A Mesoporous Gold Sensor Unveils Phospho PD-L1 in Extracellular Vesicles as a Proxy for PD-L1 Expression in Lung Cancer Tissue.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1), or its receptor, PD-1 have improved survival in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Assessment of PD-L1 expression requires tissue biopsy or fine needle aspiration that are currently used to identify patients most likely to respond to single agent anti-PD-1/PD-L1 therapy. However, obtaining sufficient tissue to generate a PD-L1 tissue proportion score (TPS) ≥ 50% using immunohistochemistry remains a challenge that potentially may be overcome by liquid biopsies. This study utilized a mesoporous gold sensor (MGS) assay to examine the phosphorylation status of PD-L1 in plasma extracellular vesicles (EV pPD-L1) and PD-L1 levels in plasma from NSCLC patient samples and their association with tumor PD-L1 TPS. The 3-dimensional mesoporous network of the electrodes provides a large surface area, high signal-to-noise ratio, and a superior electro-conductive framework, thereby significantly improving the detection sensitivity of PD-L1 nanosensing. Test (n = 20) (Pearson's r = 0.99) and validation (n = 45) (Pearson's r = 0.99) cohorts show that EV pPD-L1 status correlates linearly with the tumor PD-L1 TPS assessed by immunohistochemistry irrespective of the tumor stage, with 64% of patients overall showing detectable EV pPD-L1 levels in plasma. In contrast to the EV pPD-L1 results, plasma PD-L1 levels did not correlate with the tumor PD-L1 TPS score or EV pPD-L1 levels. These data demonstrate that EV pPD-L1 levels may be used to select patients for appropriate PD-1 and PD-L1 ICI therapy regimens in early, locally advanced, and advanced NSCLC and should be tested further in randomized controlled trials. Most importantly, the assay used has a less than 24h turnaround time, facilitating adoption of the test into the routine diagnostic evaluation of patients prior to therapy.

Liquid Biopsy Snapshots of Key Phosphoproteomic Pathways in Lung Cancer Patients for Diagnosis and Therapy Monitoring.

Phosphorylation is a post-translational modification in proteins that changes protein conformation and activity for regulating signal transduction pathways. This mechanism is frequently impaired in lung cancer, resulting in permanently active constitutive phosphorylation to initiate tumor growth and/or reactivate pathways in response to therapy. We developed a multiplexed phosphoprotein analyzer chip (MPAC) that enables rapid (detection time: 5 min) and sensitive (LOD: 2 pg/µL) detection of protein phosphorylation and presents phosphoproteomic profiling of major phosphorylation pathways in lung cancer. We monitored phosphorylated receptors and downstream proteins involved in mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathways in lung cancer cell line models and patient-derived extracellular vesicles (EV). Using kinase inhibitor drugs in cell line models, we found that the drug can inhibit the phosphorylation and/or activation of the kinase pathway. We then generated a phosphorylation heatmap by EV phosphoproteomic profiling of plasma samples isolated from 36 lung cancer patients and 8 noncancer individuals. The heatmap showed a clear difference between the noncancer and cancer samples and identify the specific proteins that are activated in the cancer samples. Our data also showed that MPAC could monitor immunotherapy responses by assessment of the phosphorylation states of the proteins, particularly for PD-L1. Finally, with a longitudinal study, we found that the phosphorylation levels of the proteins were indicative of a positive response to therapy. We believe that this study will lead to personalized treatment by providing a better understanding of the active and resistant pathways and will provide a tool for selecting combined and targeted therapies for precision medicine.

Harnessing gene fusion-derived neoantigens for 'cold' breast and prostate tumor immunotherapy.

Breast and prostate cancers are generally considered immunologically 'cold' tumors due to multiple mechanisms rendering them unresponsive to immune checkpoint blockade therapies. With little success in garnering positive outcomes in modern immunotherapeutic clinical trials, it is prudent to re-examine the role of immunogenic neoantigens in these cold tumors. Gene fusions are driver mutations in hormone-driven cancers that can result in alternative mutation-specific neoantigens to promote immunotherapy sensitivity. This review focuses on 1) gene fusion formation mechanisms in neoantigen generation; 2) gene fusion neoantigens in cancer immunotherapeutic strategies and associated clinical trials; and 3) challenges and opportunities in computational and liquid biopsy technologies. This review is anticipated to initiate further research into gene fusion neoantigens of cold tumors for further experimental validation.

