Toxins in Botanical Drugs and Plant-derived Food and Feed - from Science to Regulation: A Workshop Review.

In September 2022, the 3rd International Workshop on pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) and related phytotoxins was held on-line, entitled 'Toxins in botanical drugs and plant-derived food and feed - from science to regulation'. The workshop focused on new findings about the occurrence, exposure, toxicity, and risk assessment of PAs. In addition, new scientific results related to the risk assessment of alkenylbenzenes, a distinct class of herbal constituents, were presented. The presence of PAs and alkenylbenzenes in plant-derived food, feed, and herbal medicines has raised health concerns with respect to their acute and chronic toxicity but mainly related to the genotoxic and carcinogenic properties of several congeners. The compounds are natural constituents of a variety of plant families and species widely used in medicinal, food, and feed products. Their individual occurrence, levels, and toxic properties, together with the broad range of congeners present in nature, represent a striking challenge to modern toxicology. This review tries to provide an overview of the current knowledge on these compounds and indicates needs and perspectives for future research.

The in vitro genotoxicity potency of mixtures of pyrrolizidine alkaloids can be explained by dose addition of the individual mixture components.

Plant-based 1,2-unsaturated Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids (PAs) are responsible for liver genotoxicity/carcinogenicity following metabolic activation, making them a relevant concern for safety assessment. Due to 21st century toxicology approaches, risk of PAs can be better discerned though an understanding of differing toxic potencies, but it is often mixtures of PAs that are found as contaminants in foods, for example, herbal teas and honey, food supplements and herbal medicines. Our study investigated whether genotoxicity potency of PAs dosed individually or in mixtures differed when measured using micronuclei formation in vitro in HepaRG human liver cells, which we and others have shown to be suitable for observing genotoxic potency differences across different PA structural classes. When equipotent concentrations of up to six different PAs representing a wide range of potencies in vitro were tested as mixtures, the observed genotoxic potency aligned favorably with results for single PAs. Similarly, when the BMD confidence intervals of these equipotent mixtures were compared with the confidence intervals of the individual PAs, only minimal variation was observed. These data support a conclusion that for this class of plant impurities, all acting via the same DNA-reactive mode of action, genotoxic potency can be regarded as additive when assessing the risk of mixtures of PAs.

Assessing the genotoxicity and carcinogenicity of 2-chloroethanol through structure activity relationships and in vitro testing approaches.

The detection of 2-chloroethanol in foods generally follows an assumption that the pesticide ethylene oxide has been used at some stage in the supply chain. In this situation the Pesticide Residues in Food Regulation (EC) 396/2005 requires 2-chloroethanol to be assessed as if equivalent to ethylene oxide, which has been classified as a genotoxic carcinogen. This review investigated whether this is an appropriate risk assessment approach for 2-chloroethanol. This involved an assessment of existing genotoxicity and carcinogenicity data, application of Structure Activity Based Read Across for carcinogenicity assessment, biological reactivity in the ToxTracker assay and micronuclei formation in HepaRG cells. Although we identified there is an absence of a standard oral bioassay for 2-chloroethanol, carcinogenicity weight-of-evidence assessment along with data on relevant structural analogues do not show evidence for carcinogenicity for 2-chloroethanol. The absence of genotoxicity was demonstrated for 2-chloroethanol and suitable analogues. In contrast, ethylene oxide showed reactivity towards markers indicative of direct DNA damage which is consistent with what is known about its mode-of-action. These data facilitate the understanding of 2-chloroethanol and given that it is not a genotoxic carcinogen suggest it must be assessed relative to non-cancer endpoints and a health protective Reference Dose should be established on that basis.

Novel Insights into Pyrrolizidine Alkaloid Toxicity and Implications for Risk Assessment: Occurrence, Genotoxicity, Toxicokinetics, Risk Assessment-A Workshop Report.

This paper reports on the major contributions and results of the 2nd International Workshop of Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids held in September 2020 in Kaiserslautern, Germany. Pyrrolizidine alkaloids are among the most relevant plant toxins contaminating food, feed, and medicinal products of plant origin. Hundreds of PA congeners with widespread occurrence are known, and thousands of plants are assumed to contain PAs. Due to certain PAs' pronounced liver toxicity and carcinogenicity, their occurrence in food, feed, and phytomedicines has raised serious human health concerns. This is particularly true for herbal teas, certain food supplements, honey, and certain phytomedicinal drugs. Due to the limited availability of animal data, broader use of in vitro data appears warranted to improve the risk assessment of a large number of relevant, 1,2-unsaturated PAs. This is true, for example, for the derivation of both toxicokinetic and toxicodynamic data. These efforts aim to understand better the modes of action, uptake, metabolism, elimination, toxicity, and genotoxicity of PAs to enable a detailed dose-response analysis and ultimately quantify differing toxic potencies between relevant PAs. Accordingly, risk-limiting measures comprising production, marketing, and regulation of food, feed, and medicinal products are discussed.

