Clinical implementation of automated O2 titration in a tertiary care hospital.

Background: When treating acute respiratory failure, both hypoxemia and hyperoxemia should be avoided. SpO2 should be monitored closely and O2 flows adjusted accordingly. Achieving this goal might be easier with automated O2 titration compared to manual titration of fixed-flow O2 We evaluated the feasibility of using an automated O2 titration device in subjects treated for acute hypoxemic respiratory failure in a tertiary care hospital.Methods: Healthcare workers received education and training about oxygen therapy and were familiarized with an automated O2 titration device (FreeO2, Oxynov, Quebec City, Canada). A coordinator was available from 8 am to 5 pm during week days to provide technical assistance. The ability of the device to maintain SpO2 within the prescribed therapeutic window was recorded. Basic clinical information was recorded.Results: Subjects were enrolled from November 2020 to August 2022. We trained 508 healthcare workers on use of automated O2 titration which was finally used on 872 occasions in 763 subjects, distributed on the respiratory, COVID-19 and thoracic surgery wards and the emergency room. Clinical information could be retrieved for 609 (80%) subjects who were on the system for a median of 3 days (interquartile range: 2 to 6 days) representing 2567 subject-days of clinical experience with the device. In the 82 (14%) subjects for whom this information was available, the system maintained SpO2 within the prescribed targets 89% of the time. Ninety-six subjects experienced clinical deterioration as defined by the need to be transferred to the intensive care unit and/or requirement of high nasal flow oxygen but none of these events were judged to be related to the O2 device.Conclusions: Automated O2 titration could be successfully implemented in hospitalized subjects with hypoxemic respiratory failure from various causes. This experience should foster further improvement of the device and recommendations for an optimized utilization.

How can the findings of the EMAX trial on long-acting bronchodilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease be applied in the primary care setting?

This review addresses outstanding questions regarding initial pharmacological management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Optimizing initial treatment improves clinical outcomes in symptomatic patients, including those with low exacerbation risk. Long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ß2-agonist (LAMA/LABA) dual therapy improves lung function versus LAMA or LABA monotherapy, although other treatment benefits have been less consistently observed. The benefits of dual bronchodilation in symptomatic patients with COPD at low exacerbation risk, and its duration of efficacy and cost effectiveness in this population, are not yet fully established. Questions remain on the impact of baseline symptom severity, prior treatment, degree of reversibility to bronchodilators, and smoking status on responses to dual bronchodilator treatment. Using evidence from EMAX (NCT03034915), a 6-month trial comparing the LAMA/LABA combination umeclidinium/vilanterol with umeclidinium and salmeterol monotherapy in symptomatic patients with COPD at low exacerbation risk who were inhaled corticosteroid-naïve, we describe how these findings can be applied in primary care.

Automated O2 Titration Alone or With High-Flow Nasal Cannula During Walking Exercise in Chronic Lung Diseases.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced O2 desaturation contributes to dyspnea and exercise intolerance in various respiratory diseases. This study assessed whether automated O2 titration was superior to fixed-flow O2 to improve exertional dyspnea and walking exercise endurance. We also aimed at evaluating possible additive effects of high-flow nasal cannula coupled with automated O2 titration on these outcomes. METHODS: Subjects with chronic respiratory diseases and exercise-induced desaturation performed a 3-min constant-speed shuttle test (CSST) and an endurance shuttle walking test (ESWT) with either (1) fixed-flow O2, (2) automated O2 titration targeting an SpO2 of 94% (± 2%), and (3) automated O2 titration + high-flow nasal cannula according to a randomized sequence. The main outcome was Borg dyspnea score at the end of the 3-min CSST. Secondary outcomes included endurance time and dyspnea during ESWT and oxygenation status during exercise. RESULTS: Ten subjects with COPD, 10 with interstitial lung disease, 5 with pulmonary hypertension, and 3 with cystic fibrosis completed the study. Compared to fixed-flow O2, automated O2 titration did not reduce dyspnea at the end of the 3-min CSST. Endurance time during the ESWT was prolonged with automated O2 titration (mean difference 298 [95% CI 205-391] s, P < .001), and dyspnea at isotime was reduced. No further improvement was noted when high-flow nasal cannula was added to automated O2 titration. Compared to fixed-flow O2, O2 flows were higher with automated O2 titration, resulting in better oxygenation. CONCLUSIONS: Automated O2 titration was superior to fixed-flow O2 to alleviate dyspnea and improve exercise endurance during the ESWT in subjects with a variety of chronic respiratory diseases. Adding high-flow nasal cannula to automated O2 titration provided no further benefits.

Factors Associated with Attrition in a Longitudinal Cohort of Older Adults in the Community.

Introduction: Retaining participants in longitudinal studies increases their power. We undertook this study in a population-based longitudinal cohort of adults with COPD to determine the factors associated with increased cohort attrition. Methods: In the longitudinal population-based Canadian Cohort of Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study, 1561 adults > 40 years old were randomly recruited from 9 urban sites. Participants completed in-person visits at 18-month intervals and also were followed up every 3 months over the phone or by email. The cohort retention for the study and the reasons for attrition were analyzed. Hazard ratios and robust standard errors were calculated using Cox regression methods to explore the associations between participants who remained in the study and those who did not. Results: The median follow-up (years) of the study is 9.0 years. The overall mean retention was 77%. Reasons for attrition (23%) were: dropout by participant (39%), loss of contact (27%), investigator-initiated withdrawal (15%), deaths (9%), serious disease (9%), and relocation (2%). Factors independently associated with attrition were lower educational attainment, higher pack-year tobacco consumption, diagnosed cardiovascular disease, and a higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale score: adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) were 1.43(1.11, 1.85); 1.01(1.00, 1.01); 1.44(1.13, 1.83); 1.06(1.02, 1.10) respectively. Conclusions: Identification and awareness of risk factors for attrition could direct targeted retention strategies in longitudinal studies. Moreover, the identification of patient characteristics associated with study dropout could address any potential bias introduced by differential dropouts.

A 37-Year-Old Man With Right Lung Consolidation.

CASE PRESENTATION: A 37-year-old man attended a medical clinic at the confluence of the Appalachian and the St. Lawrence Valley after 2 weeks of coughing greenish sputum and progressive dyspnea on exertion. In addition, he reported fatigue, fevers, and chills. He had quit smoking a year earlier and was not a drug user. He recently had spent most of his free time outdoors, mountain biking, but had not travelled outside of Canada. Medical history was unremarkable. He did not take any medication. Upper airway samples taken for SARS-CoV-2 proved negative; he was prescribed cefprozil and doxycycline for presumed community-acquired pneumonia. He returned to the emergency room 1 week later with mild hypoxemia, persisting fever, and a chest radiography consistent with lobar pneumonia. The patient was admitted to his local community hospital, and broad-spectrum antibiotics were added to the regimen. Unfortunately, his condition deteriorated over the following week, and he experienced hypoxic respiratory failure for which he required mechanical ventilation before his transfer to our medical center.

Exercise testing and postoperative complications after minimally invasive lung resection: A cohort study.

Background: Peak oxygen uptake ( V ˙ O 2 ) during cardiospulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is used to stratify postoperative risk following lung cancer resection but peak V ˙ O 2 thresholds to predict post-operative mortality and morbidity were derived mostly from patients who underwent thoracotomy. Objectives: We evaluated whether peak V ˙ O 2 or other CPET-derived variables predict post-operative mortality and cardiopulmonary morbidity after minimally invasive video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for lung cancer resection. Methods: A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent VATS lung resection between 2002 and 2019 and in whom CPET was performed. Logistic regression models were used to determine predictors of postoperative outcomes until 30 days after surgery. The ability of peak V ˙ O 2 to discriminate between patients with and without post-operative complications was evaluated using Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. Results: Among the 593 patients, postoperative cardiopulmonary complications occurred in 92 (15.5%) individuals, including three deaths. Mean peak V ˙ O 2 was 18.8 ml⋅kg-1⋅min-1, ranging from 7.0 to 36.4 ml⋅kg-1⋅min-1. Best predictors of postoperative morbidity and mortality were peripheral arterial disease, bilobectomy or pneumonectomy (versus sublobar resection), preoperative FEV1, peak V ˙ O 2 , and peak V ˙ E / V ˙ C O 2 . The proportion of patients with peak V ˙ O 2 of < 15 ml⋅kg-1⋅min-1, 15 to < 20 ml⋅kg-1⋅min-1 and ≥ 20 ml⋅kg-1⋅min-1 experiencing at least one postoperative complication was 23.8, 16.3 and 10.4%, respectively. The area under the ROC curve for peak V ˙ O 2 was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.57-0.69). Conclusion: Although lower peak V ˙ O 2 was a predictor of postoperative complications following VATS lung cancer resection, its ability to discriminate patients with or without complications was limited.

Discovery of Novel, Orally Bioavailable Pyrimidine Ether-Based Inhibitors of ELOVL1.

In our efforts to identify novel small molecule inhibitors for the treatment of adrenoleukodystrophy (ALD), we conducted a high-throughput radiometric screen for inhibitors of elongation of very long chain fatty acid 1 (ELOVL1) enzyme. We developed a series of highly potent, central nervous system (CNS)-penetrant pyrimidine ether-based compounds with favorable pharmacokinetics culminating in compound 22. Compound 22 is a selective inhibitor of ELOVL1, reducing C26:0 VLCFA synthesis in ALD patient fibroblasts and lymphocytes in vitro. Compound 22 reduced C26:0 lysophosphatidyl choline (LPC), a subtype of VLCFA, in the blood of ATP binding cassette transporter D1 (ABCD1) KO mice, a murine model of ALD to near wild-type levels. Compound 22 is a low-molecular-weight, potent ELOVL1 inhibitor that may serve as a useful tool for exploring therapeutic approaches to the treatment of ALD.

Efficacy of umeclidinium/vilanterol according to the degree of reversibility of airflow limitation at screening: a post hoc analysis of the EMAX trial.

BACKGROUND: In patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the relationship between short-term bronchodilator reversibility and longer-term response to bronchodilators is unclear. Here, we investigated whether the efficacy of long-acting bronchodilators is associated with reversibility of airflow limitation in patients with COPD with a low exacerbation risk not receiving inhaled corticosteroids. METHODS: The double-blind, double-dummy EMAX trial randomised patients to umeclidinium/vilanterol 62.5/25 µg once daily, umeclidinium 62.5 µg once daily, or salmeterol 50 µg twice daily. Bronchodilator reversibility to salbutamol was measured once at screening and defined as an increase in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) of ≥ 12% and ≥ 200 mL 10-30 min post salbutamol. Post hoc, fractional polynomial (FP) modelling was conducted using the degree of reversibility (mL) at screening as a continuous variable to investigate its relationship to mean change from baseline in trough FEV1 and self-administered computerised-Transition Dyspnoea Index (SAC-TDI) at Week 24, Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms-COPD (E-RS) at Weeks 21-24, and rescue medication use (puffs/day) over Weeks 1-24. Analyses were conducted across the full range of reversibility (-850-896 mL); however, results are presented for the range -100-400 mL because there were few participants with values outside this range. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) reversibility was 130 mL (156) and the median was 113 mL; 625/2425 (26%) patients were reversible. There was a trend towards greater improvements in trough FEV1, SAC-TDI, E-RS and rescue medication use with umeclidinium/vilanterol with higher reversibility. Improvements in trough FEV1 and reductions in rescue medication use were greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol compared with either monotherapy across the range of reversibility. Greater improvements in SAC-TDI and E-RS total scores were observed with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy in the middle of the reversibility range. CONCLUSIONS: FP analyses suggest that patients with higher levels of reversibility have greater improvements in lung function and symptoms in response to bronchodilators. Improvements in lung function and rescue medication use were greater with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus monotherapy across the full range of reversibility, suggesting that the dual bronchodilator umeclidinium/vilanterol may be an appropriate treatment for patients with symptomatic COPD, regardless of their level of reversibility.

Efficacy and Safety of Umeclidinium/Vilanterol in Current and Former Smokers with COPD: A Prespecified Analysis of The EMAX Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Smoking may reduce the efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but its impact on bronchodilator efficacy is unclear. This analysis of the EMAX trial explored efficacy and safety of dual- versus mono-bronchodilator therapy in current or former smokers with COPD. METHODS: The 24-week EMAX trial evaluated lung function, symptoms, health status, exacerbations, clinically important deterioration, and safety with umeclidinium/vilanterol, umeclidinium, and salmeterol in symptomatic patients at low exacerbation risk who were not receiving ICS. Current and former smoker subgroups were defined by smoking status at screening. RESULTS: The analysis included 1203 (50%) current smokers and 1221 (50%) former smokers. Both subgroups demonstrated greater improvements from baseline in trough FEV1 at week 24 (primary endpoint) with umeclidinium/vilanterol versus umeclidinium (least squares [LS] mean difference, mL [95% CI]; current: 84 [50, 117]; former: 49 [18, 80]) and salmeterol (current: 165 [132, 198]; former: 117 [86, 148]) and larger reductions in rescue medication inhalations/day over 24 weeks versus umeclidinium (LS mean difference [95% CI]; current: - 0.42 [- 0.63, - 0.20]; former: - 0.25 - 0.44, - 0.05]) and salmeterol (current: - 0.28 [- 0.49, - 0.06]; former: - 0.29 [- 0.49, - 0.09]). Umeclidinium/vilanterol increased the odds (odds ratio [95% CI]) of clinically significant improvement at week 24 in Transition Dyspnea Index versus umeclidinium (current: 1.54 [1.16, 2.06]; former: 1.32 [0.99, 1.75]) and salmeterol (current: 1.37 (1.03, 1.82]; former: 1.60 [1.20, 2.13]) and Evaluating Respiratory Symptoms-COPD versus umeclidinium (current: 1.54 [1.13, 2.09]; former: 1.50 [1.11, 2.04]) and salmeterol (current: 1.53 [1.13, 2.08]; former: 1.53 [1.12, 2.08]). All treatments were well tolerated in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In current and former smokers, umeclidinium/vilanterol provided greater improvements in lung function and symptoms versus umeclidinium and salmeterol, supporting consideration of dual-bronchodilator therapy in symptomatic patients with COPD regardless of their smoking status.

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) often require daily medication to control their COPD. Many patients with COPD are smokers, and smoking is one of the most common causes of COPD. This means that it is important to find out whether COPD medications are effective in both smokers and nonsmokers. We analyzed data from a clinical trial (EMAX) that investigated the use of a combination of two bronchodilators, which are inhaled medications that help to open the airways. We compared umeclidinium/vilanterol, a dual-bronchodilator combination, with a single bronchodilator (either umeclidinium or salmeterol) over 6 months. We found that both current and former smokers who were treated with umeclidinium/vilanterol had larger improvements in lung function than those receiving umeclidinium or salmeterol. Current or former smokers who were treated with umeclidinium/vilanterol used their reliever inhaler less than those treated with umeclidinium or salmeterol. Patients treated with umeclidinium/vilanterol were generally less likely to experience disease worsening compared with umeclidinium or salmeterol if they were former smokers, or compared with salmeterol if they were current smokers. Our findings suggest that umeclidinium/vilanterol may be more effective than a single bronchodilator for daily treatment of patients with COPD who are current or former smokers. Physicians should consider prescribing a combination of two bronchodilators to patients who have symptoms, whether or not they currently smoke, as well as encouraging smoking cessation for all patients.

Update on Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO): A Narrative Review.

Although chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and asthma are well-characterized diseases, they can coexist in a given patient. The term asthma-COPD overlap (ACO) was introduced to describe patients that have clinical features of both diseases and may represent around 25% of COPD patients and around 20% of asthma patients. Despite the increasing interest in ACO, there are still substantial controversies regarding its definition and its position within clinical guidelines for patients with obstructive lung disease. In general, most definitions indicate that ACO patients must present with non-reversible airflow limitation, significant exposure to smoking or other noxious particles or gases, together with features of asthma. In patients with a primary diagnosis of COPD, the identification of ACO has therapeutic implication because the asthmatic component should be treated with inhaled corticosteroids and some studies suggest that the most severe patients may respond to biological agents indicated for severe asthma. This manuscript aims to summarize the current state-of-the-art of ACO. The definitions, prevalence, and clinical manifestations will be reviewed and some innovative aspects, such as genetics, epigenetics, and biomarkers will be addressed. Lastly, the management and prognosis will be outlined as well as the position of ACO in the COPD and asthma guidelines.

The Prevalence of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) and the Heterogeneity of Risk Factors in the Canadian Population: Results from the Canadian Obstructive Lung Disease (COLD) Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the spirometric-based prevalence of COPD across different regions in Canada and to evaluate the site heterogeneity of risk factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional, population-based study, random samples of non-institutionalized adults aged ≥40 years were generated by random digit dialling. Participants answered an interviewer-administered questionnaire and performed spirometry before and after bronchodilator administration. COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.70 (fixed ratio, FR) and as FEV1/FVC <5th percentile (lower limits of normal, LLN). Separate logistic regression models were used to compute the risk (adjusted odds ratio, aOR) for COPD. I2 and Tau2 analyses were used to evaluate heterogeneity. RESULTS: Out of 5176 (95%) participants, 4893 (47% male with mean age 56.6 years (95% confidence interval, 56.0-57.2)) had spirometry that satisfied ATS criteria. The population prevalence of COPD was 16.2% (95% CI, 14.5-17.8) by FR and 11.2% (95% CI, 9.7-12.6) by LLN. Male predominance in prevalence was shown by FR but not by LLN criteria. Patient characteristics associated with an increased risk of COPD included: age (OR 1.56; 95% CI 1.33-1.84); history of physician-diagnosed asthma (OR 3.30; 95% CI 2.42-4.49); and childhood hospitalization for respiratory illness (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.17-2.80). In terms of smoking-related risk factors, current smoking status had the highest odds ratio (OR 3.49; 95% CI 2.55-4.80). Variance in prevalence among sites was significantly reduced by adjusting for risk factors in Tau2 analyses. Higher odds of exposure for each risk factor was found in more severe COPD, suggesting that a higher risk could be linked to the development of severe disease. CONCLUSION: This study reports the population prevalence of COPD in nine urban cities which collectively represent the majority of the Canadian population and demonstrates that heterogeneity in prevalence among sites is substantially explained by variation in associated risk factors for COPD.

Effects of Low-Load/High-Repetition Resistance Training on Exercise Capacity, Health Status, and Limb Muscle Adaptation in Patients With Severe COPD: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: Training volume is paramount in the magnitude of physiological adaptations following resistance training. However, patients with severe COPD are limited by dyspnea during traditional two-limb low-load/high-repetition resistance training (LLHR-RT), resulting in suboptimal training volumes. During a single exercise session, single-limb LLHR-RT decreases the ventilatory load and enables higher localized training volumes compared with two-limb LLHR-RT. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does single-limb LLHR-RT lead to more profound effects compared with two-limb LLHR-RT on exercise capacity (6-min walk distance [6MWD]), health status, muscle function, and limb adaptations in patients with severe COPD? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Thirty-three patients (mean age 66 ± 7 years; FEV1 39 ± 10% predicted) were randomized to 8 weeks of single- or two-limb LLHR-RT. Exercise capacity (6MWD), health status, and muscle function were compared between groups. Quadriceps muscle biopsy specimens were collected to examine physiological responses. RESULTS: Single-limb LLHR-RT did not further enhance 6MWD compared with two-limb LLHR-RT (difference, 14 [-12 to 39 m]. However, 73% in the single-limb group exceeded the known minimal clinically important difference of 30 m compared with 25% in the two-limb group (P = .02). Health status and muscle function improved to a similar extent in both groups. During training, single-limb LLHR-RT resulted in a clinically relevant reduction in dyspnea during training compared with two-limb LLHR-RT (-1.75; P = .01), but training volume was not significantly increased (23%; P = .179). Quadriceps muscle citrate synthase activity (19%; P = .03), hydroxyacyl-coenzyme A dehydrogenase protein levels (32%; P < .01), and capillary-to-fiber ratio (41%; P < .01) were increased compared with baseline after pooling muscle biopsy data from all participants. INTERPRETATION: Single-limb LLHR-RT did not further increase mean 6MWD compared with two-limb LLHR-RT, but it reduced exertional dyspnea and enabled more people to reach clinically relevant improvements in 6MWD. Independent of execution strategy, LLHR-RT improved exercise capacity, health status, muscle endurance, and enabled several physiological muscle adaptations, reducing the negative consequences of limb muscle dysfunction in COPD. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02283580; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

Asthma with Irreversible Airway Obstruction in Smokers and Nonsmokers: Links between Airway Inflammation and Structural Changes.

