Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 34
Filtrar
1.
EBioMedicine ; 106: 105234, 2024 Jul 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The most near-term clinical application of genome-wide association studies in lung cancer is a polygenic risk score (PRS). METHODS: A case-control dataset was generated consisting of 4002 lung cancer cases from the LORD project and 20,010 ethnically matched controls from CARTaGENE. A genome-wide PRS including >1.1 million genetic variants was derived and validated in UK Biobank (n = 5419 lung cancer cases). The predictive ability and diagnostic discrimination performance of the PRS was tested in LORD/CARTaGENE and benchmarked against previous PRSs from the literature. Stratified analyses were performed by smoking status and genetic risk groups defined as low (<20th percentile), intermediate (20-80th percentile) and high (>80th percentile) PRS. FINDINGS: The phenotypic variance explained and the effect size of the genome-wide PRS numerically outperformed previous PRSs. Individuals with high genetic risk had a 2-fold odds of lung cancer compared to low genetic risk. The PRS was an independent predictor of lung cancer beyond conventional clinical risk factors, but its diagnostic discrimination performance was incremental in an integrated risk model. Smoking increased the odds of lung cancer by 7.7-fold in low genetic risk and by 11.3-fold in high genetic risk. Smoking with high genetic risk was associated with a 17-fold increase in the odds of lung cancer compared to individuals who never smoked and with low genetic risk. INTERPRETATION: Individuals at low genetic risk are not protected against the smoking-related risk of lung cancer. The joint multiplicative effect of PRS and smoking increases the odds of lung cancer by nearly 20-fold. FUNDING: This work was supported by the CQDM and the IUCPQ Foundation owing to a generous donation from Mr. Normand Lord.

2.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 63(4): 468-472, 2024.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438103

RESUMO

Ankle fractures are one of the most resource-consuming traumatic orthopedic injuries. Few studies have successfully evaluated the episode-of-care costs (EOCC) of common traumatic orthopedic injuries. The objective of this study was to determine the EOCC associated with the surgical management of ankle fractures. A retrospective cohort study of 105 consecutive patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation of an isolated ankle fracture at a Canadian Level-1 trauma center was conducted. Episode-of-care costs were generated using an activity-based costing framework. The median global episode-of-care cost for ankle fracture surgeries performed at the studied institution was $3,487 CAD [IQR 880] ($2,685 USD [IQR 616]). Patients aged 60 to 90 years had a significantly higher median EOCC than younger patients (p = .01). Supination-adduction injuries had a significantly higher median EOCC than other injury patterns (p = .01). The median EOCC for patients who underwent surgery within 10 days of their injury ($3,347 CAD [582], $2,577 USD [448]) was significantly lower than the cost for patients who had their surgery delayed 10 days or more after the injury ($3,634 CAD [776], $2,798 USD [598]) (p = .03). Patient sex, anesthesia type, ASA score and surgeon's fellowship training did not affect the EOCC. This study provides valuable data on predictors of EOCC in the surgical management of ankle fractures. Delaying simple ankle fracture cases due to operating time constraints can increase the total cost and burden of these fractures on the healthcare system. In addition, this study provides a framework for future episode-of-care cost analysis studies in orthopedic surgery.


Assuntos
Fraturas do Tornozelo , Fixação Interna de Fraturas , Humanos , Fraturas do Tornozelo/cirurgia , Fraturas do Tornozelo/economia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Feminino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fixação Interna de Fraturas/economia , Adulto , Cuidado Periódico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Canadá , Redução Aberta/economia , Estudos de Coortes , Centros de Traumatologia/economia
3.
Am J Respir Crit Care Med ; 207(12): 1612-1619, 2023 06 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36796092

