Clinical characteristics, risk factors and diagnostic outcomes of patients presented with indeterminate biliary stricture: A multicenter study.

Background and aim: Indeterminate biliary stricture (IBS) is a frequently encountered clinical problem. In this study, we aimed to highlight the clinical characteristics, risk factors and diagnostic outcomes of patients presented with indeterminate biliary stricture. Method: A Retrospective multicenter study included all patients diagnosed with IBS in the participating centers between 2017 and 2021. Data regarding IBS such as presentations, patient characteristics, diagnostic and therapeutic modalities were collected from the patients' records and then were analyzed. Results: Data of 315 patients with IBS were retrospectively collected from 7 medical centers with mean age: 62.6 ± 11 years, females: 40.3% and smokers: 44.8%. For diagnosing stricture; Magnetic resonance imaging/Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRI/MRCP) was the most frequently requested imaging modality in all patients, Contrast enhanced computerized tomography (CECT) in 85% and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS) in 23.8%. Tissue diagnosis of cholangiocarcinoma was achieved in 14% only. The used therapeutic modalities were endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP)/stenting in 70.5%, percutaneous trans-hepatic biliary drainage (PTD): 17.8%, EUS guided drainage: 0.3%, and surgical resection in 8%. The most frequent type of strictures was distal stricture in 181 patients, perihilar in 128 and intrahepatic in 6. Distal strictures had significant male predominance, with higher role for EUS for diagnosis and higher role for ERCP/stenting for drainage, while in the perihilar strictures, there was higher role for CECT and MRI/MRCP for diagnosis and more frequent use of PTD for drainage. Conclusion: Indeterminate biliary stricture is a challenging clinical problem with lack of tissue diagnosis in most of cases mandates an urgent consensus diagnostic and treatment guidelines.

Yield of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for solid pancreatic neoplasms.

OBJECTIVE: Both endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) cytology may provide tissue diagnoses in solid pancreatic neoplasms. However, there are scant data comparing these two methods. This study aims at retrospectively comparing EUS-FNA and ERCP tissue sampling and ability of cytopathological diagnosis in solid pancreatic neoplasms and to determine usefulness and adverse events of combining both procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Two hundred and thirty four patients suspected to have solid pancreatic mass on abdominal ultrasound and/or computed tomography (CT) were enrolled. EUS-FNA (group A), ERCP cytology (group B) and combined procedures (Group C) performed in 105, 91 and 38 cases, respectively. RESULTS: Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 98.9%, 93.3% and 98.1% for group A, and 72.1%, 60% and 71.4% for group B. Those for group C were all 100%. Sensitivity for malignancy in the pancreas head was 100% for group A and 82.4% for group B, and in the pancreas body and tail, 97.6% for group A and 57.1% for group B. EUS-FNA was more sensitive than ERCP cytology in diagnosing malignant pancreatic neoplasms 21-30 mm in size (p = 0.0068), 31-40 mm (p = 0.028) and ≥ 41 mm (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity for pancreatic malignancy with group C was 100% regardless of mass location or size. Adverse events were 1.9%, 6.6% and 2.6% following EUS-FNA, ERCP and combined procedures, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: EUS-FNA is superior to ERCP cytology for diagnosis of solid pancreatic neoplasms. Although combination of both procedures provide efficient tissue diagnosis and with a minimal adverse events rate, a prospective study including larger number of patients is required.

Novel method of endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy to prevent stent dysfunction.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM: The present study assesses the feasibility as well as the technical and functional success rates of a novel endoscopic ultrasound-guided hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) technique called the locking stent method that uses end-bare covered metallic stents (EBCMS). METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients who were histologically diagnosed with unresectable cancer complicated with obstructive jaundice underwent EUS-HGS due to failed endoscopic biliary drainage or inaccessible papilla. We retrospectively collected clinical data for these patients including technical and functional success rates and complications. RESULTS: Seven were treated by EUS-HGS (EUS-HGS group), and 13 were treated using the locking stent EUS-HGS method (LS group). Technical and functional success rates were 100% in both groups. Procedural duration did not significantly differ between the EUS-HGS and LS groups (26.9 ± 9.0 versus 32.3 ± 11.1 min, P = 0.30). Two patients developed complications related to stent migration in the EUS-HGS group. In contrast, although mild post-procedural bile peritonitis required conservative treatment for a few days, none of the stents malfunctioned in the LS group. CONCLUSION: Our method can safely and effectively prevent stent dysfunction, but validation in a prospective clinical trial is required.