Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 230(4): 448.e1-448.e15, 2024 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37778678

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Epidemiological studies have shown that women with preeclampsia (PE) are at increased long term cardiovascular risk. This risk might be associated with accelerated vascular ageing process but data on vascular abnormalities in women with PE are scarce. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify the most discriminatory maternal vascular index in the prediction of PE at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation and to examine the performance of screening for PE by combinations of maternal risk factors and biophysical and biochemical markers at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective observational nonintervention study in women attending a routine hospital visit at 35 0/7 to 36 6/7 weeks' gestation. The visit included recording of maternal demographic characteristics and medical history, vascular indices, and hemodynamic parameters obtained by a noninvasive operator-independent device (pulse wave velocity, augmentation index, cardiac output, stroke volume, central systolic and diastolic blood pressures, total peripheral resistance, and fetal heart rate), mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and serum concentration of placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1. The performance of screening for delivery with PE at any time and at <3 weeks from assessment using a combination of maternal risk factors and various combinations of biomarkers was determined. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 6746 women with singleton pregnancies, including 176 women (2.6%) who subsequently developed PE. There were 3 main findings. First, in women who developed PE, compared with those who did not, there were higher central systolic and diastolic blood pressures, pulse wave velocity, peripheral vascular resistance, and augmentation index. Second, the most discriminatory indices were systolic and diastolic blood pressures and pulse wave velocity, with poor prediction from the other indices. However, the performance of screening by a combination of maternal risk factors plus mean arterial pressure was at least as high as that of a combination of maternal risk factors plus central systolic and diastolic blood pressures; consequently, in screening for PE, pulse wave velocity, mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, placental growth factor, and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 were used. Third, in screening for both PE within 3 weeks and PE at any time from assessment, the detection rate at a false-positive rate of 10% of a biophysical test consisting of maternal risk factors plus mean arterial pressure, uterine artery pulsatility index, and pulse wave velocity (PE within 3 weeks: 85.2%; 95% confidence interval, 75.6%-92.1%; PE at any time: 69.9%; 95% confidence interval, 62.5%-76.6%) was not significantly different from a biochemical test using the competing risks model to combine maternal risk factors with placental growth factor and soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 (PE within 3 weeks: 80.2%; 95% confidence interval, 69.9%-88.3%; PE at any time: 64.2%; 95% confidence interval, 56.6%-71.3%), and they were both superior to screening by low placental growth factor concentration (PE within 3 weeks: 53.1%; 95% confidence interval, 41.7%-64.3%; PE at any time: 44.3; 95% confidence interval, 36.8%-52.0%) or high soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor concentration ratio (PE within 3 weeks: 65.4%; 95% confidence interval, 54.0%-75.7%; PE at any time: 53.4%; 95% confidence interval, 45.8%-60.9%). CONCLUSION: First, increased maternal arterial stiffness preceded the clinical onset of PE. Second, maternal pulse wave velocity at 35 to 37 weeks' gestation in combination with mean arterial pressure and uterine artery pulsatility index provided effective prediction of subsequent development of preeclampsia.


Assuntos
Pré-Eclâmpsia , Gravidez , Feminino , Humanos , Pré-Eclâmpsia/diagnóstico , Pré-Eclâmpsia/epidemiologia , Fator de Crescimento Placentário , Receptor 1 de Fatores de Crescimento do Endotélio Vascular , Análise de Onda de Pulso , Medição de Risco , Biomarcadores , Artéria Uterina/diagnóstico por imagem , Artéria Uterina/fisiologia , Fluxo Pulsátil , Idade Gestacional
2.
Int J Med Robot ; 13(2)2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26989866

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the efficacy of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy for deep intramural myomas. METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective study for 170 patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy by a single operator of tertiary university hospital. RESULTS: There were 100 cases of robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy for deep intramural myomas. The patients had 3.8±3.5 myomas on average, and the mean size of the largest myoma of each patient was 7.5±2.1 centimeters in diameter. Mean operative time was 276.4±97.1 minutes, and mean console time was 146.0±62.7 minutes. Thirty two patients had surgeries for other gynecologic conditions such as pelvic endometriosis or endometrial polyps along with myomectomy at the same time. All the patients recovered without any major complication. After the surgery, nine(75.0 %) of the 12 women pursuing a pregnancy became pregnant. CONCLUSION: Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy for deep intramural myomas could be a minimal invasive surgical option for women who wish preserve fertility. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Assuntos
Laparoscopia/métodos , Leiomioma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Mioma/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Robóticos/métodos , Miomectomia Uterina/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mioma/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias Uterinas
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA