Effect of sirolimus on muscle in inclusion body myositis observed with magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

BACKGROUND: Finding sensitive clinical outcome measures has become crucial in natural history studies and therapeutic trials of neuromuscular disorders. Here, we focus on 1-year longitudinal data from quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and phosphorus magnetic resonance spectroscopy (31P MRS) in a placebo-controlled study of sirolimus for inclusion body myositis (IBM), also examining their links to functional, strength, and clinical parameters in lower limb muscles. METHODS: Quantitative MRI and 31P MRS data were collected at 3 T from a single site, involving 44 patients (22 on placebo, 22 on sirolimus) at baseline and year-1, and 21 healthy controls. Assessments included fat fraction (FF), contractile cross-sectional area (cCSA), and water T2 in global leg and thigh segments, muscle groups, individual muscles, as well as 31P MRS indices in quadriceps or triceps surae. Analyses covered patient-control comparisons, annual change assessments via standard t-tests and linear mixed models, calculation of standardized response means (SRM), and exploration of correlations between MRI, 31P MRS, functional, strength, and clinical parameters. RESULTS: The quadriceps and gastrocnemius medialis muscles had the highest FF values, displaying notable heterogeneity and asymmetry, particularly in the quadriceps. In the placebo group, the median 1-year FF increase in the quadriceps was 3.2% (P < 0.001), whereas in the sirolimus group, it was 0.7% (P = 0.033). Both groups experienced a significant decrease in cCSA in the quadriceps after 1 year (P < 0.001), with median changes of 12.6% for the placebo group and 5.5% for the sirolimus group. Differences in FF and cCSA changes between the two groups were significant (P < 0.001). SRM values for FF and cCSA were 1.3 and 1.4 in the placebo group and 0.5 and 0.8 in the sirolimus group, respectively. Water T2 values were highest in the quadriceps muscles of both groups, significantly exceeding control values in both groups (P < 0.001) and were higher in the placebo group than in the sirolimus group. After treatment, water T2 increased significantly only in the sirolimus group's quadriceps (P < 0.01). Multiple 31P MRS indices were abnormal in patients compared to controls and remained unchanged after treatment. Significant correlations were identified between baseline water T2 and FF at baseline and the change in FF (P < 0.001). Additionally, significant correlations were observed between FF, cCSA, water T2, and functional and strength outcome measures. CONCLUSIONS: This study has demonstrated that quantitative MRI/31P MRS can discern measurable differences between placebo and sirolimus-treated IBM patients, offering promise for future therapeutic trials in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies such as IBM.

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: CT characteristics of interstitial lung disease and their association(s) with myositis-specific autoantibodies.

OBJECTIVES: Interstitial lung disease (ILD), one of the most common extramuscular manifestations of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs), carries a poor prognosis. Myositis-specific autoantibody (MSA)-positivity is a key finding for IIM diagnosis. We aimed to identify IIM-associated lung patterns, evaluate potential CT-ILD finding-MSA relationships, and assess intra- and interobserver reproducibility in a large IIM population. METHODS: All consecutive IIM patients (2003-2019) were included. Two chest radiologists retrospectively assessed all chest CT scans. Multiple correspondence and hierarchical cluster analyses of CT findings identified and characterized ILD-patient subgroups. Classification and regression-tree analyses highlighted CT-scan variables predicting three patterns. Three independent radiologists read CT scans twice to assign patients according to CT-ILD-pattern clusters. RESULTS: Among 257 IIM patients, 94 (36.6%) had ILDs; 87 (93%) of them were MSA-positive. ILD-IIM distribution was 54 (57%) ASyS, 21 (22%) DM, 15 (16%) IMNM, and 4 (4%) IBM. Cluster analysis identified three ILD-patient subgroups. Consolidation characterized cluster 1, with significantly (p < 0.05) more frequent anti-MDA5-autoantibody-positivity. Significantly more cluster-2 patients had a reticular pattern, without cysts and with few consolidations. All cluster-3 patients had cysts and anti-PL12 autoantibodies. Clusters 2 and 3 included significantly more ASyS patients. Intraobserver concordances to classify patients into those three clusters were good-to-excellent (Cohen κ 0.64-0.81), with good interobserver reliability (Fleiss's κ 0.56). CONCLUSION: Despite the observed IIM heterogeneity, CT-scan criteria enabled ILD assignment to the three clusters, which were associated with MSAs. Radiologist identification of those clusters could facilitate diagnostic screening and therapeutics. Interstitial lung disease in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathy could be classified into three clusters according to CT-scan criteria, and these clusters were significantly associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies. KEY POINTS: • Cluster analysis discerned three homogeneous groups of interstitial lung disease (ILD) for which cysts, consolidations, and reticular pattern were discriminatory, and associated with myositis-specific autoantibodies. • Like muscle- and extramuscular-specific phenotypes, myositis-specific autoantibodies are also associated with specific ILD patterns in patients with idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Different phenotypes in dermatomyositis associated with anti-MDA5 antibody: Study of 121 cases.

