Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab in Elderly Patients with Crohn's Disease: Real World Evidence From the ENEIDA Registry.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Clinical trials and real-life studies with ustekinumab in Crohn's disease [CD] have revealed a good efficacy and safety profile. However, these data are scarcely available in elderly patients. Therefore, we aim to assess the effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in elderly patients with CD. METHODS: Elderly patients [>60 years old] from the prospectively maintained ENEIDA registry treated with ustekinumab due to CD were included. Every patient was matched with two controls under 60 years of age, according to anti-tumour necrosis factor use and smoking habit. Values for the Harvey-Bradshaw Index [HBI], endoscopic activity, C-reactive protein [CRP] and faecal calprotectin [FC] were recorded at baseline and at weeks 16, 32 and 54. RESULTS: In total, 648 patients were included, 212 of whom were elderly. Effectiveness was similar between young and elderly patients during the follow-up. Steroid-free remission was similar at week 16 [54.6 vs 51.4%, p = 0.20], 32 [53.0% vs 54.5%, p = 0.26] and 54 [57.8% vs 51.1%, p = 0.21]. Persistence of ustekinumab as maintenance therapy was similar in both age groups [log-rank test; p = 0.91]. There was no difference in the rate of adverse effects [14.2% vs 11.2%, p = 0.350], including severe infections [7.1% vs 7.3%, p = 1.00], except for the occurrence of de novo neoplasms, which was higher in older patients [0.7% vs 4.3%, p = 0.003]. CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab is as effective in elderly patients with CD as it is in non-elderly patients. The safety profile also seems to be similar except for a higher rate of de novo neoplasms, probably related to the age of the elderly patients.

Long-Term Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ustekinumab in Crohn's Disease Patients: The SUSTAIN Study.

BACKGROUND: Large real-world-evidence studies are required to confirm the durability of response, effectiveness, and safety of ustekinumab in Crohn's disease (CD) patients in real-world clinical practice. METHODS: A retrospective, multicentre study was conducted in Spain in patients with active CD who had received ≥1 intravenous dose of ustekinumab for ≥6 months. Primary outcome was ustekinumab retention rate; secondary outcomes were to identify predictive factors for drug retention, short-term remission (week 16), loss of response and predictive factors for short-term efficacy and loss of response, and ustekinumab safety. RESULTS: A total of 463 patients were included. Mean baseline Harvey-Bradshaw Index was 8.4. A total of 447 (96.5%) patients had received prior biologic therapy, 141 (30.5%) of whom had received ≥3 agents. In addition, 35.2% received concomitant immunosuppressants, and 47.1% had ≥1 abdominal surgery. At week 16, 56% had remission, 70% had response, and 26.1% required dose escalation or intensification; of these, 24.8% did not subsequently reduce dose. After a median follow-up of 15 months, 356 (77%) patients continued treatment. The incidence rate of ustekinumab discontinuation was 18% per patient-year of follow-up. Previous intestinal surgery and concomitant steroid treatment were associated with higher risk of ustekinumab discontinuation, while a maintenance schedule every 12 weeks had a lower risk; neither concomitant immunosuppressants nor the number of previous biologics were associated with ustekinumab discontinuation risk. Fifty adverse events were reported in 39 (8.4%) patients; 4 of them were severe (2 infections, 1 malignancy, and 1 fever). CONCLUSIONS: Ustekinumab is effective and safe as short- and long-term treatment in a refractory cohort of CD patients in real-world clinical practice.

This large retrospective study demonstrated the short- and long-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in patients with Crohn's disease in real-world clinical practice, including those with refractory disease.

Ustekinumab for corticodependent immune-mediated colitis by pembrolizumab, an alternative for patients with concomitant liver injury.

Pembrolizumab, a programmed cell death receptor (PD-1) inhibitor, have improved the prognosis in several types of cancer. Despite the important clinical benefits, checkpoint inhibition have been associated with inflammatory and immune-related side effects (irAE).

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with intestinal, pulmonary or skin diseases: Inflammatory cross-talk that needs a multidisciplinary approach.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is currently considered the most common cause of liver disease. Its prevalence is increasing in parallel with the obesity and type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM2) epidemics in developed countries. Several recent studies have suggested that NAFLD may be the hepatic manifestation of a systemic inflammatory metabolic disease that also affects other organs, such as intestine, lungs, skin and vascular endothelium. It appears that local and systemic proinflammatory/anti-inflammatory cytokine imbalance, together with insulin resistance and changes in the intestinal microbiota, are pathogenic mechanisms shared by NAFLD and other comorbidities. NAFLD is more common in patients with extrahepatic diseases such as inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), obstructive syndrome apnea (OSA) and psoriasis than in the general population. Furthermore, there is evidence that this association has a negative impact on the severity of liver lesions. Specific risk characteristics for NAFLD have been identified in populations with IBD (i.e. age, obesity, DM2, previous bowel surgery, IBD evolution time, methotrexate treatment), OSA (i.e. obesity, DM2, OSA severity, increased transaminases) and psoriasis (i.e. age, metabolic factors, severe psoriasis, arthropathy, elevated transaminases, methotrexate treatment). These specific phenotypes might be used by gastroenterologists, pneumologists and dermatologists to create screening algorithms for NAFLD. Such algorithms should include non-invasive markers of fibrosis used in NAFLD to select subjects for referral to the hepatologist. Prospective, controlled studies in NAFLD patients with extrahepatic comorbidities are required to demonstrate a causal relationship and also that appropriate multidisciplinary management improves these patients' prognosis and survival.

Effectiveness and Safety of the Sequential Use of a Second and Third Anti-TNF Agent in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Results From the Eneida Registry.

BACKGROUND: The effectiveness of the switch to another anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) agent is not known. The aim of this study was to analyze the effectiveness and safety of treatment with a second and third anti-TNF drug after intolerance to or failure of a previous anti-TNF agent in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. METHODS: We included patients diagnosed with IBD from the ENEIDA registry who received another anti-TNF after intolerance to or failure of a prior anti-TNF agent. RESULTS: A total of 1122 patients were included. In the short term, remission was achieved in 55% of the patients with the second anti-TNF. The incidence of loss of response was 19% per patient-year with the second anti-TNF. Combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8-3; P < 0.0001) and ulcerative colitis vs Crohn's disease (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.1-2.1; P = 0.005) were associated with a higher probability of loss of response. Fifteen percent of the patients had adverse events, and 10% had to discontinue the second anti-TNF. Of the 71 patients who received a third anti-TNF, 55% achieved remission. The incidence of loss of response was 22% per patient-year with a third anti-TNF. Adverse events occurred in 7 patients (11%), but only 1 stopped the drug. CONCLUSIONS: Approximately half of the patients who received a second anti-TNF achieved remission; nevertheless, a significant proportion of them subsequently lost response. Combination therapy and type of IBD were associated with loss of response. Remission was achieved in almost 50% of patients who received a third anti-TNF; nevertheless, a significant proportion of them subsequently lost response.

Quality of life during one year of postoperative prophylactic drug therapy after intestinal resection in Crohn's patients: Results of the APPRECIA trial.

BACKGROUND: In APPRECIA trial, Crohn's disease (CD) patients undergoing intestinal resection were randomized to postoperative adalimumab (ADA) or azathioprine (AZA). AIMS: To evaluate health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in APPRECIA trial. METHODS: HRQoL was evaluated using disease-specific shortened Spanish version of the IBDQ (SIBDQ-9) and generic European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaires, completed at baseline and at weeks 24 and 52. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (37 ADA and 24 AZA) had evaluable data for HRQoL. Patients treated with ADA or AZA had significant improvement from baseline to weeks 24 and 52 in SIBDQ-9 and EQ-5D (p < 0.001 and p ≤ 0.006 for all comparisons, respectively). There were no differences between treatment arms in mean change in SIBDQ-9 and EQ-5D at weeks 24 and 52 vs baseline. Only patients without endoscopic recurrence had significant improvement in SIBDQ-9 (p < 0.001) and EQ-5D (p < 0.001) at week 52. At week 52, there was a high to moderate negative correlation between CDAI score with SIBDQ-9 score (Pearson's r: -0.768) and with EQ-5D index (r: -0.644). CONCLUSION: HRQoL improved after intestinal resection in CD, irrespective of the postoperative therapy used (ADA or AZA). Outcomes in HRQoL were associated with prevention of endoscopic recurrence, since improvements in HRQoL were only significant in patients with endoscopic remission at 1 year.

Serial Tuberculin Skin Tests Improve the Detection of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients With Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

AIM: To assess the likelihood of detecting latent tuberculosis infection [LTBI] by the positive conversion of a serial tuberculin skin test [TST] at 1 year in inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients with negative baseline two-step TST. METHODS: In this multicentre prospective cohort study, we evaluated rate and predictors of conversion of TST at 1 year in patients with negative baseline TST. We also evaluated management of patients who had a positive TST at baseline or a conversion at 1 year. In all patients we assessed TB cases occurring during follow-up. RESULTS: Of the 192 IBD patients receiving anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] and 220 IBD controls not receiving anti-TNF, 35 [8.5%, 95% CI 5.7-11.3] had positive conversion (median TST induration 13 mm, interquartile range [IQR] 9-16). Ten anti-TNF cohort patients [5.2%, 95% CI 2.5-9.5] versus 25 controls [11.4%, 95% CI 7.5-16.3] had TST conversion [p = 0.029]. In multivariate analysis, conversion was associated with smoking habit (odds ratio [OR] 2.19, 95% CI 1.08-3.97; p = 0.028). Anti-TNF-treated patients had a lower conversion rate [OR 0.41, 95% CI 0.20-0.83; p = 0.013]. The likelihood of conversion correlates with fewer immunosuppressive therapies between baseline TST and TST at 1 year [p = 0.042]. One case of active TB [isoniazid-resistant strain] occurred in a patient with positive baseline TST receiving anti-TNF [0.05 events/100 patient-years]. CONCLUSIONS: Serial TST at 1 year can detect LTBI in IBD patients receiving anti-TNF therapy with negative baseline TST. Serial TST seems to be advisable to reduce the risk of TB cases associated with inability to detect LTBI in pre-treatment screening.

Safety of propofol sedation directed by endoscopists: how long should we continue to generate evidence?

The administration of propofol by endoscopists is a source of permanent friction with the Societies of Anesthesiology, which is based more on a clear conflict of economic interest on the part of the anesthesiologists than supported by scientific evidence. Maestro Antolín et al. (1) presented a series of more than 33,000 sedations performed with propofol by endoscopists, observing a frequency of cardiorespiratory adverse events of 0.13%. Rather than confrontation between different specialties, where the corporatism of the Anesthesiology Societies and their interest in monopolizing the use of a safe drug such as propofol prevails with no scientific support, anesthesiologists, endoscopists and nurses should instead work together for the benefit of our patients.

Clinical Outcomes of Golimumab as First, Second or Third Anti-TNF Agent in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Ulcerative Colitis.

BACKGROUND: Golimumab efficacy data in ulcerative colitis (UC) are limited to anti-tumor necrosis factor α (TNF)-naive patients. The aim of this study was to assess the short-term and long-term efficacy of golimumab used as first, second, or third anti-TNF in UC in a real-life clinical setting. METHODS: This retrospective multicenter cohort study included patients with moderate-to-severe UC treated with golimumab. The primary efficacy endpoints were short-term partial Mayo score response, long-term golimumab failure-free survival, and colectomy-free survival. RESULTS: In 142 patients with UC, golimumab was administered as first (40%), second (23%), or third anti-TNF (37%). Ninety-two patients (65%, 95% confidence interval 56.6-73) achieved short-term clinical response. Forty-five patients (32%, 95% confidence interval 23.7-39.7) achieved clinical remission. Response rates for golimumab were 75% as first anti-TNF, 70% as second anti-TNF (ns versus first anti-TNF), and 50% as third anti-TNF (P = 0.007 versus first anti-TNF). After 12 months median follow-up (interquartile range 6-18), 60 patients (42%, 95% confidence interval 34-51) had golimumab failure, and 15 patients (11%) needed colectomy. Thirty-one patients (22%) needed golimumab dose escalation, and 71% of these regained response after escalation. Starting maintenance with 100 mg golimumab doses and short-term nonresponse were independent predictors of golimumab failure. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life cohort of patients with UC, golimumab therapy was effective for inducing and maintaining clinical response. Although anti-TNF-naive patients had better outcomes, golimumab was also effective in anti-TNF-experienced patients. Only the patients given golimumab after previous failure of 2 anti-TNF agents had significantly worse outcomes. Golimumab dose escalation was beneficial and safe.

