clinical decision rules and D-dimer testing perform less well in this clinical setting. In patients with cancer, computed tomography pulmonary angiography and venous ultrasound appear to be the most reliable diagnostic tools for diagnosis of pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis respectively. Options for treatment of venous thromboembolism include low molecular weight heparins (at a therapeutic dose or an increased dose), fondaparinux or oral direct factor Xa inhibitors. The choice of treatment should take into account the nature (pulmonary embolism or VTE) and severity of the recurrent event, the associated bleeding risk, the current anticoagulant treatment (type, dose, adherence and possible drug-drug interactions) and cancer progression.

[Translation into French and republication of: "Anticoagulant treatment of cancer-associated thromboembolism"]. / Traduction et republication de : « Traitement anticoagulant de la maladie veineuse thromboembolique associée au cancer ¼.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a frequent and potentially fatal complication in patients with cancer. During the initial period after the thromboembolic event, a patient receiving anticoagulant treatment is exposed both to a risk of VTE recurrence and also to an elevated bleeding risk conferred by the treatment. For this reason, the choice of anticoagulant is critical. The choice should take into account patient-related factors (such as functional status, age, body mass index, platelet count and renal function), VTE-related factors (such as severity or site), cancer-related factors (such as activity and progression) and treatment related factors (such as drug-drug interactions), which all potentially influence bleeding risk, and patient preference. These should be evaluated carefully for each patient during a multidisciplinary team meeting. For most patients, apixaban or a low molecular-weight heparin is the most appropriate initial choice for anticoagulant treatment. Such treatment should be offered to all patients with active cancer for at least 6months. The patient and treatment should be re-evaluated regularly, and anticoagulant treatment changed when necessary. Continued anticoagulant treatment beyond 6months is justified if the cancer remains active or if the patient experienced recurrence of VTE in the first 6months. In other cases, the interest of continued anticoagulant treatment may be considered on an individual patient basis in collaboration with oncologists.

Towards optimal use of antithrombotic therapy of people with cancer at the end of life: A research protocol for the development and implementation of the SERENITY shared decision support tool.

BACKGROUND: Even though antithrombotic therapy has probably little or even negative effects on the well-being of people with cancer during their last year of life, deprescribing antithrombotic therapy at the end of life is rare in practice. It is often continued until death, possibly resulting in excess bleeding, an increased disease burden and higher healthcare costs. METHODS: The SERENITY consortium comprises researchers and clinicians from eight European countries with specialties in different clinical fields, epidemiology and psychology. SERENITY will use a comprehensive approach combining a realist review, flash mob research, epidemiological studies, and qualitative interviews. The results of these studies will be used in a Delphi process to reach a consensus on the optimal design of the shared decision support tool. Next, the shared decision support tool will be tested in a randomised controlled trial. A targeted implementation and dissemination plan will be developed to enable the use of the SERENITY tool across Europe, as well as its incorporation in clinical guidelines and policies. The entire project is funded by Horizon Europe. RESULTS: SERENITY will develop an information-driven shared decision support tool that will facilitate treatment decisions regarding the appropriate use of antithrombotic therapy in people with cancer at the end of life. CONCLUSIONS: We aim to develop an intervention that guides the appropriate use of antithrombotic therapy, prevents bleeding complications, and saves healthcare costs. Hopefully, usage of the tool leads to enhanced empowerment and improved quality of life and treatment satisfaction of people with advanced cancer and their care givers.

Adult breast, lung, pancreatic, upper and lower gastrointestinal cancer patients with hospitalized venous thromboembolism in the national French hospital discharge database.

