RESUMO
Background: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an important cause of acute coronary syndrome and is associated with fibromuscular dysplasia (FMD). The diagnosis of stress cardiomyopathy in patients with SCAD and FMD is uncommon, though an important consideration given the shared risk profile. Complications of severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction associated with stress cardiomyopathy, such as LV thrombus, complicate the management of SCAD where anticoagulation is controversial in the context of SCAD-associated intramural haematoma. Case summary: A 65-year-old female presented with non-ST elevation myocardial infarction with a recent diagnosis of hypertension but no other traditional cardiovascular risk factors. There was, however, a family history of early cardiac death from myocardial infarction affecting her mother. Echocardiography demonstrated severe biventricular dysfunction with circumferential akinesis of the mid to apical segments. Coronary angiography demonstrated type 2A SCAD involving the first diagonal artery. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) confirmed a diagnosis of stress cardiomyopathy with biventricular involvement, complicated by LV apical thrombus and a focal region of myocardial infarction. Vascular imaging confirmed the presence of FMD. Guideline-directed heart failure therapy in addition to clopidogrel and rivaroxaban was prescribed. Follow-up contrast echocardiography at six-weeks confirmed resolution of LV dysfunction and resolution of the LV thrombus with no adverse events. Discussion: The dual diagnosis of SCAD and stress cardiomyopathy is uncommon. Cardiac MRI was useful for confirming the diagnosis of stress cardiomyopathy and the presence of LV thrombus, where anticoagulation may complicate the management of intramural haematoma in patients with concomitant SCAD and FMD.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) has gained attention as an important cause of acute coronary syndrome and sudden cardiac death (SCD) among women. Management strategies of SCAD differ from those of atherosclerotic disease. There is an elevated risk of complications and suboptimal outcomes in patients with SCAD undergoing percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). CASE SUMMARY: A 48-year-old woman without any traditional cardiovascular risk factors was admitted with severe central chest pain with associated dyspnoea and diaphoresis. The patient had a strong family history of SCD, affecting three female members in their 40s and 50s. Cardiac troponins were elevated. Coronary angiogram showed moderate to severe stenosis of the proximal circumflex coronary artery. Optical coherence tomography confirmed SCAD with sub-intimal haematoma. Despite significant stenosis in the proximal segment of a relatively large artery, a decision was made not to proceed with PCI. The follow-up angiogram demonstrated normal coronaries. Magnetic resonance imaging of renal arteries showed features suggestive of fibromuscular dysplasia affecting the right renal artery. Subsequent genetic counselling and gene testing were unremarkable. DISCUSSION: Conservative management of SCAD is recommended because the large majority of SCAD lesions heal naturally, whereas PCI is associated with increased risk of complications and adverse outcomes. Whether SCAD is associated with the sudden death events in our patient's family remains unclear. It certainly raises concerns as to an inheritable condition. In the absence of post-mortem findings in her family members, we can only speculate about this representing a possible inheritable form of SCAD.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To establish a reproducible method to estimate he point prevalence of smoking and second-hand smoke (SHS) exposure in cars, and to compare this prevalence between two areas of contrasting socioeconomic status. METHOD: A method involving two teams of observers was developed and evaluated. It involved observing 16,055 cars in Wellington, New Zealand. Two of the observation sites represented a high and a low area of deprivation (based on a neighbourhood deprivation index) and three were in the central city. RESULTS: A 4.1% point prevalence of smoking in cars was observed (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.8% to 4.4%). There was a higher prevalence of smoking in cars in the high deprivation area relative to the other sites, and particularly compared to the low deprivation area (rate ratio relative to the latter 3.2, 95% CI 2.6 to 4.0). Of cars with smoking, 23.7% had other occupants being exposed to SHS. Cars with smoking and other occupants were significantly more likely to have a window open (especially if the smoker was not the driver). The observation method developed was practical, and inter-observer agreement was high (kappa value for the "smoking seen in car" category 0.95). CONCLUSIONS: Observational studies can be an effective way of investigating smoking in cars. The data from this survey suggest that smoking in cars occurs at a higher rate in relatively deprived populations and hence may contribute to health inequalities. Fortunately, there are a number of policy options for reducing SHS exposure in cars including mass media campaigns and laws for smoke-free cars.