Reoperative aortic root surgery: single-center long-term outcomes and literature review.

Background and Objective: Reoperative aortic root surgery has become more and more common over the years and is considered high-risk, with significantly worse outcomes compared to first-procedure root surgery. At our institution, this kind of surgery is frequently performed. The aim of the present review is to describe currently available literature on reoperative surgery on the aortic root in terms of patients' population, indications for surgery and outcomes and to present our center's experience on the matter. Methods: A literature review was performed in order to identify pertinent studies. They were then compared and described. We also described preoperative characteristics, operative strategies and outcomes of all the patients who underwent redo aortic root surgery from January 1986 to December 2022 at our center. Key Content and Findings: Our literature review identified 12 pertinent studies, with a total of 16,627 considered patients. The most frequent indications for redo surgery were endocarditis (35.5%), aneurysm, dissection and pseudoaneurysm. Mean cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and cross-clamp times were 218 and 152 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 12%. When analyzing our center's data, 344 procedures were identified. Aortic root dilation was the most frequent indication (36.9%). Mean CPB and cross-clamp times were 218.0±78.8 and 158.2±49.7 minutes, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 9.6%. Survival at 5 and 15 years was 76.1% and 51.4% respectively. Freedom from further aortic reintervention was 88.1% after 5 years and 64.9% after 15 years. Conclusions: Reoperative aortic root surgery is a difficult cardiac procedure which is linked to significantly higher mortality than first-time root replacement. If it is performed by experienced surgeons with a careful preoperative planning its result can still be satisfactory. Our results showed acceptable rates of mortality and reinterventions at follow-up. Endocarditis, however, was linked to worse outcomes.

Distal stent graft-induced new entry (dSINE) after frozen elephant trunk: a scoping review.

Background: The introduction of hybrid total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk (FET) technique has improved the field of aortic surgery by allowing single-stage treatment of complex aortic pathologies. Although FET has been associated with favorable aortic remodeling, it is also associated with the potential development of distal stent graft-induced new entries (dSINEs). The aim of our review is to collect data about the incidence and the supposed conditions for the occurrence of dSINE after total hybrid arch replacement with FET technique. Methods: The literature review was performed using PubMed databases from inception to January 2022. A descriptive approach to detect and display supposed risk factors and predictors for dSINE occurrence has been adopted. Results: Eight studies summarized the state-of-the-art of dSINE in a total number of 544 FET procedures performed to treat acute and chronic aortic dissections. The scoping review showed dSINEs occurrence in 69 patients (12.7%). The mean time between surgery and the diagnosis ranged from 12.6 to 30.6 months. Most patients that developed dSINE received endovascular treatment, whereas a couple of them needed open surgery. According to our experience, from January 2007 to December 2021, in 225 FET procedures a total of 54 cases of dSINE, both with Thoraflex and E-vita grafts have been detected. The mean time between the surgical procedure and the diagnosis was 27.2±33.6 months. Conclusions: dSINEs are frequent complications after FET. Although not emergent, they require proper treatment. Due to dSINE's asymptomatic nature and potential harm, a rigorous follow-up including angio-computed tomography (CT) should be planned.

"Why is frozen elephant trunk better than classical elephant trunk?"

The treatment of complex aortic arch disease, in chronic or acute setting, has always represented a fascinating challenge for the heart surgeon also because, often, the involvement of the aortic arch is associated with a simultaneous involvement of the ascending aorta and of the proximal portion of the descending thoracic aorta. In recent years, there have been many surgical and/or endovascular techniques and approaches in a single step or multiple steps proposed with the aim of treating and simplifying these complex conditions. The first procedure available for this purpose was the conventional elephant trunk technique, proposed by the German surgeon Hans Borst, back in 1983. In the following years, the technique has undergone modifications, up to what is nowadays considered its most modern evolution, represented by the frozen elephant trunk which allows managing the proximal descending thoracic aorta using the antegrade release of a self-expandable stent graft. In this review article, we try to analyze the advantages and drawbacks of both techniques from clinical and practical points of view.

Therapeutic alternatives in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: from pulmonary endarterectomy to balloon pulmonary angioplasty to medical therapy. State of the art from a multidisciplinary team.