BACKGROUND: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) and cancer are strongly associated. In France, evidence on patients with pancreatic, upper GI [gastrointestinal], lower GI, lung, or breast cancer-associated VTE and their hospital management is limited. The aims of this study were to provide data on the number of hospitalized VTE events among cancer patients, the patients' characteristics, and their hospital management to estimate the burden of disease and the hospital burden of cancer-related VTE and to provide guidance on research. METHODS: This longitudinal, observational, and retrospective study was based on the comprehensive hospital discharge database (PMSI). Adult patients (≥ 18 years old) hospitalized with a cancer of interest in 2016 and hospitalized (within 2 years with VTE (captured a as a principal, related, or significant associated diagnosis) were included in the study. RESULTS: We identified 340,946 cancer patients, of which 7.2% (24,433 patients) were hospitalized with VTE. The proportions of hospitalized VTE were 14.6% (3,237) for patients with pancreatic cancer, 11.2% (8,339) for lung cancer, 9.9% (2,232) for upper GI cancer, 6.7% (7,011) for lower GI cancer, and 3.1% (3,614) for breast cancer. Around two thirds of cancer patients with a hospitalized VTE had active cancer (with metastases and/or receiving chemotherapy during the six months prior to the index date): from 62% of patients with pancreatic cancer to 72% with breast cancer. Around a third of patients were admitted to the hospital through the emergency room, up to 3% of patients stayed in an intensive care unit. The average length of stay ranged from 10 (breast cancer) to 15 days (upper GI cancer). Nine (lower GI cancer) to 18% (pancreatic cancer) of patients died during the VTE hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of cancer-associated VTE is substantial, both in terms of the number of patients affected and in the hospital use. These findings offer guidance on future research on VTE prophylaxis in a very high-risk population, particularly in patients with active cancer.

Prevention and treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis in France: A national survey among vascular disease and supportive care specialists.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Long-term use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) has been well-established. Conversely, the use of thromboprophylaxis in patients with cancer remains controversial in the absence of homogeneous guidelines. Our aim was to assess the awareness of treatment guidelines and the management of patients with CAT in daily clinical practice. METHODS: A national survey based on an open questionnaire developed by a panel of health professionals including specialists in vascular medicine, oncology, supportive care and pharmacy, was proposed on line to 2104 specialists experts in the management of CAT with the objective to collect at least 400 answers. Clinical practice assessment included the treatment of lung adenocarcinoma-associated thrombosis, the use of thromboprophylaxis and factors influencing the management of patients with CAT. RESULTS: A total of 401 questionnaires were completed by specialists of vascular medicine (68%), oncology (12%) and other (20%). LMWH was the preferred option for over 90% of the participants for the treatment of recent overt proximal pulmonary embolism or deep-vein thrombosis. Up to 70% of the participants considered treatment duration for 6 months and more than 12 months in case of active malignancy. Patient management in the setting of incidental VTE and thromboprophylaxis were heterogeneous in the absence of clear guidance while VTE risk scores would be used by only 14% of participants. CONCLUSION: Patients with CAT are properly managed based on clear and consistent guidelines. Patient care is heterogeneous regarding treatment duration beyond 6 months and thromboprophylaxis while VTE risk scores are misused. Identification of referent health care professionals for CAT management and more clear guidelines are required.

Long-term treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis: the choice of the optimal anticoagulant.

Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) carry a higher risk of recurrence, bleeding and mortality as compared with non-cancer patients. The specific profiles of cancer patients, combining frequent co-morbidities, the use of anti-tumoral therapies and the cancer progression itself, represent a major therapeutic challenge for choosing a long-term anticoagulant treatment. This review discusses the practical basis of making a choice between the available drugs for a long-term antithrombotic strategy, linked to their pharmacology, mechanism of action, evidence of clinical benefits, and advantages and limitations in such a complex clinical context. In patients with cancer, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) are the preferred option for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism according to current guidelines, because their efficacy is significantly superior to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Even though LMWHs are effective and safe in cancer patients, they require daily subcutaneous injections, which may be problematic for a long-term therapy that may exceed 6 months' duration. Compared with VKAs, non-vitamin-K antagonist oral anticoagulants or direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) are more target specific and do not require laboratory monitoring, whereas the oral route of administration makes them potentially attractive alternatives to LMWH. In randomized controlled trials in the general population DOACs have been shown to be non-inferior to VKAs in terms of efficacy with a lower rate of clinically relevant or major bleeding. However, given the limited number of cancer patients enrolled in these studies (with poorly defined active cancer), available trials are inconclusive regarding the usefulness of DOACs in the cancer setting. Ongoing head-to-head comparisons vs. LMWH in patients with CAT may allow an informed choice to be made regarding the DOAC option.

Factors influencing adherence to clinical guidelines in the management of cancer-associated thrombosis.

International academic and regulatory guidelines consistently recommend the long-term use of low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) as the standard for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT). However, both physicians and patients are reluctant to follow established guidelines. Insufficient compliance with treatment recommendations among care physicians represents a loss of opportunity for patients at very high risk of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and death. Few data are available regarding adherence to CAT clinical practice guidelines. Based on published data, we aimed to review the gap between guidelines and practice to draw a more precise picture of current practice in order to precisely identify the extent to which patient management is currently lacking with respect to treatment guidelines. Published observational studies, registries and surveys on cancer-associated VTE treatment were reviewed. In spite of evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showing the usefulness of long-term LMWH, only approximately 50% of patients are managed according to established guideline recommendations. Patient profiles and co-morbidities influence compliance with standard guidelines. A better knowledge of physician and patient-related factors that influence therapeutic decisions may improve the implementation of clinical practice guidelines. Efficient awareness programs including a multidisciplinary approach are necessary to implement guidelines aimed at optimizing the therapeutic management of cancer-associated VTE.

PO-23 - Expression of heparanase in cancer as biomarker of malignancies: overexpression in an aggressive, poor survival gastric cancer "gastric signet ring cell carcinoma" compared with that of other gastric cancers.

INTRODUCTION: Gastric signet ring cell carcinoma (GSRC) is a distinct entity among of other gastric cancer. With unknown etiopathology, their incidence is increasing and it presents a low sensitivity to chemotherapy. AIM: Here, we studied the expression of the heparanase (HPA) in cancer tissues from GSRC patients and several cancer cell lines. HPA is an endo-ß-D-glucuronidase, capable of cleaving the lateral chains of heparan sulfate on cell surfaces and the extracellular matrix at acidic pH. Apart from its well-characterized enzyme activity, HPA also has independent enzymatic functions, such as up-regulation of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) -A and VEGF-C and activation of intracellular signaling pathways involved in, survival, migration and proliferation of tumor cells. It can also induce an hypercoagulability by a non-enzymatic manner. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HPA was tested in several cancer cell lines from ovaries (OVCAR-3, SKOV-3), breast (MDAMB231, MCF7) colon (LS-174), lung (A549), uterus (HELA) and gastric (adenocarcinoma (AGS) and GSRC (KATO-III) using several techniques such as RT-PCR, Q-PCR, immunocytochemistry, flow cytometry and degradation of Fondaparinux at pH 5, evaluated by its anti Xa activity evaluated by Factor Xa amidolytic activity. The amount of HPA mRNA in the biopsy simples of gastric adenocarcinoma (n=10) and GSRC (n=11) in tumors and their environment were analyzed. RESULTS: HPA gene is expressed in all cancer cell lines, but its level varies depending on the tumor cell line. In biopsies of gastric cancer, the HPA gene is more expressed in the tumor regions (p=0.0002) and tumor environment (p=0.015) in GSRC than in gastric adenocarcinoma. B) The activity of HPA, evaluated by degradation of Fondaparinux at pH 5, 1) in the supernatants of 10(6) cancer cells: the residual activity of Fondaparinux after 2 hours incubation at 37°C with OVCAR-3 supernatant was of 70% of control value, and of 80% with KATO-III cell supernatants. 2) in patient's plasmas, this technique cannot be used because the site of degradation of fondaparinux by heparanase is masked by AT present in plasma. CONCLUSIONS: Heparanase was found in in many cancer cell lines and its level depends on origin of tumor cells and on its aggressivity. Taking into account the pro-metastatic functions, proangiogenic and procoagulant activity of HPA and its overexpression in gastric signet ring cell carcinoma of poor prognosis and its cell line, HPA can be considered as a biomarker of malignancy and as a therapeutic target in GSRC patients.

PO-47 - Microparticles derived from ovarian cancer cell line contained genomic and biologically active proteins, including tissue factor involved in coagulation.

INTRODUCTION: The microparticles (MPs) are sized vesicles of less than 1 µm, from different cell types upon activation or subsequent to apoptosis. They are involved in the thrombotic process, particularly in cancer. The role of MPs in ovarian cancer and their involvement in thrombosis being poorly understood. AIM: The aim of this study was to identify in vitro the generation of MPs by an human ovarian adenocarcinoma cell line (OVCAR-3). MATERIALS AND METHODS: OVCAR-3 cells were cultured in three conditions [without stimulation, with protein C (PC), and with activated protein C (APC)]. Then, the MPs present in the supernatant, were isolated by ultracentrifugation and were analyzed for their shape and properties by flow cytometry, electron microscopy, cryofracture analysis, DNA and RNA, and proteomic analysis. The level of tissue factor (TF) on MP was evaluated by TF-induced shortening of Ca(2+) plasma coagulation time. RESULTS: Our results demonstrated that 1) 92% of MPs derived from OVCAR-3 were less than 100 nm. 2) As tested by flow cytometry, the MPs contained b2 microglobulin, annexin, DNA fragments and TF that induces a shortening of Ca(2+) -induced plasma coagulation time. When OVCAR-3 were cultured for 18H with PCA, MPs were generated in greater amount than those generated by OVCAR-3 in its absence and their level of TF was increased of 20%. Curiously, in contrast with intact OVCAR-3 cells, the endothelial protein C receptor (EPCR) was not detected in MPs 3) Proteomic analysis show that the MPs contain proteins involved in cancer progression such as mucins (5A and 5B), keratin type-1, actin, annexin (A1, A2, A4), CD44, glypican, heat shock (70kDa and HS90a) proteins, Agrin associated with heparan sulfate proteoglycan abundant in the tumor-specific basement membrane, Ephrin type A receptor, coronin-1C, catenin α, integrin ß-1 and also p-selectin responsible of platelet activation. They also express several DNA associated proteins includingtranscription factors, various polymerases, nucleases, and histones involved in chromosome packaging and transcription in the cell nucleus. CONCLUSIONS: MPs derived from OVCAR-3 have an apoptotic character. They expressed several biologically active proteins, DNA and their associated proteins. Despite the absence of EPCR expression on MPs that was expressed on intact OVCAR-3 cells, they expressed procoagulant TF activity already found on intact ovarian cancer cells. This activity is greater extent in the presence of APC.

Adherence to treatment guidelines for cancer-associated thrombosis: a French hospital-based cohort study.

PURPOSE: French 2008 treatment guidelines recommend low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) for the treatment of cancer-associated thrombosis (CAT) with treatment duration of at least 3 months and up to 6 months and beyond if cancer remains active. Our aim was to assess adherence to guidelines in hospital clinical practice. METHODS: The French hospital database (PMSI) was used to identify patients with CAT admitted to three hospitals of the Paris region to be included in a retrospective cohort study. Adherence to guidelines was assessed in patients included from different treatment periods following the venous thromboembolism (VTE) episode i.e. first 10 days (T1), day 10 to 3 months (T2), months 3 to 6 (T3) and beyond 6 months (T4) when applicable. RESULTS: A total of 240 patients with CAT were included from January 2012 to December 2012 of whom 204 were analyzable. Treatment was adherent to guidelines in 55, 31 and 34 % of patients in T1, T2 and T3 treatment periods, respectively, while overall treatment adherence was found in 52 % of patients. Adherence rates were the highest among patients with pulmonary embolism (PE, 60.5 %), catheter-related thrombosis (62.5 %), class III/IV extended cancer (58.0 %) and metastatic malignancy (60.3 %) while only 40 % with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) received a treatment consistent with guidelines. CONCLUSION: Adherence to guidelines appears insufficient since only half of patients received an appropriate treatment. Adherence dropped significantly across treatment periods T2 and T3. VTE diagnosis and cancer characteristics influenced the anticoagulant prescription. Management of patients with CAT requires further education and information of health care professionals.

