Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Exp Immunol ; 202(3): 384-393, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32639582

RESUMO

Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a large-vessel granulomatous vasculitis; the inflammatory infiltration in arteries comprises macrophages, multi-nucleated giant cells, CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, γδ T cells, natural killer (NK) cells and neutrophils. However, it is unknown which subtype of macrophages predominates. This study aims to evaluate macrophages subpopulations in the aorta in TAK. Immunohistochemistry was performed in the aorta from TAK patients (n = 22), patients with atherosclerotic disease (n = 9) and heart transplant donors (n = 8) using the markers CD68, CD86, CD206, CD3, CD20 and CD56. Active disease was observed in 54·5% of patients and active histological lesions were found in 40·9%. TAK patients presented atherosclerotic lesions in 27·3% of cases. The frequency of macrophages, M1 macrophages, T, B and NK cells was higher in the aorta from TAK and atherosclerotic patients compared to heart transplant donors. In TAK, macrophages and T cells were the most abundant cells in the aorta, and the expression of CD206 was higher than CD86 (P = 0·0007). No associations were found between the expression of cell markers and active disease or with atherosclerotic lesions. In TAK patients, histological disease activity led to higher T cell counts than chronic fibrotic lesions (P = 0.030), whereas prednisone use was associated with lower T cell counts (P = 0·035). In conclusion, M1 macrophages were more frequent in TAK and atherosclerotic patients compared to heart transplant donors, while M2 macrophages dominated M1 macrophages in TAK. T cells were associated with histological disease activity and with prednisone use in TAK.


Assuntos
Antígenos CD/imunologia , Aorta/imunologia , Linfócitos/imunologia , Macrófagos/imunologia , Arterite de Takayasu/imunologia , Adulto , Idoso , Aorta/patologia , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Inflamação/tratamento farmacológico , Inflamação/imunologia , Inflamação/patologia , Linfócitos/patologia , Macrófagos/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prednisolona/administração & dosagem , Arterite de Takayasu/tratamento farmacológico , Arterite de Takayasu/patologia
2.
Braz J Med Biol Res ; 52(2): e8194, 2019 Feb 14.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30785480

RESUMO

Cytogenetics is essential in myeloid neoplasms (MN) and pre-analytical variables are important for karyotyping. We assessed the relationship between pre-analytical variables (time from collection to sample processing, material type, sample cellularity, and diagnosis) and failures of karyotyping. Bone marrow (BM, n=352) and peripheral blood (PB, n=69) samples were analyzed from acute myeloid leukemia (n=113), myelodysplastic syndromes (n=73), myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (n=17), myeloproliferative neoplasms (n=137), and other with conclusive diagnosis (n=6), and reactive disorders/no conclusive diagnosis (n=75). The rate of unsuccessful karyotyping was 18.5% and was associated with the use of PB and a low number of nucleated cells (≤7×103/µL) in the sample. High and low cellularity in BM and high and low cellularity in PB samples showed no metaphases in 3.9, 39.7, 41.9, and 84.6% of cases, respectively. Collecting a good BM sample is the key for the success of karyotyping in MN and avoids the use of expensive molecular techniques.


Assuntos
Células da Medula Óssea/patologia , Cariotipagem/métodos , Leucemia Mieloide/genética , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/genética , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/genética , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Humanos , Leucemia Mieloide/diagnóstico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/diagnóstico , Manejo de Espécimes/normas , Adulto Jovem
3.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 52(4): e8006, 2019. tab, graf
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-1001515

RESUMO

The aim of the study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of thromboelastometry for assessing rivaroxaban concentrations. The accuracy of thromboelastometry was compared with the high-performance liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method, which is the gold standard for drug plasma monitoring (the reference standard). Forty-six clinically stable patients were treated with 10, 15, or 20 mg of rivaroxaban once daily (OD group) or 15 mg twice a day (BID group) (no particular indication for treatment). Patient samples were collected 2 h after the use of the medication (peak) and 2 h before the next dose (trough). The rivaroxaban plasma concentrations were determined via HPLC-MS/MS, and thromboelastometry was performed using a ROTEM® delta analyzer. There were significant prolongations in clotting time (CT) for the 10, 15, and 20 mg of rivaroxaban treatments in the OD groups. In the 15 mg BID group, the responses at the peak and trough times were similar. At the peak times, there was a positive correlation between the plasma concentration of rivaroxaban and CT (Spearman correlation rho=0.788, P<0.001) and clot formation time (rho=0.784, P<0.001), and a negative correlation for alpha angle (rho=−0.771, P<0.001), amplitude after 5 min (rho=−0.763, P<0.001), and amplitude after 10 min (rho=−0.680, P<0.001). The CT presented higher specificity and sensitivity using the cut-off determined by the receiver characteristics curve. ROTEM has potential as screening tool to measure possible bleeding risk associated with rivaroxaban plasma levels.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Monitoramento de Medicamentos/métodos , Inibidores do Fator Xa/sangue , Rivaroxabana/sangue , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Tromboelastografia , Testes de Coagulação Sanguínea , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Inibidores do Fator Xa/administração & dosagem , Rivaroxabana/administração & dosagem , Confiabilidade dos Dados
4.
Braz. j. med. biol. res ; 52(2): e8194, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | LILACS | ID: biblio-984032

RESUMO

Cytogenetics is essential in myeloid neoplasms (MN) and pre-analytical variables are important for karyotyping. We assessed the relationship between pre-analytical variables (time from collection to sample processing, material type, sample cellularity, and diagnosis) and failures of karyotyping. Bone marrow (BM, n=352) and peripheral blood (PB, n=69) samples were analyzed from acute myeloid leukemia (n=113), myelodysplastic syndromes (n=73), myelodysplastic syndromes/myeloproliferative neoplasms (n=17), myeloproliferative neoplasms (n=137), and other with conclusive diagnosis (n=6), and reactive disorders/no conclusive diagnosis (n=75). The rate of unsuccessful karyotyping was 18.5% and was associated with the use of PB and a low number of nucleated cells (≤7×103/µL) in the sample. High and low cellularity in BM and high and low cellularity in PB samples showed no metaphases in 3.9, 39.7, 41.9, and 84.6% of cases, respectively. Collecting a good BM sample is the key for the success of karyotyping in MN and avoids the use of expensive molecular techniques.


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adolescente , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Adulto Jovem , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/genética , Células da Medula Óssea/patologia , Leucemia Mieloide/genética , Cariotipagem/métodos , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/genética , Manejo de Espécimes/normas , Síndromes Mielodisplásicas/diagnóstico , Leucemia Mieloide/diagnóstico , Transtornos Mieloproliferativos/diagnóstico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA