Real world propensity score matched analysis evaluating the influence of en-bloc vs. non en-bloc techniques, energy and instrumentation on enucleation outcomes for large and very large prostates.

PURPOSE: The primary aim of the study was to evaluate if en-bloc vs. non en-bloc made a difference to intra-, peri- and post-operative surgical outcomes of anatomical endoscopic enucleation (AEEP) in large (> 80 cc) and very large prostates (> 200 cc). The secondary aim was to determine the influence of energy and instruments used. METHODS: Data of patients with > 80 cc prostate who underwent surgery between 2019 and 2022 were obtained from 16 surgeons across 13 centres in 9 countries. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to reduce confounding. Logistic regression was performed to evaluate factors associated with postoperative urinary incontinence (UI). RESULTS: 2512 patients were included with 991 patients undergoing en-bloc and 1521 patients undergoing non-en-bloc. PSM resulted in 481 patients in both groups. Total operation time was longer in the en-bloc group (p < 0.001), enucleation time was longer in the non en-bloc group (p < 0.001) but morcellation times were similar (p = 0.054). Overall, 30 day complication rate was higher in the non en-bloc group (16.4% vs. 11.4%; p = 0.032). Rate of late complications (> 30 days) was similar (2.3% vs. 2.5%; p > 0.99). There were no differences in rates of UI between the two groups. Multivariate analysis revealed that age, Qmax, pre-operative, post-void residual urine (PVRU) and total operative time were predictors of UI. CONCLUSIONS: In experienced hands, AEEP in large prostates by the en-bloc technique yields a lower rate of complication and a slightly shorter operative time compared to the non en-bloc approach. However, it does not have an effect on rates of post-operative UI.

Uroflowmetric analysis and derivation of nomograms for normal paediatric Indian population between 5 to 15 years of age.

Objective: We aimed to established normal uroflowmetric values and subsequently derived nomograms of maximum flow rate (Qmax) and average flow rate (Qavg) against voided volume (VV) in children aged 5-15 years at our institute. Methods: A total of 440 children underwent uroflowmetric evaluation with no history of urological, renal, psychiatric, or neurological disorder between 5 and 15 years of age. Each subject data regarding Qmax, Qavg, VV, time to Qmax, and flow time, as well as age, sex, height, and weight were recorded. Of the 440 children, around 300 (68.18%) children could produce a normal flow rate at VV of more than 50 mL. Of the remaining 140 (31.82%) children, 50.00% voided less than 50 mL, and remaining 50.00% had abnormal voiding pattern, staccato or interrupted (21.43% each) and plateau or tower shaped (3.57% each). Cases were divided into two age groups (5-9 years and 10-15 years), and uroflowmetric analysis was done between boys and girls in both age groups to derive nomograms of Qavg and Qmax. Results: Qmax and Qavg flow nomograms were plotted for boys and girls. Mean Qmax for boys was 16.68 mL/s and for girls 20.69 mL/s. The mean Qavg values were 11.04 mL/s and 8.60 mL/s for girls and boys, respectively. The Qmax and Qavg values were higher in girls. There were significant increases in flow rates with increasing age, body surface area, and VV in both sexes. Conclusions: Nomograms for Qmax and Qavg may be a useful tool in evaluation of lower urinary tract disturbances in children.