Modeling and Computational Comparison of the Displacement Forces Exerted between the AFX Unibody Aortic Stent Graft and its Hybrid Combination with a Nitinol-based Proximal Aortic Cuff.

BACKGROUND: The bifurcated AFX (Endologix, Inc, Irvine, CA, USA) aortic stent-graft is the sole unibody endograft for the management of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms (AAA). In order to improve the AFX central sealing and clinical efficacy in challenging cases, a replacement of the central chromium-cobaltium AFX extension with a Nitinol-based proximal aortic cuff has been suggested. Yet, comparative data regarding the hemodynamic performance of this design is missing. Aim of this study was to compare the displacement forces (DF) acting on the hybrid AFX-Endurant design, with the classic AFX and Endurant endografts, in angulated and non-angulated cases based on patient-specific Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) simulations. METHODS: 3D endograft models of 11 treated AAA cases were reconstructed from Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) imaging data: 5 cases of AFX, 3 cases of the combination AFX-Endurant and 3 cases of the classic Endurant design. The DF on the main-body, the iliac limbs, and the entire stent-graft was calculated by processing the velocity and pressure fields generated by pulsatile CFD simulations. RESULTS: The range of total DF (acting on the whole endograft structure) in the AFX, hybrid AFX-Endurant and Endurant group was 2.5-5.2N, 2.0-5.9N and 1.9-2.9N respectively, with the maximum total DF being lower for Endurant. The DF on the main-body of the classic and hybrid AFX cases were higher than the right and left iliac limbs (2.5-4.9N vs. 0.6-5.3N and 0.7-3.6N respectively). Conversely, the DF on the main-body of the Endurant cases was comparable to the force exerted on the right and left limbs. When separating the cases with respect to their neck angulation, the DF on all endograft parts (main-body, limbs) and on the endograft as a whole were lower for the hybrid AFX-Endurant group compared to the classic AFX and Endurant groups, for cases with almost straight neck. CONCLUSION: The off-label use of the hybrid AFX-Endurant stent-graft does not seem superior to the conventional AFX or Endurant endografts in angulated cases but was associated with lower DF than AFX or Endurant in non-angulated cases. The clinical value and utility of these findings remain to be elucidated.

Comparison of Fluid Dynamics Variations Between Chimney and Fenestrated Endografts for Pararenal Aneurysms Repair: A Patient Specific Computational Study as Motivation for Clinical Decision-Making.

BACKGROUND-AIM: Limited data exist concerning the fluid dynamic changes induced by endovascular aortic repair with fenestrated and chimney graft modalities in pararenal aneurysms. We aimed to investigate and compare the wall shear stress (WSS) and flow dynamics for the branch vessels before and after endovascular aortic repair with fenestrated and chimney techniques. METHODS: Modeling was done for patient specific pararenal aortic aneurysms employing fenestrated and chimney grafts (Materialise Mimics 10.0) before and after the endovascular procedure, using computed tomography scans of patients. Surface and spatial grids were created using the ANSYS CFD meshing software 2019 R2. Assessment of blood flow, streamlines, and WSS before and after aneurysm repair was performed. RESULTS: The endovascular repair with chimney grafts leaded to a 43% to 53% reduction in perfusion in renal arteries. In fenestrated reconstruction, we observed a 15% reduced perfusion in both renal arteries. In both cases, we observed a decrease in the recirculation phenomena of the aorta after endovascular repair. Concerning the grafts of the renal arteries, we observed in both the transverse and longitudinal axes low WSS regions with simultaneous recirculation of the flow 1 cm distal to the ostium sites in both aortic graft models. High WSS regions appeared in the sites of ostium. CONCLUSIONS: We observed reduced renal perfusion in chimney grafts compared to fenestrated grafts, probably caused by the long and kinked characteristics of these devices.

Identification of regional/layer differences in failure properties and thickness as important biomechanical factors responsible for the initiation of aortic dissections.

Thoracic aortic dissections involving the ascending aorta represent one of the most dramatic and lethal emergencies in cardiovascular surgery. It is therefore critical to identify the mechanisms driving them and biomechanical analyses hold great clinical promise, since rupture/dissection occur when aortic wall strength is unable to withstand hemodynamic stresses. Although several studies have been done on the biomechanical properties of thoracic aortic aneurysms, few data are available about thoracic aortic dissections. Detailed mechanical tests with measurement of tissue thickness and failure properties were performed with a tensile-testing device on 445 standardized specimens, corresponding to 19 measurement sites per inner (intima with most of media)/outer layer (leftover media with adventitia); harvested from twelve patients undergoing emergent surgical repair for type A dissection. Our data suggested inherent differences in tissue properties between the origin of dissection and distal locations, i.e. thinner and stiffer inner layers that might render them more vulnerable to tearing despite their increased strength. The strength of tissue circumferentially was greater than that longitudinally, likely determining the direction of tear. The relative strengths of the inner: ∼{65,40}N/cm2 and outer layer: ∼{350,270}N/cm2 in the two principal directions of dissected tissue were differentiated from the intima: ∼{100,75}N/cm2, media: ∼{150,55}N/cm2, and adventitia: ∼{270,190}N/cm2 of non-dissected ascending aortic aneurysms (Sokolis et al., 2012), in favor of weaker inner and stronger outer layers, allowing an explanation as to why the presently-studied tissue suffered dissection, i.e. tear of the inner layers, and not rupture, i.e. full tearing across the entire wall thickness.

Elevated expression of mechanosensory polycystins in human carotid atherosclerotic plaques: association with p53 activation and disease severity.

Atherosclerotic plaque formation is associated with irregular distribution of wall shear stress (WSS) that modulates endothelial function and integrity. Polycystins (PC)-1/-2 constitute a flow-sensing protein complex in endothelial cells, able to respond to WSS and induce cell-proliferation changes leading to atherosclerosis. An endothelial cell-culture system of measurable WSS was established to detect alterations in PCs expression under conditions of low- and high-oscillatory shear stress in vitro. PCs expression and p53 activation as a regulator of cell proliferation were further evaluated in vivo and in 69 advanced human carotid atherosclerotic plaques (AAPs). Increased PC-1/PC-2 expression was observed at 30-60 min of low shear stress (LSS) in endothelial cells. Elevated PC-1 expression at LSS was followed by p53 potentiation. PCs immunoreactivity localizes in areas with macrophage infiltration and neovascularization. PC-1 mRNA and protein levels were significantly higher than PC-2 in stable fibroatherotic (V) and unstable/complicated (VI) AAPs. Elevated PC-1 immunostaining was detected in AAPs from patients with diabetes mellitus, dyslipidemia, hypertension and carotid stenosis, at both arteries (50%) or in one artery (90%). PCs seem to participate in plaque formation and progression. Since PC-1 upregulation coincides with p38 and p53 activation, a potential interplay of these molecules in atherosclerosis induction is posed.

Retrograde cardioplegia in CABG: is it really useful? The microcirculation and a capillary unit model.

Most surgeons, ourselves including, use retrograde cardioplegia in numerable operations in cardiac surgery. It is believed to be not only supplementary to antegrade, but also a unique alternative in special complicated cases. Regarding CABGs (coronary artery bypass grafts), many authors advocate its routine use together with antegrade, while others do not suggest it for standard practice. The existing disagreement on this special item is consequential to the different results among various protocols which have studied the effect of antegrade and retrograde perfusion. In these studies, fundamental variations in design, materials, and methods have resulted in an inability to compare results. Additionally, most of the published protocols studying cardioplegic arrest offer only a gross estimation of the microcirculatory perfusion, which is the basis of myocardial protection. Our present review is an attempt to elucidate the differences, explain the necessity of comparing retrograde cardioplegia alone with antegrade in CABGs for the reproduction of safe results, clarify the role of Thebesian veins and venovenous connections during retroperfusion, consider the critical anatomic differences between human hearts and those of animals which may result in serious study bias, and, finally, offer an explanation of what may really be going on in the microcirculation during antegrade and retrograde perfusion using a human capillary model.