EEG Beta functional connectivity decrease in the left amygdala correlates with the affective pain in fibromyalgia: A pilot study.

Fibromyalgia (FM) is a major chronic pain disease with prominent affective disturbances, and pain-associated changes in neurotransmitters activity and in brain connectivity. However, correlates of affective pain dimension lack. The primary goal of this correlational cross-sectional case-control pilot study was to find electrophysiological correlates of the affective pain component in FM. We examined the resting-state EEG spectral power and imaginary coherence in the beta (ß) band (supposedly indexing the GABAergic neurotransmission) in 16 female patients with FM and 11 age-adjusted female controls. FM patients displayed lower functional connectivity in the High ß (Hß, 20-30 Hz) sub-band than controls (p = 0.039) in the left basolateral complex of the amygdala (p = 0.039) within the left mesiotemporal area, in particular, in correlation with a higher affective pain component level (r = 0.50, p = 0.049). Patients showed higher Low ß (Lß, 13-20 Hz) relative power than controls in the left prefrontal cortex (p = 0.001), correlated with ongoing pain intensity (r = 0.54, p = 0.032). For the first time, GABA-related connectivity changes correlated with the affective pain component are shown in the amygdala, a region highly involved in the affective regulation of pain. The ß power increase in the prefrontal cortex could be compensatory to pain-related GABAergic dysfunction.

Hydroxychloroquine Dose per Ophthalmology Guidelines and the Risk of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Flares.

This study of an academic medical center patient cohort with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) investigates the association between hydroxychloroquine dose based on current guidelines and risk of lupus flares.

The Affective Dimension of Pain Appears to Be Determinant within a Pain-Insomnia-Anxiety Pathological Loop in Fibromyalgia: A Case-Control Study.

BACKGROUND: Fibromyalgia (FM) is a chronic pain disease characterized by multiple symptoms whose interactions and implications in the disease pathology are still unclear. This study aimed at investigating how pain, sleep, and mood disorders influence each other in FM, while discriminating between the sensory and affective pain dimensions. METHODS: Sixteen female FM patients were evaluated regarding their pain, while they underwent-along with 11 healthy sex- and age-adjusted controls-assessment of mood and sleep disorders. Analysis of variance and correlations were performed in order to assess group differences and investigate the interactions between pain, mood, and sleep descriptors. RESULTS: FM patients reported the typical widespread pain, with similar sensory and affective inputs. Contrary to controls, they displayed moderate anxiety, depression, and insomnia. Affective pain (but neither the sensory pain nor pain intensity) was the only pain indicator that tendentially correlated with anxiety and insomnia, which were mutually associated. An affective pain-insomnia-anxiety loop was thus completed. High ongoing pain strengthened this vicious circle, to which it included depression and sensory pain. CONCLUSIONS: Discriminating between the sensory and affective pain components in FM patients disclosed a pathological loop, with a key role of affective pain; high ongoing pain acted as an amplifier of symptoms interaction. This unraveled the interplay between three of most cardinal FM symptoms; these results contribute to better understand FM determinants and pathology and could help in orienting therapeutic strategies.

Assessment of the Frequency of Dual Allergy to Penicillins and Cefazolin: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Importance: Cefazolin is the preoperative antibiotic of choice because it is safer and more efficacious than second-line alternatives. Surgical patients labeled as having penicillin allergy are less likely to prophylactically receive cefazolin and more likely to receive clindamycin or vancomycin, which results in higher rates of surgical site infections. Objective: To examine the incidence of dual allergy to cefazolin and natural penicillins. Data Sources: MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase were searched without language restrictions for relevant articles published from database inception until July 31, 2020. Study Selection: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, a search of MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase was performed for articles published from database inception to July 31, 2020, for studies that included patients who had index allergies to a natural penicillin and were tested for tolerability to cefazolin or that included patients who had index allergies to cefazolin and were tested for tolerability to a natural penicillin. A total of 3228 studies were identified and 2911 were screened for inclusion. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Data were independently extracted by 2 authors. Bayesian meta-analysis was used to estimate the frequency of allergic reactions. Main Outcomes and Measures: Dual allergy to cefazolin and a natural penicillin. Results: Seventy-seven unique studies met the eligibility criteria, yielding 6147 patients. Cefazolin allergy was identified in 44 participants with a history of penicillin allergy, resulting in a dual allergy meta-analytical frequency of 0.7% (95% credible interval [CrI], 0.1%-1.7%; I2 = 74.9%). Such frequency was lower for participants with unconfirmed (0.6%; 95% CrI, 0.1%-1.3%; I2 = 54.3%) than for those with confirmed penicillin allergy (3.0%; 95% CrI, 0.01%-17.0%; I2 = 88.2%). Thirteen studies exclusively assessed surgical patients (n = 3884), among whom 0.7% (95% CrI, 0%-3.3%; I2 = 85.5%) had confirmed allergy to cefazolin. Low heterogeneity was observed for studies of patients with unconfirmed penicillin allergy who had been exposed to perioperative cefazolin (0.1%; 95% CrI, 0.1%-0.3%; I2 = 13.1%). Penicillin allergy was confirmed in 16 participants with a history of cefazolin allergy, resulting in a meta-analytical frequency of 3.7% (95% CrI, 0.03%-13.3%; I2 = 64.4%). The frequency of penicillin allergy was 4.4% (95% CrI, 0%-23.0%; I2 = 75%) for the 8 studies that exclusively assessed surgical patients allergic to cefazolin. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that most patients with a penicillin allergy history may safely receive cefazolin. The exception is patients with confirmed penicillin allergy in whom additional care is warranted.

Association of ß-Lactam Allergy Documentation and Prophylactic Antibiotic Use in Surgery: A National Cross-Sectional Study of Hospitalized Patients.

Alternative antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis are associated with increased adverse events and surgical site infection compared to cefazolin. In a sample of perioperative inpatients from 100 hospitals in the United States, cefazolin was 9-fold less likely to be used in patients with a documented ß-lactam allergy whereas clindamycin was 45-fold more likely.

Preoperative penicillin allergy testing in patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Cefazolin is a first-line prophylactic antibiotic used to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs) in cardiac surgery. Patients with a history of penicillin allergy often receive less effective second-line antibiotics, which is associated with an increased SSI risk. OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of preoperative penicillin allergy evaluation on perioperative cefazolin use in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with a documented penicillin allergy who underwent cardiac surgery at the Massachusetts General Hospital from September 2015 to December 2018. We describe penicillin allergy evaluation assessment and outcomes. We evaluated the association between preoperative penicillin allergy evaluation and first-line perioperative antibiotic use using a multivariable logistic regression model. RESULTS: Of 3802 cardiac surgical patients, 510 (13%) had a documented penicillin allergy; 165 (33%) were referred to allergy and immunology practitioners. Of 160 patients (31%) who underwent penicillin allergy evaluation (ie, penicillin skin testing and, if results were negative, an amoxicillin challenge), 154 (97%) were found not to have a penicillin allergy. Patients who underwent preoperative penicillin allergy evaluation were more likely to receive the first-line perioperative antibiotic (92% vs 38%, P < .001). After adjusting for potential confounders, patients who underwent preoperative penicillin allergy evaluation had higher odds of first-line perioperative antibiotic use (adjusted odds ratio, 26.6; 95% CI, 12.8-55.2). CONCLUSION: Integrating penicillin allergy evaluation into routine preoperative care ensured that almost all evaluated patients undergoing cardiac surgery received first-line antibiotic prophylaxis, a critical component of SSI risk reduction. Further efforts are needed to increase access to preoperative allergy evaluation.