Incorporation of in vitro techniques for botanicals dietary supplement safety assessment - Towards evaluation of developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART).

As complex mixtures, botanicals present unique challenges when assessing safe use, particularly when endpoint gaps exist that cannot be fully resolved by existing toxicological literature. Here we explore in vitro gene expression as well receptor binding and enzyme activity as alternative assays to inform on developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) relevant modes of action, since DART data gaps are common for botanicals. Specifically, botanicals suspected to have DART effects, in addition to those with a significant history of use, were tested in these assays. Gene expression changes in a number of different cell types were analysed using the connectivity mapping approach (CMap) to identify modes of action through a functional read across approach. Taken together with ligand affinity data obtained using a set of molecular targets customised towards known DART relevant modes of action, it was possible to inform DART risk using functional analogues, potency comparisons and a margin of internal exposure approach.

Threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) for botanicals - Concentration data analysis of potentially genotoxic constituents to substantiate and extend the TTC approach to botanicals.

This paper evaluates use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) approach to assess safety of botanical preparations that may contain potentially genotoxic constituents, based on estimation of the fraction that may be genotoxic. A database of 107 chemical constituents of botanicals was compiled and their potential for genotoxicity evaluated from published data. Forty-three constituents met the criteria for potential genotoxicity. Concentration data on their occurrence in plants provided 2878 data points; the majority were in the low ppm level (range 0.00001-139,965 ppm, by dry weight). Weibull models of the quantitative distribution data were used to calculate 95th percentile values for chemical concentrations, analysing the dataset according to their presence in botanicals (i) as a single chemical, (ii) as two or more chemicals from the same chemical group, or (iii) as two or more chemicals from different chemical groups. The highest 95th percentile concentration value from these analyses was 1.8%. Using the TTC value of 0.15 µg/person per day for potentially genotoxic substances proposed in 2004, this value of 1.8% was used to derive an adjusted TTC value of 10 µg of plant material on a dry weight basis/person per day for assessment of potentially genotoxic substances in botanicals.

Intrinsic relative potency of a series of pyrrolizidine alkaloids characterized by rate and extent of metabolism.

1,2-Unsaturated pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) are sometimes present in foods or herbal supplements/medicines as impurities and pose potential concerns for liver genotoxicity/carcinogenicity. PAs display a strong structure toxicity relationship, however, current regulatory approaches to risk assessment take the precautionary approach of assuming all PAs display the same potency as the most toxic congeners lasiocarpine (LAS) and riddelliine (RID). Here we explore the relative potencies of a series of structurally diverse PAs by measuring DNA adduct formation in vitro in a rat sandwich culture hepatocyte (SCH) cell system. The adducts generated are consistent with those identified in vivo as biomarkers of PA exposure and potential liver-tumor formation. DNA reactive PAs require metabolic activation to form intermediates that bind DNA, therefore, adduct formation is a direct reflection of reactive metabolite formation. Since the area under the concentration versus time curve (AUC) for the depletion of parent PA from the extracellular media is a measure of PA exposure, the ratio of adducts/AUC provides a measure of hepatocyte exposure to DNA-binding metabolites corresponding to an intrinsic potency for DNA adduct formation. Intrinsic potencies relative to potencies for LAS compare well with existing relative potency data further affirming that PA toxicity varies considerably with chemical structure.

Relative potency of fifteen pyrrolizidine alkaloids to induce DNA damage as measured by micronucleus induction in HepaRG human liver cells.

Plant-based 1,2-unsaturated Pyrrolizidine Alkaloids (PAs) can be found as contaminants in foods like teas, herbs and honey. PAs are responsible for liver genotoxicity/carcinogenicity following metabolic activation, making them a relevant concern for safety assessment. Current regulatory risk assessments take a precautionary approach and assume all PAs are as potent as the known most potent representatives: lasiocarpine and riddelliine. Our study investigated whether genotoxicity potency differed as a consequence of structural differences, assessing micronuclei in vitro in HepaRG cells which express metabolising enzymes at levels similar to primary human hepatocytes. Benchmark Dose (BMD) analysis was used to calculate the critical effect dose for 15 PAs representing 6 structural classes. When BMD confidence intervals were used to rank PAs, lasiocarpine was the most potent PA and plotted distinctly from all other PAs examined. PA-N-oxides were least potent, notably less potent than their corresponding parent PA's. The observed genotoxic potency compared favorably with existing in vitro data when metabolic competency was considered. Although further consideration of biokinetics will be needed to develop a robust understanding of relative potencies for a realistic risk assessment of PA mixtures, these data facilitate understanding of their genotoxic potencies and affirm that not all PAs are created equal.