RESUMO

Rationale: Transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB) for the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD) has shown promising results, but prospective studies with matched surgical lung biopsy (SLB) have yielded conflicting results. Objectives: We aimed to assess within- and between-center diagnostic agreement between TBCB and SLB at both the histopathologic and multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) levels in patients with diffuse ILD. Methods: In a multicenter prospective study, we performed matched TBCB and SLB in patients referred for SLB. After a blinded review by three pulmonary pathologists, all cases were reviewed by three independent ILD teams in an MDD. MDD was performed first with TBCB, then with SLB in a second session. Within-center and between-center diagnostic agreement was evaluated using percentages and correlation coefficients. Measurements and Main Results: Twenty patients were recruited and underwent contemporaneous TBCB and SLB. Within-center diagnostic agreement between TBCB-MDD and SLB-MDD was reached in 37 of the 60 (61.7%) paired observations, resulting in a Cohen's κ value of 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29-0.63). Diagnostic agreement increased among high-confidence or definitive diagnoses on TBCB-MDD (21 of 29 [72.4%]), but not significantly, and was more likely among cases with SLB-MDD diagnoses of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis than fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (13 of 16 [81.2%] vs. 16 of 31 [51.6%]; P = 0.047). Between-center agreement for cases was markedly higher for SLB-MDD (κ = 0.71 [95% CI, 0.52-0.89]) than TBCB-MDD (κ = 0.29 [95% CI, 0.09-0.49]). Conclusions: This study demonstrated moderate TBCB-MDD and SLB-MDD diagnostic agreement for ILD, while between-center agreement was fair for TBCB-MDD and substantial for SLB-MDD. Clinical trial registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02235779).


Assuntos
Broncoscopia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Humanos , Estudos Prospectivos , Broncoscopia/métodos , Pulmão/patologia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/patologia , Biópsia/métodos
4.
Curr Oncol ; 29(5): 3187-3199, 2022 04 29.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35621649

RESUMO

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with a five-year survival of 22% in Canada. Guidelines recommend rapid evaluation of patients with suspected lung cancer, but the impact on survival remains unclear. We reviewed medical records of all patients with newly diagnosed lung cancer in four hospital networks across the province of Quebec, Canada, between 1 February and 30 April 2017. Patients were followed for 3 years. Wait times for diagnosis and treatment were collected, and survival analysis using a Cox regression model was conducted. We included 1309 patients, of whom 39% had stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Median wait times were, in general, significantly shorter in patients with stage III-IV NSCLC or SCLC. Surgery was associated with delays compared to other types of treatments. Median survival was 12.9 (11.1-15.7) months. The multivariate survival model included age, female sex, performance status, histology and stage, treatment, and the time interval between diagnosis and treatment. Longer wait times had a slightly protective to neutral effect on survival, but this was not significant in the stage I-II NSCLC subgroup. Wait times for the diagnosis and treatment of lung cancer were generally within targets. The shorter wait times observed for advanced NSCLC and SCLC might indicate a tendency for clinicians to act quicker on sicker patients. This study did not demonstrate the detrimental effect of longer wait times on survival.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Canadá , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/patologia , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Quebeque , Estudos Retrospectivos , Listas de Espera
5.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 70(7): 583-588, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35151233

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Surgical lung biopsy (SLB) is considered in the investigation of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) when a complete clinical evaluation and a multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) do not allow the clinician to make a confident diagnosis. Owing to the risk of the procedure, an appropriate assessment of the risk/benefit ratio prior to the intervention is recommended. We aimed to assess the postoperative outcomes and diagnostic yield of SLB for the investigation of ILD in a tertiary care institution. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of consecutive subjects who underwent a SLB for the investigation of ILD in our center from 2009 to 2020. The postoperative mortality and complications rates as well as the diagnostic yield of the procedure were assessed. RESULTS: Of the 1,805 patients newly investigated for ILD in our center from 2009 to 2020, 71 (3.93%) underwent a SLB. At days 30 and 90, the mortality rates were 0 and 2.8%, whereas 4.3 and 7.6% patients experienced an acute ILD exacerbation, respectively. In addition, 4 (5.8%) patients experienced infectious complications and 5 (7.0%) presented prolonged air leaks (all within 30 days). A definite pathological diagnosis was made in 47 (66.2%) patients. Following postoperative MDD, a confident diagnosis was made in 61 patients (85.9%) and resulted in a change of therapy in 49 (69.0%) patients. CONCLUSION: SLB for the diagnosis of unclassifiable ILDs is associated with low mortality but significant morbidity. However, it results in a confident diagnosis and a change in therapy in the majority of patients.


