Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 77
Filtrar
2.
J Occup Environ Med ; 66(6): e230-e237, 2024 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527177

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: US nuclear capable shipyard workers have increased potential for occupational radiation exposure. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to examine solid tumor mortality risks at low doses. METHOD: 437,937 workers working from 1957 to 2004 at eight US shipyards were studied. RESULTS: Radiation workers with a median life-time dose at 0.82 mSv had a significantly lower solid tumor mortality risk (relative risk [RR]: 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.94-0.98) than nonradiation workers. Among 153,930 radiation workers, the RRs of solid tumors increased with increasing dose categories without statistical significance. The dose category >0-<25 mSv had significantly lower RR (0.95, 95% CI: 0.91-0.99) versus 0 dose and the excess relative risk was 0.05/100 mSv (95% CI: 0.01-0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Solid tumor risk might increase with radiation dose, but not linearly at low doses. Actual mortality risk may be dependent on dose received.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/mortalidade , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia , Doses de Radiação , Navios , Idoso , Doenças Profissionais/mortalidade , Neoplasias/mortalidade , Medição de Risco , Relação Dose-Resposta à Radiação
3.
Radiology ; 309(2): e222590, 2023 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37962507

RESUMO

Because ionizing radiation is widely used in medical imaging and in military, industry, and commercial applications, programmatic management and advancement in knowledge is needed, especially related to the health effects of low-dose radiation. The U.S. Congress in partnership with the U.S. Department of Energy called on the National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) to develop a long-term strategic and prioritized agenda for low-dose radiation research. Low doses were defined as dose amounts less than 100 mGy or low-dose rates less than 5 mGy per hour. The 2022 NASEM report was divided into sections detailing the low-dose radiation exposure and health effects, scientific basis for radiation protection, status of low-dose radiation research, a prioritized radiation research agenda, and essential components of a low-dose radiation research program, including resources needed and recommendations for financial recourse. The purpose of this review is to summarize this report and examine the recommendations to assess how these pertain to the practice of radiology and medicine.


Assuntos
Proteção Radiológica , Radiologia , Humanos , Radiografia , Indústrias
4.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 117(4): 1018-1027, 2023 11 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37364800

RESUMO

PURPOSE: This work describes the first implementation and in vivo study of ultrahigh-dose-rate radiation (>37 Gy/s; FLASH) effects induced by kilovoltage (kV) x-ray from a rotating-anode x-ray source. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A high-capacity rotating-anode x-ray tube with an 80-kW generator was implemented for preclinical FLASH radiation research. A custom 3-dimensionally printed immobilization and positioning tool was developed for reproducible irradiation of a mouse hind limb. Calibrated Gafchromic (EBT3) film and thermoluminescent dosimeters (LiF:Mg,Ti) were used for in-phantom and in vivo dosimetry. Healthy FVB/N and FVBN/C57BL/6 outbred mice were irradiated on 1 hind leg to doses up to 43 Gy at FLASH (87 Gy/s) and conventional (CONV; <0.05 Gy/s) dose rates. The radiation doses were delivered using a single pulse with the widths up to 500 ms and 15 minutes at FLASH and CONV dose rates. Histologic assessment of radiation-induced skin damage was performed at 8 weeks posttreatment. Tumor growth suppression was assessed using a B16F10 flank tumor model in C57BL6J mice irradiated to 35 Gy at both FLASH and CONV dose rates. RESULTS: FLASH-irradiated mice experienced milder radiation-induced skin injuries than CONV-irradiated mice, visible by 4 weeks posttreatment. At 8 weeks posttreatment, normal tissue injury was significantly reduced in FLASH-irradiated animals compared with CONV-irradiated animals for histologic endpoints including inflammation, ulceration, hyperplasia, and fibrosis. No difference in tumor growth response was observed between FLASH and CONV irradiations at 35 Gy. The normal tissue sparing effects of FLASH irradiations were observed only for high-severity endpoint of ulceration at 43 Gy, which suggests the dependency of biologic endpoints to FLASH radiation dose. CONCLUSIONS: Rotating-anode x-ray sources can achieve FLASH dose rates in a single pulse with dosimetric properties suitable for small-animal experiments. We observed FLASH normal tissue sparing of radiation toxicities in mouse skin irradiated at 35 Gy with no sacrifice to tumor growth suppression. This study highlights an accessible new modality for laboratory study of the FLASH effect.


