Identification of candidate causal variants and target genes at 41 breast cancer risk loci through differential allelic expression analysis.

Understanding breast cancer genetic risk relies on identifying causal variants and candidate target genes in risk loci identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS), which remains challenging. Since most loci fall in active gene regulatory regions, we developed a novel approach facilitated by pinpointing the variants with greater regulatory potential in the disease's tissue of origin. Through genome-wide differential allelic expression (DAE) analysis, using microarray data from 64 normal breast tissue samples, we mapped the variants associated with DAE (daeQTLs). Then, we intersected these with GWAS data to reveal candidate risk regulatory variants and analysed their cis-acting regulatory potential. Finally, we validated our approach by extensive functional analysis of the 5q14.1 breast cancer risk locus. We observed widespread gene expression regulation by cis-acting variants in breast tissue, with 65% of coding and noncoding expressed genes displaying DAE (daeGenes). We identified over 54 K daeQTLs for 6761 (26%) daeGenes, including 385 daeGenes harbouring variants previously associated with BC risk. We found 1431 daeQTLs mapped to 93 different loci in strong linkage disequilibrium with risk-associated variants (risk-daeQTLs), suggesting a link between risk-causing variants and cis-regulation. There were 122 risk-daeQTL with stronger cis-acting potential in active regulatory regions with protein binding evidence. These variants mapped to 41 risk loci, of which 29 had no previous report of target genes and were candidates for regulating the expression levels of 65 genes. As validation, we identified and functionally characterised five candidate causal variants at the 5q14.1 risk locus targeting the ATG10 and ATP6AP1L genes, likely acting via modulation of alternative transcription and transcription factor binding. Our study demonstrates the power of DAE analysis and daeQTL mapping to identify causal regulatory variants and target genes at breast cancer risk loci, including those with complex regulatory landscapes. It additionally provides a genome-wide resource of variants associated with DAE for future functional studies.

Colocalised Genetic Associations Reveal Alternative Splicing Variants as Candidate Causal Links for Breast Cancer Risk in 10 Loci.

Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have revealed numerous loci associated with breast cancer risk, yet the precise causal variants, their impact on molecular mechanisms, and the affected genes often remain elusive. We hypothesised that specific variants exert their influence by affecting cis-regulatory alternative splice elements. An analysis of splicing quantitative trait loci (sQTL) in healthy breast tissue from female individuals identified multiple variants linked to alterations in splicing ratios. Through colocalisation analysis, we pinpointed 43 variants within twelve genes that serve as candidate causal links between sQTL and GWAS findings. In silico splice analysis highlighted a potential mechanism for three genes-FDPS, SGCE, and MRPL11-where variants in proximity to or on the splice site modulate usage, resulting in alternative splice transcripts. Further in vitro/vivo studies are imperative to fully understand how these identified changes contribute to breast oncogenesis. Moreover, investigating their potential as biomarkers for breast cancer risk could enhance screening strategies and early detection methods for breast cancer.

THOR is a targetable epigenetic biomarker with clinical implications in breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer (BC) is the most frequently diagnosed cancer and a leading cause of death among women worldwide. Early BC is potentially curable, but the mortality rates still observed among BC patients demonstrate the urgent need of novel and more effective diagnostic and therapeutic options. Limitless self-renewal is a hallmark of cancer, governed by telomere maintenance. In around 95% of BC cases, this process is achieved by telomerase reactivation through upregulation of the human telomerase reverse transcriptase (hTERT). The hypermethylation of a specific region within the hTERT promoter, termed TERT hypermethylated oncological region (THOR) has been associated with increased hTERT expression in cancer. However, its biological role and clinical potential in BC have never been studied to the best of our knowledge. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the role of THOR as a biomarker and explore the functional impact of THOR methylation status in hTERT upregulation in BC. RESULTS: THOR methylation status in BC was assessed by pyrosequencing on discovery and validation cohorts. We found that THOR is significantly hypermethylated in malignant breast tissue when compared to benign tissue (40.23% vs. 12.81%, P < 0.0001), differentiating malignant tumor from normal tissue from the earliest stage of disease. Using a reporter assay, the addition of unmethylated THOR significantly reduced luciferase activity by an average 1.8-fold when compared to the hTERT core promoter alone (P < 0.01). To further investigate its biological impact on hTERT transcription, targeted THOR demethylation was performed using novel technology based on CRISPR-dCas9 system and significant THOR demethylation was achieved. Cells previously demethylated on THOR region did not develop a histologic cancer phenotype in in vivo assays. Additional studies are required to validate these observations and to unravel the causality between THOR hypermethylation and hTERT upregulation in BC. CONCLUSIONS: THOR hypermethylation is an important epigenetic mark in breast tumorigenesis, representing a promising biomarker and therapeutic target in BC. We revealed that THOR acts as a repressive regulatory element of hTERT and that its hypermethylation is a relevant mechanism for hTERT upregulation in BC.