Assuntos
Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais , Biópsia/efeitos adversos , Biópsia/métodos , Humanos , Pulmão/patologia , Pulmão/cirurgia , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/diagnóstico , Doenças Pulmonares Intersticiais/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
7.
Lung Cancer ; 156: 151-156, 2021 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33962765

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: Medical management based on palliative chemotherapy is currently the standard of care in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Median survival of 12-16 months has been reported with modern chemotherapy regimens with or without anti-angiogenic agents. Multimodality therapy incorporating cytoreductive surgery, systemic chemotherapy and radiotherapy has been offered for years to fit patients with early-stage disease, but its role remains debated. Our objective was to compare overall survival in patients offered multimodality therapy in a specialized clinic setting in London, UK to that of patients offered exclusively medical treatment at another academic institution in Quebec, Canada. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively compared the survival rates of 2 separate cohorts of patients treated consecutively: Cohort 1 (n = 106) received multimodality therapy including systemic chemotherapy, extended pleurectomy/decortication (P/D) and prophylactic radiotherapy in London (United Kingdom) between 2009 and 2016, while Cohort 2 (n = 98) received medical treatment at the Quebec Heart and Lung Institute (Canada) during the same period. RESULTS: In Cohort 1, all patients but two completed trimodality therapy. In cohort 2, 51 % received palliative care only and 40 % received systemic chemotherapy. Median survival was 32 months vs 10 months in Cohort 1 and Cohort 2, respectively (hazard ratio with age, gender, pathology and TNM staging as covariates: 3.81; 95 % CI: 2.67-5.45; p < 0.0001). Similar results were obtained in sensitivity analyses, after excluding those who received best supportive care only and in a propensity score-matched analysis. CONCLUSION: Aggressive therapy of MPM using cancer-directed surgery, systemic chemotherapy and prophylactic radiotherapy may provide a significant survival benefit in selected patients.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Mesotelioma Maligno , Mesotelioma , Neoplasias Pleurais , Canadá , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Mesotelioma/terapia , Neoplasias Pleurais/terapia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Reino Unido
8.
Chest ; 160(2): 718-730, 2021 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33667493

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A successful lung cancer screening program requires a patient cohort at sufficient risk of developing cancer who are willing to participate. Among other factors, a patient's lung cancer risk perception may inform their attitudes toward screening and smoking cessation programs. RESEARCH QUESTION: This study analyzed data from the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer (PanCan) Study to address the following questions: Which factors are associated with the perception of lung cancer risk? Is there an association between risk perception for lung cancer and actual calculated risk? Is there an association between risk perception for lung cancer and the intent to quit smoking? Are there potential targets for lung cancer screening awareness? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: The PanCan study recruited current or former smokers aged 50 to 75 years who had at least a 2% risk of developing lung cancer over 6 years to undergo low-dose screening CT. Risk perception and worry about lung cancer were captured on a baseline questionnaire. Cumulative logistic regression analysis was used to assess the relationship between baseline risk variables and both lung cancer risk perception and worry. RESULTS: Among the 2,514 individuals analyzed, a higher perceived risk of lung cancer was positively associated with calculated risk (P = .032). Younger age, being a former smoker, respiratory symptoms, lower FEV1, COPD, and a family history of lung cancer were associated with higher perceived risk. Conversely, a consistent relationship between calculated risk and worry was not identified. There was a positive association between risk perception and lung cancer worry and reported intent to quit smoking. INTERPRETATION: Individuals' lung cancer risk perception correlated positively with calculated risk in a screening population. Promotion of screening programs may benefit from focusing on factors associated with higher risk perception; conversely, harnessing worry seemingly holds less value.


