Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 300: 17-22, 2024 Sep.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38972162

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To study hemodynamic changes along controlled ovarian stimulation in women undergoing in vitro fertilization. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study conducted at Mother and Child Department of University Hospital Federico II, in Naples, Italy, between April 2021 and July 2022. Sixty-eight infertile patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation with gonadotropin, antagonist protocol and a fresh embryo transfer were included. Haemodynamic assessment was carried out using UltraSonic Cardiac Output Monitor at baseline (T1), estradiol peak (T2), fresh embryo-transfer day (T3). To evaluate relationships between quantitative variables and groups a Student T test for independent data was assessed. One-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the differences between the means of three time points (T1, T2 and T3) for quantitative variables. A mixed-model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to determine the differences between groups, among time points (T1, T2 and T3). RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients were included. Significant differences over the three time points have been observed for CO (f = 3.78 l/min; p = 0.025), SVI (f = 3.56 ml/m2;p = 0.013), and RSVI (f = 4.84 dscm-5 m2; p = 0.009). No significant differences in trends have been found between beta hCG positive and beta hCG negative groups. There were no significant differences in maternal hemodynamic parameters at time-point T3 between patients treated with hCG 10,000 UI and with Triptorelin. Patients considered at increased risk of hyperstimulation reported a significant increase in SVI at baseline (26.9 ± 9.0 mL/m2 vs 21.9 ± 7.0 mL/m2; p = 0.010). CONCLUSION: According to the results of our study, during controlled ovarian stimulation with antagonist protocol, patients undergo significant changes in maternal cardiovascular parameters over a very short period.


Assuntos
Fertilização in vitro , Indução da Ovulação , Humanos , Feminino , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Fertilização in vitro/métodos , Adulto , Estudos Prospectivos , Transferência Embrionária , Hemodinâmica , Gravidez , Infertilidade Feminina/terapia
2.
Reprod Biomed Online ; 48(5): 103750, 2024 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38430660

RESUMO

RESEARCH QUESTION: Is ovarian stimulation with levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) in situ and co-treatment with letrozole safe and effective in patients undergoing fertility-sparing combined treatment for atypical endometrial hyperplasia (AEH) or early endometrial cancer limited to the endometrium? DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study recruiting women who had undergone fertility-sparing 'combined' treatment and ovarian stimulation with letrozole and LNG-IUS in situ. The 'three steps' hysteroscopic technique was used. Once complete response was achieved, the ovaries were stimulated, and mature oocytes cryopreserved. The LNG-IUS was removed, and embryos transferred. A comparative analysis was conducted between the two control groups of the initial outcomes of ART (number of oocytes and MII oocytes retrieved): healthy infertile women undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI (control group A); and patients diagnosed with breast cancer who underwent ovarian stimulation with letrozole (control group B). RESULTS: Of the 75 patients analysed, 15 underwent oocyte cryopreservation after achieving a complete response to fertility-sparing treatment (study group); 30 patients in control group A and B, respectively. No statistically significant differences were observed in retrieved oocytes and mature oocytes between the study and control groups. In the nine patients who underwent embryo transfer, clinical pregnancy (55.6%), cumulative live birth (44.4%) and miscarriage (20%) rates were reported. In three patients with AEH, recurrence occurred (12%) at 3, 6 and 16 months after removing the LNG-IUS to attempt embryo transfer, respectively. CONCLUSION: Fertility-sparing hysteroscopic combined treatment and subsequent ovarian stimulation with letrozole and LNG-IUS in situ could be suggested to women with AEH or early endometrial cancer who ask for future fertility preservation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Preservação da Fertilidade , Letrozol , Levanogestrel , Indução da Ovulação , Humanos , Feminino , Levanogestrel/administração & dosagem , Levanogestrel/uso terapêutico , Letrozol/uso terapêutico , Letrozol/administração & dosagem , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto , Indução da Ovulação/métodos , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Preservação da Fertilidade/métodos , Gravidez , Neoplasias do Endométrio/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias do Endométrio/complicações , Criopreservação , Hiperplasia Endometrial/tratamento farmacológico , Dispositivos Intrauterinos Medicados , Taxa de Gravidez
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA