Outcomes of Valved and Nonvalved Tube Shunts in Neovascular Glaucoma.

PURPOSE: To determine the outcomes of Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV; New World Medical Inc) and Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI; Advanced Medical Optics) surgery in the setting of neovascular glaucoma (NVG). DESIGN: Single-center, retrospective study. PARTICIPANTS: Consecutive patients who underwent AGV or BGI surgery for the treatment of NVG and had ≥6 months of follow-up. METHODS: Chart review of AGV and BGI surgical outcomes in patients with NVG. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Progression to no light perception (NLP) vision and 6-month surgical failure, which was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mmHg with medications or <5 mmHg at 2 consecutive visits, or glaucoma reoperation. RESULTS: A total of 152 eyes (91 AGV, 61 BGI) were included with an average follow-up of 29.6 ± 25.8 months. Baseline demographics and clinical characteristics were comparable between groups. At month 6, failure was similar between AGV and BGI eyes (21.6% vs. 25.9%; P = 0.552), but glaucoma medication use was lower in BGI eyes (P < 0.001). At the final visit, 18.7% of AGV and 14.8% of BGI eyes progressed to NLP vision (P = 0.530), and medication use was lower in BGI eyes (P < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis identified lower preoperative visual acuity (VA) (P = 0.001), failure to receive panretinal photocoagulation within 2 weeks of surgery (P = 0.003), and bilaterality of the underlying ischemic retinal pathology (P = 0.026) as the strongest predictors of NLP outcome. Age, sex, race, NVG etiology, tube type, preoperative IOP, extent of synechial angle closure preoperatively, preoperative hyphema, IOP at the first NLP visit, and final IOP were not significant predictors of NLP vision. CONCLUSIONS: Eyes with AGV and BGI had comparable outcomes in NVG, although fewer medications were required in BGI eyes to control IOP. Progression to NLP vision was associated with poor baseline VA, delayed retinal treatment, and bilaterality of the underlying ischemic retinal pathology.

Ahmed Versus Baerveldt Glaucoma Drainage Device in Uveitic Glaucoma: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

PRECIS: Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device demonstrated a greater reduction in intraocular pressure (IOP) than Ahmed in patients with uveitic glaucoma. The most common cause of failure was uncontrolled IOP in Ahmed and hypotony in the Baerveldt group. PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy and safety of Ahmed and Baerveldt glaucoma drainage devices in uveitic glaucoma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The retrospective comparative study included patients with uveitic glaucoma who underwent Ahmed or Baerveldt glaucoma drainage device implantation with a minimum follow-up of 3 months. Success was defined as IOP ≥6 and ≤21 mm Hg and >20% reduction on 2 consecutive visits after the third month with (qualified success) or without (complete success) medications and no further glaucoma surgery or loss of vision. IOP, number of medications, visual acuity, complications, and interventions were compared between groups. RESULTS: In total, 137 eyes of 122 patients (67 Ahmed, 70 Baerveldt) were included. The preoperative IOP and number of medications in the Ahmed group (32.7±10.3 mm Hg; 4.1±1.3) were similar to Baerveldt (32.1±10.2 mm Hg; 4.3±1.3; P=0.73, 0.35). These at the last follow-up were (18.1±9.8 mm Hg; 2.1±1) in Ahmed and (12.7±6.9 mm Hg; 1.3±1.3) in Baerveldt groups (P=0.04, 0.01). The Baerveldt had greater IOP reduction (60.3% vs. 44.5%) and complete success rate (30% vs. 9%) with higher complication rate (51.4% vs. 20.9%) (all P≤0.05). The de novo glaucoma reoperation rate was 19% in the Ahmed group and 4% in the Baerveldt group (P=0.006). Hypotony resulted in failure in 7 eyes (10%) in the Baerveldt group and none in the Ahmed group (P=0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Higher complete success rate and significantly greater reduction in mean IOP and number of medications were observed in the Baerveldt group, but with a higher rate of complications including hypotony.

Adherence to Follow-up Recommendations Among Individuals in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project.

PURPOSE: To evaluate rates of adherence to free follow-up eye exam appointments among participants in the Philadelphia Glaucoma Detection and Treatment Project. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Ophthalmologists and testing equipment were brought directly to participants at risk for glaucoma at 43 community sites in Philadelphia. Those diagnosed with glaucoma-related pathology were recommended to return for follow-up to be reexamined on site. Rates of adherence and clinical and demographic risk factors for adherence were evaluated. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-one participants were diagnosed with glaucoma-related conditions and recommended to attend community-based follow-up exams. Follow-up adherence rate was 61.2% (n=325/531). Significant factors associated with greater eye exam appointment adherence, based on our univariable analysis, included final diagnosis of glaucoma (risk ratio [RR]=1.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.13-1.57), male sex (RR=1.19; 95% CI, 1.04-1.36), white race (RR=1.26; 95% CI, 1.08-1.48), age (RR=1.17; 95% CI, 1.00-1.37) recommendation for glaucoma medication (RR=1.52; 95% CI, 1.35-1.71), recommendation for laser peripheral iridotomy (RR=1.18; 95% CI, 1.02-1.35), diagnosis of age-related macular degeneration (RR=1.42; 95% CI, 1.13-1.77) and an increased intraocular pressure (>22 mm Hg in the worse eye) (RR=1.23; 95% CI, 1.06-1.42). On the basis of our multivariable model, diagnosis, sex, and recommended glaucoma medications were significantly associated with follow-up adherence. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that individuals living in underserved urban communities would take advantage of free eye exams in community sites and return for follow-up eye exams in these same settings. Future studies could investigate interventions to improve eye exam appointment adherence in community-based settings to detect glaucoma-eye conditions.

Glaucoma.

Glaucoma is a multifactorial degenerative optic neuropathy that can progress at variable rates and afflict all age groups. It is the second leading cause of blindness worldwide. The disease is commonly divided into 2 major subtypes, open angle and angle closure. Diagnosis of glaucoma is made by a combination of identifying characteristic changes of the optic nerve, functional testing such as visual fields, and structural imaging of the optic nerve. Management is aimed at reducing intraocular pressure (IOP). Patients with known risk factors should be referred to an ophthalmologist for complete evaluation.

Short-term intraocular pressure changes immediately after intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents.

PURPOSE: To assess short-term trends and the need to monitor intraocular pressure (IOP) changes immediately after intravitreal injections of ranibizumab, bevacizumab, pegaptanib, and triamcinolone acetonide. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: Charts of 213 consecutive injections to 120 eyes of 112 patients were reviewed. Pressures were measured before injection, immediately after injection (T0), and at five-minute intervals until IOP was less than 30 mm Hg. Optic nerve perfusion was assessed by testing for hand movement vision and by indirect ophthalmoscopic examination. Kaplan-Meier and Chi-square analyses of IOP after injections and correlation of IOP spikes to drug, needle bore size, injection volume, and history of glaucoma were performed. RESULTS: Mean preinjection IOP was 14 mm Hg (range, 7 to 22 mm Hg). Mean IOP at T0 was 44 mm Hg (range, 4 to 87 mm Hg). All but one eye had at least hand movement vision and a perfused optic nerve at T0. IOP was reduced to less than 30 mm Hg in 96% of injections by 15 minutes and in 100% by 30 minutes. Eyes with a history of glaucoma took longer to normalize the IOP (P = .002). Statistically significant IOP spikes were observed with a smaller needle bore size (P < .0001) and in eyes with a history of glaucoma (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: Elevations in IOP immediately after intravitreal injections are common, but are transient. Prolonged monitoring of IOP may not be necessary on the day of injection in most cases if hand movement vision, optic nerve perfusion, and lack of intraocular complications have been verified. However, cautious monitoring should be considered in select cases.

Accuracy of surrogate decision making in elective surgery.

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of surrogate decision making for elective cataract surgery. SETTING: Comprehensive Ophthalmology Department of Tertiary Care Hospital. METHODS: Decisions regarding elective cataract surgery of currently competent, elderly patients were compared with the predictions of patient-identified surrogate decision makers in scenarios of current state of mental health and progressive dementia. Patients were identified (age >50 years, Mini-Mental Status Score >20, absence of significant noncataract pathology) consecutively at a scheduled clinic visit to a single provider. Preferences for cataract surgery in the current state of health and hypothetical progressive dementia were assessed on a Likert scale. The same interviewer contacted patient-identified surrogate decision makers within 48 hours. Independently, a survey of community ophthalmologists was performed. The concordance of surrogate predictions with patient preferences (32 pairs) was assessed using percentage agreement, the kappa coefficient with dichotomous Likert scale data, and chi-square analyses (concordance beyond chance). RESULTS: In their current state of health, most patients said they would prefer to have surgery if they were deemed to have a visually significant cataract, which was accurately predicted by surrogates (72% agreement, kappa = 0.65, chi square = 16.5). In a hypothetical dementia scenario, contrary to perceptions of patients and their surrogates, proxies were unable to accurately represent a patient's wishes for elective cataract surgery (34% agreement, kappa = 0.23, chi square = 14.4). Physicians tended to withhold intervention in the dementia scenario. CONCLUSIONS: The findings suggest that current methods of decision making in elective surgery for patients unable to make autonomous decisions may be seriously flawed. This extends previous findings of inaccuracy with the substituted judgment approach to end-of-life issues to reflect elective surgical scenarios.