A guide to large data sets for population-based cancer research: Strengths, limitations, and pitfalls.

With the proliferation of cancer research based on large databases, misalignment of research questions and data set capabilities is inevitable. Nationally maintained databases are appealing to cancer researchers because of the ease of access to large amounts of patient data available for analysis and risk estimation. Data sets that are commonly used in cancer research include the National Cancer Database, the SEER (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results) program of the National Cancer Institute, the SEER-Medicare database, the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program, and the Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project databases, among others. Each data set has pros and cons with respect to variable availability and the ability to analyze cancer-specific outcomes. It is critical for researchers to understand the strengths and limitations of each database. Changing variable definitions, the length of postoperative data collection, and the availability of patient-reported outcomes or social determinants of health data are examples of factors that researchers must consider when selecting a data set for research purposes. For the current review, the authors summarized the advantages and disadvantages of various national data sets for cohort studies in cancer populations.

The Top Ten Annals of Surgical Oncology Original Articles on Twitter/X: 2020-2023.

Social media has become omnipresent in society, especially given that it enables the rapid and widespread communication of news, events, and information. Social media platforms have become increasingly used by numerous surgical societies to promote meetings and surgical journals to increase the visibility of published content. In September 2020, Annals of Surgical Oncology (ASO) established its Social Media Committee (SMC), which has worked to steadily increase the visibility of published content on social media platforms, namely X (formerly known as Twitter). The purpose of this review is to highlight the 10 ASO original articles with the most engagement on X, based on total number of mentions, since the founding of the SMC. These articles encompass a wide variety of topics from various oncologic disciplines including hepatopancreatobiliary, breast, and gynecologic surgery.

Market Factors, Not Quality, Influence Reimbursement for Pancreaticoduodenectomy in an Era of Price Transparency.

BACKGROUND: The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) price transparency rule tries to facilitate cost-conscious decision-making. For surgical services, such as pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD), factors mediating transparency and real-world reimbursement are not well described. METHODS: The Leapfrog Survey was used to identify United States hospitals performing PD. Financial and operational data were obtained from Turquoise Health and CMS Cost Reports. Chi-square tests and modified Poisson regression evaluated associations with reimbursement disclosure. Two-part logistic and gamma regression models estimated effects of hospital factors on commercial, Medicare, and self-pay reimbursements for PD. RESULTS: Of 452 Leapfrog hospitals, 295 (65%) disclosed PD hospital or procedure reimbursements. Disclosing hospitals were larger (beds > 200: 81.0% vs. 71.3%, p = 0.04), reported higher net margins (0.7% vs. - 2.1%, p = 0.04), more likely for-profit (26.1% vs. 6.4%, p < 0.001), and teaching-affiliated (82.0% vs. 65.6%, p < 0.001). Nonprofit status conferred hospitalization reimbursement increases of $8683-$12,329, while moderate market concentration predicted savings up to $5066. Teaching affiliation conferred reimbursement increases of $4589-$16,393 for hospitalizations and $644 for procedures. Top Leapfrog volume ratings predicted an increase of up to $7795 for only Medicare hospitalization reimbursement. CONCLUSIONS: Nondisclosure of hospital and procedural reimbursements for PD remains a major issue. Transparency was noted in hospitals with higher margins, size, and academic affiliation. Factors associated with higher reimbursement were non-profit status, academic affiliation, and more equitable market share. Reimbursement inconsistently tracked with PD quality or volume measures. Policy changes may be required to incentivize reimbursement disclosure and translate transparency into increased value for patients.

Utilizing risk-stratified pathways to personalize post-hepatectomy discharge planning: A contemporary analysis of 1,354 patients.

BACKGROUND: While risk-stratified post-hepatectomy pathways (RSPHPs) reduce length-of-stay, can they stratify hepatectomy patients by risk of early postoperative events. METHODS: 90-day outcomes from consecutive hepatectomies were analyzed (1/1/2017-12/31/2021). Pre/post-pathway analysis was performed for pathways: minimally invasive surgery ("MIS"); non-anatomic resection/left hepatectomy ("low-intermediate risk"); right/extended hepatectomy ("high-risk"); "Combination" operations. Time-to-event (TTE) analyses for readmission and interventional radiology procedures (IRPs) was performed. RESULTS: 1354 patients were included: MIS/n= â€‹119 (9 â€‹%); low-intermediate risk/n= â€‹443 (33 â€‹%); high-risk/n= â€‹328 (24 â€‹%); Combination/n= â€‹464 (34 â€‹%). There was no difference in readmission (pre: 13 â€‹% vs. post:11.5 â€‹%, p â€‹= â€‹0.398). There were fewer readmissions in post-pathway patients amongst MIS, low-intermediate risk, and Combination patients (all p â€‹> â€‹0.1). 114 (8.4 â€‹%) patients required IRPs. Time-to-readmission and time-to-IR-procedure plots demonstrated lower plateaus and flatter slopes for MIS/low-intermediate-risk pathways post-pathway implementation (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). CONCLUSION: RSPHPs can reliably stratify patients by risks of readmission or need for an IR procedure by predicting the most frequent period for these events.