Assuntos
Atitude Frente a Saúde , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Programas de Rastreamento , Participação do Paciente , Idoso , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Fatores de Risco , Fumantes , Abandono do Hábito de Fumar/psicologia
9.
JBMR Plus ; 4(12): e10424, 2020 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33354645

RESUMO

The evaluation of bone complications in chronic kidney disease (CKD) often requires a bone biopsy, the analysis of which can refine the diagnosis of bone defects. Bone histomorphometry performed on sections of the iliac crest biopsy remains the reference procedure for the quantitative assessment of bone health in CKD patients, whereas immunohistochemistry and other molecular biology analyses are indispensable tools for studying the disrupted signaling pathways. Traditionally, the whole iliac crest biopsy was included in methyl-methacrylate (MMA) and was exclusively used for bone histomorphometry to describe static, dynamic, and structural parameters. Therefore, further molecular analysis of the bone tissue or the need for tissue banking would require a second biopsy to be made, because inclusion in MMA prevents the extraction of good-quality nucleic acids. In this work, we describe a simple approach to divide a single iliac crest bone biopsy into multiple parts. This allows for simultaneous assessments of histology, immunohistochemistry, biomolecular analysis, and tissue banking while preserving the same bone surface area for histomorphometry. © 2020 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research © 2020 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

10.
BMC Pulm Med ; 20(1): 300, 2020 Nov 16.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33198781

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is an underdiagnosed condition sharing risk factors with lung cancer. Lung cancer screening may provide an opportunity to improve COPD diagnosis. Using Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer (PanCan) study data, the present study sought to determine the following: 1) What is the prevalence of COPD in a lung cancer screening population? 2) Can a model based on clinical and screening low-dose CT scan data predict the likelihood of COPD? METHODS: The single arm PanCan study recruited current or former smokers age 50-75 who had a calculated risk of lung cancer of at least 2% over 6 years. A baseline health questionnaire, spirometry, and low-dose CT scan were performed. CT scans were assessed by a radiologist for extent and distribution of emphysema. With spirometry as the gold standard, logistic regression was used to assess factors associated with COPD. RESULTS: Among 2514 recruited subjects, 1136 (45.2%) met spirometry criteria for COPD, including 833 of 1987 (41.9%) of those with no prior diagnosis, 53.8% of whom had moderate or worse disease. In a multivariate model, age, current smoking status, number of pack-years, presence of dyspnea, wheeze, participation in a high-risk occupation, and emphysema extent on LDCT were all statistically associated with COPD, while the overall model had poor discrimination (c-statistic = 0.627 (95% CI of 0.607 to 0.650). The lowest and the highest risk decile in the model predicted COPD risk of 27.4 and 65.3%. CONCLUSIONS: COPD had a high prevalence in a lung cancer screening population. While a risk model had poor discrimination, all deciles of risk had a high prevalence of COPD, and spirometry could be considered as an additional test in lung cancer screening programs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: (Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00751660 , registered September 12, 2008).


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Programas de Rastreamento/métodos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/diagnóstico , Fumar/efeitos adversos , Idoso , Canadá/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Enfisema/diagnóstico por imagem , Feminino , Humanos , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Análise Multivariada , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/epidemiologia , Enfisema Pulmonar/complicações , Fatores de Risco , Espirometria , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
12.
Clin Trials ; 17(2): 202-211, 2020 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31894702