BACKGROUND: The development of irreversible airway obstruction (IRAO) in asthma is related to lung/airway inflammatory and structural changes whose characteristics are likely influenced by exposure to tobacco smoke. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the interplay between airway and lung structural changes, airway inflammation, and smoking exposure in asthmatics with IRAO. METHODS: We studied asthmatics with IRAO who were further classified according to their smoking history, those with ≥20 pack-years of tobacco exposure (asthmatics with smoking-related IRAO [AwS-IRAO]) and those with <5 pack-years of tobacco exposure (asthmatics with nonsmoking-related IRAO [AwNS-IRAO]). In addition to recording baseline clinical and lung function features, all patients had a chest computed tomography (CT) from which airway wall thickness was measured and quantitative and qualitative assessment of emphysema was performed. The airway inflammatory profile was documented from differential inflammatory cell counts on induced sputum. RESULTS: Ninety patients were recruited (57 AwS-IRAO and 33 AwNS-IRAO). There were no statistically significant differences in the extent of emphysema and gas trapping between groups on quantitative chest CT analysis, although Pi10, a marker of airway wall thickness, was significantly higher in AwS-IRAO (p = 0.0242). Visual analysis showed a higher prevalence of emphysema (p = 0.0001) and higher emphysema score (p < 0.0001) in AwS-IRAO compared to AwNS-IRAO and distribution of emphysema was different between groups. Correlations between radiological features and lung function were stronger in AwS-IRAO. In a subgroup analysis, we found a correlation between airway neutrophilia and emphysematous features in AwS-IRAO and between eosinophilia and both airway wall thickness and emphysematous changes in AwNS-IRAO. CONCLUSIONS: Although bronchial structural changes were relatively similar in smoking and nonsmoking patients with asthma and IRAO, emphysematous changes were more predominant in smokers. However, neutrophils in AwS-IRAO and eosinophils in AwNS-IRAO were associated with lung and airway structural changes.

Effect of once-daily fluticasone furoate/vilanterol versus vilanterol alone on bone mineral density in patients with COPD: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between inhaled corticosteroids and bone mineral density (BMD) remains uncertain despite extensive research. METHODS: This was an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group, 3-year noninferiority study. Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (⩾40 years of age; smoking history ⩾10 pack years) and at least one native hip evaluable for BMD were enrolled and randomized 1:1, stratified by sex, to treatment with vilanterol (VI) 25 µg or fluticasone furoate/vilanterol (FF/VI) 100 µg/25 µg. BMD measurements were taken via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry every 6 months. The primary endpoint was assessment of the noninferiority of change from baseline in total hip BMD per year at the -1% noninferiority level. Change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine and BMD measurements by sex were secondary endpoints. Incidences of COPD exacerbations and bone fractures throughout the study were also recorded. RESULTS: Of 283 randomized patients, 170 (60%) completed the study. Noninferiority was demonstrated for FF/VI versus VI with regards to change from baseline in total hip BMD per year, with changes of -0.27% and 0.18%, respectively, and a treatment difference of -0.46% per year [95% confidence interval (CI) -0.97 to 0.06]. The treatment difference for FF/VI versus VI regarding lumbar spine BMD was -0.51% per year (95% CI -1.11 to 0.10). COPD exacerbations and bone fracture rates were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION: FF/VI showed noninferiority to VI for change from baseline in total hip BMD per year, when assessed at the -1% noninferiority margin in a combined sample of men and women with COPD.The reviews of this paper are available via the supplemental material section.

Granularity of SERPINA1 alleles by DNA sequencing in CanCOLD.

DNA sequencing of the SERPINA1 gene to detect α1-antitrypsin (AAT) deficiency (AATD) may provide a better appreciation of the individual and cumulative impact of genetic variants on AAT serum levels and COPD phenotypes.AAT serum level and DNA sequencing of the coding regions of SERPINA1 were performed in 1359 participants of the Canadian Cohort Obstructive Lung Disease (CanCOLD) study. Clinical assessment for COPD included questionnaires, pulmonary function testing and computed tomography (CT) imaging. Phenotypes were tested for association with SERPINA1 genotypes collated into four groups: normal (MM), mild (MS and MI), intermediate (heterozygote MZ, non-S/non-Z/non-I, compound IS, and homozygote SS) and severe (ZZ and SZ) deficiency. Smoking strata and MZ-only analyses were also performed.34 genetic variants were identified including 25 missense mutations. Overall, 8.1% of alleles in this Canadian cohort were deficient and 15.5% of 1359 individuals were carriers of at least one deficient allele. Four AATD subjects were identified and had statistically lower diffusion capacity and greater CT-based emphysema. No COPD phenotypes were associated with mild and intermediate AATD in the overall cohort or stratified by smoking status. MZ heterozygotes had similar CT-based emphysema, but lowered diffusion capacity compared with normal and mild deficiency.In this Canadian population-based cohort, comprehensive genetic testing for AATD reveals a variety of deficient alleles affecting 15.5% of subjects. COPD phenotype was demonstrated in severe deficiency and MZ heterozygotes. This study shows the feasibility of implementing a diagnostic test for AATD using DNA sequencing in a large cohort.

Lung cancer resection and postoperative outcomes in COPD: A single-center experience.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) increases postoperative morbidity and is associated with diminished long-term survival after lung cancer resection. Whether this is also true for mild-to-moderate COPD is uncertain. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all the patients who underwent lung cancer surgery between 2002 and 2012 in a university-affiliated hospital. The severity of airflow limitation was stratified according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) from stage 1 to 4. Data from 1456 cases of lung cancer surgery were reviewed and 1126 patients were included in the study: 672 (59.7%) patients had COPD (GOLD 1, n = 340; GOLD 2, n = 282; GOLD 3, n = 50) and 454 patients had a normal spirometry (controls). Following lung cancer resection, patients with COPD had a higher rate of postoperative morbidities of any kind (p < 0.0001), in particular, pneumonia (7.0% vs. 3.7%; p = 0.0251) and prolonged air leak (17.0% vs. 8.2%; p < 0.0001) than controls. In-hospital mortality was increased in GOLD 3 COPD but the incidence of other postoperative complications was not influenced by COPD severity. Neither COPD nor its severity influenced long-term survival in this population. To conclude, patients with COPD undergoing lung cancer surgery were at higher risk of postoperative complications than patients with normal respiratory function but the procedure was considered safe. The presence of COPD itself did not influence long-term survival. The results of our study apply mainly to patients with a GOLD 1 and 2 COPD since only a small number of patients with GOLD 3 COPD were involved.

Metabolic profiles among COPD and controls in the CanCOLD population-based cohort.

A high prevalence of intermediate cardiometabolic risk factors and obesity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has suggested the existence of pathophysiological links between hypertriglyceridemia, insulin resistance, visceral adiposity, and hypoxia or impaired pulmonary function. However, whether COPD contributes independently to the development of these cardiometabolic risk factors remains unclear. Our objective was to compare ectopic fat and metabolic profiles among representative individuals with COPD and control subjects and to evaluate whether the presence of COPD alters the metabolic risk profile. Study participants were randomly selected from the general population and prospectively classified as non-COPD controls and COPD, according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease classification. The metabolic phenotype, which consisted of visceral adipose tissue area, metabolic markers including homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and blood lipid profile, was obtained in 144 subjects with COPD and 119 non-COPD controls. The metabolic phenotype was similar in COPD and controls. The odds ratios for having pathologic values for HOMA-IR, lipids and visceral adipose tissue area were similar in individuals with COPD and control subjects in multivariate analyses that took into account age, sex, body mass index, tobacco status and current medications. In a population-based cohort, no difference was found in the metabolic phenotype, including visceral adipose tissue accumulation, between COPD and controls. Discrepancies between the present and previous studies as to whether or not COPD is a risk factor for metabolic abnormalities could be related to differences in COPD phenotype or disease severity of the study populations.

A Rare Complication: Development of an Aspergilloma after Endobronchial Coil Placement in a COPD Patient.

Endobronchial coils are a relatively novel endoscopic lung volume reduction modality that aims to increase functional capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Two major trials have studied the safety and efficacy of this therapy, but long-term safety has not been studied. Adverse events reported are mainly periprocedural pneumothoraces and early bacterial infectious complications. We report the case of a patient with severe emphysema (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage IV COPD) who developed endobronchial coil-associated aspergillomas 3 years after coil placement.