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is a rare disease with a very complex pathophysiology differing from other causes of pulmonary hypertension (PH). It is an infrequent consequence of acute pulmonary embolism that is frequently misdiagnosed. Pathogenesis has been related to coagulation abnormalities, infection or inflammation, although these disturbances can be absent in many cases. The hallmarks of CTEPH are thrombotic occlusion of pulmonary vessels, variable degree of ventricular dysfunction and secondary microvascular arteriopathy. The definition of CTEPH also includes an increase in mean pulmonary arterial pressure of more than 25 mmHg with a normal pulmonary capillary wedge of less than 15 mmHg. It is classified as World Health Organization group 4 PH, and is the only type that can be surgically cured by pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA). This operation needs to be carried out by a team with strong expertise, from the diagnostic and decisional pathway to the operation itself. However, because the disease has a very heterogeneous phenotype in terms of anatomy, degree of PH and the lack of a standard patient profile, not all cases of CTEPH can be treated by PEA. As a result, PH-directed medical therapy traditionally used for the other types of PH has been proposed and is utilized in CTEPH patients. Since 2015, we have been witnessing the rebirth of balloon pulmonary angioplasty, a technique first performed in 2001 but has since fallen out fashion due to major complications. The refinement of such techniques has allowed its safe utilization as a salvage therapy in inoperable patients. In the present keynote lecture, we will describe these therapeutic approaches and results.

Impact of prior sternotomy on survival and allograft function after heart transplantation: A single center matched analysis.

BACKGROUND: Orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) remains the gold standard for the treatment of end-stage heart failure. The number of patients who have had at least one prior sternotomy while awaiting transplantation has increased over the years reaching 50% in the last ISHLT registry report. We analysed our institutional transplant activity focusing on prior-sternotomy setting to identify the real burden of this preoperative variable and its potential consequences. METHODS: Between 2000 and 2020, a total of 512 consecutive adult patients underwent OHT. We divided them into two groups according to the previous sternotomy variable: a prior sternotomy group (PS-group, n = 131, 25.6%) and a heart transplant as first sternotomy group (FS-group, n = 381, 74.4%). After propensity score matching, a total of 106 matched-pairs were identified for the final analysis. RESULTS: The overall 30-day mortality was similar in the two groups (7.5% vs. 5.7%, p = .58). The prior sternotomy was not an independent risk factor for 90-day mortality (odds ratio: 0.89, p = .81). In the matched sample, prior cardiac surgery was not predictive for any major postoperative complication: primary graft failure, AKI, bleeding, acute respiratory insufficiency, need for extra-corporeal life support (p > .05). The log-rank test revealed no significant difference between the two groups in the unmatched and matched pools (p = .93 and 0.69 respectively. At univariable analysis prior sternotomy was not associated with an increased risk of posttransplant mortality (hazard ratio: 0.87, p = .599). CONCLUSIONS: Despite it increases surgical complexity, the reoperation alone does not represent a proper risk factor and among different co-variates that may affect post-OHT outcomes.

Impact of concomitant cardiac valvular surgery during implantation of continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices: A European registry for patients with mechanical circulatory support (EUROMACS) analysis.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical outcomes after cardiac valvular surgery procedures concomitant (CCPs) with left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation compared to propensity score (PS) matched controls using the European Registry for Patients with Mechanical Circulatory Support (EUROMACS) data. METHODS: Between 2006 and 2018, 2760 continuous-flow LVAD patients were identified. Of these, 533 underwent a CCP during the LVAD implant. RESULTS: Cardiopulmonary bypass time (p < 0.001) and time for implant (p < 0.001) were both significantly longer in the LVAD+CCP group. Hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups from the unmatched population (15.7% vs. 14.1%, p = 0.073). Similarly, short-to-mid-term survival was similar in both groups, with 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of 67.9%, 48.2%, and 27.7% versus 66.4%, 46.1%, and 26%, respectively (log-rank, p = 0.25). The results were similar in the PS-matched population. Hospital mortality was comparable between the two groups (18.9% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.074). The short-to-mid-term Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was similar for both groups, with 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year survival rates of 63.4%, 49.2%, and 24.7% versus 66.5%, 46%, and 25.1%, respectively (log-rank, p = 0.81). In the unmatched population, LVAD+CCP patients had longer intensive care unit (ICU) stays (p < 0.0001), longer mechanical ventilation time (p = 0.001), a higher rate of temporary right ventricular assist device (RVAD) support (p = 0.033), and a higher rate of renal replacement therapy (n = 35, 6.6% vs. n = 89, 4.0%, p = 0.014). In the PS-matched population, the LVAD+CCP patients had longer ICU stays (p = 0.019) and longer mechanical ventilation time (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The effect of additive valvular procedures (CCPs) does not seem to affect short-term survival, significantly, based on our registry data analysis. However, the decision to perform CCPs should be balanced with the projected type of surgery and preoperative characteristics. LVAD+CCP patients remain a delicate population and adverse device-related events should be strictly monitored and managed.

Frozen Elephant Trunk in Right Aberrant Subclavian Artery.

Aberrant right subclavian artery is a relatively rare congenital anomaly of the aortic arch. A 74-year-old woman was referred to our cardiac surgery department for chest pain. Computed tomography angiography scan showed an acute aortic dissection and revealed an aberrant right subclavian artery routed behind the trachea. We performed supracoronary ascending aorta and total arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique. The aberrant right subclavian artery was then anastomosed termino-terminal to one branch of the Thoraflex (Vascutek, Glasgow, Scotland) arch graft. Postoperative computed tomography scan indicated a successful reconstruction of the aortic arch, proving the open stent-grafting technique as a useful and effective approach for aortic disease with aberrant right subclavian artery.

Late acute aortic dissection following cardiac transplantation in lupus-affected donor aorta.

We report the case of a young woman who underwent cardiac transplantation from systemic lupus erythematosus affected donor and who developed a type A aortic dissection limited only to the graft aortic wall 9 years after.

Visceral malperfusion after Frozen Elephant Trunk in chronic aortic dissection: post-operative predictors and outcomes.

BACKGROUND: The aims of this study were to analyse the incidence of visceral malperfusion syndrome (MPS) following Frozen Elephant trunk operations in patients affected by chronic aortic dissection and the associated risk factors. METHODS: Between January 2007 and February 2019, 165 patients underwent surgery with FET for chronic aortic dissection. Post-operative computer tomography angiogram parameters (diameters, early post-operative false lumen enhancement and involving of aortic branches by the dissection) were collected and analysed to evaluate their impact on the occurrence of visceral malperfusion. RESULTS: Visceral (renal and mesenteric) MPS (with both clinical and radiological signs of MPS) was detected in 10 cases (6.1%). Post-operative visceral malperfusion was strongly related with in hospital mortality. The involvement of the visceral branches in the dissection was not a risk factor for visceral malperfusion occurrence, while a larger post-operative total aortic diameter at level of the coeliac trunk increased the risk of visceral MPS (OR 1.05; CI 1.002-1.102, p-value = 0.04). Furthermore, visceral MPS was associated to a complete thrombosis of the false lumen at level of the distal descending thoracic aorta. CONCLUSIONS: The development of post-operative MPS in frozen elephant trunk is strongly related to in-hospital mortality. The involvement of aortic branches by the dissection does not represent a real predictive risk factor for MPS, while early larger aortic diameters and false lumen thrombosis represent independent risk factors for MPS and in-hospital mortality.

Ventricular assist devices implantation: surgical assessment and technical strategies.

Along with the worldwide increase in continuous left ventricular assist device (LVAD) strategy adoption, more and more patients with demanding anatomical and clinical features are currently referred to heart failure (HF) departments for treatment. Thus surgeons have to deal, technically, with re-entry due to previous cardiac surgery procedures, porcelain aorta, peripheral vascular arterial disease, concomitant valvular or septal disease, biventricular failure. New surgical techniques and surgical tools have been developed to offer acceptable postoperative outcomes to all mechanical circulatory support recipients. Several less invasive and/or thoracotomic approaches for surgery combined with various LVAD inflow and outflow graft alternative anastomotic sites for system placement have been reported and described to solve complex clinical scenarios. Surgical techniques have been upgraded with further technical tips to preserve the native anatomy in case of re-entry for heart transplantation, myocardial recovery or device explant. The current continuous-flow miniaturized and intrapericardial devices provide versatility and technical advantages. However, the surgical planning requires a careful multidisciplinary evaluation which must be driven by a dedicated and well-trained Heart Failure team. Biventricular assist device (BVAD) implantation by adoption of the newer radial pumps might be a challenge. However, the results are encouraging thus remaining a valid option. This paper reviews and summarizes LVAD preoperative assessment and current surgical techniques for implantation.

Mechanically Supported Early Graft Failure After Heart Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: The occurrence of early graft failure (EGF) after heart transplantation (Htx) often requires a mechanical circulatory support (MCS) therapy. The aims of our study were to identify risk factors of mechanically supported severe EGF and evaluate their impact on both early and late outcomes. METHODS: Between January 2000 and December 2019, 499 consecutive adult patients underwent Htx at our institution. Severe EGF was defined as the need for extracorporeal life support (ECLS) within 24 hours after surgery. All available recipient and donor variables were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: Overall, EGF occurred in 58 (11.6%) patients. Post-Htx peripheral or central ECLS was necessary in 32 (6.4%) cases. Independent predictors of severe EGF were, in the recipient group, preoperative transpulmonary gradient (TPG) >12 mm Hg (odds ratio [OR] 4.1, P = .013), preoperative inotropic score >10 (OR 7.3, P = .0001), and pre-Htx ECLS support (OR 5.2, P = .015), while in the donors, a Eurotransplant donor score ≥17 (OR 8.5, P = .005). The absence of EGF was related with a better survival at 1 year and 5 years (94% and 85%, respectively) compared with EGF requiring ECLS population (36% and 28% at 1 year and 5 years, respectively; P < .001). A five-year conditional survival rate did not differ significantly (85% no EGF vs 83% EGF requiring ECLS). CONCLUSION: Both donor and recipient factors may influence EGF occurrence. Post-Htx ECLS may impact negatively early; however, patients weaned from ECLS eventually benefit from such a rescue treatment with outcomes comparable with Htx patients who did not suffer EGF.

