Cancer care in transgender and gender-diverse persons: results from two national surveys among providers and health service users by the Italian Association of Medical Oncology.

BACKGROUND: Transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) population represents an underserved group across the cancer care continuum. To assess the perspective of both oncology health care providers (OHPs) and TGD individuals in Italy, we conducted two national surveys: one among 2407 OHPs about their attitudes, knowledge and behavior toward TGD patients, and one among TGD persons about their health needs, experiences and barriers encountered in the use of health services across the cancer continuum. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The surveys were self-compiled web-based computer-aided web interview, conducted in Italy within the 'OncoGender-Promoting Inclusion in Oncology' project, led by the Italian national cancer society [Associazione Italiana di Oncologia Medica (AIOM)]-associated researchers. All members of AIOM were invited by e-mail to participate in the OHP survey. TGD persons were reached through advocacy groups and consumers' panel. The recruitment was completed on a voluntary basis. Survey data were collected and managed using an online platform managed by ELMA Research, an independent pharmaceutical marketing agency. RESULTS: A total of 305 OHPs (13% of AIOM members) and 190 TGD individuals participated in the surveys. Only 19% of OHPs felt competent in providing care to TGD patients and 21% declared not to feel comfortable in treating TGD patients. Seventy-one percent of TGD persons reported that they had never joined any cancer screening program; 32% reported one or more acts of discrimination by health care providers. Seventy-two percent of OHPs recognized the lack of specific education on cancer care for TGD patients and deemed it necessary to receive adequate training. CONCLUSIONS: A general lack of knowledge among OHPs about TGD health issues seems to be the main driver of difficulties in providing assistance and of discriminatory attitudes against TGD individuals. Ultimately, this whole issue generates access barriers and contributes to lack of trust in health care services. Educational interventions and an implementation of person-centric cancer policies are urgently needed.

How liquid biopsies can change clinical practice in oncology.

Cell-free DNA fragments are shed into the bloodstream by tumor cells. The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), commonly known as liquid biopsy, can be exploited for a variety of clinical applications. ctDNA is being used to genotype solid cancers non-invasively, to track tumor dynamics and to detect the emergence of drug resistance. In a few settings, liquid biopsies have already entered clinical practice. For example, ctDNA is used to guide treatment in a subset of lung cancers. In this review, we discuss how recent improvements in the sensitivity and accuracy of ctDNA analyses have led to unprecedented advances in this research field. We further consider what is required for the routine deployment of liquid biopsies in the clinical diagnostic space. We pinpoint technical hurdles that liquid biopsies have yet to overcome, including preanalytical and analytical challenges. We foresee how liquid biopsies will transform clinical practice: by complementing (or replacing) imaging to monitor treatment response and by detecting minimal residual disease after surgery with curative intent.

Targeting the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) oncogene in colorectal cancer.

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is an oncogenic driver, and a well-established therapeutic target in breast and gastric cancers. Using functional and genomic analyses of patient-derived xenografts, we previously showed that a subset (approximately 5%) of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) tumors is driven by amplification or mutation of HER2. This paper reviews the role of HER2 amplification as an oncogenic driver, a prognostic and predictive biomarker, and a clinically actionable target in CRC, considering the specifics of HER2 testing in this tumor type. While the role of HER2 as a biomarker for prognosis in CRC remains uncertain, its relevance as a therapeutic target has been established. Indeed, independent studies documented substantial clinical benefit in patients treated with biomarker-driven HER2-targeted therapies, with an impact on response rates and duration of response that compared favorably with immunotherapy and other examples of precision oncology. HER2-targeted therapeutic strategies have the potential to change the treatment paradigm for a clinically relevant subgroup of metastatic CRC patients.

Dual MET/EGFR therapy leads to complete response and resistance prevention in a MET-amplified gastroesophageal xenopatient cohort.