Combination of Anti-Angiogenics and Checkpoint Inhibitors for Renal Cell Carcinoma: Is the Whole Greater Than the Sum of Its Parts?

Anti-angiogenic agents, such as vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors and anti-VEGF antibodies, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) are standard treatments for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). In the past, these agents were administered as sequential monotherapies. Recently, combinations of anti-angiogenic agents and CPIs have been approved for the treatment of aRCC, based on evidence that they provide superior efficacy when compared with sunitinib monotherapy. Here we explore the possible mechanisms of action of these combinations, including a review of relevant preclinical data and clinical evidence in patients with aRCC. We also ask whether the benefit is additive or synergistic, and, thus, whether concomitant administration is preferred over sequential monotherapy. Further research is needed to understand how combinations of anti-angiogenic agents with CPIs compare with CPI monotherapy or combination therapy (e.g., nivolumab and ipilimumab), and whether the long-term benefit observed in a subset of patients treated with CPI combinations will also be realised in patients treated with an anti-angiogenic therapy and a CPI. Additional research is also needed to establish whether other elements of the tumour microenvironment also need to be targeted to optimise treatment efficacy, and to identify biomarkers of response to inform personalised treatment using combination therapies.

A digital single-molecule nanopillar SERS platform for predicting and monitoring immune toxicities in immunotherapy.

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated significant improvements in survival for subsets of cancer patients. However, they carry significant and sometimes life-threatening toxicities. Prompt prediction and monitoring of immune toxicities have the potential to maximise the benefits of immune checkpoint therapy. Herein, we develop a digital nanopillar SERS platform that achieves real-time single cytokine counting and enables dynamic tracking of immune toxicities in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment - broader applications are anticipated in other disease indications. By analysing four prospective cytokine biomarkers that initiate inflammatory responses, the digital nanopillar SERS assay achieves both highly specific and highly sensitive cytokine detection down to attomolar level. Significantly, we report the capability of the assay to longitudinally monitor 10 melanoma patients during immune inhibitor blockade treatment. Here, we show that elevated cytokine concentrations predict for higher risk of developing severe immune toxicities in our pilot cohort of patients.

Apalutamide and Overall Survival in Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: The phase 3 SPARTAN study evaluated apalutamide versus placebo in patients with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC) and prostate-specific antigen doubling time of ≤10 mo. At primary analysis, apalutamide improved median metastasis-free survival (MFS) by 2 yr and overall survival (OS) data were immature. OBJECTIVE: We report the prespecified event-driven final analysis for OS. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1207 patients with nmCRPC (diagnosed by conventional imaging) were randomised 2:1 to apalutamide (240mg/d) or placebo, plus on-going androgen deprivation therapy. After MFS was met and the study was unblinded, 76 (19%) patients still receiving placebo crossed over to apalutamide. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: OS and time to cytotoxic chemotherapy (TTChemo) were analysed by group-sequential testing with O'Brien-Fleming-type alpha spending function. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: At median 52-mo follow-up, 428 deaths had occurred. The median treatment duration was 32.9 mo for apalutamide group and 11.5 mo for placebo group. Median OS was markedly longer with apalutamide versus placebo, reaching prespecified statistical significance (73.9 vs 59.9 mo, hazard ratio [HR]: 0.78 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.64-0.96]; p=0.016). Apalutamide also lengthened TTChemo versus placebo (HR: 0.63 [95% CI, 0.49-0.81]; p=0.0002). Discontinuation rates in apalutamide and placebo groups due to progressive disease were 43% and 74%, and due to adverse events 15% and 8.4%, respectively. Subsequent life-prolonging therapy was received by 371 (46%) patients in the apalutamide arm and by 338 (84%) patients in the placebo arm including 59 patients who received apalutamide after crossover. Safety was consistent with previous reports; when adverse events were adjusted for treatment exposure, rash had the greatest difference of incidence between the apalutamide and placebo groups. CONCLUSIONS: Extension of OS with apalutamide compared with placebo conferred impactful benefit in patients with nmCRPC. There was a 22% reduction in the hazard of death in the apalutamide group despite 19% crossover (placebo to apalutamide) and higher rates of subsequent therapy in the placebo group. PATIENT SUMMARY: With data presented herein, all primary and secondary study end points of SPARTAN were met; findings demonstrate the value of apalutamide as a treatment option for nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Correlation of Progression-Free Survival-2 and Overall Survival in Solid Tumors.