Comparison of Two Strategies for Aortic Valve-Sparing Root Replacement.

BACKGROUND: Since its introduction in 1992, multiple variations of the aortic valve-sparing David procedure technique have been described. Here, we present the short- and midterm outcomes of 2 centers using the straight tube graft (David-I) and the Valsalva prosthesis in patients who underwent isolated David procedure. METHODS: Between March 2002 and October 2015, 232 patients underwent the David procedure at 2 European centers. Patients received either a straight tube graft (David-I, group A, n = 103, 74% men) or Valsalva graft (group B, n = 129, 85% men). Mean age was 47 ± 17 years in group A and 48 ± 17 years in group B (P = .916). RESULTS: There were significantly more cusp repairs in group B (n=28, 22%) compared with group A (n = 4, 4%, P < .001). The 30-day mortality rate was 1% (n = 1) in group A and 2% (n = 2, P = .698) in group B. Postoperative echocardiography showed aortic insufficiency ≥II in 0% (n = 0) of group A and 17% (n = 21) of group B (P < .001). Follow-up comprised 1530 patient-years, and survival was comparable between the 2 groups (P = .799). Follow-up echocardiography showed aortic insufficiency ≥II in 22% (n = 15) of group A and 39% (n = 33) of group B (P < .026). The rates for aortic valve-related reoperation were 8% (n = 8) in group A and 13% (n = 16) in group B (P = .241). Logistic Cox regression analysis identified bicuspid aortic valve (odds ratio, 3.435; 95% confidence interval, 1.459-8.083, P = .005) and postoperative aortic insufficiency ≥II (odds ratio, 5.988; 95% confidence interval, 2.545-14.088, P < .001) as risk factors for aortic valve-related reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: The aortic valve-sparing David procedure has acceptable midterm results. Our results show that the David-I procedure with straight tube graft is not inferior to those performed with Valsalva prosthesis.

Open distal anastomosis in the frozen elephant trunk technique: initial experiences and preliminary results of arch zone 2 versus arch zone 3†.

OBJECTIVES: We compared the results of 2 groups of patients who underwent aortic arch replacement with the frozen elephant trunk technique. In the first group, the distal anastomosis was performed in arch zone 2; in the second control group, the distal anastomosis was performed in arch zone 3. METHODS: Between January 2007 and April 2018, the frozen elephant trunk technique was used in 282 patients. The median age was 62 years (range 18-83 years), and 233 patients were men (82.6%). Two different frozen elephant trunk prostheses were used: the Jotec E-vita open prosthesis in 167 patients (59.2%) and the Vascutek Thoraflex hybrid prosthesis in 115 patients (40.8%). Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the distal anastomosis site: zone 2 group (69 patients) and zone 3 group (213 patients). The main indications were chronic aortic dissection (n = 164, 58.2%), degenerative aneurysm (n = 72, 25.5%) and acute aortic dissections (n = 45, 16%). RESULTS: The overall in-hospital mortality rate was 17%: 20% for the zone 2 group and 16% for the zone 3 group, without significant differences, also in terms of cardiopulmonary bypass and myocardial ischaemia times. However, the visceral ischaemia time was significantly shorter for the zone 2 group, whereas the antegrade selective cerebral perfusion time was significantly longer for the same group. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury rate was lower in the zone 2 group. The overall postoperative paraplegia rate was 3.5%, whereas the occurrence of permanent neurological dysfunction and dialysis was 9% and 19%, respectively, with no significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: 'Proximalization' of the distal anastomosis can be used for arch reconstruction, especially in complex cases such as reoperations or acute aortic dissections. Furthermore, with the aid of branched hybrid grafts, a reduction of the visceral ischaemia time is achieved.

