Helical tomotherapy in the treatment of pediatric malignancies: a preliminary report of feasibility and acute toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Radiation therapy plays a central role in the management of many childhood malignancies and Helical Tomotherapy (HT) provides potential to decrease toxicity by limiting the radiation dose to normal structures. The aim of this article was to report preliminary results of our clinical experience with HT in pediatric malignancies. METHODS: In this study 66 consecutive patients younger than 14 years old, treated with HT at our center between January 2006 and April 2010, have been included. We performed statistical analyses to assess the relationship between acute toxicity, graded according to the RTOG criteria, and several clinical and treatment characteristics such as a dose and irradiation volume. RESULTS: The median age of patients was 5 years. The most common tumor sites were: central nervous system (57%), abdomen (17%) and thorax (6%). The most prevalent histological types were: medulloblastoma (16 patients), neuroblastoma (9 patients) and rhabdomyosarcoma (7 patients). A total of 52 patients were treated for primary disease and 14 patients were treated for recurrent tumors. The majority of the patients (72%) were previously treated with chemotherapy. The median prescribed dose was 51 Gy (range 10-70 Gy). In 81% of cases grade 1 or 2 acute toxicity was observed. There were 11 cases (16,6%) of grade 3 hematological toxicity, two cases of grade 3 skin toxicity and one case of grade 3 emesis. Nine patients (13,6%) had grade 4 hematological toxicity. There were no cases of grade 4 non-hematological toxicities. On the univariate analysis, total dose and craniospinal irradiation (24 cases) were significantly associated with severe toxicity (grade 3 or more), whereas age and chemotherapy were not. On the multivariate analysis, craniospinal irradiation was the only significant independent risk factor for grade 3-4 toxicity. CONCLUSION: HT in pediatric population is feasible and safe treatment modality. It is characterized by an acceptable level of acute toxicity that we have seen in this highly selected pediatric patient cohort with clinical features of poor prognosis and/or aggressive therapy needed. Despite of a dosimetrical advantage of HT technique, an exhaustive analysis of long-term follow-up data is needed to assess late toxicity, especially in this potentially sensitive to radiation population.

Multimodality treatment of locally advanced soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremities.

BACKGROUND: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RTE) still has a fundamental role as a post-operative treatment of locally advanced soft tissues sarcomas of the extremities. Moreover the employment of combined modalities in locally advanced soft tissues sarcomas of the extremities allow to maximize the chance of local cure even in difficult presentation cases, and possibly improve survival, especially in high-risk disease patients. In patients with sarcomas of the extremities in which definitive surgery has not been radical (with positive or "close" margins) radiotherapy can improve the results in terms of Disease Free Survival (DFS) and, together with chemotherapy, of Overall Survival (OS). We recommend radiotherapy in case of deep tumor location, inadequate surgical margins and grade 3 tumour; for positive or "marginal (or close)" excision (that means inadequate surgery) or in selected patients with a bad prognosis, we believe that a multidisciplinary approach can be preferable. INTRODUCTION: Adjuvant radiotherapy (RTE) still has a fundamental role as a post-operative treatment. In patients with sarcomas of the extremities in whom definitive surgery has been or not radical (positive or "close" margins), radiotherapy with chemotherapy can improve the results in terms of Disease Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS), while RTE alone seems to improve local control. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 1/2000 to 12/2005 we treated 34 patients affected by locally advanced sarcomas of the upper or lower extremities with radiotherapy (doses ranging from 54 to 66 Gy) and chemotherapy in 18/34 with an adjuvant scheme that consisted in Epirubicine (120 mg/m(2)) plus Ifosfamide (7000-9000 mg/m(2)). RESULTS: Disease Free Survival (DFS) and the Overall Survival (OS) rates were 76% and 82%, respectively. Eighteen patients developed one or more long-term side effects. Most of these complications were mild: all patients experienced only erithema, edema, local sclerosis or moderate pain. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy has an important role as a post-operative treatment also when surgery was non-radical. It improves local control more in patients with high-grade sarcomas of the extremity with positive or close margins. It is still difficult to assess the role of adjuvant chemotherapy.