Assuntos
Neoplasias , Lesões por Radiação , Animais , Camundongos , Raios X , Camundongos Endogâmicos C57BL , Radiografia , Radiometria
6.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 24(3): e13885, 2023 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36659841

RESUMO

The historic and ongoing evolution of the practice, technology, terminology, and implementation of programs related to quality in the medical radiological professions has given rise to the interchangeable use of the terms Quality Management (QM), Quality Assurance (QA), and Quality Control (QC) in the vernacular. This White Paper aims to provide clarification of QM, QA, and QC in medical physics context and guidance on how to use these terms appropriately in American College of Radiology (ACR) Practice Parameters and Technical Standards, generalizable to other guidance initiatives. The clarification of these nuanced terms in the radiology, radiation oncology, and nuclear medicine environments will not only boost the comprehensibility and usability of the Medical Physics Technical Standards and Practice Parameters, but also provide clarity and a foundation for ACR's clinical, physician-led Practice Parameters, which also use these important terms for monitoring equipment performance for safety and quality. Further, this will support the ongoing development of the professional practice of clinical medical physics by providing a common framework that distinguishes the various types of responsibilities borne by medical physicists and others in the medical radiological environment. Examples are provided of how QM, QA, and QC may be applied in the context of ACR Practice Parameters and Technical Standards.


Assuntos
Medicina Nuclear , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Humanos , Radiografia , Controle de Qualidade , Física
7.
Radiat Res ; 2022 Dec 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36520982

RESUMO

The linear, non-threshold (LNT) hypothesis of cancer induction derived from studies of populations exposed to moderate-to-high acute radiation doses may not be indicative of cancer risks associated with lifetime radiation exposures less than 100 mSv. The objective of this study was to examine risks and dose-response patterns of lymphohematopoietic cancer (LHC) and its types associated with low radiation exposure while adjusting for possible confounding factors. A retrospective cohort of 437,937 U.S. nuclear shipyard workers (153,930 radiation and 284,007 non-radiation workers) was followed from 1957 to 2011, with 3,699 LHC deaths observed. The risk of LHC in radiation workers was initially compared to the risk in non-radiation workers. Time dependent accumulated radiation dose, lagged 2 years, was used in categorical and continuous dose analysis among radiation workers to examine the LHC risks and possible dose-response relationships based on Poisson regression models. These analyses controlled for sex, race, time dependent age, calendar time, socioeconomic status, solvent-related last job, and age at first hire. The median lifetime radiation dose for the radiation worker population was 0.82 mSv and the 95th percentile dose was 83.63 mSv. The study shows: 1. LHC mortality for radiation workers was significantly lower than non-radiation workers relative risk: 0.927; 95% confidence intervals (95% CI): 0.865, 0.992; P = 0.030]. Among LHC types, the risks for lymphoid leukemia and lymphomas in radiation workers were lower than the risk in non-radiation workers with statistical significance, while the risk for the rest of LHC types did not show any statistically significant difference. 2. In categorical dose analysis among radiation workers, sample size weighted linear trend of relative risk (RRs) for LHC and its types in five dose categories (>0-<25, 25-<50, 50-<100, 100-<200, and > = 200 mSv) vs. 0 mSv were not statistically significant, although there was an elevation of RR for chronic myeloid leukemia only in the 50-<100 mSv category (RR: 2.746; 95% CI: 1.002, 7.521; P = 0.049) vs. 0 mSv. 3. The Poisson regression analyses among radiation workers using the time dependent radiation dose as a continuous variable showed an excess relative risk (ERR) for LHC at 100 mSv of 0.094 (95% CI: -0.037, 0.225; P = 0.158) and leukemia less chronic lymphoid leukemia, of 0.178 (95% CI: -0.085, 0.440; P = 0.440) vs. 0 mSv. The ERRs and their linear trend for all other types were not statistically significant.

