How nonverbal communication shapes the doctor-patient relationship: from paternalism to the ethics of care in oncology.

The purpose of this research, led in the wake of years of pressure to reject paternalism, was to study whether controlled practice of nonverbal communication by doctors inheres a continued risk of paternalistic attitudes in oncology clinic interviews (chosen to illustrate the doctor-patient relationship). This study involved qualitative descriptive research based on interview observations and questionnaires and mobilized recognized theory borrowed from sociology and anthropology. We found that the legislative framework governing the doctor-patient relationship has simply shifted the paternalism issue from verbal communication over to a new area that doctors have not yet mastered and patients have not yet understood, i.e., nonverbal communication. This study shows that all the laws framing the doctor-patient relationship can be circumvented, and that by controlling nonverbal communication, the doctor can fall back into paternalism. The rejection of paternalism therefore needs to lead to an appropriate reading of the patient's story, which in ethical terms can only happen if hospital structures are made non-paternalizing by design, if doctors learn to understand the patient's different chronemic timeframe, and if doctors committedly engage in the Hippocratic Oath codified through the ethics of care.

Kidney transplantation at Necker Hospital: the most recent 5-year period (2004-2009).

The results of our last 5 years activity in kidney transplantation clearly show that it is possible to perform high-risk transplantations with very acceptable results: ECD kidneys, dual transplantation, recipients with DSAs. In depth statistical analysis of these data should allow a clearer definition of the best strategies to use in these situations.

[Place of nephrectomy in patients with autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease waiting for renal transplantation]. / Place de la néphrectomie chez les patients atteints de polykystose rénale autosomique dominante de l'adulte en attente de transplantation rénale.

OBJECTIVE: To define the indications, results and place of nephrectomy for autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease (ADPKD) in relation to renal transplantation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Between October 1998 and February 2006, 145 patients with ADPKD were followed in our institution; 38 of them underwent nephrectomy via a subcostal incision, mainly in preparation for renal transplantation. The decision to perform nephrectomy in preparation for renal transplantation was based on clinical examination and CT findings. RESULTS: Indications for nephrectomy were preparation for renal transplantation (n=28, 68%), severe urological complications (n=12) and malignant tumour (n=1). Forty-one nephrectomies were performed, pretransplantation in 36 cases (88%) and five post-transplantation nephrectomies in three patients. The nephrectomy rate was 26%. The median kidney weight was 2800 grams. The mean operating time was 100 minutes and mean blood loss was 76 ml. The overall morbidity was 36.6% with 7.3% of serious complications. The mean hospital stay was 14.5 days. No patient nephrectomized before transplantation (n=13) developed any complications of the contralateral native kidney with a mean follow-up of 33 months. The mean interval between initiation of dialysis and transplantation and between nephrectomy and transplantation was 30 and 16 months, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The optimal timing and incision for nephrectomy for ADPKD are still a subject of debate. In the absence of urological complications, nephrectomy, associated with considerable morbidity, should only be performed when very large kidneys truly interfere with graft implantation. Systematic unilateral or bilateral nephrectomy must therefore no longer be proposed. To avoid the complications of the anephric state, it is preferable to wait, whenever possible, until the patient is placed on dialysis, but the development of pre-emptive transplantation raises the issue of concomitant nephrectomy and transplantation, which may be a feasible option.