The GORE TAG conformable thoracic stent graft with the new ACTIVE CONTROL deployment system.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to describe single-center intraoperative details and early outcome of the new GORE TAG conformable stent graft with ACTIVE CONTROL (C-TAG ACTIVE CONTROL; W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz). METHODS: Between September 2017 and June 2018, a consecutive 30 patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair with C-TAG ACTIVE CONTROL. This new system provides an intermediate deployment step at 50% and optional angulation control of the proximal part of the stent graft. Indications for thoracic endovascular aortic repair varied widely, including chronic postdissection and degenerative aneurysms, complicated acute dissections, and intramural hematomas, among others, in an elective (63.3%), urgent (13.3%), or emergent (23.3%) setting. The proximal landing zone (LZ) was LZ 2 in 23.3%, LZ 3 in 43.3%, and LZ 4 in 33.3%. Data were collected retrospectively and analyzed for technical and clinical success. RESULTS: In all patients, the stent graft was successfully introduced and deployed at the intended position, with complete exclusion of aortic disease and without intraoperative mortality (primary technical success, 100%). One emergent patient died at 2 days of ongoing septic shock (clinical success at 30 days, 96.6%). Median follow-up was 107 days (range, 33-271 days); late mortality was 3.4% (one patient died of stent graft infection at 40 days). Freedom from type I and type III endoleak at the early follow-up was 100%. No patients required other surgical or endovascular procedures for the primary treated aortic disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our reported initial experience in 30 patients with the C-TAG ACTIVE CONTROL showed excellent early results, with high deployment accuracy and conformability. The additional features of staged deployment and angulation control may be of great help in challenging aortic arch diseases, allowing precise positioning and preventing bird-beak effect.

The frozen elephant trunk surgery: a systematic review analysis.

The frozen elephant trunk might be considered one of the most appreciated innovations during the last decades to treat complex thoracic aortic lesions. Many useful tips have been progressively introduced to standardize the procedures and, nowadays, the improved post-operative outcomes contributed to spread the procedure. The following article will provide a comprehensive review analysis of the Frozen Elephant Trunk (FET) technique, throughout the current available devices, possible surgical indications and primary post-operative complications.

On-X mitral valve replacement: a single-centre experience in 318 patients.

OBJECTIVES: If mitral valve repair is not feasible, mitral valve replacement remains the only option. Based on our overall experience with the On-X mitral valve, the aim of this study was to investigate early and late outcomes after mitral valve replacement using this latest generation prosthesis. METHODS: From 1998 to 2016, 600 patients received an On-X prosthesis in the mitral position. Of them, we excluded all patients who had combined aortic procedures and retrospectively analysed 318 consecutive patients who had a mitral valve replacement. Associated procedures (53.5%) were tricuspid valve repair, coronary artery bypass graft and the maze procedure. The mean follow-up time was 5.6 ± 4.0 years. RESULTS: The overall hospital mortality rate was 4.4%, including acute cases of ischaemic mitral regurgitation (9.4%) and infective endocarditis (9.4%). Survival rates at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years were 97.8 ± 1.0%, 92.4 ± 1.7%, 88.4 ± 2.2% and 70.9 ± 4.0%, respectively. Independent predictors of late mortality were hypertension [hazard ratio (HR) 1.91; P = 0.027], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 2.91; P = 0.003) and chronic renal failure (HR 5.27; P < 0.001). Freedom from reoperation was 99.3 ± 0.5%, 98.4 ± 0.8%, 97.2 ± 1.2% and 92.5 ± 2.4% at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years, respectively. At follow-up, 8.5% events were recognized as thromboembolic or haemorrhagic events; freedom from events related to anticoagulation therapy at 1, 3, 5 and 10 years was 99.0 ± 0.6%, 96.8 ± 1.1%, 93.7 ± 1.8% and 89.0 ± 2.7%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this observational study, the unique design of the On-X valve works well with mitral valve diseases of various aetiologies, especially in cases with an unfavourable anatomy. This prosthesis also guarantees safe long-term durability associated with a low incidence of thromboembolism.

Cerebral perfusion issues in type A aortic dissection.

Stroke events are very common in acute type A aortic dissection. Cerebral malperfusion could manifest at presentation due to prolonged arch vessels hypoperfusion or develop after surgery for inadequate cerebral protection during arch repair. To reduce this detrimental complication there are several adjuncts that can be adopted for cerebral protection such as direct antegrade or retrograde cerebral perfusion (RCP) and use period of deep to moderate hypothermic circulatory arrest time; however, they are often insufficient as preoperative malperfusion already caused irreversible ischemic damages. The aim of the current review article is to analyze the principal series reporting on neurological injuries during type A aortic dissection to focus on the outcomes according to the type of surgical management and identify possible predictors to better manage this complication.