8.
J Occup Environ Med ; 64(4): e224-e230, 2022 04 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081587

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine the risk of diseases among industrial workers with low and fractionated radiation exposures. METHOD: The 372,047 US male shipyard radiation and non-radiation workers were followed for 54 years and compared with US men using standardized mortality ratio (SMR) method. RESULTS: SMRs for both radiation and non-radiation workers had lower risks of death from all causes (0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74 to 0.75 and 0.77; 95% Cl 0.77 to 0.78, respectively) and from all cancers (0.92; 95% CI 0.91 to 0.93 and 0.90; 95% CI 0.89 to 0.91, respectively) compared with US men. Asbestos-related diseases including pleural cancers, mesothelioma, and asbestosis, but not lung cancers, were statistically higher in both radiation and non-radiation workers compared with the US men. CONCLUSION: US shipyard male radiation and non-radiation workers did not show any elevated mortality risks that might be associated with radiation exposure.


Assuntos
Amianto , Asbestose , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mesotelioma , Doenças Profissionais , Exposição Ocupacional , Humanos , Masculino , Doenças Profissionais/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Radiação Ionizante
11.
Pediatr Emerg Care ; 37(6): 296-302, 2021 Jun 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34038924

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To compare radiation doses used for pediatric computed tomography (CT) scans at community-based referring facilities (RF) to those at a designated pediatric trauma center (PTC) to assess the consistency of radiation exposure. METHODS: In this retrospective study, patients 0 to 18 years of age with CT imaging performed either at a RF or at a PTC from January 1, 2015, to January 5, 2016, were identified. Data about patients, CT radiation dose, and characteristics of the RFs were compared. RESULTS: We identified 502 patients (156 RF, 346 PTC) with 281 head CTs (79 RF, 202 PTC) and 86 abdominal/pelvis CTs (28 RF, 58 PTC). The radiation dose (measured in mean dose-length product [DLP] ± 1 standard deviation) was significantly higher for RF scans compared with PTC scans (head, RF DLP = 545 ± 334 vs PTC DLP = 438 ± 186 (P < 0.001); abdomen/pelvis, RF DLP = 279 ± 160 vs PTC DLP = 181 ± 201 [P = 0.027]). There was a nonsignificant trend toward lower head CT radiation dosages at RFs with a dedicated pediatric emergency department compared with RFs without a pediatric emergency department. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that CT scans performed at RFs expose pediatric patients to significantly higher doses of radiation when compared with a PTC. These data support further study to identify factors associated with increased radiation and educational outreach to RFs.


Assuntos
Exposição à Radiação , Centros de Traumatologia , Criança , Humanos , Doses de Radiação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
12.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 21(12): 325-328, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33207042

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility and practicality of ultraviolet (UV) germicidal irradiation of the inner bore of a computed tomography (CT) gantry as a means of viral decontamination. METHOD: A UV lamp (PADNUT 38 W, 253 nm UV-C light tube) and UV-C dosimeter (GENERAL UV-C Digital Light Meter No. UV512C) were used to measure irradiance throughout the inner bore of a CT scanner gantry. Irradiance (units µW/cm2 ) was related to the time required to achieve 6-log viral kill (10-6 survival fraction). RESULTS: A warm-up time of ~120 s was required for the lamp to reach stable irradiance. Irradiance at the scan plane (z = 0 cm) of the CT scanner was 580.9 µW/cm2 , reducing to ~350 µW/cm2 at z = ±20 cm toward the front or back of the gantry. The angular distribution of irradiation was uniform within 10% coefficient of variation. A conservative estimate suggests at least 6-log kill (survival fraction ≤ 10-6 ) of viral RNA within ±20 cm of the scan plane with an irradiation time of 120 s from cold start. More conservatively, running the lamp for 180 s (3 min) or 300 s (5 min) from cold start is estimated to yield survival fraction <<10-7 survival fraction within ±20 cm of the scan plane. CONCLUSION: Ultraviolet irradiation of the inner bore of the CT gantry can be achieved with a simple UV-C lamp attached to the CT couch. Such practice could augment manual wipe-down procedures, improve safety for CT technologists or housekeeping staff, and could potentially reduce turnover time between scanning sessions.


