Resistance Training in Cardiovascular Diseases: A Review on Its Effectiveness in Controlling Risk Factors.

Cardiovascular Disease (CVD), a term encompassing various disorders affecting the heart and blood vessels, includes coronary artery disease (CAD). CAD is primarily due to the development of atherosclerotic plaques that disrupt blood flow, oxygenation, and nutrient delivery to the myocardium. Risk factors contributing to CAD progression include smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus (DM), dyslipidaemia, and obesity. While aerobic exercise (AE) has shown promising results in controlling CVD risk factors, the impact of resistance training (RT) has not been extensively investigated. This review aims to describe the effects of RT on CVD risk factors based on studies retrieved from PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Both isometric and isotonic RT have been found to decrease systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure, or mean arterial pressure, with SBP showing a more significant reduction. Hypertensive patients engaging in RT alongside a calorie-restricted diet demonstrated significant improvements in blood pressure. RT is associated with increased nitric oxide bioavailability, sympathetic modulation, and enhanced endothelial function. In type-2 DM patients, 8-12 weeks of RT led to improvements in fasting blood glucose levels, insulin secretion, metabolic syndrome risk, and glucose transporter numbers. Combining AE with RT had a more significant impact in reducing insulin resistance and enhancing blood glucose compared to performing exercises separately. It also significantly decreased total cholesterol, triglycerides, and low-density lipoprotein levels while increasing high-density lipoprotein within 12 weeks of application. However, improvements are considered insignificant when lipid levels are already low to normal at baseline. The administration of RT resulted in weight loss and improved body mass index, with more pronounced effects seen when combining AE with RT and a calorie-restricted diet. Considering these results, the administration of RT, either alone or in combination with AE, proves beneficial in rehabilitating CAD patients by improving various risk factors.

A multidisciplinary approach of a patient with pheochromocytoma presenting as recurrent acute fulminant myocarditis: A rare case report and comprehensive review of literature.

Fulminant myocarditis (FM) is a rare illness characterized by abrupt and severe widespread cardiac inflammation, which frequently results in mortality due to cardiogenic shock, ventricular arrhythmias, or multiorgan system failure. Pheochromocytoma is an uncommon and difficult-to-diagnose cause of FM, and it is associated with a significant risk of recurrent acute myocarditis. There is, however, little information on reoccurring acute FM. Herein, we report a rare case of recurrent acute FM due to pheochromocytoma. We present the case of a 22-year-old woman who was admitted to our hospital three days previously with acute dyspnea. Five months prior, the patient was diagnosed with post-acute myocarditis, and a massive tumor on the right adrenal gland was discovered, which lead to pheochromocytoma diagnosis. In this present admission, following the exclusion of infection, autoimmune, and metabolic derangements, pheochromocytoma was presumed to be the reason for the recurrence and more severe acute FM during the current hospitalization. The patient responded favorably to high-dose steroids combined with heart failure therapy regimens. To detect recurrent acute myocarditis related to pheochromocytoma, a multidisciplinary approach was used, including several laboratory biomarkers and imaging findings. Following pheochromocytoma removal and biopsy, the patient recovered satisfactorily. Our findings may provide beneficial contributions to the literature as pheochromocytoma is an uncommon but important cause of recurrent acute myocarditis. A multidisciplinary approach is essential in identifying acute FM and determining the underlying causes of this malady.

Endotheliopathy marked by high von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigen in COVID-19 is associated with poor outcome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the levels of von Willebrand Factor (vWF) antigen in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) with a poor outcome compared with those with a good outcome, and explored factors that may affect the difference in terms of vWF antigen between the two groups. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of PubMed, Embase and Scopus databases was undertaken from inception until 7 April 2021. The primary outcome was poor outcome, which is a composite of mortality and severity of COVID-19. RESULTS: Ten studies including a total of 996 patients were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. vWF antigen was higher in patients with poor outcomes [standardized mean difference (SMD) 0.84 [0.45-1.23], P<0.001; I2=87.3, P<0.001). For subgroup analysis on studies that reported the vWF antigen level as a percentage, the mean difference was 121.6 [(53.7-189.4), P<0.001; I2=92.0, P<0.001]. Meta-regression showed that the SMD between poor outcome and good outcome was affected by the platelet count (coefficient 0.0061, P=0.001), d-dimer level (coefficient 0.0007, P=0.026) and factor VIII level (coefficient 0.0057, P=0.031), but not by age (coefficient -0.0610, P=0.440), gender (coefficient 0.0135, P=0.698), obesity (coefficient 0.0282, P=0.666), hypertension (coefficient 0.0273, P=0.423), diabetes (coefficient 0.0317, P=0.398) or malignancy (coefficient 0.0487, P=0.608). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that the level of vWF antigen was significantly higher in patients with COVID-19 with a poor outcome, signalling marked endotheliopathy. Meta-regression showed that the differences became larger as the platelet count, d-dimer level and factor VIII level increased.

The Difference in Accuracy Between Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events Score and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction Score in Predicting In-Hospital Mortality of Acute ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients.

BACKGROUND: In-hospital mortality of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients varies between 1% and 19% in Asia. Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score and Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) score are the most frequently used risk scores for predicting in-hospital mortality. These two scores have different accuracy depending on the risk profiles of each region. This study aimed to identify the difference in accuracy between GRACE and TIMI scores. METHODS: This was an observational cohort retrospective study on consecutive patients with STEMI admitted to Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital Bandung between July 2018 and June 2019. RESULTS: The risk scores were evaluated in 255 patients with STEMI, whose data were collected from medical records. Patients in this study were 58 ± 11 years old, more often male (78.8%) and have smoking (65.5%), dyslipidemia (61%), hypertension (56.5%) and diabetes mellitus (21.6 %) as their risk factors. Forty-five patients died in hospitalization (17%). The TIMI and GRACE scores revealed a significant graded increase in mortality with a rising score. There was a statistically significant difference in accuracy between the scores of 0.082 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.040 - 0.125; P < 0.001) with the GRACE score (C statistics of 0.91; P < 0.001) having better accuracy compared to TIMI score (C statistics of 0.83; P < 0.001). This might be due to the fact that the GRACE scoring system has more detail and complete variables than the TIMI score. CONCLUSION: There is a significant difference between the accuracy of GRACE and TIMI scores in predicting in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients. The accuracy of the GRACE score is better than the TIMI score for predicting in-hospital mortality in STEMI patients.

Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) measured by echocardiography and mortality in COVID-19: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we assessed the association between tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE) measured by echocardiography and mortality in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases with the keywords "COVID-19" OR "SARS-CoV-2" OR "2019-nCoV" AND "Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion" OR "TAPSE" until January 20, 2021. The main outcome was mortality. The effect estimate was reported as the hazard ratio (HR), which was pooled from the unadjusted and adjusted effect estimates retrieved from the studies included. Mean differences in TAPSE (in mm) between non-survivors and survivors were pooled. RESULTS: In total, 641 patients from seven studies were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. TAPSE was lower in non-survivors compared with survivors (mean difference = -3.74 [-5.22, -2.26], p < 0.001; I2: 85.5%, p < 0.001). Each 1 mm decrease in TAPSE was associated with increased mortality (HR = 1.24 [1.18, 1.31], p < 0.001; I2: 0.0%, p = 0.491). In the pooled adjusted model, each 1 mm decrease in TAPSE was associated with increased mortality (HR = 1.21 [1.11, 1.33], p < 0.001; I2: 45.1%, p = 0.156). Meta-regression indicated that the difference in TAPSE between non-survivors and survivors was affected by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (-0.183, p < 0.001) and pulmonary artery systolic pressure (-0.344, p = 0.039), but not by age (p = 0.668), male gender (p = 0.821), hypertension (p = 0.101), diabetes (p = 0.603), coronary artery disease (p = 0.564), smoking (p = 0.140), and left ventricular ejection fraction (p = 0.452). CONCLUSION: Every 1 mm decrease in TAPSE was associated with an increase in mortality of approximately 20%. PROSPERO ID: CRD42021232194.