Adalimumab vs Azathioprine in the Prevention of Postoperative Crohn's Disease Recurrence. A GETECCU Randomised Trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Postoperative recurrence of Crohn's disease [POR-CD] is almost certain if no prophylaxis is administered. Evidence for optimal treatment is lacking. Our aim was to compare the efficacy of adalimumab [ADA] and azathioprine [AZA] in this setting. METHODS: We performed a phase 3, 52-week, multicentre, randomised, superiority study [APPRECIA], in which patients with ileocolonic resection were randomised either to ADA 160-80-40 mg subcutaneously [SC] or AZA 2.5 mg/kg/day, both associated with metronidazole. The primary endpoint was endoscopic recurrence at 1 year [Rutgeerts i2b, i3, i4], as evaluated by a blinded central reader. RESULTS: We recruited 91 patients [median age 35.0 years, disease duration 6.0 years, 23.8% smokers, 7.1% previous resections]. The study drugs were administered to 84 patients. Treatment was discontinued owing to adverse events in 11 patients [13.1%]. Discontinuation was significantly less frequent in the ADA [4.4%] than in the AZA group [23.2%] (dif.: 18.6% [95% CI 4.1-33.2], p = 0.011). According to the intention-to-treat analysis, therapy failed in 23/39 patients in the AZA group [59%] and 19/45 patients in the ADA group [42.2%] [p = 0.12]. In the per-protocol analysis [61 patients with centrally evaluable images], recurrence was recorded in 8/24 [33.3%] patients in the AZA and 11/37 [29.7%] in the ADA group [p = 0.76]. No statistically significant differences between the groups were found for recurrence in magnetic resonance images, biological markers of activity, surgical procedures, or hospital admissions. CONCLUSIONS: ADA has not demonstrated a better efficacy than AZA [both associated with metronidazole] for prophylaxis of POR-CD in an unselected population, although tolerance to ADA is significantly better. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01564823.

Early Tuberculin Skin Test for the Diagnosis of Latent Tuberculosis Infection in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Sensitivity of tuberculin skin test [TST] during screening for latent tuberculosis infection [LTBI] is affected by steroid and/or immunosuppressant therapy. The aim of this study was to compare performance of the two-step TST in inflammatory bowel disease patients immediately before anti-tumour necrosis factor [TNF] therapy as part of routine screening for LTBI vs control patients when the TST was carried out at an early stage. METHODS: In this multicentre prospective controlled study, we evaluated the performance of two-step TST with 5-mm threshold. Factors associated with TST results were determined by logistic regression. RESULTS: We evaluated 243 candidates for anti-TNF therapy and 337 control patients. Overall, 105 patients [18.1%] had an induration ≥ 5 mm in the first TST or in TST retest. LTBI was diagnosed in 25% of patients by TST retest. Twenty-eight [11.5%] anti-TNF group patients vs 77 [22.8%] control patients had a positive TST (odds ratio [OR] 0.44, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.70; P < 0.001]. In multivariate analysis, positive TST was associated with higher age [OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.21-5.72; P < 0.001] and 5-aminosalicylate therapy [OR 1.86, 95% CI 1.14-3.05; P = 0.013]. Negative TST was associated with steroid therapy [OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.83; P = 0.016], immunosuppressant therapy [OR 0.36, 95% CI 0.21-0.62; P < 0.001], or steroids + immunosuppressant therapy [OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.07-0.59; P = 0.004]. CONCLUSIONS: The sensitivity of routine TST performed just before starting anti-TNF therapy is low. TST performed at an early stage enables screening in the absence of immunosuppressive treatment and thus maximises the diagnostic yield of TST for detecting LTBI.

