Low-Intensity Pulsed Ultrasound Augments Tendon, Ligament, and Bone-Soft Tissue Healing in Preclinical Animal Models: A Systematic Review.

PURPOSE: To appraise the available animal and human studies investigating low-intensity pulsed ultrasound stimulation (LIPUS) on tendon, ligament, and bone-soft tissue (B-ST) junction healing. METHODS: A systematic review of PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library was performed for animal and human studies investigating the effects of LIPUS on tendon, ligament, and B-ST junction healing. The systematic search was performed using the key term "low intensity pulsed ultrasound" and any of the following: "tendon," "ligament," "tendon-bone," and "bone-tendon." Inclusion criteria consisted of (1) randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of LIPUS on bone, tendon, and soft tissue in animals or humans and (2) English-language articles. RESULTS: A total of 28 animal and 2 human studies met inclusion criteria. Animal studies utilized various models, including Achilles and patellar tendon transections, medial collateral ligament transections, and surgical repair of patellar tendon, rotator cuff tendon, and anterior cruciate ligament, to evaluate the effects of LIPUS. Animal studies demonstrated significantly improved collagen content and organization, bone formation, fibrocartilage remodeling, and mechanical strength with LIPUS treatment compared with controls. In human trials, LIPUS treatment of chronic tendinopathies did not improve clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In acute injury animal models, LIPUS augmented healing of acute tendon, ligament, and B-ST junction injuries through increased collagen content and organization; increased anti-inflammatory cellular signaling; and increased angiogenesis. However, in 2 human studies investigating chronic tendinopathy, LIPUS did not lead to superior outcomes compared with controls. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Animal models suggest that LIPUS may be a promising noninvasive treatment modality for accelerating patient recovery after acute tendon and ligament injuries, as well as after surgical repair of B-ST junction injuries, but this has not been demonstrated in human studies. Randomized clinical trials evaluating LIPUS for acute tendon and ligament injuries are warranted.

Does Strict Adherence to the Ponseti Method Improve Isolated Clubfoot Treatment Outcomes? A Two-institution Review.

BACKGROUND: Despite being recognized as the gold standard in isolated clubfoot treatment, the Ponseti casting method has yielded variable results. Few studies have directly compared common predictors of treatment failure between institutions with high versus low failure rates. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: We asked: (1) is the provider's rigid adherence to the Ponseti method associated with a lower likelihood of unplanned clubfoot surgery, and (2) at the institution that did not adhere rigidly to Ponseti's principles, are any demographic or treatment-related factors associated with increased likelihood of unplanned clubfoot surgery? METHODS: After institutional review board approval, a consecutive series of patients with a diagnosis of isolated clubfoot who underwent treatment between January 2003 and December 2007 were identified. At Institution 1, 91 of 133 patients met the eligibility criteria and were followed for a minimum of 2 years compared with 58 of 58 patients at Institution 2. At Institution 1, 16 providers managed care using a conservative casting approach based on the Ponseti method. However, treatment was adapted by the provider(s). At Institution 2, one orthopaedic surgeon managed care with strict adherence to the Ponseti method. Surgical indications at both institutions included the presence of a persistent equinovarus foot position while standing. A chart review was used to collect data related to proportion of patients undergoing unplanned additional treatment for deformity recurrences after Ponseti casting, demographics, and treatment patterns. RESULTS: The proportion of subjects who underwent unplanned major surgical intervention was greater (odds ratio [OR], 51.1; 95% CI, 6.8-384.0; p < 0.001) at Institution 1 (60 of 131, 47%) compared with Institution 2 (two of 91, 2%). There was no difference (p = 0.200) in the proportion of patients who underwent additional casting, repeat tendo Achilles lengthening, and/or anterior tibialis tendon transfer only (minor recurrence) at Institution 1 (nine of 131, 7%) compared with Institution 2 (11 of 91, 13%). At Institution 1, an increase in the number of revision casts (multiple vs no casts, hazard ratio [HR] = 3.9; 95% CI, 2.0-7.6; p < 0.001) and an increase in the number of cast-related complications (multiple vs no complications, HR = 2.8; 95% CI, 1.2-6.7; p = 0.019) were associated with increased risk of major surgery in the multivariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Rigid commitment to the Ponseti method in the conservative treatment of patients with isolated clubfoot was associated with a lower risk of subsequent unplanned surgical intervention. In addition, clubfoot treatment programs that use a care model that prioritizes continuity in care and dedication to the Ponseti method may decrease the proportion of patients who undergo unplanned surgical intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.