Are Hindfoot Procedures More Painful than Forefoot Procedures? A Prospective Observational Study in Elective Foot and Ankle Surgery.

Pain after lower limb orthopedic surgery can be severe. Poorly controlled pain is associated with adverse outcomes. Peripheral nerve blocks (PNB) have become popular in foot and ankle surgery for their effective pain control and low complication rates. It has always been assumed that hindfoot procedures are more painful than midfoot/forefoot procedures often requiring inpatient stay for pain relief. There are no published studies evaluating this assumption. To investigate whether hindfoot procedures are more painful than forefoot/midfoot procedures by measuring pain scores, assessing effectiveness of PNBs and patient satisfaction. One hundred forty patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery were prospectively studied. Inclusion criteria: Adults undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery. Exclusion criteria: Patients 16 years or under, those with alternate sources of pain, peripheral neuropathy, known substance abuse, psychiatric illness and incomplete pain scores. Pain was measured via the Visual Analog Scale at 3 time intervals: immediately, 6 hours and at 24 hours postoperatively. Analysis was via t-test. A p value of <.05 demonstrated a statistical significance. Forefoot/midfoot versus hindfoot surgery pain scores showed that there was no significant difference at any postoperative interval. PNB versus no PNB pain scores showed there was no significant difference, except at 24 hours postoperatively (p value .024). Patients who had a PNB experienced rebound pain at 24 hours. Hindfoot surgery is not more painful than forefoot/midfoot surgery. Patients who had a PNB experienced rebound pain at 24 hours postoperatively, a finding that requires further research.

Diagnosis and treatment of tuberculosis of the foot and ankle-A literature review.

Foot osteoarticular tuberculosis is uncommon. Late diagnosis and sub-optimal management can lead to significant morbidity, deformity and even death. Preservation of life, limb and function can be achieved with prompt diagnosis and treatment. In 1882, Robert Koch published his discovery of mycobacterium tuberculosis as the causative agent of tuberculosis (TB), and showed the disease was infectious rather than inherited. Over two centuries later, TB remains one of the top 10 causes of death worldwide. Whilst in 90% of cases TB infects the respiratory system, in 10% it is extrapulmonary and can infect the skeletal, nervous, lymphatic and genitourinary systems. The spine is the most frequently affected site in the musculoskeletal system and this is known as Pott's disease. The foot and ankle is affected in only 0.13% cases of extrapulmonary TB. A high index of suspicion is thus required. This infrequency in incidence, heterogeneity of its presentation along with the difficulty in early diagnosis often causes significant delays in its treatment and hence results in a considerable disability. The medical treatment is well established but the role of surgery, its usefulness and its correct timing remain controversial. The main diagnostic issues include imaging being non-specific. Plain radiographs remain the first line imaging modality. MRI and CT scans provide greater detail and capture the disease at an earlier stage. Microbiological testing has low sensitivity and specificity becasue TB lesions are paucibacillary. Bone biopsy is of significant diagnostic value as it not only allows histological examination to detect granulomas but enables sensitivity and resistance testing of anti-tuberculous therapy (ATT). Issues relating to treatment include timing, duration, combination of chemotherapy and the challenge of multi drug resistant tuberculosis MDR-TB. The selection and timing of appropriate surgical techniques and optimal duration of follow-up are further points to consider. In this article we aim to review the literature on diagnosis and treatment of foot and ankle TB.