Background: Using progression-free survival (PFS)2, time from randomization to 2nd disease progression or death, is proposed as a surrogate for overall survival (OS) in oncology clinical trials. We used published data from solid tumor trials to assess whether PFS2 and OS are correlated. Methods: A literature search identified studies that reported PFS, PFS2, and OS. Two reviewers screened for eligibility, and documented PFS2, PFS or time from 1st to 2nd disease progression or death and OS. Correlation between PFS2 and OS was assessed using: (1) Kendall's Tau + Pearson's correlation coefficient in randomized controlled trials (RCTs); (2) Meta-analysis with the random effects model to compute the pooled correlation of PFS2 and OS. Results: Overall, 133 studies met search criteria, 15 (28 arms) had complete PFS2 and OS data in ovarian, gastric, colorectal, prostate, lung, renal and breast cancers. A positive correlation for PFS2 and OS was found for all 15 studies (Kendall's Tau = 0.7 [95% CIs 0.54, 0.78]); 10 RCTs (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.86); and meta-analysis from 7 trials (pooled Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.84 [p = 0.0001; 95% CIs 0.71, 0.96]). Conclusions: In this retrospective analysis PFS2 strongly correlates with OS supporting the use of PFS2 to measure long-term clinical benefit when OS cannot be assessed.

Efficacy and Safety Exposure-Response Relationships of Apalutamide in Patients with Nonmetastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the relationship between exposure of apalutamide and its active metabolite, N-desmethyl-apalutamide, and selected clinical efficacy and safety parameters in men with high-risk nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: An exploratory exposure-response analysis was undertaken using data from the 1,207 patients (806 apalutamide and 401 placebo) enrolled in the SPARTAN study, including those who had undergone dose reductions and dose interruptions. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models evaluated the relationships between apalutamide and N-desmethyl-apalutamide exposure, expressed as area under the concentration-time curve at steady state, and metastasis-free survival (MFS). Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models assessed the relationship between apalutamide and N-desmethyl-apalutamide exposure and common treatment-emergent adverse events including fatigue, fall, skin rash, weight loss, and arthralgia. RESULTS: A total of 21% of patients in the apalutamide arm experienced dose reductions diminishing the average daily dose to 209 mg instead of 240 mg. Within the relatively narrow exposure range, no statistically significant relationship was found between MFS and apalutamide and N-desmethyl-apalutamide exposure. Within apalutamide-treated subjects, skin rash and weight loss had a statistically significant association with higher apalutamide exposure. CONCLUSIONS: The use of apalutamide at the recommended dose of 240 mg once daily provided a similar delay in metastases across the SPARTAN patient population, regardless of exposure. The exploratory exposure-safety analysis supports dose reductions in patients experiencing adverse events.

Understanding the Role of Comparative Clinical Studies in the Development of Oncology Biosimilars.

Biosimilars have the potential to broaden patient access to biologics and provide cost savings for health care systems. During the development of a biosimilar, data that directly compare the proposed biosimilar with the reference product are required. Such comparative data are generated in a stepwise hierarchical process that begins with extensive laboratory-based structural analyses and functional assays. This initial analytical phase serves as the foundation for the demonstration of biosimilarity and is followed by nonclinical in vivo testing (if required) and then clinical evaluation, including a comparative pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics study that is usually conducted in healthy volunteers. The development program typically culminates with a comparative clinical efficacy study. The aim of this study is to confirm clinical equivalence of the potential biosimilar and reference product on the basis of prespecified margins, using a study population and efficacy end point that are sufficiently sensitive for detecting potential product-related differences. Such studies also include detailed analyses of safety as well as evaluation of immunogenicity. As biosimilars become more widely available in oncology, especially with recent regulatory approvals of rituximab, trastuzumab, and bevacizumab biosimilars, it is critically important that clinicians understand how the comparative clinical study differs from a traditional phase III efficacy and safety study in the development of a novel biologic originator product. Here, we review the role of comparative clinical studies in biosimilar development, with a focus on trials conducted to support approved trastuzumab biosimilars. We discuss the study populations and end points used, extrapolation of indications, and the confirmatory nature of these studies within the totality of evidence supporting biosimilarity.

Phosphoprotein Biosensors for Monitoring Pathological Protein Structural Changes.

Current biotechnological developments are driving a significant shift towards integrating proteomic analysis with landmark genomic, methylomic, and transcriptomic data to elucidate functional effects. For the majority of proteins, structure and function are closely intertwined. Post-translational protein modifications (e.g., phosphorylation) leading to aberrantly active structures can originate a wide variety of pathological conditions, including cancer. Analysis of protein structure variants is thus integral to the identification of clinically actionable targets and the design of novel disease diagnosis and therapy approaches. However, it is still challenging to interrogate subtle structural changes of proteins in a rapid and cost-effective manner with current tools. This review primarily compiles the latest biosensing techniques for protein structural analysis.

Merging new-age biomarkers and nanodiagnostics for precision prostate cancer management.

The accurate identification and stratified treatment of clinically significant early-stage prostate cancer have been ongoing concerns since the outcomes of large international prostate cancer screening trials were reported. The controversy surrounding clinical and cost benefits of prostate cancer screening has highlighted the lack of strategies for discriminating high-risk disease (that requires early treatment) from low-risk disease (that could be managed using watchful waiting or active surveillance). Advances in molecular subtyping and multiomics nanotechnology-based prostate cancer risk delineation can enable refinement of prostate cancer molecular taxonomy into clinically meaningful and treatable subtypes. Furthermore, the presence of intertumoural and intratumoural heterogeneity in prostate cancer warrants the development of novel nanodiagnostic technologies to identify clinically significant prostate cancer in a rapid, cost-effective and accurate manner. Circulating and urinary next-generation prostate cancer biomarkers for disease molecular subtyping and the newest complementary nanodiagnostic platforms for enhanced biomarker detection are promising tools for precision prostate cancer management. However, challenges in merging both aspects and clinical translation still need to be overcome.

Reading Conformational Changes in Proteins with a New Colloidal-Based Interfacial Biosensing System.

Many biological events such as mutations or aberrant post-translational modifications can alter the conformation and/or folding stability of proteins and their subsequent biological function, which may trigger the onset of diseases like cancer. Evaluating protein folding is hence crucial for the diagnosis of these diseases. Yet, it is still challenging to detect changes in protein folding, especially if they are subtle, in a simple and highly sensitive manner with the current assays. Herein, we report a new colloidal-based interfacial biosensing approach for qualitative and quantitative profiling of various types of changes in protein folding; from denaturation to variant conformations in native proteins, such as protein activation via mutations or phosphorylation. The approach is based on the direct interfacial interaction of proteins freely available in solution with added tannic-acid-capped gold nanoparticles, to interrogate their folding status in their solubilized form. We found that under the optimized conditions, proteins can modulate colloids solvation according to their folding or conformational status, which can be visualized in a single step, by the naked eye, with minimal protein input requirements (limit of detection of 1 ng/µL). Protein folding detection was achieved regardless of protein topology and size without using conformation-specific antibodies and mutational analysis, which are the most common assays for sensing malfunctioning proteins. The approach showed excellent sensitivity, superior to circular dichroism, for the detection of the very subtle conformational changes induced by activating mutations and phosphorylation in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) proteins. This enabled their detection even in complex samples derived from lung cancer cells, which contained up to 95% excess of their wild-type forms. A broader clinical translation was shown via monitoring the action of conformation-restoring drugs, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors, on EGFR conformation and its downstream protein network, using the ERK protein as a surrogate.

Effect of apalutamide on health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: an analysis of the SPARTAN randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: In the SPARTAN trial, addition of apalutamide to androgen deprivation therapy, as compared with placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy, significantly improved metastasis-free survival in men with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for development of metastases. We aimed to investigate the effects of apalutamide versus placebo added to androgen deprivation therapy on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). METHODS: SPARTAN is a multicentre, international, randomised, phase 3 trial. Participants were aged 18 years or older, with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less, and a prostate-specific antigen concentration of 2 ng/mL or more in serum. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to 240 mg oral apalutamide per day plus androgen deprivation therapy, or matched oral placebo plus androgen deprivation therapy, using an interactive voice randomisation system. Permuted block randomisation was used according to the three baseline stratification factors: prostate-specific antigen doubling time (>6 months vs ≤6 months), use of bone-sparing drugs (yes vs no), and presence of local-regional nodal disease (N0 vs N1). Each treatment cycle was 28 days. The primary endpoint was metastasis-free survival. The trial was unblinded in July, 2017. In this prespecified exploratory analysis we assessed HRQOL using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and EQ-5D-3L questionnaires, which we collected at baseline, day 1 of cycle 1 (before dose), day 1 of treatment cycles 1-6, day 1 of every two cycles from cycles 7 to 13, and day 1 of every four cycles thereafter. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01946204. FINDINGS: Between Oct 14, 2013, and Dec 15, 2016, we randomly assigned 1207 patients to receive apalutamide (n=806) or placebo (n=401). The clinical cutoff date, as for the primary analysis, was May 19, 2017. Median follow-up for overall survival was 20·3 months (IQR 14·8-26·6). FACT-P total and subscale scores were associated with a preservation of HRQOL from baseline to cycle 29 in the apalutamide group; there were similar results for EQ-5D-3L. At baseline, the mean for FACT-P total score in both the apalutamide and placebo groups were consistent with the FACT-P general population norm for US adult men. Group mean patient-reported outcome scores over time show that HRQOL was maintained from baseline after initiation of apalutamide treatment and was similar over time among patients receiving apalutamide versus placebo. Least-squares mean change from baseline shows that HRQOL deterioration was more apparent in the placebo group. INTERPRETATION: In asymptomatic men with high-risk non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, HRQOL was maintained after initiation of apalutamide treatment. Considered with findings from SPARTAN, patients who received apalutamide had longer metastasis-free survival and longer time to symptomatic progression than did those who received placebo, while preserving HRQOL. FUNDING: Janssen Research & Development.

An exosomal- and interfacial-biosensing based strategy for remote monitoring of aberrantly phosphorylated proteins in lung cancer cells.

It is a well-known phenomenon that cancer cells release key biological information such as DNA, RNA or proteins into body fluids (e.g., blood, urine or saliva). The analysis of these molecules-often encapsulated within nanovesicules called exosomes-is highly attractive, because it could replace current surgical biopsies, which are painful, costly and potentially risky for patients. For example, current strategies in lung cancer diagnosis involve genetic analyses from tumour tissues to detect the presence of underlying DNA mutations, known to alter the phosphorylation status and function of proteins. This information is used to direct therapy, as aberrantly phosphorylated proteins are the main targets of current drugs such as Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs). An alternative and less invasive strategy would be the remote analysis of these phospho-proteins by isolating them from cancer-derived exosomes. This would allow evaluating not only their phosphorylation status at diagnosis, but also the timely restoration of protein phosphorylation levels during therapy with TKIs. Yet, this proteomic approach remains vastly unexplored. Herein, we demonstrate that key lung cancer phosphoproteins, such as EGFR and ERK, are expressed in lung cancer exosomes and we outline a new exosomal proteomic-based approach for their fast and convenient detection. This approach, which could complement current genetic analysis for lung cancer detection, easily detects the phosphorylation status of lung cancer exosomal proteins within minutes after their extraction, bringing hope of circumventing the need for tissue biopsy and costly and cumbersome DNA sequencing techniques. It exploits the fact that phosphorylation induces protein conformational changes, which in turn alter protein's ability to effectively interact with bare gold surfaces. This leads to phosphorylated and non-phosphorylated protein isoforms displaying different gold-adsorption profiles. Using single-use and inexpensive, gold (Au) screen-printed electrodes (SPEs), we demonstrate the successful detection of aberrantly phosphorylated EGFR and ERK protein isoforms derived from lung cancer cell exosomes with a sensitivity down to 15 ng µL-1 in samples with up to 90% excess of their non-phosphorylated (wild-type) forms. We further show the applicability of this strategy for monitoring the action of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors over time. We believe that this non-invasive technique will open up new avenues for facilitating cancer diagnosis and time-point monitoring of therapeutic responses.

Design and Clinical Verification of Surface-Enhanced Raman Spectroscopy Diagnostic Technology for Individual Cancer Risk Prediction.