Racial disparities in pancreatic cancer clinical trials: Defining the problem and identifying solutions.

Underrepresented minority patients with pancreatic cancer have differential access to cancer treatments, including clinical trials. The successful conduct and completion of clinical trials is critical to improve outcomes for patients with pancreatic cancer. Therefore, it is essential to consider how to maximize eligibility of patients for both therapeutic and non-therapeutic clinical trials. It is important for clinicians and for the health system to understand individual-, clinician-, and system-level barriers to recruitment, enrollment, and completion of clinical trials to alleviate bias. Understanding strategies that lead to improved enrollment of underrepresented minorities, socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, and underserved communities will improve generalizability of cancer clinical trials and advance health equity.

Impact of cumulative operative time on postoperative complication risk in simultaneous resections of colorectal liver metastases and primary tumors.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous resection of colorectal liver metastases (CLM) and primary colorectal cancers (CRC) is nuanced without firm rules for selection. This study aimed to identify factors associated with morbidity after simultaneous resection. METHODS: Using a prospective database, patients undergoing simultaneous CLM-CRC resection from 1/1/2017-7/1/2020 were analyzed. Regression modeling estimated impact of colorectal resection type, Kawaguchi-Gayet (KG) hepatectomy complexity, and perioperative factors on 90-day complications. RESULTS: Overall, 120 patients underwent simultaneous CLM-CRC resection. Grade≥2 complications occurred in 38.3% (n = 46); these patients experienced longer length of stay (median LOS 7.5 vs. 4, p < 0.001) and increased readmission (39% vs. 1.4%, p < 0.001) compared to patients with zero or Grade 1 complications. Median OR time was 298 min. Patients within highest operative time quartile (>506 min) had higher grade≥2 complications (57%vs. 23%, p = 0.04) and greater than 4-fold increased odds of grade≥2 morbidity (OR 4.3, 95% CI (Confidence Interval) 1.41-13.1, p = 0.01). After adjusting for Pringle time, KG complexity and colorectal resection type, increasing operative time was associated with grade≥2 complications, especially for resections in highest quartile of operative time (OR 7.28, 95% CI 1.73-30.6, p = 0.007). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing simultaneous CLM-CRC resection, prolonged operative time is independently associated with grade≥2 complications. Awareness of cumulative operative time may inform intraoperative decision-making by surgical teams.

Re-excision After Unplanned Excision of Soft Tissue Sarcoma is Associated with High Morbidity and Limited Pathologic Identification of Residual Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with unplanned excision (UPE) of trunk and extremity soft tissue sarcoma (STS) present a significant management challenge for sarcoma specialists. Oncologic re-resection has been considered standard practice after UPE with positive or uncertain margins. A strategy of active surveillance or "watch and wait" has been suggested as a safe alternative to routine re-excision. In this context, the current study sought to evaluate short-term outcomes and morbidity after re-resection to better understand the risks and benefits of this treatment strategy. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution study reviewed patients undergoing oncologic re-resection after UPE of an STS during a 5-year period (2015-2020), excluding those with evidence of gross residual disease. Short-term clinical outcomes were evaluated together with final pathologic findings. RESULTS: The review identified 67 patients undergoing re-resection after UPE of an STS. Of these 67 patients, 45 (67%) were treated with a combination of external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and surgery. Plastic surgery was involved for reconstruction in 49 cases (73%). The rate of wound complications after re-resection was 45 % (n = 30), with 15 % (n = 10) of the patients experiencing a major wound complication. Radiation therapy and plastic surgery involvement were independently associated with wound complications. Notably, 45 patients (67%) had no evidence of residual disease in the re-resection specimen, whereas 13 patients (19 %) had microscopic disease, and 9 patients (13%) had indeterminate pathology. CONCLUSION: Given the morbidity of re-resection and limited identification of residual disease, treatment plans and discussions with patients should outline the expected pathologic findings and morbidity of surgery.

Individual components of post-hepatectomy care pathways have differential impacts on length of stay.

BACKGROUND: The value of individual variable contributions to post-hepatectomy length of stay (LOS) are difficult to quantify within bundled care pathways. METHODS: Poisson regression and marginal effects models for prolonged post-hepatectomy LOS (>25% median) included Kawaguchi-Gayet (KG) complexity, perioperative variables, and pathways (minimally-invasive = MIS; low-intermediate-risk = KGI/II; high-risk = KGIII; combination). RESULTS: Median LOS was 2, 4, 5, and 5 days for MIS, KGI/II, KGIII and combination pathways (N = 978). Poisson regression identified age, intraoperative fluids, delayed diet tolerance, and combination cases as associated with increased LOS (p < 0.01). Marginal effects analysis demonstrated the following added probability of longer LOS: each year of age 0.03x, 250 mL intraoperative fluids 0.06x, each operative hour 0.2x, additional day before diet tolerance 0.4x, combination cases 0.7x. MIS was associated with 1.2x increased probability of shorter LOS. CONCLUSIONS: Optimizing intraoperative fluids, operative time, and postoperative diet, while favoring MIS approach when feasible, may maximize effects of post-hepatectomy care pathways to reduce LOS.

Risk-stratified posthepatectomy pathways based upon the Kawaguchi-Gayet complexity classification and impact on length of stay.

Background: The Kawaguchi-Gayet classification is a validated system to stratify open liver resections by complexity and postoperative complications. We hypothesized that Kawaguchi-Gayet classification could be used to create and implement risk-stratified posthepatectomy pathways to reduce length of stay and variation in care. Methods: Clinicopathologic data from hepatectomy patients (1/2017-6/2020) were abstracted from a prospective database. All open hepatectomies were assigned to groups based on 2 levels of Kawaguchi-Gayet classification, and corresponding risk-stratified posthepatectomy pathways were created to decrease length of stay by 1 day compared to patients who were historically treated without a pathway: low-intermediate risk (open Kawaguchi-Gayet I/II) and high risk (open Kawaguchi-Gayet III). Outcomes were compared between periods before ("PRE"; 1/1/2017-9/30/2019) and after ("POST"; 10/1/2019-6/30/2020) implementation. Results: Among 487 open hepatectomies (PRE: 374, POST: 113), 55.0% (n = 268) were low-intermediate risk and 45.0% (n = 219) were high risk. Major complications were similar PRE/POST: low-intermediate risk (PRE: 7.8%, POST: 9.4%, P = .681) and high risk (PRE: 18.9%, POST 10.0%, P = 0.139). Risk-stratified posthepatectomy pathway implementation reduced median length of stay for both low-intermediate risk (4 to 3.5 days, P = .009) and high risk (5 to 4 days, P = 0.022) patients. Risk-stratified posthepatectomy pathways decreased length of stay variation, reflected in mean and standard deviation for all patients (PRE 5.5 ± 7.5 vs POST 4.4 ± 2.8 days). There was no difference in 90-day readmission rates between PRE (12.6%) and POST (8.8%) periods (P = .278). Conclusion: The creation and implementation of risk-stratified posthepatectomy pathways reduced length of stay without increasing readmissions after hepatectomy. These generalizable risk-stratified posthepatectomy pathways preoperatively stratify patients a priori into pathways for individualized preoperative discussions on realistic postoperative complications and length of stay expectations.

Disparities in telemedicine utilization among surgical patients during COVID-19.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine has been rapidly adopted in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. There is limited work surrounding demographic and socioeconomic disparities that may exist in telemedicine utilization. This study aimed to examine demographic and socioeconomic differences in surgical patient telemedicine usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Department of Surgery outpatients seen from July 1, 2019 to May 31, 2020 were stratified into three visit groups: pre-COVID-19 in-person, COVID-19 in-person, or COVID-19 telemedicine. Generalized linear models were used to examine associations of sex, race/ethnicity, Distressed Communities Index (DCI) scores, MyChart activation, and insurance status with telemedicine usage during the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: 14,792 patients (median age 60, female [57.0%], non-Hispanic White [76.4%]) contributed to 21,980 visits. Compared to visits before the pandemic, telemedicine visits during COVID-19 were more likely to be with patients from the least socioeconomically distressed communities (OR, 1.31; 95% CI, 1.08,1.58; P = 0.005), with an activated MyChart (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.17-1.64; P < .001), and with non-government or commercial insurance (OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.84-2.94; P < .001). Adjusted comparison of telemedicine visits to in person visits during COVID-19 revealed telemedicine users were more likely to be female (OR, 1.38, 95% CI, 1.10-1.73; P = 0.005) and pay with non-government or commercial insurance (OR, 2.77; 95% CI, 1.85-4.16; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: During the first three months of the COVID-19 pandemic, telemedicine was more likely utilized by female patients and those without government or commercial insurance compared to patients who used in-person visits. Interventions using telemedicine to improve health care access might consider such differences in utilization.

Safety of Major Abdominal Operations in the Elderly: A Study of Geriatric-Specific Determinants of Health.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative assessment of geriatric-specific determinants of health may enhance perioperative risk stratification among elderly patients. This study examines effects of geriatric-specific variables on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing elective major abdominal operations. METHODS: Patients included in the ACS NSQIP pilot Geriatric Surgery Research File program who underwent elective pancreatic, liver, and colorectal operations between 2014 and 2016 were examined. Multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate associations between patient-specific geriatric variables and risk of death, morbidity, readmission, and discharge destination. RESULTS: A total of 4165 patients were included. Patients ≥85 years were more likely to die, experience postoperative morbidity, and be discharged to a facility (all p ≤ 0.039) than younger patients. Preoperatively, patients ≥85 years were more likely to use a mobility aid, have a prior fall, have consent signed by a surrogate, and to live alone at home prior to operation (all p < 0.001). After adjustment for ACS NSQIP-estimated probabilities of morbidity or mortality, no geriatric-specific preoperative risk factors were significantly associated with increased risk of death or complications in any age group (all p > 0.055). Patients 75-84 and ≥85 years were more likely to be discharged to facility (OR 2.33 and 4.75, respectively, both p < 0.001) compared to patients 65-74 years. All geriatric-specific variables: use of mobility aid, living alone, consent signed by a surrogate, and fall history, were significantly associated with discharge to a facility (all p ≤ 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: After adjusting for comorbid conditions, geriatric-specific variables are not associated with postoperative mortality and morbidity among elderly patients; however, geriatric-specific variables are significantly associated with discharge to a facility.

Association of Geriatric-Specific Variables with 30-Day Hospital Readmission Risk of Elderly Surgical Patients: A NSQIP Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients (65 years of age and older) undergo an increasing number of operations performed annually in the US and they present with unique healthcare needs. Preventing postoperative readmission remains an important challenge to improving surgical care. This study examined whether geriatric-specific variables were independently associated with postoperative readmissions of elderly patients. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Geriatric Surgery Research File (GSRF) was joined with the ACS NSQIP Participant Use Data Files for 2014 to 2016. This data set included 13 GSRF variables and 26 ACS NSQIP variables. Associations between clinically relevant variables and readmission were tested with multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The data represented 6,039 general surgery patients age 65 years and older. Fifty-eight percent of patients had colorectal operations, 19% pancreatic or hepatobiliary, 15% hernia, 4% thyroid or esophageal, and 3% had appendix operations. Twenty-four percent of patients experienced an NSQIP-defined 30-day postoperative complication and 3% died within 30 days after operation. Eleven percent of patients had unplanned 30-day readmission. Standard NSQIP variables, including 30-day composite morbidity (odds ratio [OR] 5.11; 95% CI, 4.24 to 6.16; p < 0.001), reoperation (OR 2.8; 95% CI, 2.07 to 3.79; p < 0.001), and steroid use (1.42; 95% CI, 1.03 to 1.96; p = 0.03) were associated with readmission. In addition, GSRF variables, including incompetent on admission (OR 1.63; 95% CI, 1.11 to 2.38; p = 0.01), fall risk at discharge (OR 1.42; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.82; p = 0.005), use of mobility aid (OR 1.26; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.56; p = 0.03), and discharged home with skilled care (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.49; p = 0.04) were associated with readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Four GSRF and 3 current standard ACS NSQIP variables were important in the evaluation of postoperative readmission of elderly patients. Geriatric-specific variables contributed to the explanation of the relationship between clinical variables and readmissions in elderly surgical patients.

Implementation of an Enhanced Recovery Protocol Is Associated With On-Time Initiation of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Delayed initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy negatively impacts long-term survival in patients with colorectal cancer. Colorectal enhanced recovery protocols result in decreased complications and length of stay; however, the impact of enhanced recovery on the timing of adjuvant chemotherapy remains unknown. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify factors associated with on-time delivery of adjuvant chemotherapy after colorectal cancer surgery, hypothesizing that implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol would result in more patients receiving on-time chemotherapy. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study comparing the rate of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy delivery after colorectal cancer resection before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a large academic medical center. PATIENTS: All of the patients who underwent nonemergent colorectal cancer resections for curative intent from January 2010 to June 2017, excluding patients who had no indication for adjuvant chemotherapy, had received preoperative systemic chemotherapy, or did not have medical oncology records available were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patients before and enhanced recovery were compared, with the rate of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy delivery as the primary outcome. Adjuvant chemotherapy delivery was considered on time if initiated ≤8 weeks postoperatively, and treatment was considered delayed or omitted if initiated >8 weeks postoperatively (delayed) or never received (omitted). Multivariable logistic regression identified predictors of on-time chemotherapy delivery. RESULTS: A total of 363 patients met inclusion criteria, with 189 patients (52.1%) undergoing surgery after enhanced recovery implementation. Groups differed in laparoscopic approach and median procedure duration, both of which were higher after enhanced recovery. Significantly more patients received on-time chemotherapy after enhanced recovery implementation (p = 0.007). Enhanced recovery was an independent predictor of on-time adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.014). LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective and nonrandomized before-and-after design. CONCLUSIONS: Enhanced recovery was associated with receiving on-time adjuvant chemotherapy. As prompt initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy improves survival in colorectal cancer, future investigation of long-term oncologic outcomes is necessary to evaluate the potential impact of enhanced recovery on survival. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B21. LA IMPLEMENTACIÓN DE UN PROTOCOLO DE RECUPERACIÓN ACELERADA SE ASOCIA CON EL INICIO A TIEMPO DE QUIMIOTERAPIA ADYUVANTE EN CÁNCER COLORRECTAL:: El inicio tardío de la quimioterapia adyuvante afecta negativamente la supervivencia a largo plazo en pacientes con cáncer colorrectal. Los protocolos de recuperación acelerada colorrectales dan lugar a una disminución de las complicaciones y la duración de estancia hospitalaria; sin embargo, el impacto de la recuperación acelerada en el momento de inicio de quimioterapia adyuvante sigue siendo desconocido.Este estudio tuvo como objetivo identificar los factores asociados con la administración a tiempo de la quimioterapia adyuvante después de la cirugía de cáncer colorrectal, con la hipótesis de que la implementación de un protocolo de recuperación acelerada daría lugar a que más pacientes reciban quimioterapia a tiempo.Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo que compara la tasa de administración de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo después de la resección del cáncer colorrectal antes y después de la implementación de un protocolo de recuperación acelerada.Centro médico académico grande.Todos los pacientes que se sometieron a resecciones de cáncer colorrectal no emergentes con intención curativa desde enero de 2010 hasta junio de 2017, excluyendo a los pacientes que no tenían indicación de quimioterapia adyuvante, que recibieron quimioterapia sistémica preoperatoria o no tenían registros médicos de oncología disponibles.Los pacientes se compararon antes y después de la implementación de la recuperación acelerada, con la tasa de administración de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo como el resultado primario. La administración de quimioterapia adyuvante se consideró a tiempo si se inició ≤8 semanas después de la operación, y el tratamiento se consideró retrasado / omitido si se inició> 8 semanas después de la operación (retrasado) o nunca fue recibido (omitido). La regresión logística multivariable identificó predictores de administración de quimioterapia a tiempo.363 pacientes cumplieron con los criterios de inclusión, con 189 (52.1%) pacientes sometidos a cirugía después de la implementación de recuperación acelerada. Los grupos difirieron en el abordaje laparoscópico y la duración media del procedimiento; ambos factores fueron mayores después de la recuperación acelerada. Significativamente más pacientes recibieron quimioterapia a tiempo después de la implementación de recuperación acelerada (p = 0.007). La recuperación acelerada fue un factor predictivo independiente de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo (p = 0.014).Diseño retrospectivo, tipo ¨antes y después¨ no aleatorizado.La recuperación acelerada se asoció con la recepción de quimioterapia adyuvante a tiempo. Debido a que el inicio rápido de la quimioterapia adyuvante mejora la supervivencia en el cáncer colorrectal, en el futuro será necesario investigar los resultados oncológicos a largo plazo para evaluar el impacto potencial de la recuperación acelerada en la supervivencia. Vea el Resumen en Video en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B21.