Amplification of the MET oncogene occurs in 2-4% of gastroesophageal cancers and defines a small and aggressive subset of tumors. Although in vitro studies have given very promising results, clinical trials with MET inhibitors have been disappointing, showing few and short lasting responses. The aim of the work was to exploit a MET-amplified patient-derived xenograft model to optimize anti-MET therapeutic strategies in gastroesophageal cancer. We found that despite the high MET amplification level (26 gene copies), in the absence of qualitative or quantitative alterations of EGFR, MET inhibitors induced only tumor growth inhibition, whereas dual MET/EGFR inhibition led to complete tumor regression. Importantly, the combo treatment completely prevented the onset of resistance, which quite rapidly appeared in tumors treated with MET monotherapy. We found that this secondary resistance was due to EGFR activation and could be overcome by dual MET/EGFR inhibition. Similar results were also obtained in a MET-addicted, established gastric cancer cell line. In vitro experiments performed on tumor-derived primary cells confirmed that MET inhibitors were not able to abrogate the activation of downstream transducers and that only the combined MET/EGFR treatment completely shut off the signaling. Previously reported cases, as well as those described here, showed only partial and transient sensitivity to anti-MET therapy. The finding that combined anti-MET/EGFR therapy-even in the absence of EGFR genetic alterations-induced complete and durable response, represents a proof of concept and guarantees further investigations, opening a new perspective of treatment for these patients.

Value of KRAS as prognostic or predictive marker in NSCLC: results from the TAILOR trial.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic and predictive role of KRAS mutations in advanced nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still unclear. TAILOR prospectively assessed the prognostic and predictive value of KRAS mutations in NSCLC patients treated with erlotinib or docetaxel in second line. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NSCLC patients from 52 Italian hospitals were genotyped for KRAS and EGFR mutational status in two independent laboratories. Wild-type EGFR patients (N = 218) received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy and were randomly allocated at progression to erlotinib or docetaxel. Overall survival (OS) according to KRAS mutational status was the primary end point. RESULTS: KRAS mutations were present in 23% of TAILOR randomized cases. The presence of a KRAS mutation did not adversely affect progression-free (PFS) or overall (OS) survival [hazard ratio (HR) PFS = 1.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-1.41, P = 0.977; OS = 1.24, 95% CI 0.87-1.77, P = 0.233], nor influenced treatment outcome (test for interaction: OS P = 0.965; PFS P = 0.417). Patients randomized to docetaxel treatment experienced longer survival independently from the KRAS mutational status of their tumors (HR: mutated KRAS 0.81, 95% CI 0.45-1.47; wild-type KRAS 0.79, 95% CI 0.57-1.10). CONCLUSION: In TAILOR, KRAS was neither prognostic nor predictive of benefit for either docetaxel or erlotinib. Docetaxel remains superior independently from KRAS status for second-line treatment in EGFR wild-type advanced NSCLC patients. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT00637910.

Outcome of patients with sarcoma and other mesenchymal tumours participating in phase I trials: a subset analysis of a European Phase I database.

BACKGROUND: Although sarcomas account for only 1% of all solid tumours, patients with sarcomas comprise a larger proportion of patients entering phase I trials, due to the limited number of registered or active drugs for these diseases. To help in patient selection, we evaluated the utility of the predictive Royal Marsden Score which had been derived in carcinoma patients. In addition, we analysed efficacy and toxicity regarding the sarcoma population enrolled in phase I trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data from a European Database comprising 2182 patients treated in phase I trials in 14 European institutions between 2005 and 2007. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-eight patients diagnosed with advanced sarcoma or other mesenchymal tumours were identified and accounted for 217 phase I trial participations during the study period. Histological type, class of drug, number of metastatic sites, high serum lactate dehydrogenase activity (LDH), low albumin and high white blood cell count were independent prognostic factors. Poor performance status (PS), liver metastases and high leucocyte count were associated with increased risk of early death. The class of drug used was the strongest predictor of progression-free survival (PFS) duration, inhibitors of angiogenesis and histone deacetylase giving the best results. Poor PS, high serum LDH and low lymphocyte count correlated with shorter PFS. In this heterogeneous population, PFS with investigational agents appeared comparable with that previously published for patients receiving standard treatments beyond first line. CONCLUSION: Prognostic factors in sarcoma patients do not differ from a broader phase I population. Efficacy measures suggest that some patients with sarcoma derive benefit from therapy in this setting which could therefore be considered for patients with no remaining standard therapeutic option.

Prediction of early death among patients enrolled in phase I trials: development and validation of a new model based on platelet count and albumin.

BACKGROUND: Selecting patients with 'sufficient life expectancy' for Phase I oncology trials remains challenging. The Royal Marsden Hospital Score (RMS) previously identified high-risk patients as those with ≥ 2 of the following: albumin <35 g l(-1); LDH > upper limit of normal; >2 metastatic sites. This study developed an alternative prognostic model, and compared its performance with that of the RMS. METHODS: The primary end point was the 90-day mortality rate. The new model was developed from the same database as RMS, but it used Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detection (CHAID). The ROC characteristics of both methods were then validated in an independent database of 324 patients enrolled in European Organization on Research and Treatment of Cancer Phase I trials of cytotoxic agents between 2000 and 2009. RESULTS: The CHAID method identified high-risk patients as those with albumin <33 g l(-1) or ≥ 33 g l(-1), but platelet counts ≥ 400.000 mm(-3). In the validation data set, the rates of correctly classified patients were 0.79 vs 0.67 for the CHAID model and RMS, respectively. The negative predictive values (NPV) were similar for the CHAID model and RMS. CONCLUSION: The CHAID model and RMS provided a similarly high level of NPV, but the CHAID model gave a better accuracy in the validation set. Both CHAID model and RMS may improve the screening process in phase I trials.

Venous thromboembolism is a relevant and underestimated adverse event in cancer patients treated in phase I studies.

BACKGROUND: To investigate, retrospectively, the role of tumour histotype and antiangiogenic drugs for venous thromboembolism (VTE) development in advanced cancer patients treated in phase I studies. METHODS: Patients enrolled and treated in phase I studies conducted by SENDO (Southern Europe New Drugs Organisation) were considered. RESULTS: Data of 1415 patients were included in the analysis: 526 (37.2%) patients were males, median age was 57.3 years (range: 13-85). Fifty-six (3.96%) patients developed a VTE. At multivariate analysis gynaecologic (hazard ratio (HR): 2.8, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-6.23, P=0.009) and gastrointestinal tumours (HR: 3.23, 95% CI: 1.18-8.87, P=0.023) as well as combination regimens of cytotoxic and antiangiogenic agents (HR: 2.6, 95% CI: 1.11-6.30, P=0.028), white blood cell >11,000 µl(-1) (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.10-6.09, P=0.028) and haemoglobin<10 g dl(-1) (HR: 3.1, 95% CI: 1.07-8.94, P=0.037) were statistically correlated with VTE development. Venous thromboembolism was the fourth most common cause of drug discontinuation. The median time from first drug administration to discontinuation was 1.4 for VTE and 2.3 months for the other adverse events (P=0.02). CONCLUSION: Venous thromboembolism is a relatively common complication among patients treated in the context of phase I studies, and may lead to early drug discontinuation. A greater risk of developing VTE is associated with the diagnosis of gynaecologic and gastrointestinal tumours and the combined use of chemotherapy and antiangiogenic drugs.

Incidence, risk factors and clinical implications of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients treated within the context of phase I studies: the 'SENDO experience'.

BACKGROUND: To investigate the incidence, risk factors and clinical implications of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in advanced cancer patients treated in phase I studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients enrolled and treated in phase I studies conducted by SENDO (Southern Europe New Drugs Organization) Foundation between 2000 and 2010 in 15 experimental centers were considered for the study. Clinical data, including adverse events, were prospectively collected during the studies and retrospectively pooled for VTE analysis. RESULTS: Data of 1415 patients were considered for analysis. Five hundred and twenty-six (37.2%) patients were males, and median age was 57.3 years (range: 13-85). Eighty-five percent of patients had metastatic disease, while the remaining had locally advanced irresectable disease. For 706 (49.9%) of the patients, the study treatment was with cytotoxic agent(s) only, for 314 with target therapy(ies) only, while the remaining patients received a target therapy in combination with a cytotoxic drug. Fifty-six (3.96%) patients who developed a VTE, almost all (89.3%) during the course of treatment, the remaining during the follow-up. At univariate analysis, the Khorana score, the combination of an antiangiogenic agent with a cytotoxic drug, and the time from first cancer diagnosis to study entry (as continuous variable) were associated with a statistically significant increase of VTE occurrence. The multivariate analysis confirmed only a statistically significant association for the Khorana score. The hazard ratio of VTE occurrence was 7.88 [95% confidence interval (CI) 2.86-21.70) and 2.74 (95% CI 1.27-5.92) times higher for the highest (≥3) and intermediate (1-2) scores as compared with score = 0. CONCLUSIONS: VTE is a relatively common complication among patients treated in the context of phase I studies. The Khorana score predicts VTE development and can be used to identify patients at high of VTE.

Phase I clinical and pharmacokinetic study of trabectedin and cisplatin in solid tumours.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity of trabectedin (T) and cisplatin (C) given on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks to adult patients with advanced solid tumours. Plasma pharmacokinetics at cycle 1 and a preliminary anti-tumour activity assessment in ovarian and non-small cell lung cancer (OC, NSCLC) were secondary objectives. METHODS: In the dose finding part (DFP) of the study the dose of T given at each administration was escalated by 100 microg/m(2) increments from 300 microg/m(2) up to the MTD, with a fixed dose of C of 40 mg/m(2). The recommended dose (RD) was assessed in the previously treated and untreated OC and NSCLC patients in the expansion of the RD (ERD) part of the study. T was administered with corticosteroids pre-medication as 3-h infusion and C as 30-min infusion. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients were treated in the DFP and 10 in the ERD. The MTD of T was 700 microg/m(2) due to dose-limiting neutropaenia and the RDs in the previously treated/untreated patients were 500 and 600 microg/m(2), respectively. Most common toxicities were nausea/vomiting (67%), asthenia/fatigue (55%) and reversible ASAT/ALAT elevation (51%). Time to recovery from myelosuppression was dose-dependent and treatment could be repeated after > or = 4 weeks in the majority of patients at 600 microg/m(2). Confirmed partial responses were observed in 4 of 13 evaluable OC patients and in 1 with uterine leiomyosarcoma. No pharmacokinetic interaction was observed. CONCLUSION: The administration of T and C on days 1 and 8 resulted in prolonged neutropaenia requiring treatment delay. The evaluation of a single every 3 week schedule is worthwhile because of the hints of anti-tumour activity observed in OC.

Phase I clinical study of the novel epothilone B analogue BMS-310705 given on a weekly schedule.

BACKGROUND: BMS-310705, a water-soluble semi-synthetic analogue of epothilone B, was selected for clinical development because of its in vivo anti-tumour activity and toxicity profile similar to that of ixabepilone, currently the most extensively evaluated and promising epothilone B analogue. The improved solubility of BMS-310705 allowed a cremophore-free formulation that avoided the need for pre-medication. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two schedules were tested, one with drug administrations on days (D) 1, 8 and 15 followed by 1-week's rest, the other with administrations on D1 and 8 (D1&8 schedule) followed by 1-week's rest. Treatment was given as a 15-min infusion without pre-medication against hypersensitivity. The plasma pharmacokinetics of BMS-310705 was studied in 30 patients. An accelerated titration design 2B was applied for dose escalations. Twenty-seven patients were accrued in the D1, 8, 15 and 32 in the D1&8 schedule. RESULTS: The dose was escalated from 5-30 mg/m(2)/week with diarrhoea as dose-limiting toxicity; 15 and 20 mg/m(2) were the recommended doses in the D1, 8, 15 and D1&8 schedule, respectively. Other frequent non-haematological toxicities were neurotoxicity, mainly paraesthesia, asthenia and myalgia. Preliminary results showed linear pharmacokinetics along the range of doses tested with a short half-life. Five objective responses were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Further clinical development of BMS-310705 might be worthwhile in solid tumours where ixabepilone or other epothilones are not indicated.

Concerted escalation of dose and dosing duration in a phase I study of the oral camptothecin gimatecan (ST1481) in patients with advanced solid tumors.

BACKGROUND: Gimatecan is an orally bioavailable camptothecin analogue with preclinical findings of promising antitumor activity. A phase I design of concerted dose escalation and dosing duration was implemented to assess the potential schedule dependency of tolerability that emerged from animal studies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Gimatecan was given daily for five consecutive days per week for 1, 2 or 3 weeks every 28 days. Plasma levels of total gimatecan were measured on the first and the last day of treatment in each schedule. RESULTS: Overall, 108 patients were treated with 0.8-7.2 mg/m(2) of gimatecan per cycle. The main toxicity was myelosuppression with dose-limiting thrombocytopenia. In the 1-, 2- and 3-week schedule, the maximum tolerated doses were 4.5, 5.6 and 6.4 mg/m(2). Diarrhea and asthenia were of low grade and of minor clinical relevance, while the higher incidence of nausea and vomiting in the 1-week schedule required the use of antiemetic prophylaxis. Due to the prolonged half-life (approximately 77 h), the plasma concentration of gimatecan increased from the first to the last day of dosing. Six partial responses were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerability of gimatecan was schedule dependent. Further testing with schedules taking into account its long persistence in human plasma is worthwhile.

Randomized single-agents trials in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer.