OBJECTIVES: The predominance of extramuscular manifestations (e.g., skin rash, arthralgia, interstitial lung disease [ILD]) as well as the low frequency of muscle signs in anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 antibody-positive (anti-MDA5+) dermatomyositis caused us to question the term myositis-specific antibody for the anti-MDA5 antibody, as well as the homogeneity of the disease. METHODS: To characterize the anti-MDA5+ phenotype, an unsupervised analysis was performed on anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83/121) and compared to a group of patients with myositis without anti-MDA5 antibody (anti-MDA5-; n = 190/201) based on selected variables, collected retrospectively, without any missing data. RESULTS: Within anti-MDA5+ patients (n = 83), 3 subgroups were identified. One group (18.1%) corresponded to patients with a rapidly progressive ILD (93.3%; p < 0.0001 across all) and a very high mortality rate. The second subgroup (55.4%) corresponded to patients with pure dermato-rheumatologic symptoms (arthralgia; 82.6%; p < 0.01) and a good prognosis. The third corresponded to patients, mainly male (72.7%; p < 0.0001), with severe skin vasculopathy, frequent signs of myositis (proximal weakness: 68.2%; p < 0.0001), and an intermediate prognosis. Raynaud phenomenon, arthralgia/arthritis, and sex permit the cluster appurtenance (83.3% correct estimation). Nevertheless, an unsupervised analysis confirmed that anti-MDA5 antibody delineates an independent group of patients (e.g., dermatomyositis skin rash, skin ulcers, calcinosis, mechanic's hands, ILD, arthralgia/arthritis, and high mortality rate) distinct from anti-MDA5- patients with myositis. CONCLUSION: Anti-MDA5+ patients have a systemic syndrome distinct from other patients with myositis. Three subgroups with different prognosis exist.

Edematous myositis: a clinical presentation first suggesting dermatomyositis diagnosis.

AIMS: Edema of the limbs is uncommon in idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM). The few reported cases have been associated with severe and refractory dermatomyositis (DM), sometimes in association with cancers. We aimed to determine if edematous myositis is a homogeneous subtype based on clinical, serological and pathological features. METHODS: This is a retrospective observational study performed between 2008 and 2015 in the French national referral center for myositis. All adult patients with an inflammatory muscle biopsy and upper limbs edema were included as well as IIM cases without limb edema as controls. Clinical, biological and pathological features were collected. RESULTS: Seventeen edematous myositis were included and compared to 174 IIM without edema, including 50 DM controls. Edema was the first manifestation in 23% of patients. Muscle weakness was severe and symmetric, 71% of patients presented dysphagia and a restrictive ventilatory pattern was found in 40%. Fifty-two percent of patients had a typical DM skin rash and 23% had cancer within 3 years of diagnosing myositis. Fifty-three percent of patients presented a myositis specific antibody and only DM-specific antibodies were detected. Classic pathological DM features (perifascicular atrophy, perifascicular/perimysial perivascular inflammation) were uncommon but capillary C5b-9 deposition and MxA expression were seen in 79% and 73% of cases, respectively. A perimysial edema was found in 82% of cases. Seventeen percent of patients died (median follow up of 18 months). Edematous myositis demonstrated more marked capillary C5b-9 deposition compared to IIM controls. There was no clinical, biological or pathological difference with DM controls except for limb edema. CONCLUSION: Our study underlines that limb edema could be a symptom of IIM and that edematous myositis are mostly DM. The vasculopathy seems to play a key role in its pathophysiology. Limb edema associated with muscle impairment should suggest the diagnosis of DM in clinical settings.

Granulomatosis-associated myositis: High prevalence of sporadic inclusion body myositis.

OBJECTIVE: To refine the predictive significance of muscle granuloma in patients with myositis. METHODS: A group of 23 patients with myositis and granuloma on muscle biopsy (granuloma-myositis) from 8 French and Belgian centers was analyzed and compared with (1) a group of 23 patients with myositis without identified granuloma (control-myositis) randomly sampled in each center and (2) a group of 20 patients with sporadic inclusion body myositis (sIBM) without identified granuloma (control-sIBM). RESULTS: All but 2 patients with granuloma-myositis had extramuscular involvement, including signs common in sarcoidosis that were systematically absent in the control-myositis and the control-sIBM groups. Almost half of patients with granuloma-myositis matched the diagnostic criteria for sIBM. In these patients, other than the granuloma, the characteristics of the myopathy and its nonresponse to treatment were similar to the control-sIBM patients. Aside from 1 patient with myositis overlapping with systemic sclerosis, the remaining patients with granuloma-myositis did not match the criteria for a well-defined myositis subtype, suggesting pure sarcoidosis. Matching criteria for sIBM was the sole feature independently associated with nonresponse to myopathy treatment in patients with granuloma-myositis. CONCLUSION: Patients with granuloma-myositis should be carefully screened for sIBM associated with sarcoidosis in order to best tailor their care.

Development of a New Classification System for Idiopathic Inflammatory Myopathies Based on Clinical Manifestations and Myositis-Specific Autoantibodies.

Importance: Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are heterogeneous in their pathophysiologic features and prognosis. The emergence of myositis-specific autoantibodies suggests that subgroups of patients exist. Objective: To develop a new classification scheme for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies based on phenotypic, biological, and immunologic criteria. Design, Setting, and Participants: An observational, retrospective cohort study was performed using a database of the French myositis network. Patients identified from referral centers for neuromuscular diseases were included from January 1, 2003, to February 1, 2016. Of 445 initial patients, 185 patients were excluded and 260 adult patients with myositis who had complete data and defined historical classifications for polymyositis, dermatomyositis, and inclusion body myositis were enrolled. All patients were tested for anti-histidyl-ARN-t- synthetase (Jo1), anti-threonine-ARN-t-synthetase (PL7), anti-alanine-ARN-t-synthetase (PL12), anti-complex nucleosome remodeling histone deacetylase (Mi2), anti-Ku, anti-polymyositis/systemic scleroderma (PMScl), anti-topoisomerase 1 (Scl70), and anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) antibodies. A total of 708 variables were collected per patient (eg, cancer, lung involvement, and myositis-specific antibodies). Main Outcomes and Measures: Unsupervised multiple correspondence analysis and hierarchical clustering analysis to aggregate patients in subgroups. Results: Among 260 participants (163 [62.7%] women; mean age, 59.7 years; median age [range], 61.5 years [48-71 years]), 4 clusters of patients emerged. Cluster 1 (n = 77) included patients who were male, white, and older than 60 years and had finger flexor and quadriceps weakness and findings of vacuolated fibers and mitochondrial abnormalities. Cluster 1 regrouped patients who had inclusion body myositis (72 of 77 patients [93.5%]; 95% CI, 85.5%-97.8%; P < .001). Cluster 2 (n = 91) regrouped patients who were women and had high creatine phosphokinase levels, necrosis without inflammation, and anti-SRP or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies corresponding to immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy (53 of 91 [58.2%]; 95% CI, 47.4%-68.5%; P < .001). Cluster 3 (n = 52) regrouped patients who had dermatomyositis rash and anti-Mi2, anti-melanoma differentiation-associated protein 5 (MDA5), or anti-transcription intermediary factor-1γ (TIF1γ) antibodies, mainly corresponding with patients who had dermatomyositis (43 of 52 [82.7%]; 95% CI, 69.7%-91.8%; P < .001). Cluster 4 (n = 40) was defined by the presence of anti-Jo1 or anti-PL7 antibodies corresponding to antisynthetase syndrome (36 of 40 [90.0%]; 95% CI, 76.3%-97.2%; P < .001). The classification of an independent cohort (n = 50) confirmed the 4 clusters (Cohen κ light, 0.8; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9). Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest a classification of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies with 4 subgroups: dermatomyositis, inclusion body myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, and antisynthetase syndrome. This classification system suggests that a targeted clinical-serologic approach for identifying idiopathic inflammatory myopathies may be warranted.

Necrosis in anti-SRP+ and anti-HMGCR+myopathies: Role of autoantibodies and complement.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize muscle fiber necrosis in immune-mediated necrotizing myopathies (IMNM) with anti-signal recognition particle (SRP) or anti-3-hydroxy-3-methylglutarylcoenzyme A reductase (HMGCR) antibodies and to explore its underlying molecular immune mechanisms. METHODS: Muscle biopsies from patients with IMNM were analyzed and compared to biopsies from control patients with myositis. In addition to immunostaining and reverse transcription PCR on muscle samples, in vitro immunostaining on primary muscle cells was performed. RESULTS: Creatine kinase levels and muscle regeneration correlated with the proportion of necrotic fibers (r = 0.6, p < 0.001). CD68+iNOS+ macrophages and a Th-1 immune environment were chiefly involved in ongoing myophagocytosis of necrotic fibers. T-cell densities correlated with necrosis but no signs of cytotoxicity were detected. Activation of the classical pathway of the complement cascade, accompanied by deposition of sarcolemmal immunoglobulins, featured involvement of humoral immunity. Presence of SRP and HMGCR proteins on altered myofibers was reproduced on myotubes exposed to purified patient-derived autoantibodies. Finally, a correlation between sarcolemmal complement deposits and fiber necrosis was observed (r = 0.4 and p = 0.004). Based on these observations, we propose to update the pathologic criteria of IMNM. CONCLUSION: These data further corroborate the pathogenic role of anti-SRP and anti-HMGCR autoantibodies in IMNM, highlighting humoral mechanisms as key players in immunity and myofiber necrosis.

High risk of cancer in autoimmune necrotizing myopathies: usefulness of myositis specific antibody.

Cancer can occur in patients with inflammatory myopathies. This association is mainly observed in dermatomyositis, and myositis-specific antibodies have allowed us to delineate patients at an increased risk. Malignancy is also reported in patients with necrotizing autoimmune myopathies, but the risk remains elusive. Anti-signal recognition particle or anti-HMGCR antibodies have been specifically associated with necrotizing autoimmune myopathies. We aimed at screening the incidence of cancer in necrotizing autoimmune myopathies. A group of patients (n = 115) with necrotizing autoimmune myopathies with or without myositis-specific antibodies was analysed. Malignancy occurred more frequently in seronegative necrotizing autoimmune myopathies patients and in HMGCR-positive patients compared to anti-signal recognition particle positive patients. Synchronous malignancy was diagnosed in 21.4% and 11.5% of cases, respectively, and incidence of cancer was higher compared to the general population in both groups. No specific type of cancer was predominant. Patients suffering from a synchronous cancer had a decreased median survival time. Cancer screening is necessary in seronegative necrotizing autoimmune myopathies and in HMGCR-positive patients but not in anti-signal recognition particle-positive patients.