Allelic expression imbalance of PIK3CA mutations is frequent in breast cancer and prognostically significant.

PIK3CA mutations are the most common in breast cancer, particularly in the estrogen receptor-positive cohort, but the benefit of PI3K inhibitors has had limited success compared with approaches targeting other less common mutations. We found a frequent allelic expression imbalance between the missense mutant and wild-type PIK3CA alleles in breast tumors from the METABRIC (70.2%) and the TCGA (60.1%) projects. When considering the mechanisms controlling allelic expression, 27.7% and 11.8% of tumors showed imbalance due to regulatory variants in cis, in the two studies respectively. Furthermore, preferential expression of the mutant allele due to cis-regulatory variation is associated with poor prognosis in the METABRIC tumors (P = 0.031). Interestingly, ER-, PR-, and HER2+ tumors showed significant preferential expression of the mutated allele in both datasets. Our work provides compelling evidence to support the clinical utility of PIK3CA allelic expression in breast cancer in identifying patients of poorer prognosis, and those with low expression of the mutated allele, who will unlikely benefit from PI3K inhibitors. Furthermore, our work proposes a model of differential regulation of a critical cancer-promoting gene in breast cancer.

Germline allelic expression of genes at 17q22 locus associates with risk of breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Translation of genome-wide association study (GWAS) findings into preventive approaches is challenged by the identification of the causal risk variants and the understanding of the biological mechanisms by which they act. We present using allelic expression (AE) ratios to perform quantitative case-control analysis as a novel approach to identify risk associations, causal regulatory variants, and target genes. METHODS: Using the breast cancer (BC) risk locus 17q22 to validate this approach, we measured AE ratios in normal breast tissue samples from controls and cases, as well as from unmatched blood samples. Then we used in-silico and in-vitro analysis to map and functionally characterised candidate causal variants. RESULTS: We found a significant shift in the AE patterns of STXBP4 (rs2628315) and COX11 (rs17817901) in the normal breast tissue of cases and healthy controls. Preferential expression of the G-rs2628315 and A-rs17817901 alleles, more often observed in cases, was associated with an increased risk for BC. Analysis of blood samples from cases and controls found a similar association. Furthermore, we identified two putative cis-regulatory variants - rs17817901 and rs8066588 - that affect a miRNA and a transcription factor binding site, respectively. CONCLUSION: We propose causal variants and target genes for the 17q22 BC risk locus and show that using AE ratios in case-control association studies is helpful in identifying risk and mapping causal variants.

Allele-specific miRNA-binding analysis identifies candidate target genes for breast cancer risk.

Most breast cancer (BC) risk-associated single-nucleotide polymorphisms (raSNPs) identified in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are believed to cis-regulate the expression of genes. We hypothesise that cis-regulatory variants contributing to disease risk may be affecting microRNA (miRNA) genes and/or miRNA binding. To test this, we adapted two miRNA-binding prediction algorithms-TargetScan and miRanda-to perform allele-specific queries, and integrated differential allelic expression (DAE) and expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) data, to query 150 genome-wide significant ( P ≤ 5 × 10 - 8 ) raSNPs, plus proxies. We found that no raSNP mapped to a miRNA gene, suggesting that altered miRNA targeting is an unlikely mechanism involved in BC risk. Also, 11.5% (6 out of 52) raSNPs located in 3'-untranslated regions of putative miRNA target genes were predicted to alter miRNA::mRNA (messenger RNA) pair binding stability in five candidate target genes. Of these, we propose RNF115, at locus 1q21.1, as a strong novel target gene associated with BC risk, and reinforce the role of miRNA-mediated cis-regulation at locus 19p13.11. We believe that integrating allele-specific querying in miRNA-binding prediction, and data supporting cis-regulation of expression, improves the identification of candidate target genes in BC risk, as well as in other common cancers and complex diseases.

Epigenetic therapy in urologic cancers: an update on clinical trials.

Epigenetic dysregulation is one of many factors that contribute to cancer development and progression. Numerous epigenetic alterations have been identified in urologic cancers including histone modifications, DNA methylation changes, and microRNA expression. Since these changes are reversible, efforts are being made to develop epigenetic drugs that restore the normal epigenetic patterns of cells, and many clinical trials are already underway to test their clinical potential. In this review we analyze multiple clinical trials (n=51) that test the efficacy of these drugs in patients with urologic cancers. The most frequently used epigenetic drugs were histone deacetylase inhibitors followed by antisense oligonucleotides, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors and histone demethylase inhibitors, the last of which are only being tested in prostate cancer. In more than 50% of the clinical trials considered, epigenetic drugs were used as part of combination therapy, which achieved the best results. The epigenetic regulation of some cancers is still matter of research but will undoubtedly open a window to new therapeutic approaches in the era of personalized medicine. The future of therapy for urological malignancies is likely to include multidrug regimens in which epigenetic modifying drugs will play an important role.

Candidate genetic modifiers for breast and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers.

BACKGROUND: BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers are at substantially increased risk for developing breast and ovarian cancer. The incomplete penetrance coupled with the variable age at diagnosis in carriers of the same mutation suggests the existence of genetic and nongenetic modifying factors. In this study, we evaluated the putative role of variants in many candidate modifier genes. METHODS: Genotyping data from 15,252 BRCA1 and 8,211 BRCA2 mutation carriers, for known variants (n = 3,248) located within or around 445 candidate genes, were available through the iCOGS custom-designed array. Breast and ovarian cancer association analysis was performed within a retrospective cohort approach. RESULTS: The observed P values of association ranged between 0.005 and 1.000. None of the variants was significantly associated with breast or ovarian cancer risk in either BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers, after multiple testing adjustments. CONCLUSION: There is little evidence that any of the evaluated candidate variants act as modifiers of breast and/or ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation carriers. IMPACT: Genome-wide association studies have been more successful at identifying genetic modifiers of BRCA1/2 penetrance than candidate gene studies.

TOX3 mutations in breast cancer.

TOX3 maps to 16q12, a region commonly lost in breast cancers and recently implicated in the risk of developing breast cancer. However, not much is known of the role of TOX3 itself in breast cancer biology. This is the first study to determine the importance of TOX3 mutations in breast cancers. We screened TOX3 for mutations in 133 breast tumours and identified four mutations (three missense, one in-frame deletion of 30 base pairs) in six primary tumours, corresponding to an overall mutation frequency of 4.5%. One potentially deleterious missense mutation in exon 3 (Leu129Phe) was identified in one tumour (genomic DNA and cDNA). Whilst copy number changes of 16q12 are common in breast cancer, our data show that mutations of TOX3 are present at low frequency in tumours. Our results support that TOX3 should be further investigated to elucidate its role in breast cancer biology.

Functional variants at the 11q13 risk locus for breast cancer regulate cyclin D1 expression through long-range enhancers.

Analysis of 4,405 variants in 89,050 European subjects from 41 case-control studies identified three independent association signals for estrogen-receptor-positive tumors at 11q13. The strongest signal maps to a transcriptional enhancer element in which the G allele of the best candidate causative variant rs554219 increases risk of breast cancer, reduces both binding of ELK4 transcription factor and luciferase activity in reporter assays, and may be associated with low cyclin D1 protein levels in tumors. Another candidate variant, rs78540526, lies in the same enhancer element. Risk association signal 2, rs75915166, creates a GATA3 binding site within a silencer element. Chromatin conformation studies demonstrate that these enhancer and silencer elements interact with each other and with their likely target gene, CCND1.