The use of emerging nanotechnologies, such as plasmonic nanoparticles in diagnostic applications, potentially offers opportunities to revolutionize disease management and patient healthcare. Despite worldwide research efforts in this area, there is still a dearth of nanodiagnostics which have been successfully translated for real-world patient usage due to the predominant sole focus on assay analytical performance and lack of detailed investigations into clinical performance in human samples. In a bid to address this pressing need, we herein describe a comprehensive clinical verification of a prospective label-free surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) nanodiagnostic assay for prostate cancer (PCa) risk stratification. This contribution depicts a roadmap of (1) designing a SERS assay for robust and accurate detection of clinically validated PCa RNA targets; (2) employing a relevant and proven PCa clinical biomarker model to test our nanodiagnostic assay; and (3) investigating the clinical performance on independent training ( n = 80) and validation ( n = 40) cohorts of PCa human patient samples. By relating the detection outcomes to gold-standard patient biopsy findings, we established a PCa risk scoring system which exhibited a clinical sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 and 0.90, respectively [area-under-curve of 0.84 (95% confidence interval: 0.81-0.87) for differentiating high- and low-risk PCa] in the validation cohort. We envision that our SERS nanodiagnostic design and clinical verification approach may aid in the individualized prediction of PCa presence and risk stratification and may overall serve as an archetypical strategy to encourage comprehensive clinical evaluation of nanodiagnostic innovations.

nab-Paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Australian subset analyses of the phase III MPACT trial.

AIM: The phase III MPACT trial (N = 861) demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) with first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus gemcitabine alone (median, 8.7 months vs 6.6 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.83; P < 0.001) in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer. The efficacy benefit of the combination over gemcitabine alone was observed across patient subgroups, including those based on region. This subset analysis was designed to examine the safety and efficacy of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients treated in Australia to understand whether differences in patient population or regional variations in patient care had any impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS: Patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer received first-line nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine or gemcitabine alone in the MPACT study; this analysis focused on those treated in Australia. RESULTS: In the Australian cohort, 120 patients were randomized to receive nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (n = 61) or gemcitabine alone (n = 59). Median OS was 9.4 months with nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine versus 6.7 months with gemcitabine alone (HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.44-0.94; P = 0.022). Progression-free survival (median, 5.5 months vs 3.6 months; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.42-1.00; P = 0.049) and the overall response rate (23% vs 2%; P < 0.001) were significantly improved with the combination. No new safety signals were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this subset analysis confirm the efficacy and manageable safety profile of nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer treated in Australia.

Apalutamide Treatment and Metastasis-free Survival in Prostate Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Apalutamide, a competitive inhibitor of the androgen receptor, is under development for the treatment of prostate cancer. We evaluated the efficacy of apalutamide in men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who were at high risk for the development of metastasis. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial involving men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer and a prostate-specific antigen doubling time of 10 months or less. Patients were randomly assigned, in a 2:1 ratio, to receive apalutamide (240 mg per day) or placebo. All the patients continued to receive androgen-deprivation therapy. The primary end point was metastasis-free survival, which was defined as the time from randomization to the first detection of distant metastasis on imaging or death. RESULTS: A total of 1207 men underwent randomization (806 to the apalutamide group and 401 to the placebo group). In the planned primary analysis, which was performed after 378 events had occurred, median metastasis-free survival was 40.5 months in the apalutamide group as compared with 16.2 months in the placebo group (hazard ratio for metastasis or death, 0.28; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.23 to 0.35; P<0.001). Time to symptomatic progression was significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.32 to 0.63; P<0.001). The rate of adverse events leading to discontinuation of the trial regimen was 10.6% in the apalutamide group and 7.0% in the placebo group. The following adverse events occurred at a higher rate with apalutamide than with placebo: rash (23.8% vs. 5.5%), hypothyroidism (8.1% vs. 2.0%), and fracture (11.7% vs. 6.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Among men with nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastasis-free survival and time to symptomatic progression were significantly longer with apalutamide than with placebo. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; SPARTAN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01946204 .).

Quality of Life Outcomes for Cabozantinib Versus Everolimus in Patients With Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: METEOR Phase III Randomized Trial.

Purpose In the phase III METEOR trial ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01865747), 658 previously treated patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive cabozantinib or everolimus. The cabozantinib arm had improved progression-free survival, overall survival, and objective response rate compared with everolimus. Changes in quality of life (QoL), an exploratory end point, are reported here. Patients and Methods Patients completed the 19-item Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI-19) and the five-level EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) questionnaires at baseline and throughout the study. The nine-item FKSI-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS), a subset of FKSI-19, was also investigated. Data were summarized descriptively and by repeated-measures analysis (for which a clinically relevant difference was an effect size ≥ 0.3). Time to deterioration (TTD) was defined as the earlier of date of death, radiographic progressive disease, or ≥ 4-point decrease from baseline in FKSI-DRS. Results The QoL questionnaire completion rates remained ≥ 75% through week 48 in each arm. There was no difference over time for FKSI-19 Total, FKSI-DRS, or EQ-5D data between the cabozantinib and everolimus arms. Among the individual FKSI-19 items, cabozantinib was associated with worse diarrhea and nausea; everolimus was associated with worse shortness of breath. These differences are consistent with the adverse event profile of each drug. Cabozantinib improved TTD overall, with a marked improvement in patients with bone metastases at baseline. Conclusion In patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma, relative to everolimus, cabozantinib generally maintained QoL to a similar extent. Compared with everolimus, cabozantinib extended TTD overall and markedly improved TTD in patients with bone metastases.

Cabazitaxel Versus Docetaxel As First-Line Therapy for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Randomized Phase III Trial-FIRSTANA.

Purpose In patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), overall survival (OS) is significantly improved with cabazitaxel versus mitoxantrone after prior docetaxel treatment. FIRSTANA ( ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01308567) assessed whether cabazitaxel 20 mg/m2 (C20) or 25 mg/m2 (C25) is superior to docetaxel 75 mg/m2 (D75) in terms of OS in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. Patients and Methods Patients with mCRPC and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 to 2 were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive C20, C25, or D75 intravenously every 3 weeks plus daily prednisone. The primary end point was OS. Secondary end points included safety; progression-free survival (PFS); tumor, prostate-specific antigen, and pain response; pharmacokinetics; and health-related quality of life. Results Between May 2011 and April 2013, 1,168 patients were randomly assigned. Baseline characteristics were similar across cohorts. Median OS was 24.5 months with C20, 25.2 months with C25, and 24.3 months with D75. Hazard ratio for C20 versus D75 was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.85 to 1.20; P = .997), and hazard ratio for C25 versus D75 was 0.97 (95% CI, 0.82 to 1.16; P = .757). Median PFS was 4.4 months with C20, 5.1 months with C25, and 5.3 months with D75, with no significant differences between treatment arms. Radiographic tumor responses were numerically higher for C25 (41.6%) versus D75 (30.9%; nominal P = .037, without multiplicity test adjustment). Rates of grade 3 or 4 treatment-emergent adverse events were 41.2%, 60.1%, and 46.0% for C20, C25, and D75, respectively. Febrile neutropenia, diarrhea, and hematuria were more frequent with C25; peripheral neuropathy, peripheral edema, alopecia, and nail disorders were more frequent with D75. Conclusion C20 and C25 did not demonstrate superiority for OS versus D75 in patients with chemotherapy-naïve mCRPC. Tumor response was numerically higher with C25 versus D75; pain PFS was numerically improved with D75 versus C25. Cabazitaxel and docetaxel demonstrated different toxicity profiles, with overall less toxicity with C20.

Detection of aberrant protein phosphorylation in cancer using direct gold-protein affinity interactions.

Protein phosphorylation is one of the most prominent post-translational mechanisms for protein regulation, which is frequently impaired in cancer. Through the covalent addition of phosphate groups to certain amino-acids, the interactions of former residues with nearby amino-acids are drastically altered, resulting in major changes of protein conformation that impacts its biological function. Herein, we report that these conformational changes can also disturb the protein's ability to interact with and adsorb onto bare gold surfaces. We exploited this feature to develop a simple electrochemical method for detecting the aberrant phosphorylation of EGFR protein in several lung cancer cell lines. This method, which required as low as 10ng/µL (i.e., 50ng) of purified EGFR protein, also enabled monitoring cell sensitivity to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) - a common drug used for restoring the function of aberrantly phosphorylated proteins in lung cancer. The reported strategy based on direct gold-protein affinity interactions avoids the conventional paradigm of requiring a phospho-specific antibody for detection and could be a potential alternative of widely used mass spectrometry.