Assuntos
COVID-19/prevenção & controle , Desinfecção/métodos , Controle de Infecções/métodos , Tomógrafos Computadorizados , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/instrumentação , Calibragem , Descontaminação/instrumentação , Diagnóstico por Imagem/métodos , Controle de Infecções/instrumentação , RNA Viral/efeitos da radiação , Radiometria , SARS-CoV-2/efeitos da radiação , Raios Ultravioleta
13.
J Am Coll Radiol ; 17(9): 1176-1182, 2020 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32105647

RESUMO

The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) recently assessed patient radiation exposure in the United States, which was summarized in its 2019 NCRP Report No. 184. This work involved an estimation of the number of medical procedures using ionizing radiation, as well as the associated effective doses from these procedures. The NCRP Report No. 184 committee elected to not incorporate radiation dose from radiotherapy into its calculated population dose exposures, as the assessment of effective dose for the population undergoing radiotherapy is more complex than that for other medical radiation exposures. However, the aim of NCRP Report No. 184 was to raise awareness of ancillary radiation exposures to patients undergoing radiotherapy. Overall, it was estimated that annually, in 2016, approximately 800,000 patients received approximately 1 million courses of radiation therapy. Each of these treatments includes various types of imaging that may not be familiar to radiologists or others. Exposures from radiotherapy planning and delivery are reviewed in the report and summarized in this executive summary. The imaging techniques, use of this imaging, and associated tissue doses are described. Imaging can contribute a few percent to the planned treatment doses (which are prescribed to specified target volumes) as well as exposing patients to radiation outside of the target volume (in the imaging field of view).


Assuntos
Exposição à Radiação , Radioterapia (Especialidade) , Proteção Radiológica , Diagnóstico por Imagem , Humanos , Relatório de Pesquisa , Estados Unidos
14.
Med Phys ; 46(12): e757-e788, 2019 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31571229

RESUMO

Managing radiotherapy patients with implanted cardiac devices (implantable cardiac pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) has been a great practical and procedural challenge in radiation oncology practice. Since the publication of the AAPM TG-34 in 1994, large bodies of literature and case reports have been published about different kinds of radiation effects on modern technology implantable cardiac devices and patient management before, during, and after radiotherapy. This task group report provides the framework that analyzes the potential failure modes of these devices and lays out the methodology for patient management in a comprehensive and concise way, in every step of the entire radiotherapy process.


Assuntos
Desfibriladores Implantáveis , Marca-Passo Artificial , Radioterapia/métodos , Relatório de Pesquisa , Humanos , Dosagem Radioterapêutica , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador
16.
Pract Radiat Oncol ; 9(3): e307-e313, 2019 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30684586

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To evaluate the precision of 2 low-dose cone (LD) beam computed tomography (CBCT) protocols to align to bone and soft tissue for pediatric patients receiving image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) to the abdomen and pelvis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Image-quality evaluation was done for 858 CBCT scans from 46 pediatric patients treated with IGRT from January 2015 to December 2017. The evaluations guided the development of 2 significantly dose-reduced protocols, LD-CBCT1 and a further dose-reduced LD-CBCT2. Representative scans from LD-CBCT1 and LD-CBCT2 from 8 patients with at least 1 CBCT scan from both protocols were registered separately to a bone and soft-tissue landmark on the simulation computed tomography scan. Eighteen identical blinded random offsets were applied to each patient's LD-CBCT1 and LD-CBCT2 from a starting registration that was then realigned using rigid registration. The residual offset between the baseline registration and the final registration attempt was calculated and analyzed using a 1-sided, 1 sample t test to evaluate whether LD-CBCT1, delivering a higher dose, was superior to the lower-dose LD-CBCT2 for bone and soft-tissue alignment. RESULTS: In comparing 288 registrations with a bone landmark across 8 patients, no difference was found in the vector magnitude offsets using LD-CBCT 1 (mean [x¯], 0.73 mm; standard deviation [σ], 0.39 mm) and LD-CBCT2 (x¯, 0.74 mm; σ, 0.40 mm; P = .425). Comparing 216 registrations with a soft-tissue landmark across 6 patients, alignment using LD-CBCT2 (x¯, 1.55 mm; σ, 1.08 mm) resulted in larger differences in the vector magnitude of the offsets compared with LD-CBCT1 (x¯, 1.37 mm; σ, 0.74 mm; P = .049). CONCLUSIONS: Clinics treating pediatric patients should consider implementing a protocol mirroring LD-CBCT2 for abdomen and pelvis IGRT bone alignment. Further evaluation of the precision of LD-CBCTs for soft-tissue alignment is necessary.


