Effects of amifostine on perfused isolated rat heart and on acute doxorubicin-induced cardiotoxicity.

PURPOSE: To determine the effects of amifostine on an isolated perfused rat-heart model and its protective activity with regard to cardiotoxic doxorubicin perfusion. METHODS: Langendorff constant-pressure isolated rat-heart preparations were used to analyze the effects of the drugs during a 40-min period of perfusion after a 20-min stabilization interval. The first study was conducted with amifostine alone (controls and 10(-6), 10(-5), and 10(-4) M amifostine; n=6 in each group). The second study was conducted with amifostine and doxorubicin (controls, 2.5 x 10(-5) M doxorubicin, 2.5 x 10(-5) M doxorubicin and 10(-5) M amifostine, and 2.5 x 10(-5) M doxorubicin and 10(-4) M amifostine; n=4 in each group). RESULTS: Amifostine had no significant effect on hemodynamic parameters at 10(-6), 10(-5), and 10(-4) M concentrations. However. amifostine increased the coronary flow expressed as a percentage+/-SEM of the baseline flow as follows: 82+/-4% for controls, 95+/-6% for 10(-6) M amifostine, (P=0.13), 111+/-4% for 10(-5) M amifostine (P < 0.01), and 104+/-3% for 10(-6) M amifostine (P < 0.01). When we commenced an amifostine perfusion 20 min in advance of and then during a 40-min perfusion with doxorubicin, at a cardiotoxic concentration of 2.5 x 10(-5) M the left ventricular pressures (LVDP, expressed as percentages +/-SEM of the baseline LVDP before doxorubicin) were 55+/-3% for the doxorubicin controls, 68+/-2% for doxorubicin with 10(-5) M amifostine (P=0.05), and 80+/-3% for doxorubicin with 10(-4) M amifostine (P < 0.01). Whether this protective effect might be related to the known free-radical-scavenging activity of amifostine remains to be determined. CONCLUSION: On a Langendorff-type model of rat heart, 10(-5) and 10(-4) M amifostine alone induced a coronary dilation and, when associated with a cardiotoxic concentration of 2.5 x 10(-5) M doxorubicin, 10(-5) and 10(-4) M amifostine displayed a cardioprotective effect.

Evaluation of a prediction model of cisplatin dose based on total platinum plasma concentration.

The aim of this study was to validate prospectively a model of cisplatin dose adjustment. 27 patients (63 courses) with lung cancer were treated by a 5 day continuous infusion of cisplatin and etoposide. The dose of cisplatin was adjusted in order to reach a target plasma concentration of total platinum (TP) of 2000 mu/l at the end of the infusion. The target concentration was reached with a mean bias of 2.7% and a precision of 7.8%. The results were compared with those of a population of 38 patients (97 courses) with lung cancer and treated with the same protocol of chemotherapy, but without dose adjustment. The average dose adjustment was an increase of cisplatin dose of 20.2%. This augmentation was most important during the first course, decreasing during the following courses. There was also an increase in the etoposide AUC, although its dose was not modified. Toxicity to polymorphonuclear cells was significantly increased and was linked to etoposide AUC.

Comparison of two dose prediction models for cisplatin.

Cisplatin toxicity could be decreased by adjusting its dosage to each patient. For this purpose, a limited sampling method was established and validated based on a Bayesian approach taken using the values of assays during a 5-day continuous infusion of cisplatin. Using this method, a dosing model to achieve a target plasma concentration of total platinum (Pt) was evaluated retrospectively; the calculated dose of cisplatin was 95.0 to 104.8% of the actual dose. This model was then studied prospectively and the actual plasma Pt concentration reached at the end of the infusion was 94.9% of the target concentration. A strong correlation was observed between the clearance of Pt and the calculated clearance of creatinine or Cockroft index (p = 1.7 x 10(-11), and this correlation was used to develop another cisplatin dosing model. With this model the actual concentration reached at the end of the infusion was 85.3% of the theoretical concentration. The Bayesian approach gave reliable results for most clinical uses, whereas the creatinine based model has to be improved.