Delphi consensus statement: Quality Indicators for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Comprehensive Care Units.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: While it is commonly accepted that Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) Comprehensive Care Units (ICCUs) facilitate the delivery of quality care to Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis patients, it remains unclear how an ICCU should be defined or evaluated. The aim of the present study was to develop a comprehensive set of Quality Indicators (QIs) of structure, process, and outcomes for defining and evaluating an ICCU. METHODS: A Delphi consensus-based approach with a standardized three-step process was used to identify a core set of QIs. The process included an exhaustive search using complementary approaches to identify potential QIs, and two Delphi voting rounds to select the QIs defining the core requirements for an ICCU. RESULTS: The consensus selected a core set of 56 QIs (12 structure, 20 process and 24 outcome). Structure and process QIs highlighted the need for multidisciplinary management and continuity of care. The minimal IBD team should include an IBD nurse, gastroenterologists, radiologists, surgeons, endoscopists and stoma management specialists. ICCUs should be able to provide both outpatient and inpatient care and admission should not break the continuity of care. Outcome QIs focused on the adequate prophylaxis of disease complication and drug adverse events, the need to monitor appropriateness of treatment and the need to reinforce patient autonomy by providing adequate information and facilitating the patients' participation in their own care. CONCLUSIONS: The present Delphi consensus identified a set of core QIs that may be useful for evaluating and certifying ICCUs.

Induction of psoriasis with anti-TNF agents in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a report of 21 cases.

AIM: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents are widely used for the treatment of both inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and psoriasis. Psoriatic skin lesions induced by anti-TNF have been described in patients with IBD. We report a case series of psoriasis induced by anti-TNF agents in IBD patients. METHODS: Systematic analysis of cases of psoriasis induced by anti-TNF in an IBD patient cohort in tertiary hospitals of Madrid. RESULTS: A total of 21 of 1294 patients with IBD treated with anti-TNF-alpha agents developed drug-induced psoriasis (cumulative incidence 1.62%; 95% CI 1.06%-2.47%): 14 patients with infliximab and 7 with adalimumab; seventeen with Crohn's disease, 4 with ulcerative colitis. The onset of skin lesions varied in a wide range of time (after a mean 13±8 doses). The most frequent site of skin lesions was the limbs (62%) followed by the trunk (48%) and the scalp (43%). The psoriasis phenotypes were plaque psoriasis (57%), scalp (14%), palmoplantar pustulosis (14%), pustular generalized psoriasis (5%), guttate (5%) and inverse (5%). Four patients interrupted the anti-TNF treatment, and that led to the complete regression of lesions in 1 of them. The other 17 patients were maintained on anti-TNF therapy and managed with topical steroids. CONCLUSION: Psoriatic lesions can be induced by anti-TNF drugs. Plaque psoriasis on the extremities and trunk were the most frequent presentations in our series. Topical steroid treatment is effective in most patients. Anti-TNF discontinuance may be reserved for patients with severe psoriasis or patients without response to topical therapy.

Adalimumab is effective in long-term real life clinical practice in both luminal and perianal Crohn's disease. The Madrid experience.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate effectiveness and safety of adalimumab in CD patients of the Madrid area and identify predictors of response. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective survey of all CD patients treated with adalimumab in 9 hospitals of the Madrid area (Spain). Univariate and multivariate analysis of predictors of response was performed. RESULTS: 174 patients included (50% males) with a median follow-up of 40 weeks. 30% had active perianal fistulizing disease at the beginning of the therapy with adalimumab. 59% had been previously treated with infliximab, being the lost of response (42.2%) the most frequent cause of withdrawal of the drug. 33% of patients needed dose escalation from every-other week to every week. The median time for this dose escalation was 33 weeks (range 2-120). The percentages of complete response at 4 weeks, 6 months and end of follow-up were 63, 70 and 63% in luminal disease and 49, 50 and 41% in perianal disease respectively. The prevalence of adverse events was 18% (most frequent was: 5 abscesses) causing the withdrawal of the drug in 21% of them. CONCLUSIONS: Adalimumab is effective and safe for the management of CD, even in refractory cases to infliximab.

Infliximab maintenance therapy is associated with decreases in direct resource use in patients with luminal or fistulizing Crohn's disease.