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Recruitment to clinical trials is suboptimal, increasing costs, and delaying the potential implementation of clinical advances. Among other barriers, the lack of marketing experience among trialists may limit recruitment. In this observational study, in the context of the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Trial, we assessed the value of a motivational survey of study participants in planning a tailored advertising campaign and analysed the value of individual components of advertising in generating telephone calls to the study and recruited subjects. METHODS: The Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Trial was a single arm study assessing risk modelling for lung cancer screening by low-dose computed tomography scan and autofluorescence bronchoscopy. Individuals were recruited to eight sites across Canada without a central marketing plan. On contact with the study, individuals reported how they heard about the study according to a predefined list. One site, the Juravinski Cancer Centre, worked with a marketing expert to develop a survey to assess participant motivations, source of study awareness, and personal habits. The survey was used to develop a media campaign for recruitment. Media events were collected from all sites. The primary analysis assessed the number of telephone contacts and recruited subjects associated with various media factors. Individual print media characteristics were assessed for their effect on recruitment. RESULTS: At all sites, 7059 individuals contacted the study, and 2537 were eligible and recruited. Among 52 individuals completing the Juravinski Cancer Centre survey, motivation included concern for personal risk of lung cancer (71%), followed by desire to contribute to a cure (67%), followed by personal knowledge of a person with lung cancer (50%). Most reported hearing of the study from the newspaper (58%) despite no print ad yet being distributed. With survey input, a newsprint campaign was executed. The number of media events varied by site (median: 13, range: 3-28). Among all recruits, 56.4% reported referral by newspaper followed by family/friend (14%). Telephone contacts and recruited subjects per event varied significantly by site, while unpaid media events appeared superior to paid events. Print media characteristics associated with increased telephone contacts and recruitment included use of a rational appeal (vs a mixed rational-emotional), less use of white space, and larger headline font. CONCLUSION: A survey of trial candidates provides useful information regarding personal motivation, media use, and lifestyle. Unpaid media events appear superior in generating recruitment, while print media may be superior to radio and television in selecting eligible recruits. The utility of individual print media characteristics appears to differ from the commercial advertising literature. Further research on marketing in clinical trials is encouraged to improve recruitment ( ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT00751660, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT00751660 ).


Assuntos
Ensaios Clínicos como Assunto/métodos , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/terapia , Marketing , Seleção de Pacientes , Idoso , Canadá , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Meios de Comunicação de Massa , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Motivação , Participação do Paciente , Medição de Risco , Inquéritos e Questionários
13.
Respiration ; 99(5): 423-425, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31622972

RESUMO

Endobronchial coils are a relatively novel endoscopic lung volume reduction modality that aims to increase functional capacity in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. Two major trials have studied the safety and efficacy of this therapy, but long-term safety has not been studied. Adverse events reported are mainly periprocedural pneumothoraces and early bacterial infectious complications. We report the case of a patient with severe emphysema (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage IV COPD) who developed endobronchial coil-associated aspergillomas 3 years after coil placement.


Assuntos
Broncoscopia , Corpos Estranhos/diagnóstico por imagem , Pneumonectomia , Aspergilose Pulmonar/diagnóstico por imagem , Enfisema Pulmonar/cirurgia , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Antifúngicos/uso terapêutico , Técnicas de Cultura , Volume Expiratório Forçado , Humanos , Masculino , Testes de Precipitina , Aspergilose Pulmonar/diagnóstico , Aspergilose Pulmonar/tratamento farmacológico , Enfisema Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/tratamento farmacológico , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X , Voriconazol/uso terapêutico
15.
BMJ Open ; 9(1): e024719, 2019 01 17.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30659040

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The impact of lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT (LDCT) on participants' anxiety levels and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important consideration in the implementation of such programmes. We aimed to describe changes in anxiety and HRQoL in a high-risk Canadian cohort undergoing LDCT lung cancer screening. METHODS: 2537 subjects who had 2% or greater lung cancer risk over 6 years using a risk prediction tool were recruited from eight centres across Canada in the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study (2008-2010). We compared HRQoL and anxiety levels before and after screening of 1237 participants with LDCT (excluding a subset of 1300 participants who also underwent autofluorescence bronchoscopy screening), as well as after investigations performed because of a positive screening examination. The 12-item short-form Physical and Mental Component Scales (SF-12), EQ-5D-3L scores and State Trait Anxiety Inventory-State anxiety were used at each assessment. RESULTS: Overall, there were no clinically significant differences in HRQoL outcomes between baseline and each of the survey time points following initial screening. No mean change in anxiety in the overall cohort was noted following baseline LDCT, but more participants had clinically significant increase in anxiety versus decrease after baseline screening (increase >minimal clinically important difference (MCID) (n=180) vs decrease >MCID (n=50), p<0.001). This finding persisted but to a lesser degree at the 12 month time point (increase >MCID (n=146) vs decrease >MCID (n=87), p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: CT screening for lung cancer has no major overall impact on HRQoL among participants, although a minority of participants (number-needed-to-harm=7 after baseline screening and 18 at 1 year) demonstrated clinically significant increased anxiety levels. TRIALREGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00751660; Results.


Assuntos
Ansiedade/psicologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/psicologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Qualidade de Vida/psicologia , Idoso , Canadá , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X
16.
Lancet Oncol ; 18(11): 1523-1531, 2017 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29055736

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Results from retrospective studies indicate that selecting individuals for low-dose CT lung cancer screening on the basis of a highly predictive risk model is superior to using criteria similar to those used in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST; age, pack-year, and smoking quit-time). We designed the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer (PanCan) study to assess the efficacy of a risk prediction model to select candidates for lung cancer screening, with the aim of determining whether this approach could better detect patients with early, potentially curable, lung cancer. METHODS: We did this single-arm, prospective study in eight centres across Canada. We recruited participants aged 50-75 years, who had smoked at some point in their life (ever-smokers), and who did not have a self-reported history of lung cancer. Participants had at least a 2% 6-year risk of lung cancer as estimated by the PanCan model, a precursor to the validated PLCOm2012 model. Risk variables in the model were age, smoking duration, pack-years, family history of lung cancer, education level, body-mass index, chest x-ray in the past 3 years, and history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Individuals were screened with low-dose CT at baseline (T0), and at 1 (T1) and 4 (T4) years post-baseline. The primary outcome of the study was incidence of lung cancer. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00751660. FINDINGS: 7059 queries came into the study coordinating centre and were screened for PanCan risk. 15 were duplicates, so 7044 participants were considered for enrolment. Between Sept 24, 2008, and Dec 17, 2010, we recruited and enrolled 2537 eligible ever-smokers. After a median follow-up of 5·5 years (IQR 3·2-6·1), 172 lung cancers were diagnosed in 164 individuals (cumulative incidence 0·065 [95% CI 0·055-0·075], incidence rate 138·1 per 10 000 person-years [117·8-160·9]). There were ten interval lung cancers (6% of lung cancers and 6% of individuals with cancer): one diagnosed between T0 and T1, and nine between T1 and T4. Cumulative incidence was significantly higher than that observed in NLST (4·0%; p<0·0001). Compared with 593 (57%) of 1040 lung cancers observed in NLST, 133 (77%) of 172 lung cancers in the PanCan Study were early stage (I or II; p<0·0001). INTERPRETATION: The PanCan model was effective in identifying individuals who were subsequently diagnosed with early, potentially curable, lung cancer. The incidence of cancers detected and the proportion of early stage cancers in the screened population was higher than observed in previous studies. This approach should be considered for adoption in lung cancer screening programmes. FUNDING: Terry Fox Research Institute and Canadian Partnership Against Cancer.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X/métodos , Distribuição por Idade , Idoso , Área Sob a Curva , Canadá/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Invasividade Neoplásica/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Risco Ajustado , Medição de Risco , Distribuição por Sexo , Análise de Sobrevida
17.
Thorac Cancer ; 8(5): 517-522, 2017 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28731576

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Linear endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS) is a safe and effective method for the diagnostic sampling of mediastinal lymph nodes. However, there is a learning curve associated with the procedure and operator experience influences diagnostic yield. We sought to determine if trainee involvement during EBUS influences procedural characteristics, complication rate, and diagnostic yield. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of 220 subjects who underwent an EBUS procedure at our center from December 2012 to June 2013. Procedures were performed by six different interventional pulmonologists with substantial experience with EBUS or by a trainee under their direct supervision. Procedural characteristics and complications were recorded. Diagnostic yield and specimen adequacy were compared between groups. RESULTS: EBUS was performed in 220 patients with a trainee involved (n = 116) or by staff physician alone (n = 104). Patient characteristics, and the number and size of lymph node stations sampled were similar. EBUS duration was longer (16.0 vs. 13.7 minutes; P = 0.002) and the total dose of lidocaine used was higher (322.3 vs. 304.2 mg; P = 0.045) when a trainee was involved. The rate of adequate specimens sampled was comparable between the groups (92.0 vs. 92.0%; P = 0.60). Diagnostic yield was lower when a trainee was involved in the EBUS procedure (52.6 vs. 68.3%; P = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Trainee involvement significantly increased EBUS duration and the dose of local anesthesia used for the procedure. Diagnostic yield was lower when a trainee was involved. Factors accounting for this difference in yield, despite adequate samples being obtained, warrant further investigation.