The response to salvage treatment in recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer (REOC), is influenced by many biologic features which should be taken into account in the process of therapeutic decision. Until recently, single agents have been considered effective as combination chemotherapy in REOC and they still represent an option for well-defined categories of patients. In clinical practice, the selection of drugs for second-line treatment can be based on the knowledge that tumor size and response to prior platinum are predictors of response and that the efficacy of some commonly used single agents is supported by well designed clinical studies. Only two single-agent randomized studies with long-term survival analyses have been published; in the topotecan versus paclitaxel study, performed on a total of 235 patients, the long-term survival results did not confirm the initial report of a superiority of topotecan, with a median survival of 63 weeks and 53 weeks for patients treated with topotecan, and, respectively, paclitaxel. No comparative data were provided in the subgroup of potentially platinum-sensitive disease. In the phase III study of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus topotecan, into which 474 patients were treated between 1997 and 1999, the higher efficacy of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin was even more evident in the long-term survival analysis, with a 18% reduction in the risk of death, in the overall population which increased to 30% in the subset of platinum-sensitive patients. The survival after the two treatments, however, was not different in the group of patients with platinum-refractory disease. The toxicity profile of the two drugs was completely different, with palmar-plantar erythrodysestesia as most common adverse event after pegylated doxo (35% of patients) and severe neutropenia after topotecan (77% of patients). These data confirm the role of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in the management of REOC and indicate that the identification of new active drugs in this disease is relevant but also feasible only in platinum-sensitive patients.

Phase IB and pharmacological study of the novel taxane BMS-184476 in combination with doxorubicin.

The aim of this study was to define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and the pharmacological profile of the paclitaxel analogue BMS-184476 given once every 3 weeks, or on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks (d1&8), in combination with a fixed dose of 50 mg/m(2) of Doxorubicin (Doxo) administered on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. Adult patients with advanced solid malignancies received escalating doses of BMS-184476 infused over 1 h after bolus Doxo. Pharmacokinetics (PK) of BMS-184476, Doxo and metabolites were investigated. The effect of BMS-184476 on doxorubicinol formation was studied in the cytosol from human myocardium. The MTD of 3-weekly BMS-184476 was 30 mg/m(2). The MTD/recommended Phase II dose was 35 mg/m(2)/week (70 mg/m(2) per cycle) in the d1&8 schedule. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia for both schedules. Other toxicities were loss of appetite, asthenia, and mild, cumulative peripheral neuropathy. The objective response rate in 17 previously untreated or minimally pretreated patients with breast cancer treated at 35 mg/m(2)/week of BMS-184476 was 59% (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 33-82%). Two of the 7 patients not responding to the study regimen later responded to Doxo and paclitaxel. Plasma disposition of BMS-184476 at 30, 35 and 40 mg/m(2) was linear without evidence of a PK interaction with Doxo. In studies with cytosol from human myocardium, the formation of cardiotoxic doxorubicinol was not enhanced by BMS-184476. Dosing of BMS-184476 for 2 consecutive weeks allowed the administration of larger doses of the taxane with a promising antitumour activity in patients with untreated or minimally pretreated breast cancer. The higher than expected myelotoxicity of the 3-weekly schedule is unexplained by the investigated interactions. Lack of enhanced doxorubicinol formation in human myocardium is consistent with the cardiac safety of the regimen.

Cancer drug development in Europe: a selection of new agents under development at the European Drug Development Network.

From may 99, three european leaders in anti-cancer drug development (EORTC, Cancer Research UK, SENDO) have got together to form a network of collaborating groups: the European Drug Development Network. The member organisations have all agreed to join their efforts in developing new drugs. They have acquired a great and efficient expertise in anticancer drug development covering all aspects from drug screening to refinement of trial methodology and translational research. In this paper, the most interesting drugs under development in each of the three organisations are being described and discussed.

Efficacy of adjuvant fluorouracil and leucovorin in stage B2 and C colon cancer. International Multicenter Pooled Analysis of Colon Cancer Trials Investigators.

The International Multicenter Pooled Analysis of Colon Cancer Trials (IMPACT) investigators have now completed two large systematic reviews of adjuvant therapy trials in colon cancer. The IMPACT 1 study pooled data from three separate trials each comparing the efficacy of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)/leucovorin with observation alone as adjuvant treatment for 1,526 patients with Dukes' B or C colon cancer. The results showed that treatment with 5-FU/leucovorin significantly reduced mortality by 22% (P = .029) and events such as relapse, second tumor, or death by 35% (P < .0001) after 3 years of follow-up. The side effects associated with 5-FU/leucovorin were clinically acceptable. The IMPACT 1 study also showed a clear benefit of adjuvant treatment for patients with Dukes' C colon cancer, but not for stage-B patients. After up to 10 years of follow-up, 5-FU/leucovorin significantly reduced mortality by 30% for patients with Dukes' C disease (P = .003), but only reduced mortality by 8% in patients with Dukes' B colon cancer (P = .658). The aim of the IMPACT 2 study was to determine whether 5-FU/leucovorin is an effective adjuvant treatment for patients with Dukes' B2 colon cancer. Results were pooled from five separate trials that randomized 1,016 patients. After a median of 5.75 years of follow-up, B2 patients receiving 5-FU/leucovorin did not have a significant increase in overall survival or event-free survival. At 5 years, the hazard ratio for overall survival was 0.86 (90% confidence interval, 0.68 to 1.07) and for event-free survival was 0.83 (90% confidence interval, 0.72 to 1.07). 5-Fluorouracil/leucovorin was not recommended as a standard adjuvant treatment for all patients with Dukes' B2 colon cancer.

Clinical and pharmacological phase I study with accelerated titration design of a daily times five schedule of BBR3464, a novel cationic triplatinum complex.

OBJECTIVES: To define the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), the toxicity and pharmacokinetic profile of BBR3464, a novel triplatinum complex. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fourteen patients with advanced solid tumors not responsive to previous antitumor treatments received BBR 3464 on a daily x 5 schedule every twenty-eighth day. The drug was given as a one-hour infusion with pre-and post-treatment hydration (500 ml in one hour) and no antiemetic prophylaxis. The starting dose was 0.03 mg/m2/day. A modified accelerated titration escalation design was used. Total and free platinum (Pt) concentrations in plasma and urine were assessed by ICP-MS on days 1 and 5 of the first cycle. RESULTS: Dose was escalated four times up to 0.17 mg/m2/day. Short-lasting neutropenia and diarrhea of late onset were dose-limiting and defined the MTD at 0.12 mg/m2. Nausea and vomiting were rare, neither neuro- nor renal toxic effects were observed. BBR3464 showed a rapid distribution phase of 1 hour and a terminal half-life of several days. At 0.17 mg/m2 plasma Cmax and AUC on day 5 were higher than on day 1, indicating drug accumulation. Approximately 10% of the equivalent dose of BBR3464 (2.2%-13.4%) was recovered in a 24-hour urine collection. CONCLUSIONS: The higher than expected incidence of neutropenia and GI toxicity might be related to the prolonged half-life and accumulation of total and free Pt after daily administrations. Lack of nephrotoxicity and the low urinary excretion support the use of the drug without hydration. The single intermittent schedule has been selected for clinical development.

Adjuvant portal-vein infusion of fluorouracil and heparin in colorectal cancer: a randomised trial. European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Cooperative Group, the Gruppo Interdisciplinare Valutazione Interventi in Oncologia, and the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research.

BACKGROUND: There is conflicting evidence on the efficacy of regional adjuvant chemotherapy, via portal-vein infusion (PVI), after resection of colorectal cancer. We undertook a randomised controlled multicentre trial to investigate the efficacy of PVI (500 mg/m2 fluorouracil plus 5000 IU heparin daily for 7 days). METHODS: 1235 of about 1500 potentially eligible patients were randomly assigned surgery plus PVI or surgery alone (control). The patients were followed up for a median of 63 months, with yearly screening for recurrent disease. The primary endpoint was survival; analyses were by intention to treat. FINDINGS: 619 patients in the control group and 616 in the PVI group met eligibility criteria. 164 (26%) control-group patients and 173 (28%) PVI-group patients died. 5-year survival did not differ significantly between the groups (73 vs 72%; 95% Cl for difference -6 to 4). The control and PVI groups were also similar in terms of disease-free survival at 5 years (67 vs 65%) and the number of patients with liver metastases (79 vs 77%). INTERPRETATION: PVI of fluorouracil, at a dose of 500 mg/m2 for 7 days, cannot be recommended as the sole adjuvant treatment for high-risk colorectal cancer after complete surgical excision. However, these results cannot eliminate a small benefit when PVI is used at a higher dosage or in combination with mitomycin.