GOALS: To estimate the impact of infliximab (IFX) maintenance therapy on the use of hospital resources in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). STUDY: Medical records of patients treated with IFX maintenance therapy (5 mg/kg body weight; intravenous infusion) for luminal (L) or fistulizing (F) CD at 13 hospitals were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were assessed as their own controls. Use of CD-related healthcare resources was recorded comparing 1-year periods before and after first IFX infusion (pre-IFX and post-IFX). RESULTS: One hundred fifty-three CD patients (n=84 L; 69 F) fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Mean number of IFX infusions was 7/y with an average of 335 mg/infusion dose/patient. During the pre-IFX period, 55% of patients needed hospitalization versus 31% in the post-IFX period (P<0.001). Mean inpatient stay was 11.3 d/y [11.2 (L), 11.5 (F)] for the pre-IFX period, and 6.3 d/y [6.2 (L), 6.3 (F)] in the post-IFX period (P<0.001). Surgery was required in 24% patients in the pre-IFX period and in 11% post-IFX (P<0.001). There were no significant changes in the incidence of outpatient visits although emergency room visits fell significantly. CONCLUSIONS: Maintenance IFX in CD patients is associated with decreases in the use and length of hospitalizations and the need for surgery in clinical practice.

Open-label infliximab therapy in ulcerative colitis: a multicenter survey of results and predictors of response.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Results of randomized controlled trials showing efficacy of infliximab in ulcerative colitis (UC) should be confirmed in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of infliximab in UC patients of the Madrid area, looking for clinical predictors of response. METHODOLOGY: Multicenter retrospective survey of all UC patients treated with infliximab in the region of Madrid (Spain). RESULTS: 47 UC patients were included (45% males, mean age 44 +/- 15 yrs), mean follow up of 4.7 months (range 0.5-21), and a total number of 211 infliximab infusions. Clinical response and steroid-free remission rates were, respectively, 97/42% in the 2nd week, 93/69% in the 6th week, and 80/65% at the long-term follow up (mean 8.2 months, range 3.5-21). Colectomy rate was 10.6% (five patients). Age, gender, disease duration, indication (steroid-resistance/dependence), disease severity, C-reactive protein, concomitant thiopurinic therapy or smoking habit did not influence on efficacy. Extent of the disease was the only predictive factor (p=0.02). Only 4 cases of mild adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is effective and safe for UC. Real life clinical practice may have better outcome than showed in randomized controlled trials. Extent of the disease was the only predictive factor for clinical response in our experience.

Open-label infliximab therapy in Crohn's disease: a long-term multicenter study of efficacy, safety and predictors of response.

BACKGROUND: Efficacy of infliximab in Crohn's disease (CD) showed by randomized controlled trials must be confirmed in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate efficacy and safety of infliximab in CD patients of the Madrid area, looking for clinical predictors of response. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective survey of all CD patients treated with infliximab in 8 University hospitals of the Madrid area (Spain) with a minimum follow up of 14 wks. RESULTS: 169 patients included (48%males, mean age 39 +/- 12 yrs). 64% of them had perianal disease. 82% were under immunosuppressants. 1,355 infliximab infusions administered (mean 8, range 1-30). 90% response rate and 48% remission rate were obtained with induction therapy. 73% followed maintenance treatment, and 78% of them maintained or improved the response after a mean follow up of 28 months (range 3.5-86). 24 patients lost response during the follow up, after a mean of 41 wks (range 6-248). Only the prescription of maintenance therapy was predictive factor for favourable response (p < 0.01). 17 infusion reactions were reported (10% of the patients, 1.2% of the infusions; only one case was severe) and were the cause of treatment withdrawal in 7 patients. Co-treatment with immunosuppressive drugs and maintenance infliximab therapy were protective factors for infusion reactions (p < 0.05). Other adverse events occurred in 26% of the patients, and were cause of treatment withdrawal in 7 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Infliximab is effective and safe for CD management but concomitant immunosuppressive drugs and maintenance treatment should be prescribed to obtain the best outcome. That confirms in a real life clinical setting the favourable results obtained in randomized clinical trials.