Assuntos
Aspiração por Agulha Fina Guiada por Ultrassom Endoscópico/métodos , Linfonodos/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagem , Idoso , Anestesia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mediastino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Estudos Prospectivos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Ensino , Ultrassonografia de Intervenção/métodos
18.
J Thorac Oncol ; 12(8): 1210-1222, 2017 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28499861

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Lung cancer risk prediction models have the potential to make programs more affordable; however, the economic evidence is limited. METHODS: Participants in the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST) were retrospectively identified with the risk prediction tool developed from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial. The high-risk subgroup was assessed for lung cancer incidence and demographic characteristics compared with those in the low-risk subgroup and the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study (PanCan), which is an observational study that was high-risk-selected in Canada. A comparison of high-risk screening versus standard care was made with a decision-analytic model using data from the NLST with Canadian cost data from screening and treatment in the PanCan study. Probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity analyses were undertaken to assess uncertainty and identify drivers of program efficiency. RESULTS: Use of the risk prediction tool developed from the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial with a threshold set at 2% over 6 years would have reduced the number of individuals who needed to be screened in the NLST by 81%. High-risk screening participants in the NLST had more adverse demographic characteristics than their counterparts in the PanCan study. High-risk screening would cost $20,724 (in 2015 Canadian dollars) per quality-adjusted life-year gained and would be considered cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 in Canadian dollars per quality-adjusted life-year gained with a probability of 0.62. Cost-effectiveness was driven primarily by non-lung cancer outcomes. Higher noncurative drug costs or current costs for immunotherapy and targeted therapies in the United States would render lung cancer screening a cost-saving intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Non-lung cancer outcomes drive screening efficiency in diverse, tobacco-exposed populations. Use of risk selection can reduce the budget impact, and screening may even offer cost savings if noncurative treatment costs continue to rise.


Assuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/economia , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Idoso , Análise Custo-Benefício , Feminino , Humanos , Incidência , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos
20.
Chest ; 150(5): 1015-1022, 2016 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27142184

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Lung cancer screening with low-dose CT (LDCT) scan has been demonstrated to reduce lung cancer mortality. Preliminary reports suggested that up to 20% of lung cancers may be CT scan occult but detectable by autofluorescence bronchoscopy (AFB). We evaluated the prevalence of CT scan occult, invasive, and high-grade preinvasive lesions in high-risk participants undergoing screening for lung cancer. METHODS: The first 1,300 participants from seven centers in the Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Study who had ≥ 2% lung cancer risk over 5 years were invited to have an AFB in addition to a LDCT scan. We determined the prevalence of CT scan and AFB abnormalities and analyzed the association between selected predictor variables and preinvasive lesions plus invasive cancer. RESULTS: A total of 776 endobronchial biopsies were performed in 333 of 1,300 (25.6%) participants. Dysplastic or higher-grade lesions were detected in 5.3% of the participants (n = 68; mild dysplasia: n = 36, moderate dysplasia: n = 25, severe dysplasia: n = 3, carcinoma in situ [CIS]: n = 1, and carcinoma: n = 4). Only one typical carcinoid tumor and one CIS lesion were detected by AFB alone, for a rate of CT scan occult cancer of 0.15% (95% CI, 0.0%-0.6%). Fifty-six prevalence lung cancers were detected by LDCT scan (4.3%). The only independent risk factors for finding of dysplasia or CIS on AFB were smoking duration (OR, 1.05; 95% CI, 1.02-1.07) and FEV1 percent predicted (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of AFB to LDCT scan in a high lung cancer risk cohort detected too few CT occult cancers (0.15%) to justify its incorporation into a lung cancer screening program. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT00751660; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.


Assuntos
Broncoscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patologia , Programas de Rastreamento , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/epidemiologia , Idoso , Biópsia , Canadá/epidemiologia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Gradação de Tumores , Invasividade Neoplásica , Lesões Pré-Cancerosas/patologia , Prevalência , Fatores de Risco
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA