RESUMO
Retrospective, cohort analysis including people with HIV and 4-class drug resistance (4DR). The 8-year probability of malignancy after first evidence of 4DR was 12%, with an incidence of 1.6/100 person years of follow-up. Cancer risk tended to increase with higher precancer viremia copy-years adjusted for time [per 1 - log10 copies/ml higher: adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) = 1.35; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) = 0.98-1.85] and male sex-assigned-at-birth (aHR = 2.50; 95% CIâ=â0.86-7.27). Efforts to achieve long-term undetectability, risk factor control, prevention, and more aggressive cancer screening are needed in this fragile population.
Assuntos
Farmacorresistência Viral Múltipla , Infecções por HIV , Neoplasias , Humanos , Infecções por HIV/complicações , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Estudos Retrospectivos , Incidência , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) severity presentation between oncologic and non-oncologic patients and to evaluate the impact of cancer type and stage on COVID-19 course. METHODS: We performed a multicentre, retrospective study involving 13 COVID-19 Units in Campania region from February to May 2020. We defined as severe COVID-19 presentation the cases that required mechanical ventilation and/or admission to Intensive Care Units (ICU) and/or in case of death. RESULTS: We enrolled 371 COVID-19 patients, of whom 34 (9.2%) had a history or a diagnosis of cancer (24 solid, 6 onco-hematological). Oncologic patients were older (p<0.001), had more comorbidities (p<0.001) and showed a higher rate of severe COVID-19 presentation (p=0.001) and of death (p<0.001). Compared to 12 patients with non-active cancer and to 337 without cancer, the 17 patients with active cancer had more comorbidities and showed a higher rate of severe COVID-19 and of mortality (all p values <0.001). Compared to the 281 non-severe patients, the 90 subjects with a severe presentation of COVID-19 were older (p<0.01), with more comorbidities (p<0.001) and with a higher rate of cancer (p=0.001). At multivariate analysis, age (OR 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.11) and suffering from cancer in an active stage (OR 5.33, 95% CI: 1.77-16.53) were independently associated with severe COVID-19. CONCLUSIONS: Since the higher risk of severe evolution of COVID-19, cancer patients, especially those with an active malignancy, should be candidates for early evaluation of symptoms and early treatment for COVID-19.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The inflammatory pathology observed in severe COVID-19 disease caused by the 2019 novel severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is characterized by elevated serum levels of C reactive protein (CRP) and cytokines, including interferon gamma, interleukin 8 (IL-8), and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Initial reports from the outbreak in Italy, China and the USA have provided anecdotal evidence of improved outcomes with the administration of anti-IL-6 agents, and large-scale trials evaluating these therapies are ongoing. STUDY DESCRIPTION: In this retrospective case series, clinical outcomes and correlates of response to treatment with the IL-6 receptor antagonist sarilumab are described for 15 patients with COVID-19 from a single institution in Southern Italy. Among 10 patients whose symptoms improved after sarilumab treatment, rapid decreases in CRP levels corresponded with clinical improvement. Lower levels of IL-6 at baseline as well as lower neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio as compared with patients whose COVID-19 did not improve with treatment were associated with sarilumab-responsive disease. CONCLUSIONS: This observation may reflect a possible clinical benefit regarding early intervention with IL-6-modulatory therapies for COVID-19 and that CRP could be a potential biomarker of response to treatment.
Assuntos
Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados/uso terapêutico , Biomarcadores Farmacológicos/sangue , Infecções por Coronavirus/tratamento farmacológico , Interleucina-6/sangue , Pneumonia Viral/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , COVID-19 , Infecções por Coronavirus/complicações , Infecções por Coronavirus/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Itália , Contagem de Linfócitos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Neutrófilos , Pandemias , Pneumonia Viral/complicações , Pneumonia Viral/diagnóstico por imagem , Receptores de Interleucina-6/antagonistas & inibidores , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Tratamento Farmacológico da COVID-19RESUMO
In June 2008 a 23-year-old immunocompetent came to our observation, without fever and with an occasional cough for 2 months, who showed two chest X-rays and a CT, performed respectively 60, 40 and 20 days earlier, that pointed to a small lobitis at the right lung base. The patient had already undergone several antibiotic therapies that had not changed the X-graphic framework. On presentation, routine blood tests and cultural examinations of sputum were carried out to detect common germs, fungi and TB bacteria (microscopic observation, cultivation and PCR), and a new antibiotic therapy (piperacillin/tazobactam) was started. Since the radiological picture appeared unchanged after 10 days of therapy and the examinations (microscopic observation and PCR) were negative, bronchoscopy with bacteriological evaluation of BAL was performed, which was positive to Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and then tubercular lobitis was diagnosed. Therefore a specific therapy - rifampin (RMP), isoniazid (INH), etambutol (EMB), pyrazinamid (PZA) - was started and changed after 10 days due to the growth of mycobacteria resistant to INH and EMB on examination of sputum. Consequently, the early use of PCR on BAL allows, in skilled hands, small aspecific lobitis to be diagnosed more rapidly than using cultural examination of sputum.