Professional unmet needs in the palliative care field (a scoping review).

BACKGROUND: Palliative care (PC) is oriented to improving the quality of life of patients and their families who are facing problems associated with life-threatening illness. It is a continuously changing and evolving field. Although it is a universal right, there are many barriers to addressing the unmet need for PC, affecting both patient and family as well as health care professionals (HCP). Many studies have highlighted the unmet needs of patients and caregivers, but it is also necessary to understand the needs of HCP in order to better develop PC. It is therefore necessary to identify all those barriers and unmet needs in order to develop and guarantee universal quality PC. METHODS: Bibliography search in relevant databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, Trip Database) of documents published between 2018 and 2022, both included, written in English or Spanish. Key words-MeSH terms: Palliative Care, Palliative Medicine, Health Personnel, Continuing Education, Health Care Providers; and free text: healthcare professionals, continuous learning, training needs, gap, unmet needs, nursing. Articles about children or teenagers were excluded, as those related to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. RESULTS: A grand total of 1,150 documents were located and 20 were found through other sources. Additionally, 3 documents were found and kept despite not being included in the timeline previously discussed due to its relevance. Only 20 were finally included in this review. The identified unmet needs throughout the PC continuum have been categorized in three groups: diagnosis/recognition of the patient entering the PC continuum; end-of-life (EoL); and bereavement. Facilitators in PC have been identified in each category. CONCLUSIONS: Given the challenging nature of PC and the lack of knowledge throughout the continuum, addressing the challenges identified may result in meaningful and long-lasting results for both HCP and the patient-family unit. Training would be the answer to most of the unmet needs detected.

Barriers and drivers of public engagement in palliative care, Scoping review.

BACKGROUND: The integral model of Palliative Care recognizes the community as essential element in improving quality of life of patients and families. It is necessary to find a formula that allows the community to have a voice. The aim of this scoping review is to identify barriers and facilitators to engage community in PC. METHODS: Systematic search was conducted in NICE, Cochrane Library, Health Evidence, CINAHL and PubMed database. KEYWORDS: Palliative care, End of life care, community networks, community engagement, public engagement, community participation, social participation, barriers and facilitators. RESULTS: Nine hundred seventy-one results were obtained. Search strategy and inclusion criteria yielded 13 studies that were read in detail to identify factors influencing community engagement in palliative care, categorized into: Public health and public engagement; Community attitudes towards palliative care, death and preferences at the end of life; Importance of volunteers in public engagement programs; Compassionate communities. CONCLUSION: Societal awareness must be a facilitated process to catalyse public engagement efforts. National policy initiatives and regional system support provide legitimacy and focus is essential for funding. The first step is to get a sense of what is important to society, bearing in mind cultural differences and to channel those aspects through health care professionals; connecting the most assistential part with community resources. The process and long-term results need to be systematically evaluated.

ITV-Pal programme: protocol of evaluation of the implementation of tech-volunteer programme in palliative care services.

INTRODUCTION: Volunteer support for patients and families at the end of life provides many benefits for the beneficiaries. New technologies could be a necessary resource in the accompaniment although, if there is little literature on palliative care volunteering in general, specifically on volunteering and new technologies, we find little information on the subject.Therefore, the aim of this study is to implement and evaluate a training program for palliative care volunteers using new technologies in order to begin accompanying patients and families in hospital or at home. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-method study design will be conducted. We will recruit 20 volunteers and 70 patients in two years. INTERVENTION: training of volunteers in new technologies and volunteer accompaniment of patients/relatives using technologies. The control group will accompany patients as usual. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval for the ITV-Pal Programme project was granted by the Malaga Regional Research Ethics Committee. As new knowledge is gained from this project, findings will be disseminated through publications, presentations and feedback to clinicians who are participating in this study. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04900103.

Level of Palliative Care Complexity in Advanced Cancer Patients: A Multinomial Logistic Analysis.

The current treatment approach for patients in palliative care (PC) requires a health model based on shared and individualised care, according to the degree of complexity encountered. The aims of this study were to describe the levels of complexity that may be present, to determine their most prevalent elements and to identify factors that may be related to palliative complexity in advanced-stage cancer patients. An observational retrospective study was performed of patients attended to at the Cudeca Hospice. Socio-demographic and clinical data were compiled, together with information on the patients' functional and performance status (according to the Palliative Performance Scale (PPS)). The level of complexity was determined by the Diagnostic Instrument of Complexity in Palliative Care (IDC-Pal©) and classified as highly complex, complex or non-complex. The impact of the independent variables on PC complexity was assessed by multinomial logistic regression analysis. Of the 501 patients studied, 44.8% presented a situation classed as highly complex and another 44% were considered complex. The highly complex items most frequently observed were the absence or insufficiency of family support and/or caregivers (24.3%) and the presence of difficult-to-control symptoms (17.3%). The complex item most frequently observed was an abrupt change in the level of functional autonomy (47.6%). The main factor related to the presence of high vs. non-complexity was that of performance status (odds ratio (OR) = 10.68, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 2.81-40.52, for PPS values < 40%). However, age was inversely related to high complexity. This study confirms the high level of complexity present in patients referred to a PC centre. Determining the factors related to this complexity could help physicians identify situations calling for timely referral for specialised PC, such as a low PPS score.

Instruments to evaluate complexity in end-of-life care.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The growing number of patients with terminal and chronic conditions and co-morbidities constitutes a challenge for any healthcare system, to provide effective and efficient patient-centred care at the end of life. Resources are limited, and complexity is rising within patients' situations and healthcare professionals interventions. This review presents the state of art of the role of complexity in specialist palliative care provision. RECENT FINDINGS: Although studies related to complexity in palliative care are still limited, interesting reviews on complexity frameworks in co-morbidity conditions and palliative care are growing more present in current literature. They identify multidimensional issues, resource utilisation, and the relationship between them as fundamental aspects of complexity constructs, helping to define and understand complexity, and to therefore design validated tools to support healthcare professionals identifying the most complex patients, such as Hui's criteria, PALCOM, INTERMED, and IDC-Pal which is presented in this review. SUMMARY: There is an urgent need to guarantee quality and equity of care for all the patients eligible for palliative care, from those who need a palliative care approach to those needing specialist intensive palliative care. Implementing complexity theory into practice is paramount. In this review, complexity science, complexity frameworks, as well as tools evaluating complexity in palliative care are described.