[Administration of anti-HER2 and satisfaction of patients treated for breast cancer]. / Administration des anti-HER2 et satisfaction des patients avec un cancer du sein.

INTRODUCTION: Quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction are major concerns in oncology. METHODS: The aim of this prospective observational study was to evaluate these parameters according to the mode of administration of anti-HER2 (subcutaneous [SC] versus intravenous [IV]), the place of administration (Home Hospitalization or HOD versus hospital) for patients supervised by an advanced practice nurse (APN). RESULTS: Between January 2022 and June 2023, 32 patients were included. They were statistically more satisfied with subcutaneous management (P=0.0004), a result explained by the speed of administration (43.5%), comfort during administration (26%) even though some expressed pain on injection and felt less anxiety (26%). Management by the APN seems more appropriate when anti-HER2 drugs were administered in HOD. In HOD, patients perceived an overall improvement in their quality of life, appetite and cognitive abilities, with a reduction in fatigue, pain and depression (P<0.05). However, the rate of outsourcing to HOD remained too low (30.4%), as 56.3% of patients would have liked to be cared for in HOD if they had had the opportunity. CONCLUSION: SC administration of anti-HER2 under the supervision of an APN has advantages for the patient, resulting in greatest satisfaction and improved patient QOL, preferably in HOD.

Assessment of workplace environmental contamination and occupational exposure to cisplatin and doxorubicin aerosols during electrostatic pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Electrostatic precipitation pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (ePIPAC) is a novel approach for intraperitoneal drug delivery. As ePIPAC using cisplatin and doxorubicin is performed in an operating room, the challenge is to safely deliver the chemotherapeutic aerosol intraperitoneally while preventing exposure to healthcare workers. The objective of this study was to describe cisplatin and doxorubicin workplace environmental contamination and healthcare worker exposure during ePIPAC. METHODS: Antineoplastic drugs concentrations of cisplatin and doxorubicin were measured in wipe samples from the operating room, and urine samples were collected from healthcare workers. The air samples were collected in order to detect Cisplatin contamination. Cisplatin was analysed by inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry and doxorubicin by ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: No trace of cisplatin was found in the air. Cisplatin and doxorubicin were detected on the operating room floor, surfaces, devices and personal protective equipment even after a cleaning protocol. No traces of cisplatin or doxorubicin were found in the urine samples. CONCLUSION: In this study, no internal contamination was found in the ePIPAC surgical team even after implementing two successive ePIPAC procedures. These results showed the effectiveness of the individual and collective protective measures applied. However, the cleaning procedure during ePIPAC should be respected to limit environmental exposure to chemotherapy to cisplatin and doxorubicin during ePIPAC.

Prospective evaluation of an anti-cancer drugs management programme in a dedicated oral therapy center (DICTO programme).

Oral therapies have highly modified cancer patient management and changed hospital practises. We introduce a specific Oral Therapy Centre and retrospectively review information prospectively recorded by co-ordination nurses (CNs) (the DICTO programme). We describe the roles played by CNs in the management of oral cancer therapies at Limoges Dupuytren Hospital between May 2015 and June 2018. All cancers, irrespective of stage or whether oral general chemotherapy or targeted therapy was prescribed, are included. We followed up 287 patients of median age 67 years (range 26-89 years). Of these, 76% had metastases and 44% were on first-line therapy. The vast majority (88%) of their first CN contacts occurred just after physician consultation and lasted an average of 60 min. As part of follow-up, the CNs made 2719 calls (average 10 min) to patients to educate them and to verify compliance and drug tolerance. They also received 833 calls from patients (70%) or their relatives or health professionals (30%) seeking advice on management of side effects. In addition to the initial appointments, 1069 non-scheduled follow-up visits were made to assess side effects (49.2%). The CNs devoted 5 h to each patient over 3 months of treatment (i.e. 25 min/day) and, also organised scheduled hospitalisations in the department of oncology for 51% of patients. We show the interest and real-life work in a specific oral therapy centre within oncology department with the role of CNs to facilitate the global health care of the patients.