Prospective multi-center evaluation of the incidence of unplanned extubation and its outcomes in French intensive care units. The Safe-ICU study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to determine the epidemiology and outcomes of unplanned extubation (UE), both accidental and self-extubation, in ICU. METHODS: A multicentre prospective cohort study was conducted in 47 French ICUs. The number of mechanical ventilation (MV) days, and planned and unplanned extubation were recorded in each center over a minimum period of three consecutive months to evaluate UE incidence. Patient characteristics, UE environmental factors, and outcomes were compared based on the UE mechanism (accidental or self-extubation). Self-extubation outcomes were compared with planned extubation using a propensity-matched population. Finally, risk factors for extubation failure (re-intubation before day 7) were determined following self-extubation. RESULTS: During the 12-month inclusion period, we found a pooled UE incidence of 1.0 per 100 MV days. UE accounted for 9% of all endotracheal removals. Of the 605 UE, 88% were self-extubation and 12% were accidental-extubations. The latter had a worse prognosis than self-extubation (34% vs. 8% ICU-mortality, p < 0.001). Self-extubation did not increase mortality compared with planned extubation (8% vs. 11%, p = 0.075). Regardless of the type of extubation, planned or unplanned, extubation failure was independently associated with a poor outcome. Cancer, higher respiratory rate, lower PaO2/FiO2 at the time of extubation, weaning process not-ongoing, and immediate post-extubation respiratory failure were independent predictors of failed self-extubation. CONCLUSION: Unplanned extubation, mostly represented by self-extubation, is common in ICU and accounts for 9% of all endotracheal extubations. While accidental extubations are a serious and infrequent adverse event, self-extubation does not increase mortality compared to planned extubation.

Reactivation of Epstein-Barr virus among intensive care patients: a prospective observational study.

PURPOSE: Herpesvirus reactivation has been documented among patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality, particularly for cytomegalovirus (CMV). Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) has been poorly studied despite >95% of the population being seropositive. Our preliminary study suggested an association between EBV reactivation and increased morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to investigate this association among patients admitted to the ICU. METHODS: In this multicenter prospective study, polymerase chain reaction was performed to quantify EBV in patients upon ICU admission and then twice a week during their stay. Follow-up was 90 days. RESULTS: The study included 129 patients; 70 (54.3%) had EBV reactivation. On day 90, there was no difference in mortality rates between patients with and without reactivation (25.7% vs 15.3%, p = 0.22). Patients with EBV reactivation at admission had increased mortality compared with those without reactivation and those with later reactivation. EBV reactivation was associated with increased morbidity. Patients with EBV reactivation had fewer ventilator-free days at day 28 than those without reactivation (18 [1-22] vs. 21 days [5-26], p = 0.037) and a higher incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (34.3% vs. 17%, p = 0.04), infections (92.9% vs. 78%, p = 0.03), and septic shock (58.6% vs. 32.2%, p = 0.004). More patients with EBV reactivation required renal replacement therapy (30% vs. 11.9%, p = 0.02). EBV reactivation was also associated with a more inflammatory immune profile. CONCLUSION: While EBV reactivation was not associated with increased 90-day mortality, it was associated with significantly increased morbidity.

Blood product needs and transfusion timelines for the multisite massive Paris 2015 terrorist attack: A retrospective analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Hemorrhage is the leading cause of death after terrorist attack, and the immediacy of labile blood product (LBP) administration has a decisive impact on patients' outcome. The main objective of this study was to evaluate the transfusion patterns of the Paris terrorist attack victims, November 13, 2015. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis including all casualties admitted to hospital, aiming to describe the transfusion patterns from admission to the first week after the attack. RESULTS: Sixty-eight of 337 admitted patients were transfused. More than three quarters of blood products were consumed in the initial phase (until November 14, 11:59 PM), where 282 packed red blood cell (pRBC) units were transfused along with 201 plasma and 25 platelet units, to 55 patients (16% of casualties). Almost 40% of these LBPs (134 pRBC, 73 plasma, 8 platelet units) were transfused within the first 6 hours after the attack. These early transfusions were massive transfusion (MT) for 20 (6%) of 337 patients, and the average plasma/red blood cell ratio was 0.8 for MT patients who received 366 (72%) of 508 LBPs.The median time from admission to pRBC transfusion was 57 (25-108) minutes and 208 (52-430) minutes for MT and non-MT patients, respectively. These same time intervals were 119 (66-202) minutes and 222 (87-381) minutes for plasma and 225 (131-289) minutes and 198 (167-230) minutes for platelets. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that improving transfusion procedures in mass casualty setting should rely more on shortening the time to bring LBP to the bedside than in increasing the stockpile. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Epidemiological study, Therapeutic IV.

Terrorist threat: Creating a nationwide damage control training program for non-trauma care providers.

INTRODUCTION: The current terrorist threat challenges nations to train numerous non-trauma care providers with different backgrounds in damage control (DC) strategies. The purpose of this work was to propose a specific DC training program. METHODS: A Task Force of 16 civilian and military physicians met for a 24-hour session, to propose the construction of a DC training program for non-specialised caregivers. RESULTS: Existing DC training programs are heterogeneous, mainly theoretical and almost only for physicians. A program entitled Damage Control for Terrorist Attack Victims (DC-TAV) was then proposed. Identified training targets were care providers from prehospital and hospital staffs, with no experience in trauma care. The training objectives were the improvement of individual and collective skills in managing terrorist attacks casualties. The tools selected for training concerned e-learning on a dedicated digital teaching platform (including a core section of four modules with types and mechanisms of injury, basic DC techniques, triage, organisation of emergency medical response and two complementary modules for doctors with DC resuscitation including remote transfusion and DC surgery), hands-on workshops with procedural simulation and full-scale simulation exercises, technical (tourniquets, haemostatic gauzes, needle thoracostomy, chest tube drainage, management of airway, coniotomy) and non-technical (leadership, communication, coordination and triage, decision-making, appropriate use of resources) skills. Finally, an evaluation of the DC-TAV program was planned. CONCLUSIONS: The DC-TAV program is an ambitious, civilian-military, nationwide and long-term program, based on a harmonised standard of care and including multidimensional training. Further studies are required to assess its efficacy.

Use of ketamine for prehospital pain control on the battlefield: A systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Intravenous ketamine is commonly used for pain management in the civilian prehospital setting. Several studies have evaluated its effectiveness in the military setting. To date, there has been no report reviewing the published data on the use of ketamine in this context. The objective of this systematic review was to analyze the content and quality of published data on the use of ketamine for prehospital pain management in military trauma. METHODS: The MEDLINE database was searched for studies on ketamine use in combat prehospital settings, at point of injury or during evacuation, published between 2000 and 2019. The systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, and the protocol was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42019115728). Civilian reports and case series lacking systematic data collection were excluded. RESULTS: Eight studies were included with 2029 casualties receiving ketamine. All but one were American reports from Afghanistan and Iraq conflicts. Studies implied retrospective cohorts or prospective observational analysis. Ketamine use rose from 3.9% during the period preceding its addition to the Tactical Combat Casualty Care guidelines in 2012 to 19.8% thereafter. It was the most common analgesic administered (up to 52% of casualties) in one of the studies. Ketamine was more likely given during tactical medical evacuation when no analgesic was provided at the point of injury. The median total intravenous dose was 50 mg. Pain intensity decreased from moderate or severe to mild or none, sometimes after only one dose. In one study, ketamine administration during tactical evacuation was associated with increased systolic blood pressure as opposed to morphine. Incoherent speech, extremity movements, and hallucinations were the main adverse events reported. CONCLUSION: Published data on ketamine use in military trauma are rare and heterogeneous. Though, all studies tend to strengthen the belief in the efficacy and safety of ketamine when given at 50-mg to 100-mg intravenous for prehospital analgesia in combat casualties. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Systematic Review, Level IV.