Pharmaceutical cost savings from the treatment of oncology patients in clinical trials.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was twofold: to assess the annual pharmaceutical savings associated with the treatment of cancer patients at Marqués de Valdecilla University Hospital and to estimate the cost of innovative antineoplastic therapies that patients receive as experimental treatment, both during clinical trials throughout 2020. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An observational and financial analysis of the drug cost related to clinical trials was applied. Direct cost savings to the Regional Health System of Cantabria and the cost of innovative therapies used as an experimental treatment in clinical trials were quantified. RESULTS: This study includes 38 clinical trials with a sample of 101 patients. The clinical trials analyzed provide a total cost savings of €603,350.21 and an average cost saving of €6,630.22 per patient. Furthermore, the total investment amounts to €789,892.67, with an average investment of €15,488.09 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical trials are essential for the advancement of science. Furthermore, clinical trials can be a significant source of income for both hospitals and Regional Health Systems, contributing to their financial sustainability.

Risk stratification model for the pharmaceutical care of oncology patients with solid or hematologic neoplasms. / [Artículo traducido] Modelo de estratificación de riesgo de atención farmacéutica para pacientes oncológicos con neoplasias sólidas o hematológicas.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to develop of a risk stratification model for the pharmaceutical care (PC) of patients with solid or hematologic neoplasms who required antineoplastic agents or supportive treatments. METHOD: The risk stratification model was collaboratively developed by oncology pharmacists from the Spanish Society of Hospital Pharmacy (SEFH). It underwent refinement through three workshops and a pilot study. Variables were defined, grouped into four dimensions, and assigned relative weights. The pilot study collected and analyzed data from participating centers to determine priority levels and evaluate variable contributions. The study followed the Kaiser Permanente pyramid model, categorizing patients into three priority levels: Priority 1 (intensive PC, 90th percentile), Priority 2 (60th-90th percentiles), and Priority 3 (60th percentile). Cut-off points were determined based on this stratification. Participating centers recorded variables in an Excel sheet, calculating mean weight scores for each priority level and the total risk score. RESULTS: The participants agreed to complete a questionnaire that comprised 22 variables grouped into 4 dimensions: demographic (maximum score =11); social and health variables and cognitive and functional status (maximum = 19); clinical and health services utilization (maximum = 25); and treatment-related (maximum = 41). From the results of applying the model to the 199 patients enrolled, the cutoff points for categorization were 28 or more points for priority 1, 16 to 27 points for priority 2 and less than 16 for priority 3; more than 80% of the total score was based on the dimensions of 'clinical and health services utilization' and 'treatment-related'. Interventions based on the pharmaceutical care model were recommended for patients with solid or hematological neoplasms, according to their prioritization level. CONCLUSION: This stratification model enables the identification of cancer patients requiring a higher level of pharmaceutical care and facilitates the adjustment of care capacity. Validation of the model in a representative population is necessary to establish its effectiveness.

Severe hepatotoxicity during treatment with capmatinib.

INTRODUCTION: Capmatinib is a mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) inhibitor authorized for metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with MET exon 14 skipping mutation treatment in adult patients. CASE REPORT: We report a case of an elderly female with a diagnosis of metastatic NSCLC with MET exon 14 skipping mutation who developed a severe hepatotoxicity after 7 weeks under treatment with capmatinib. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: Capmatinib was immediately discontinued. Hepatotoxicity is included as "warning and precautions" in the product information sheet. The patient was admitted with severe acute hepatitis, secondary hypocoagulability and acute deterioration of renal function. She experienced a rapid worsening with a fatal outcome three days after admission. The causal relationship between capmatinib and the appearance of hepatotoxicity was determined as probable according to Naranjo's modified Karch and Lasagna's imputability algorithm. DISCUSSION: The recognition and diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury (DILI) are often difficult and delayed. Molecularly targeted agents require careful assessment of liver function both prior to and during therapy. Capmatinib hepatotoxicity is an infrequent but severe adverse drug reaction (ADR). Prescribing information includes recommendations about liver function monitoring. The main approachment for DILI is the removal of the causative agent. Detection and communication of ADRs to the Pharmacovigilance Systems have special relevance for novel drugs, with little data in real life setting.

Adherence and quality of life in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with oral antineoplastic drugs. / Adherencia y calidad de vida en los pacientes con leucemia linfocítica crónica tratados con antineoplásicos orales.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence and quality of life to oral antineoplastic treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. To compare adherence and QoL according to treatment subgroups and treatment-line subgroups. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive prospective study from June to November 2021 in a tertiary care hospital. Patients treated at the Oncology Pharmacy with a diagnosis of chronic lymphocytic leukemia and treatment with oral antineoplastics for at least 6 months before inclusion in the study were included. Adherence was assessed using Morisky's 8 item Medication Adherence Scale and leftover pills counts, considering adherents if their adherence rate was ≥ 90%. Quality of life was assessed with Euro-Qol EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue scale and QLQ-C30 questionnaire from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Two interviews were scheduled: at the time of inclusion and at 3 months. Variable collected: demographic data, clinical data (disease and treatment); and response (scores obtained from questionnaires and adherence rate). The data statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS® 25.0 software. RESULTS: Twenty three patients were included, all of them showed an adherence rate higher than 90%; 20 patients were considered high adherent, and 3 patients medium adherent to treatment according to Morisky's 8 item Medication Adherence Scale. The results of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire showed that the patients were all of them autonomous in their personal care and daily activities, 69.6% did not have any mobility problems and 78.3% did not have anxiety/depression; 56.5% had some type of pain. Eighteen patients had no fatigue, and 5 had mild/moderate fatigue according to Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue scale. The results of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire showed that patients had a high /healthy functional level, a good quality of life and a low level of symptoms. Analysis by treatment subgroups and by treatment-line subgroups did not show statistically significant differences in adherence or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and treated with oral antineoplastic therapies showed a high adherence rate and referred a good quality of life.

[Translated article] Adherence and quality of life in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia treated with oral antineoplastic drugs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate adherence and quality of life to oral antineoplastic treatment in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia. To compare adherence and quality of life according to treatment subgroups and treatment-line subgroups. METHODS: We conducted a descriptive prospective study from June to November 2021 in a tertiary care hospital.  Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, seen at the Oncology Pharmacy and treated with oral antineoplastic drugs for at least 6 months prior to inclusion in the study were included. Adherence was assessed using Morisky's 8 item Medication Adherence Scale and leftover pills counts, considering adherents if their adherence rate was ≥90%. Quality of life was assessed with Euro-Qol EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue scale and QLQ-C30 questionnaire from European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Two interviews were scheduled: at the time of inclusion and at 3 months. The clinical history was reviewed and demographic and clinical variables were collected. The data statistical analysis was carried out with SPSS® 25.0 software. RESULTS: Twenty three patients were included, all of them showed an adherence rate higher than 90%; 20 patients were considered high adherent, and 3 patients médium adherent to treatment according to Morisky's 8 item Medication Adherence Scale. The results of the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire showed that the patients were all of them autonomous in their personal care and daily activities, 69.6% did not have any mobility problems and 78.3% did not have anxiety/depression; 56.5% had some type of pain. Eighteen patients had no fatigue, and 5 had mild/moderate fatigue according to Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy - Fatigue scale. The results of the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire showed that patients had a high /healthy functional level, a good quality of life and a low level of symptoms. Analysis by treatment subgroups and by treatment-line subgroups did not show statistically significant differences in adherence or quality of life. CONCLUSIONS: Patients diagnosed with chronic lymphocytic leukemia and treated with oral antineoplastic therapies showed a high adherence rate and referred a good quality of life.

Predictive value of immune-related adverse events during pembrolizumab treatment in non-small cell lung cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Several studies have reported the role of immune-related adverse events as a predictor of clinical benefit, but few have properly described these findings in advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with pembrolizumab. This study aimed to evaluate the association between immune-related adverse events development and clinical outcomes in the aforementioned group of patients. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer treated with pembrolizumab. Overall response rate, progression-free survival and overall survival were evaluated according to the appearance, subtype and number of immune-related adverse events developed. We report the results of the immune-related adverse events analysis and the potential correlation between immune-related adverse events and clinical outcomes. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate this relationship. RESULTS: A total of 94 patients were analysed; 60 of them developed immune-related adverse events. Patients with immune-related adverse events had a significantly higher overall response rate compared with the non-immune-related adverse events group (34% vs 8.5%, χ2=0.005). Median progression-free survival was statistically significant in favour of patients with at least one immune-related adverse event (p=0.015). Median overall survival was not reached in patients with ≥1 immune-related adverse events, compared with 8 months (95% CI 0.6 to 15.4 months) in those without immune-related adverse events. Patients who developed ≥2 immune-related adverse events had longer median progression-free survival (11 vs 4 months, not statistically significant) and overall survival (not reached vs 11, p=0.022) compared with those with ≤1 immune-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Obtained data showed that patients with immune-related adverse events occurrence had significantly better overall response rate and longer progression-free survival and overall survival. This study highlights the role of immune-related adverse events as a predictor of survival in a real-life setting.

Pre-clinical development of Listeria-based nanovaccines as immunotherapies for solid tumours: insights from melanoma.

Gold glyconanoparticles loaded with the listeriolysin O peptide 91-99 (GNP-LLO91-99), a bacterial peptide with anti-metastatic properties, are vaccine delivery platforms facilitating immune cell targeting and increasing antigen loading. Here, we present proof of concept analyses for the consideration of GNP-LLO91-99 nanovaccines as a novel immunotherapy for cutaneous melanoma. Studies using mouse models of subcutaneous melanoma indicated that GNP-LLO91-99 nanovaccines recruite and modulate dendritic cell (DC) function within the tumour, alter tumour immunotolerance inducing melanoma-specific cytotoxic T cells, cause complete remission and improve survival. GNP-LLO91-99 nanovaccines showed superior tumour regression and survival benefits, when combined with anti-PD-1 or anti-CTLA-4 checkpoint inhibitors, resulting in an improvement in the efficacy of these immunotherapies. Studies on monocyte-derived DCs from patients with stage IA, IB or IIIB melanoma confirmed the ability of GNP-LLO91-99 nanovaccines to complement the action of checkpoint inhibitors, by not only reducing the expression of cell-death markers on DCs, but also potentiating DC antigen-presentation. We propose that GNP-LLO91-99 nanovaccines function as immune stimulators and immune effectors and serve as safe cancer therapies, alone or in combination with other immunotherapies.