ADAMTS-13 and von Willebrand factor predict venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer.

UNLABELLED: ESSENTIALS: Cancer patients are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). In this study, cases and controls were cancer patients who did or did not develop VTE. von Willebrand factor (VWF) levels were higher if compared with controls and correlated with cancer stage. VWF and ADAMTS-13 are associated with the occurrence of VTE in cancer. BACKGROUND: Patients with cancer are at high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). ADAMTS-13 regulates von Willebrand factor (VWF) activity, which plays a role in the development of cancer and in VTE. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to search for an association between the levels of VWF and ADAMTS-13 and VTE in patients with cancer and to compare current scoring systems for prediction of VTE before and after addition of these parameters. PATIENTS/METHODS: In a case-control study, in which patients with recently diagnosed cancer were followed-up for 6 months, we compared 20 patients who developed VTE (cases) and 140 patients with cancer without VTE (controls), matched for sex, age, and type and stage of cancer. We measured VWF, ADAMTS-13 (activity and antigen), P-selectin, D-dimer and F1 + 2 levels at baseline, and calculated both the Khorana score and the Khorana score expanded after addition of P-selectin and D-dimer levels. RESULTS: VWF levels were significantly higher in cases when compared with controls (326 ± 185% vs. 242 ± 158%) and correlated with advanced stage of cancer: localized, 185 [142; 222]; locally advanced, 240 [146; 257]; metastatic, 267 [153; 324] (mean [interquartile range]). The addition of two biomarkers, ADAMTS-13 activity and F1 + 2 levels, to the Khorana score improved receiver operating curves. CONCLUSIONS: von Willebrand factor and ADAMTS-13 are associated with the occurrence of VTE in patients with cancer. Moreover, addition of ADAMTS-13 and F1 + 2 levels to the Khorana score considerably increases the predictive value for VTE.

[Prevention of venous thromboembolic events by fondaparinux 2.5 mg in general practice. ArchiMed Ville]. / Utilisation du fondaparinux 2,5 mg pour la prévention des évènements thromboemboliques veineux en médecine générale. ArchiMed Ville.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the mean duration of treatment course with fondaparinux 2.5 mg (ARIXTRA(®)) in the setting of ambulatory general medicine, with respect to its indication in thromboprophylaxis for medically ill patients and to describe the population treated. METHODS: Observational, prospective, national, multicenter, pharmaco-epidemiological study, performed in France, at the request of the Transparency Commission (a division of the French Health Regulatory Authority). The general practitioners had to include the first three adult patients, considered as patients at high risk of venous thromboembolic events and immobilized for acute medical illness, treated with initiation of thromboprophylaxis by fondaparinux 2.5 mg. RESULTS: Two hundred and seventeen general practitioners included 840 patients. The mean age of patients was 63.6±18.1 years, and 63% of patients (n=520/831) were females. The real total administration duration of the treatment by fondaparinux 2.5 mg was known for 797 patients and was 15.8±12.4 days on average (range: 1-90 days, median: 10 days). In 40% of patients, the duration ranged from 6 to 14 days [duration consistent with the summary of product characteristics (SmPC)]. Among the 834 patients analyzed, 569 (68%) suffered from at least one acute illness and had at least one risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE). The indication did fully comply with the summary of product characteristics of fondaparinux 2.5 mg in 52% of the patients (n=434/834 patients). CONCLUSION: The results of the ArchiMed study support that the thromboprophylaxis treatment with fondaparinux 2.5 mg in ambulatory general medicine, and the associated medical conditions were usually consistent with the SmPC or guidelines. However, a difference was found for the duration and the initial indication, in situations that may be regarded as presenting a risk by the prescriber.