RESUMO
AIMS: When administered orally as either an immediate or modified release dosage form, zolpidem demonstrates a negative food effect, i.e. decrease in Cmax and AUC. The aim of the study was to arrive at a better understanding of the absorption of this BCS class I compound in vivo and to simulate the observed plasma profiles using in vitro and in silico methods. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic profiles of zolpidem are presented from a bioavailability (8mg intravenous; 10mg immediate release Stilnox®; 10mg and 12.5mg modified release Ambien® CR) and from a food effect study (12.5mg modified release Ambien® CR). The dissolution behavior of the 12.5mg strength was investigated using compendial methods in the USP apparatus II and using biorelevant methods in the USP apparatus III and IV. The mean plasma profiles as well as selected individual plasma profiles were simulated with Simcyp® and GastroPlus™. The absorption behavior was additionally investigated using the Qgut model, which entails algebraic deconvolution of all individual profiles, incorporating both first pass gut and liver extraction. RESULTS: It was possible to simulate the mean plasma profiles using a "middle-out" approach, based on in vitro data combined with pharmacokinetic parameters obtained after intravenous administration, using PBPK software (Simcyp® and GastroPlus™), resulting in average fold error (AFE) values <1.5. Deconvolution verified that the in vivo absorption rate from the modified release formulation is controlled by the formulation in the fasted state, whereas in the fed state, the absorption rate is mainly controlled by gastric emptying. One-stage in vitro tests suggested that interactions with meal components, resulting in incomplete release, may be the source of the negative food effect for both the immediate and modified release formulations. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrated that a combination of biorelevant dissolution testing with modeling approaches enables a mechanistic understanding of the absorption of zolpidem from various formulations and can serve as a useful biopharmaceutical approach for the development of modified release solid oral dosage forms.
Assuntos
Jejum/metabolismo , Interações Alimento-Droga , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/farmacocinética , Piridinas/farmacocinética , Administração Oral , Adolescente , Adulto , Animais , Disponibilidade Biológica , Linhagem Celular Tumoral , Estudos Cross-Over , Liberação Controlada de Fármacos , Jejum/sangue , Feminino , Trato Gastrointestinal/metabolismo , Humanos , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/sangue , Hipnóticos e Sedativos/química , Absorção Intestinal , Masculino , Leite , Modelos Biológicos , Piridinas/sangue , Piridinas/química , Soroalbumina Bovina , Software , Adulto Jovem , ZolpidemRESUMO
PURPOSE: Characterize the contents of distal ileum and cecum in healthy adults under conditions simulating the bioavailability/bioequivelance studies of drug products in fasted and fed state. METHODS: Twelve males participated in a two-phase crossover study. Phase I: subjects remained fasted overnight plus 4.5 h in the morning prior to colonoscopy. Phase II: subjects remained fasted overnight, consumed breakfast in the morning, and abstain from food until colonoscopy, 4.5 h after breakfast. Upon sampling, volume, pH and buffer capacity were measured; after ultracentrifugation, supernatant was physicochemically characterized and non-liquid particles diameter was measured. RESULTS: In distal ileum, pH is ~8.1 and size of non-liquid particles is ~200 µm, regardless of dosing conditions; in fed state, liquid fraction was lower whereas osmolality and carbohydrate content were higher. In cecum, the environment was similar with previously characterized environment in the ascending colon; in fasted state, size of non-liquid particles is smaller than in distal ileum (~70 µm). Fluid composition in distal ileum is different from cecum, especially in fasted state. CONCLUSION: Differences in luminal environment between distal ileum and cecum may impact the performance of orally administered products which deliver drug during residence in lower intestine. Dosing conditions affect cecal environment more than in distal ileum.