Assuntos
Abdome/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada de Feixe Cônico/métodos , Pelve/diagnóstico por imagem , Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador/métodos , Radioterapia Guiada por Imagem/métodos , Osso e Ossos/diagnóstico por imagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Neoplasias/radioterapia , Dosagem Radioterapêutica
17.
Clin Imaging ; 55: 188-195, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30236642

RESUMO

Digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) is a new technology that is being used more frequently for both breast cancer screening and diagnostic purposes and its utilization is likely to continue to increase over time. The major benefit of tomosynthesis over 2D-mammography is that it allows radiologists to view breast tissue using a three-dimensional dataset and improves diagnostic accuracy by facilitating differentiation of potentially malignant lesions from overlap of normal tissue. In addition, image processing techniques allow reconstruction of two dimensional synthesized mammograms (SM) from DBT data, which eliminates the need for acquiring two dimensional full field digital mammography (FFDM) in addition to tomosynthesis and thereby reduces the radiation dose. DBT systems incorporate a moveable x-ray tube, which moves in a prescribed way over a limited angular range to obtain three-dimensional data of patients' breasts, and utilize reconstruction algorithms. The limited angular range for DBT leads to incomplete sampling of the object, and a movable x-ray tube prolongs the imaging time, both of which make DBT and SM susceptible to artifacts. Understanding the etiology of these artifacts should help radiologists in reducing the number of artifacts and in differentiating a true finding from one related to an artifact, thus potentially decreasing recall rates and false positive rates. This is becoming especially important with increased incorporation of DBT in practices around the world. The goal of this article is to review the physics principles behind DBT systems and use these principles to explain the origin of artifacts that can limit diagnostic evaluation.


Assuntos
Artefatos , Neoplasias da Mama/diagnóstico por imagem , Mamografia/métodos , Algoritmos , Mama/patologia , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Calcinose/diagnóstico por imagem , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Processamento de Imagem Assistida por Computador , Intensificação de Imagem Radiográfica/métodos
18.
J Med Imaging (Bellingham) ; 5(1): 015005, 2018 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29487882

RESUMO

Positioning of an intraoperative C-arm to achieve clear visualization of a particular anatomical feature often involves repeated fluoroscopic views, which cost time and radiation exposure to both the patient and surgical staff. A system for virtual fluoroscopy (called FluoroSim) that could dramatically reduce time- and dose-spent "fluoro-hunting" by leveraging preoperative computed tomography (CT), encoded readout of C-arm gantry position, and automatic 3D-2D image registration has been developed. The method is consistent with existing surgical workflow and does not require additional tracking equipment. Real-time virtual fluoroscopy was achieved via mechanical encoding of the C-arm motion, C-arm geometric calibration, and patient registration using a single radiograph. The accuracy, time, and radiation dose associated with C-arm positioning were measured for FluoroSim in comparison with conventional methods. Five radiology technologists were tasked with acquiring six standard pelvic views pertinent to sacro-illiac, anterior-inferior iliac spine, and superior-ramus screw placement in an anthropomorphic pelvis phantom using conventional and FluoroSim approaches. The positioning accuracy, exposure time, number of exposures, and total time for each trial were recorded, and radiation dose was characterized in terms of entrance skin dose and in-room scatter. The geometric accuracy of FluoroSim was measured to be [Formula: see text]. There was no significant difference ([Formula: see text]) observed in the accuracy or total elapsed time for C-arm positioning. However, the total fluoroscopy time required to achieve the desired view decreased by 4.1 s ([Formula: see text] for conventional, compared with [Formula: see text] for FluoroSim, [Formula: see text]), and the total number of exposures reduced by 4.0 ([Formula: see text] for conventional, compared with [Formula: see text] for FluoroSim, [Formula: see text]). These reductions amounted to a 50% to 78% decrease in patient entrance skin dose and a 55% to 70% reduction in in-room scatter. FluoroSim was found to reduce the radiation exposure required in C-arm positioning without diminishing positioning time or accuracy, providing a potentially valuable tool to assist technologists and surgeons.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA